(WITH VIDEO) AFC Bournemouth boss Howe: Only our best will do against Barnsley

MANAGER: Eddie Howe

MANAGER: Eddie Howe

First published in Sport
Last updated
Bournemouth Echo: Photograph of the Author by

BOSS Eddie Howe insists Cherries will need to be “at our best” when they face-off against Championship strugglers Barnsley tomorrow.

Howe’s men suffered their first defeat in seven against teams currently in the bottom five when they went down 1-0 at Charlton on Tuesday.

It was their first blemish having completed the double over Doncaster after beating the Addicks, the Tykes, Millwall and Yeovil in the first half of the season.

Howe told the Daily Echo: “I think it will be a similar test to Charlton. We are going to a team fighting for their lives and will need to be at our best.

“When you look back, we were terrific for the first 30 minutes against Charlton and, for whatever reason, we just didn’t capitalise on our good start and that was the frustrating thing. It really stung to concede so late and with no time to reply so we need to respond to that.

“You have to roll up your sleeves in any game and try to compete physically to make sure you don’t get overrun. You need to stamp your authority and I thought we did that against Charlton in a different way because we controlled the ball.

"We were dominant so didn’t really have that physical element and I don’t think that was a factor behind defeat. It was the fact we surrendered control of the ball and didn’t capitalise when we were on top.”

Howe added: “Barnsley have had a change of manager and have some good players. In their current position, their home form needs to be good to give them a chance of staying up and it has been.”

Comments (27)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

6:37am Fri 21 Mar 14

TedMacsCherryPants says...

Two interesting fixtures on the table and I would love to see six points from them. Barnsley purely for the points and dirty L**ds for the payback! ATB to all travelling 'oop there tomorrow and good luck to the boys. I personally am very much looking forward to Tuesday as if you can't tell!
UTCIAD
Two interesting fixtures on the table and I would love to see six points from them. Barnsley purely for the points and dirty L**ds for the payback! ATB to all travelling 'oop there tomorrow and good luck to the boys. I personally am very much looking forward to Tuesday as if you can't tell! UTCIAD TedMacsCherryPants
  • Score: 8

8:32am Fri 21 Mar 14

canfordcherry says...

Barnsley may be bottom but it isn't a given, as we found out on Tuesday, we need to put in a performance to ensure a win.
As for Leeds, well that is one where a win would be celebrated as if we had won the league.
Barnsley may be bottom but it isn't a given, as we found out on Tuesday, we need to put in a performance to ensure a win. As for Leeds, well that is one where a win would be celebrated as if we had won the league. canfordcherry
  • Score: 7

9:10am Fri 21 Mar 14

smhinto says...

This another game where if we let Barnsley take the lead and get their noses in front it will lift them considerably. We must not switch off as we seemingly did against Charlton during the last half hour.
.
We must get hold of the game within the first 30 mins in order to force them out.
.
The longer the game goes on at nil-nil the more chance we will have of losing. If they take the lead with 20 mins remaining it is highly likely they will just sit back, string bodies across the box and just see the game out.
.
We need two more wins for safety in my view. So let's get the first tomorrow!!
.
Up the Cherries!!!
.
Regards
This another game where if we let Barnsley take the lead and get their noses in front it will lift them considerably. We must not switch off as we seemingly did against Charlton during the last half hour. . We must get hold of the game within the first 30 mins in order to force them out. . The longer the game goes on at nil-nil the more chance we will have of losing. If they take the lead with 20 mins remaining it is highly likely they will just sit back, string bodies across the box and just see the game out. . We need two more wins for safety in my view. So let's get the first tomorrow!! . Up the Cherries!!! . Regards smhinto
  • Score: 3

9:26am Fri 21 Mar 14

swanagecherrie says...

I was always a bit skeptical about the Charlton game, we was due a bad game and we have done so well against the top sides we could have got a bit complacent. Also Charlton are not as bad a team as there league position suggests they are in a false position with the games in hand they have. Maybe loosing there was not such a bad thing a wake up call for the boys. However I can't see it happening twice so 3 points on Saturday and Please Please PLEASE 3 points on Tuesday.
I was always a bit skeptical about the Charlton game, we was due a bad game and we have done so well against the top sides we could have got a bit complacent. Also Charlton are not as bad a team as there league position suggests they are in a false position with the games in hand they have. Maybe loosing there was not such a bad thing a wake up call for the boys. However I can't see it happening twice so 3 points on Saturday and Please Please PLEASE 3 points on Tuesday. swanagecherrie
  • Score: 12

10:34am Fri 21 Mar 14

RED LETTER DAY says...

WE DID OUR BEST AGAINST CHARLTON, . . and it was not good enough.
WE DID OUR BEST AGAINST CHARLTON, . . and it was not good enough. RED LETTER DAY
  • Score: -9

11:37am Fri 21 Mar 14

eaststandman says...

I would prefer us to try and win the match, rather than try not to lose. Still think we should put them under pressure in their own half instead of inviting them onto us.
Attack, attack, attack.
I would prefer us to try and win the match, rather than try not to lose. Still think we should put them under pressure in their own half instead of inviting them onto us. Attack, attack, attack. eaststandman
  • Score: 5

3:00pm Fri 21 Mar 14

raybren says...

Thank goodness Smhinto is back with his wisdom and insight ! We can only hope that Eddie reads his comments , so that he can adjust the game plan accordingly . As for me , I ' m going for something unusual , a 4-2 victory for the Cherries !
Thank goodness Smhinto is back with his wisdom and insight ! We can only hope that Eddie reads his comments , so that he can adjust the game plan accordingly . As for me , I ' m going for something unusual , a 4-2 victory for the Cherries ! raybren
  • Score: 0

3:18pm Fri 21 Mar 14

smhinto says...

raybren wrote:
Thank goodness Smhinto is back with his wisdom and insight ! We can only hope that Eddie reads his comments , so that he can adjust the game plan accordingly . As for me , I ' m going for something unusual , a 4-2 victory for the Cherries !
I believe my post reflects on what is very likely to happen if we do not get hold of the game.
.
It is not a derisory post. Away from home the longer the game stays at 0-0 against a fighting battling side like Barnsley who are fighting for their lives, the chances of losing the game is increased.
.
As I have said if Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins to go, it will be game over as they will shut up shop and as well you know it.
.
We must also take into account the fatique factoe of which effecting the pakers acxcording to Francis and Arter. Kermorgant is unlikely to feature according to BBC teletext.
.
I and no doubt other will be pleased if you prediction comes true.
.
Regards to you
[quote][p][bold]raybren[/bold] wrote: Thank goodness Smhinto is back with his wisdom and insight ! We can only hope that Eddie reads his comments , so that he can adjust the game plan accordingly . As for me , I ' m going for something unusual , a 4-2 victory for the Cherries ![/p][/quote]I believe my post reflects on what is very likely to happen if we do not get hold of the game. . It is not a derisory post. Away from home the longer the game stays at 0-0 against a fighting battling side like Barnsley who are fighting for their lives, the chances of losing the game is increased. . As I have said if Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins to go, it will be game over as they will shut up shop and as well you know it. . We must also take into account the fatique factoe of which effecting the pakers acxcording to Francis and Arter. Kermorgant is unlikely to feature according to BBC teletext. . I and no doubt other will be pleased if you prediction comes true. . Regards to you smhinto
  • Score: -10

3:58pm Fri 21 Mar 14

STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road says...

smhinto wrote:
raybren wrote:
Thank goodness Smhinto is back with his wisdom and insight ! We can only hope that Eddie reads his comments , so that he can adjust the game plan accordingly . As for me , I ' m going for something unusual , a 4-2 victory for the Cherries !
I believe my post reflects on what is very likely to happen if we do not get hold of the game.
.
It is not a derisory post. Away from home the longer the game stays at 0-0 against a fighting battling side like Barnsley who are fighting for their lives, the chances of losing the game is increased.
.
As I have said if Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins to go, it will be game over as they will shut up shop and as well you know it.
.
We must also take into account the fatique factoe of which effecting the pakers acxcording to Francis and Arter. Kermorgant is unlikely to feature according to BBC teletext.
.
I and no doubt other will be pleased if you prediction comes true.
.
Regards to you
Can someone please translate this, i think smhinto has been on the sauce early today.
[quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]raybren[/bold] wrote: Thank goodness Smhinto is back with his wisdom and insight ! We can only hope that Eddie reads his comments , so that he can adjust the game plan accordingly . As for me , I ' m going for something unusual , a 4-2 victory for the Cherries ![/p][/quote]I believe my post reflects on what is very likely to happen if we do not get hold of the game. . It is not a derisory post. Away from home the longer the game stays at 0-0 against a fighting battling side like Barnsley who are fighting for their lives, the chances of losing the game is increased. . As I have said if Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins to go, it will be game over as they will shut up shop and as well you know it. . We must also take into account the fatique factoe of which effecting the pakers acxcording to Francis and Arter. Kermorgant is unlikely to feature according to BBC teletext. . I and no doubt other will be pleased if you prediction comes true. . Regards to you[/p][/quote]Can someone please translate this, i think smhinto has been on the sauce early today. STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road
  • Score: 6

4:23pm Fri 21 Mar 14

golfer33 says...

STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road wrote:
smhinto wrote:
raybren wrote:
Thank goodness Smhinto is back with his wisdom and insight ! We can only hope that Eddie reads his comments , so that he can adjust the game plan accordingly . As for me , I ' m going for something unusual , a 4-2 victory for the Cherries !
I believe my post reflects on what is very likely to happen if we do not get hold of the game.
.
It is not a derisory post. Away from home the longer the game stays at 0-0 against a fighting battling side like Barnsley who are fighting for their lives, the chances of losing the game is increased.
.
As I have said if Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins to go, it will be game over as they will shut up shop and as well you know it.
.
We must also take into account the fatique factoe of which effecting the pakers acxcording to Francis and Arter. Kermorgant is unlikely to feature according to BBC teletext.
.
I and no doubt other will be pleased if you prediction comes true.
.
Regards to you
Can someone please translate this, i think smhinto has been on the sauce early today.
Its the same post he wrote back in august and every other game since,
the record is stuck, the record is stuck, the record is stuck, the record is stuck,
the record is stuck, the record is stuck, the record is stuck, the record is stuck,
[quote][p][bold]STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]raybren[/bold] wrote: Thank goodness Smhinto is back with his wisdom and insight ! We can only hope that Eddie reads his comments , so that he can adjust the game plan accordingly . As for me , I ' m going for something unusual , a 4-2 victory for the Cherries ![/p][/quote]I believe my post reflects on what is very likely to happen if we do not get hold of the game. . It is not a derisory post. Away from home the longer the game stays at 0-0 against a fighting battling side like Barnsley who are fighting for their lives, the chances of losing the game is increased. . As I have said if Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins to go, it will be game over as they will shut up shop and as well you know it. . We must also take into account the fatique factoe of which effecting the pakers acxcording to Francis and Arter. Kermorgant is unlikely to feature according to BBC teletext. . I and no doubt other will be pleased if you prediction comes true. . Regards to you[/p][/quote]Can someone please translate this, i think smhinto has been on the sauce early today.[/p][/quote]Its the same post he wrote back in august and every other game since, the record is stuck, the record is stuck, the record is stuck, the record is stuck, the record is stuck, the record is stuck, the record is stuck, the record is stuck, golfer33
  • Score: 10

4:27pm Fri 21 Mar 14

nonnogeppetto says...

STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road wrote:
smhinto wrote:
raybren wrote:
Thank goodness Smhinto is back with his wisdom and insight ! We can only hope that Eddie reads his comments , so that he can adjust the game plan accordingly . As for me , I ' m going for something unusual , a 4-2 victory for the Cherries !
I believe my post reflects on what is very likely to happen if we do not get hold of the game.
.
It is not a derisory post. Away from home the longer the game stays at 0-0 against a fighting battling side like Barnsley who are fighting for their lives, the chances of losing the game is increased.
.
As I have said if Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins to go, it will be game over as they will shut up shop and as well you know it.
.
We must also take into account the fatique factoe of which effecting the pakers acxcording to Francis and Arter. Kermorgant is unlikely to feature according to BBC teletext.
.
I and no doubt other will be pleased if you prediction comes true.
.
Regards to you
Can someone please translate this, i think smhinto has been on the sauce early today.
I am glad I am not the only one (cant even blame it on the fact that English is not my native language!!).

Smhinto (only a bit of fun!) but did I spot you on Channel 5 Police Interceptors the other evening? the programme is currently about policing roads in your neck of the woods!!!!!

By the way your initial post has merit and you are right that teams battling for survival gives the biggest headaches.

Kind regards
[quote][p][bold]STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]raybren[/bold] wrote: Thank goodness Smhinto is back with his wisdom and insight ! We can only hope that Eddie reads his comments , so that he can adjust the game plan accordingly . As for me , I ' m going for something unusual , a 4-2 victory for the Cherries ![/p][/quote]I believe my post reflects on what is very likely to happen if we do not get hold of the game. . It is not a derisory post. Away from home the longer the game stays at 0-0 against a fighting battling side like Barnsley who are fighting for their lives, the chances of losing the game is increased. . As I have said if Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins to go, it will be game over as they will shut up shop and as well you know it. . We must also take into account the fatique factoe of which effecting the pakers acxcording to Francis and Arter. Kermorgant is unlikely to feature according to BBC teletext. . I and no doubt other will be pleased if you prediction comes true. . Regards to you[/p][/quote]Can someone please translate this, i think smhinto has been on the sauce early today.[/p][/quote]I am glad I am not the only one (cant even blame it on the fact that English is not my native language!!). Smhinto (only a bit of fun!) but did I spot you on Channel 5 Police Interceptors the other evening? the programme is currently about policing roads in your neck of the woods!!!!! By the way your initial post has merit and you are right that teams battling for survival gives the biggest headaches. Kind regards nonnogeppetto
  • Score: 1

5:13pm Fri 21 Mar 14

bmthtillidie says...

4-4-2 against Barnsley please Eddie. Grabs and Kermo if he's fit, if not Brett or Rante. Rest Surman, Arter and O'Kane in the centre midfield. I'm not going to even going suggest the wingers, there are so many different permutations and now Smith is in the mix as well! More chance of getting lottery numbers than guessing.Could Coulibally play off Grabs, worth a try, he's got pace and ball control. Will be there tomorrow, I want to see a few balls in their net!!
UTC
4-4-2 against Barnsley please Eddie. Grabs and Kermo if he's fit, if not Brett or Rante. Rest Surman, Arter and O'Kane in the centre midfield. I'm not going to even going suggest the wingers, there are so many different permutations and now Smith is in the mix as well! More chance of getting lottery numbers than guessing.Could Coulibally play off Grabs, worth a try, he's got pace and ball control. Will be there tomorrow, I want to see a few balls in their net!! UTC bmthtillidie
  • Score: 5

6:15pm Fri 21 Mar 14

the amazon returns again says...

smhinto wrote:
raybren wrote:
Thank goodness Smhinto is back with his wisdom and insight ! We can only hope that Eddie reads his comments , so that he can adjust the game plan accordingly . As for me , I ' m going for something unusual , a 4-2 victory for the Cherries !
I believe my post reflects on what is very likely to happen if we do not get hold of the game.
.
It is not a derisory post. Away from home the longer the game stays at 0-0 against a fighting battling side like Barnsley who are fighting for their lives, the chances of losing the game is increased.
.
As I have said if Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins to go, it will be game over as they will shut up shop and as well you know it.
.
We must also take into account the fatique factoe of which effecting the pakers acxcording to Francis and Arter. Kermorgant is unlikely to feature according to BBC teletext.
.
I and no doubt other will be pleased if you prediction comes true.
.
Regards to you
smhinto, You get my vote pal, your bang on with your comment. Right Eddie boy, 2 up front tomorrow or your getting a slap..

Regards
[quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]raybren[/bold] wrote: Thank goodness Smhinto is back with his wisdom and insight ! We can only hope that Eddie reads his comments , so that he can adjust the game plan accordingly . As for me , I ' m going for something unusual , a 4-2 victory for the Cherries ![/p][/quote]I believe my post reflects on what is very likely to happen if we do not get hold of the game. . It is not a derisory post. Away from home the longer the game stays at 0-0 against a fighting battling side like Barnsley who are fighting for their lives, the chances of losing the game is increased. . As I have said if Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins to go, it will be game over as they will shut up shop and as well you know it. . We must also take into account the fatique factoe of which effecting the pakers acxcording to Francis and Arter. Kermorgant is unlikely to feature according to BBC teletext. . I and no doubt other will be pleased if you prediction comes true. . Regards to you[/p][/quote]smhinto, You get my vote pal, your bang on with your comment. Right Eddie boy, 2 up front tomorrow or your getting a slap.. Regards the amazon returns again
  • Score: 1

6:32pm Fri 21 Mar 14

Richard 1976 says...

If the pit boys can beat forest then we need to be cautious.. It's a game we should easily win but as was proved on Tuesday things don't always go to plan! Three points would be great tomorrow, even greater against those scumbags next Tuesday.. Up the cherries!
If the pit boys can beat forest then we need to be cautious.. It's a game we should easily win but as was proved on Tuesday things don't always go to plan! Three points would be great tomorrow, even greater against those scumbags next Tuesday.. Up the cherries! Richard 1976
  • Score: 2

7:15pm Fri 21 Mar 14

gtd says...

bmthtillidie wrote:
4-4-2 against Barnsley please Eddie. Grabs and Kermo if he's fit, if not Brett or Rante. Rest Surman, Arter and O'Kane in the centre midfield. I'm not going to even going suggest the wingers, there are so many different permutations and now Smith is in the mix as well! More chance of getting lottery numbers than guessing.Could Coulibally play off Grabs, worth a try, he's got pace and ball control. Will be there tomorrow, I want to see a few balls in their net!!
UTC
Yes we must play two strikers; I despair when I see only one - it means we won' score unless we get a penalty.....
Bring back Brett.
[quote][p][bold]bmthtillidie[/bold] wrote: 4-4-2 against Barnsley please Eddie. Grabs and Kermo if he's fit, if not Brett or Rante. Rest Surman, Arter and O'Kane in the centre midfield. I'm not going to even going suggest the wingers, there are so many different permutations and now Smith is in the mix as well! More chance of getting lottery numbers than guessing.Could Coulibally play off Grabs, worth a try, he's got pace and ball control. Will be there tomorrow, I want to see a few balls in their net!! UTC[/p][/quote]Yes we must play two strikers; I despair when I see only one - it means we won' score unless we get a penalty..... Bring back Brett. gtd
  • Score: 3

7:46pm Fri 21 Mar 14

smhinto says...

gtd wrote:
bmthtillidie wrote:
4-4-2 against Barnsley please Eddie. Grabs and Kermo if he's fit, if not Brett or Rante. Rest Surman, Arter and O'Kane in the centre midfield. I'm not going to even going suggest the wingers, there are so many different permutations and now Smith is in the mix as well! More chance of getting lottery numbers than guessing.Could Coulibally play off Grabs, worth a try, he's got pace and ball control. Will be there tomorrow, I want to see a few balls in their net!!
UTC
Yes we must play two strikers; I despair when I see only one - it means we won' score unless we get a penalty.....
Bring back Brett.
I very much doubt if we will play with two up front away from home or at least not to start with. Kermorgant is not fully fit and therefore will start on the bench.
.
More than likely we will fill up the midfield to contain Barnsley. The pitch will more than likely resemble a scene from the first world war trenches or worse, so we cannot leave ourselves too exposed.
.
The thing that is worrying me is the fatique factor, we have played a lot of games. My hopes are not high for the Leeds game next week. two or three of the of the players have already stated that tiredness is starting to bite. Getting something tomorrow is vital. We must hit the target first in order to draw Barnsley out then perhaps a 4-4-2 may be introduced, but certainly not to start with.
.
Regards
[quote][p][bold]gtd[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]bmthtillidie[/bold] wrote: 4-4-2 against Barnsley please Eddie. Grabs and Kermo if he's fit, if not Brett or Rante. Rest Surman, Arter and O'Kane in the centre midfield. I'm not going to even going suggest the wingers, there are so many different permutations and now Smith is in the mix as well! More chance of getting lottery numbers than guessing.Could Coulibally play off Grabs, worth a try, he's got pace and ball control. Will be there tomorrow, I want to see a few balls in their net!! UTC[/p][/quote]Yes we must play two strikers; I despair when I see only one - it means we won' score unless we get a penalty..... Bring back Brett.[/p][/quote]I very much doubt if we will play with two up front away from home or at least not to start with. Kermorgant is not fully fit and therefore will start on the bench. . More than likely we will fill up the midfield to contain Barnsley. The pitch will more than likely resemble a scene from the first world war trenches or worse, so we cannot leave ourselves too exposed. . The thing that is worrying me is the fatique factor, we have played a lot of games. My hopes are not high for the Leeds game next week. two or three of the of the players have already stated that tiredness is starting to bite. Getting something tomorrow is vital. We must hit the target first in order to draw Barnsley out then perhaps a 4-4-2 may be introduced, but certainly not to start with. . Regards smhinto
  • Score: -3

8:29pm Fri 21 Mar 14

raybren says...

Smhinto , your hopes are not high for any game , that ' s why we love you so much ! If we feel like we are getting too positive , you bring us back down to earth . Maybe the Germans will turn up for a game on that pitch ! Are you scouting Cambridge v Gosport at Wembley on Sunday ?
Smhinto , your hopes are not high for any game , that ' s why we love you so much ! If we feel like we are getting too positive , you bring us back down to earth . Maybe the Germans will turn up for a game on that pitch ! Are you scouting Cambridge v Gosport at Wembley on Sunday ? raybren
  • Score: 3

11:03am Sat 22 Mar 14

rednblack37 says...

smhinto wrote:
This another game where if we let Barnsley take the lead and get their noses in front it will lift them considerably. We must not switch off as we seemingly did against Charlton during the last half hour.
.
We must get hold of the game within the first 30 mins in order to force them out.
.
The longer the game goes on at nil-nil the more chance we will have of losing. If they take the lead with 20 mins remaining it is highly likely they will just sit back, string bodies across the box and just see the game out.
.
We need two more wins for safety in my view. So let's get the first tomorrow!!
.
Up the Cherries!!!
.
Regards
I completely agree with needing 2 more wins, I've said from day one we need a minimum 50 points to ensure staying up. But why do you always write so negatively? In my view, if we go at Barnsley from kick-off, get them on the back foot and pressure them, trying to score an early goal, then their heads will drop and their confidence will drain away, meaning we can control the game. Nothing personal against Barnsley though. Talking about more chances of losing is exactly why people have the opinion of you that they do - it sounds so negative. We all know we can lose any game, any team can, but we don't have to talk ourselves into a negative mindset before kick-off. Don't bang on about reading your post properly either - it's about the way it's written. Someone else could include the same information and sound positive and upbeat No offence intended, just trying to explain how a lot of us on here perceive your posts to sound. Though I daresay you'll come back with some kind of name for me as you normally do to people who criticise you. Up the Cherries!!!!!! Come on boys!!!
[quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: This another game where if we let Barnsley take the lead and get their noses in front it will lift them considerably. We must not switch off as we seemingly did against Charlton during the last half hour. . We must get hold of the game within the first 30 mins in order to force them out. . The longer the game goes on at nil-nil the more chance we will have of losing. If they take the lead with 20 mins remaining it is highly likely they will just sit back, string bodies across the box and just see the game out. . We need two more wins for safety in my view. So let's get the first tomorrow!! . Up the Cherries!!! . Regards[/p][/quote]I completely agree with needing 2 more wins, I've said from day one we need a minimum 50 points to ensure staying up. But why do you always write so negatively? In my view, if we go at Barnsley from kick-off, get them on the back foot and pressure them, trying to score an early goal, then their heads will drop and their confidence will drain away, meaning we can control the game. Nothing personal against Barnsley though. Talking about more chances of losing is exactly why people have the opinion of you that they do - it sounds so negative. We all know we can lose any game, any team can, but we don't have to talk ourselves into a negative mindset before kick-off. Don't bang on about reading your post properly either - it's about the way it's written. Someone else could include the same information and sound positive and upbeat No offence intended, just trying to explain how a lot of us on here perceive your posts to sound. Though I daresay you'll come back with some kind of name for me as you normally do to people who criticise you. Up the Cherries!!!!!! Come on boys!!! rednblack37
  • Score: 0

12:57pm Sat 22 Mar 14

smhinto says...

rednblack37 wrote:
smhinto wrote:
This another game where if we let Barnsley take the lead and get their noses in front it will lift them considerably. We must not switch off as we seemingly did against Charlton during the last half hour.
.
We must get hold of the game within the first 30 mins in order to force them out.
.
The longer the game goes on at nil-nil the more chance we will have of losing. If they take the lead with 20 mins remaining it is highly likely they will just sit back, string bodies across the box and just see the game out.
.
We need two more wins for safety in my view. So let's get the first tomorrow!!
.
Up the Cherries!!!
.
Regards
I completely agree with needing 2 more wins, I've said from day one we need a minimum 50 points to ensure staying up. But why do you always write so negatively? In my view, if we go at Barnsley from kick-off, get them on the back foot and pressure them, trying to score an early goal, then their heads will drop and their confidence will drain away, meaning we can control the game. Nothing personal against Barnsley though. Talking about more chances of losing is exactly why people have the opinion of you that they do - it sounds so negative. We all know we can lose any game, any team can, but we don't have to talk ourselves into a negative mindset before kick-off. Don't bang on about reading your post properly either - it's about the way it's written. Someone else could include the same information and sound positive and upbeat No offence intended, just trying to explain how a lot of us on here perceive your posts to sound. Though I daresay you'll come back with some kind of name for me as you normally do to people who criticise you. Up the Cherries!!!!!! Come on boys!!!
There is nothing neagtive about my post. It is actual overview of what can happen if we do not get hold of the game.
.
You have taken post in the wrong context. Any football pundit could say exactly the same thing as a pre match comment i.e. if we let Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins left the game will more than likely be lost for us. We have got to get at them. I said this in my original post and then you have more or less repeated what I have said in your reply. So in fact we agree with each other don't we.?
.
Try re-reading it and take it in the vain that I have described above.
.
Regards
[quote][p][bold]rednblack37[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: This another game where if we let Barnsley take the lead and get their noses in front it will lift them considerably. We must not switch off as we seemingly did against Charlton during the last half hour. . We must get hold of the game within the first 30 mins in order to force them out. . The longer the game goes on at nil-nil the more chance we will have of losing. If they take the lead with 20 mins remaining it is highly likely they will just sit back, string bodies across the box and just see the game out. . We need two more wins for safety in my view. So let's get the first tomorrow!! . Up the Cherries!!! . Regards[/p][/quote]I completely agree with needing 2 more wins, I've said from day one we need a minimum 50 points to ensure staying up. But why do you always write so negatively? In my view, if we go at Barnsley from kick-off, get them on the back foot and pressure them, trying to score an early goal, then their heads will drop and their confidence will drain away, meaning we can control the game. Nothing personal against Barnsley though. Talking about more chances of losing is exactly why people have the opinion of you that they do - it sounds so negative. We all know we can lose any game, any team can, but we don't have to talk ourselves into a negative mindset before kick-off. Don't bang on about reading your post properly either - it's about the way it's written. Someone else could include the same information and sound positive and upbeat No offence intended, just trying to explain how a lot of us on here perceive your posts to sound. Though I daresay you'll come back with some kind of name for me as you normally do to people who criticise you. Up the Cherries!!!!!! Come on boys!!![/p][/quote]There is nothing neagtive about my post. It is actual overview of what can happen if we do not get hold of the game. . You have taken post in the wrong context. Any football pundit could say exactly the same thing as a pre match comment i.e. if we let Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins left the game will more than likely be lost for us. We have got to get at them. I said this in my original post and then you have more or less repeated what I have said in your reply. So in fact we agree with each other don't we.? . Try re-reading it and take it in the vain that I have described above. . Regards smhinto
  • Score: -2

2:23pm Sat 22 Mar 14

rednblack37 says...

smhinto wrote:
rednblack37 wrote:
smhinto wrote:
This another game where if we let Barnsley take the lead and get their noses in front it will lift them considerably. We must not switch off as we seemingly did against Charlton during the last half hour.
.
We must get hold of the game within the first 30 mins in order to force them out.
.
The longer the game goes on at nil-nil the more chance we will have of losing. If they take the lead with 20 mins remaining it is highly likely they will just sit back, string bodies across the box and just see the game out.
.
We need two more wins for safety in my view. So let's get the first tomorrow!!
.
Up the Cherries!!!
.
Regards
I completely agree with needing 2 more wins, I've said from day one we need a minimum 50 points to ensure staying up. But why do you always write so negatively? In my view, if we go at Barnsley from kick-off, get them on the back foot and pressure them, trying to score an early goal, then their heads will drop and their confidence will drain away, meaning we can control the game. Nothing personal against Barnsley though. Talking about more chances of losing is exactly why people have the opinion of you that they do - it sounds so negative. We all know we can lose any game, any team can, but we don't have to talk ourselves into a negative mindset before kick-off. Don't bang on about reading your post properly either - it's about the way it's written. Someone else could include the same information and sound positive and upbeat No offence intended, just trying to explain how a lot of us on here perceive your posts to sound. Though I daresay you'll come back with some kind of name for me as you normally do to people who criticise you. Up the Cherries!!!!!! Come on boys!!!
There is nothing neagtive about my post. It is actual overview of what can happen if we do not get hold of the game.
.
You have taken post in the wrong context. Any football pundit could say exactly the same thing as a pre match comment i.e. if we let Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins left the game will more than likely be lost for us. We have got to get at them. I said this in my original post and then you have more or less repeated what I have said in your reply. So in fact we agree with each other don't we.?
.
Try re-reading it and take it in the vain that I have described above.
.
Regards
It is negative, your first sentence focuses on Barnsley scoring - why not on us scoring? And how did I know you would say re-read the post? Typical. Thank goodness you aren't the manager, the game would be lost in the dressing room, the team would go out in fear, worrying about the other team scoring first. It's still possible to win even when you concede first..........a shock to you it seems. As long as you have belief in the players.....which you obviously don't - confimed by expecting to lose if we concede first with 20 mins to go. I can remember a game a few years ago being 2-1 down going into injury time under Kevin Bond, we won 3-2. I imagine you weren't there? It's possible and does happen
[quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]rednblack37[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: This another game where if we let Barnsley take the lead and get their noses in front it will lift them considerably. We must not switch off as we seemingly did against Charlton during the last half hour. . We must get hold of the game within the first 30 mins in order to force them out. . The longer the game goes on at nil-nil the more chance we will have of losing. If they take the lead with 20 mins remaining it is highly likely they will just sit back, string bodies across the box and just see the game out. . We need two more wins for safety in my view. So let's get the first tomorrow!! . Up the Cherries!!! . Regards[/p][/quote]I completely agree with needing 2 more wins, I've said from day one we need a minimum 50 points to ensure staying up. But why do you always write so negatively? In my view, if we go at Barnsley from kick-off, get them on the back foot and pressure them, trying to score an early goal, then their heads will drop and their confidence will drain away, meaning we can control the game. Nothing personal against Barnsley though. Talking about more chances of losing is exactly why people have the opinion of you that they do - it sounds so negative. We all know we can lose any game, any team can, but we don't have to talk ourselves into a negative mindset before kick-off. Don't bang on about reading your post properly either - it's about the way it's written. Someone else could include the same information and sound positive and upbeat No offence intended, just trying to explain how a lot of us on here perceive your posts to sound. Though I daresay you'll come back with some kind of name for me as you normally do to people who criticise you. Up the Cherries!!!!!! Come on boys!!![/p][/quote]There is nothing neagtive about my post. It is actual overview of what can happen if we do not get hold of the game. . You have taken post in the wrong context. Any football pundit could say exactly the same thing as a pre match comment i.e. if we let Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins left the game will more than likely be lost for us. We have got to get at them. I said this in my original post and then you have more or less repeated what I have said in your reply. So in fact we agree with each other don't we.? . Try re-reading it and take it in the vain that I have described above. . Regards[/p][/quote]It is negative, your first sentence focuses on Barnsley scoring - why not on us scoring? And how did I know you would say re-read the post? Typical. Thank goodness you aren't the manager, the game would be lost in the dressing room, the team would go out in fear, worrying about the other team scoring first. It's still possible to win even when you concede first..........a shock to you it seems. As long as you have belief in the players.....which you obviously don't - confimed by expecting to lose if we concede first with 20 mins to go. I can remember a game a few years ago being 2-1 down going into injury time under Kevin Bond, we won 3-2. I imagine you weren't there? It's possible and does happen rednblack37
  • Score: 0

2:41pm Sat 22 Mar 14

STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road says...

smhinto wrote:
rednblack37 wrote:
smhinto wrote:
This another game where if we let Barnsley take the lead and get their noses in front it will lift them considerably. We must not switch off as we seemingly did against Charlton during the last half hour.
.
We must get hold of the game within the first 30 mins in order to force them out.
.
The longer the game goes on at nil-nil the more chance we will have of losing. If they take the lead with 20 mins remaining it is highly likely they will just sit back, string bodies across the box and just see the game out.
.
We need two more wins for safety in my view. So let's get the first tomorrow!!
.
Up the Cherries!!!
.
Regards
I completely agree with needing 2 more wins, I've said from day one we need a minimum 50 points to ensure staying up. But why do you always write so negatively? In my view, if we go at Barnsley from kick-off, get them on the back foot and pressure them, trying to score an early goal, then their heads will drop and their confidence will drain away, meaning we can control the game. Nothing personal against Barnsley though. Talking about more chances of losing is exactly why people have the opinion of you that they do - it sounds so negative. We all know we can lose any game, any team can, but we don't have to talk ourselves into a negative mindset before kick-off. Don't bang on about reading your post properly either - it's about the way it's written. Someone else could include the same information and sound positive and upbeat No offence intended, just trying to explain how a lot of us on here perceive your posts to sound. Though I daresay you'll come back with some kind of name for me as you normally do to people who criticise you. Up the Cherries!!!!!! Come on boys!!!
There is nothing neagtive about my post. It is actual overview of what can happen if we do not get hold of the game.
.
You have taken post in the wrong context. Any football pundit could say exactly the same thing as a pre match comment i.e. if we let Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins left the game will more than likely be lost for us. We have got to get at them. I said this in my original post and then you have more or less repeated what I have said in your reply. So in fact we agree with each other don't we.?
.
Try re-reading it and take it in the vain that I have described above.
.
Regards
Haven't you got a low quality non league match to go and scout today.???
I assume we can rely on you to be first up on here later, should we do the unthinkable and actually beat the mighty Barnsley.
Na, thought not.!!!
[quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]rednblack37[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: This another game where if we let Barnsley take the lead and get their noses in front it will lift them considerably. We must not switch off as we seemingly did against Charlton during the last half hour. . We must get hold of the game within the first 30 mins in order to force them out. . The longer the game goes on at nil-nil the more chance we will have of losing. If they take the lead with 20 mins remaining it is highly likely they will just sit back, string bodies across the box and just see the game out. . We need two more wins for safety in my view. So let's get the first tomorrow!! . Up the Cherries!!! . Regards[/p][/quote]I completely agree with needing 2 more wins, I've said from day one we need a minimum 50 points to ensure staying up. But why do you always write so negatively? In my view, if we go at Barnsley from kick-off, get them on the back foot and pressure them, trying to score an early goal, then their heads will drop and their confidence will drain away, meaning we can control the game. Nothing personal against Barnsley though. Talking about more chances of losing is exactly why people have the opinion of you that they do - it sounds so negative. We all know we can lose any game, any team can, but we don't have to talk ourselves into a negative mindset before kick-off. Don't bang on about reading your post properly either - it's about the way it's written. Someone else could include the same information and sound positive and upbeat No offence intended, just trying to explain how a lot of us on here perceive your posts to sound. Though I daresay you'll come back with some kind of name for me as you normally do to people who criticise you. Up the Cherries!!!!!! Come on boys!!![/p][/quote]There is nothing neagtive about my post. It is actual overview of what can happen if we do not get hold of the game. . You have taken post in the wrong context. Any football pundit could say exactly the same thing as a pre match comment i.e. if we let Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins left the game will more than likely be lost for us. We have got to get at them. I said this in my original post and then you have more or less repeated what I have said in your reply. So in fact we agree with each other don't we.? . Try re-reading it and take it in the vain that I have described above. . Regards[/p][/quote]Haven't you got a low quality non league match to go and scout today.??? I assume we can rely on you to be first up on here later, should we do the unthinkable and actually beat the mighty Barnsley. Na, thought not.!!! STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road
  • Score: 1

2:46pm Sat 22 Mar 14

smhinto says...

rednblack37 wrote:
smhinto wrote:
rednblack37 wrote:
smhinto wrote:
This another game where if we let Barnsley take the lead and get their noses in front it will lift them considerably. We must not switch off as we seemingly did against Charlton during the last half hour.
.
We must get hold of the game within the first 30 mins in order to force them out.
.
The longer the game goes on at nil-nil the more chance we will have of losing. If they take the lead with 20 mins remaining it is highly likely they will just sit back, string bodies across the box and just see the game out.
.
We need two more wins for safety in my view. So let's get the first tomorrow!!
.
Up the Cherries!!!
.
Regards
I completely agree with needing 2 more wins, I've said from day one we need a minimum 50 points to ensure staying up. But why do you always write so negatively? In my view, if we go at Barnsley from kick-off, get them on the back foot and pressure them, trying to score an early goal, then their heads will drop and their confidence will drain away, meaning we can control the game. Nothing personal against Barnsley though. Talking about more chances of losing is exactly why people have the opinion of you that they do - it sounds so negative. We all know we can lose any game, any team can, but we don't have to talk ourselves into a negative mindset before kick-off. Don't bang on about reading your post properly either - it's about the way it's written. Someone else could include the same information and sound positive and upbeat No offence intended, just trying to explain how a lot of us on here perceive your posts to sound. Though I daresay you'll come back with some kind of name for me as you normally do to people who criticise you. Up the Cherries!!!!!! Come on boys!!!
There is nothing neagtive about my post. It is actual overview of what can happen if we do not get hold of the game.
.
You have taken post in the wrong context. Any football pundit could say exactly the same thing as a pre match comment i.e. if we let Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins left the game will more than likely be lost for us. We have got to get at them. I said this in my original post and then you have more or less repeated what I have said in your reply. So in fact we agree with each other don't we.?
.
Try re-reading it and take it in the vain that I have described above.
.
Regards
It is negative, your first sentence focuses on Barnsley scoring - why not on us scoring? And how did I know you would say re-read the post? Typical. Thank goodness you aren't the manager, the game would be lost in the dressing room, the team would go out in fear, worrying about the other team scoring first. It's still possible to win even when you concede first..........a shock to you it seems. As long as you have belief in the players.....which you obviously don't - confimed by expecting to lose if we concede first with 20 mins to go. I can remember a game a few years ago being 2-1 down going into injury time under Kevin Bond, we won 3-2. I imagine you weren't there? It's possible and does happen
When one is way from the odds are usually stacked against you. The chances of Barnsley scoring first is most likely as they are at home.. But funny enough rather like you I do actually hope it is us that scores first because we need to in order to get control of the game.
.
You must remember they are scrapping for their lives and there home form is not that bad if you look at there recent home results. That is whyt I said that the longer the game stays at 0-0 the higher the risk of losing becomes.
.
Yes you are right we could score first but seeing that we are away from home and that we are likely to be without Kermorgant to start and we will probably start with one up front, scoring first is less likely than them scoring.
.
I am just having pre match coffee at Scunthorpe now so I will be watching progress from Oakwell.
.
I sincerely hope AFCB get a positive result.
.
I wish you well
.
Regards
[quote][p][bold]rednblack37[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]rednblack37[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: This another game where if we let Barnsley take the lead and get their noses in front it will lift them considerably. We must not switch off as we seemingly did against Charlton during the last half hour. . We must get hold of the game within the first 30 mins in order to force them out. . The longer the game goes on at nil-nil the more chance we will have of losing. If they take the lead with 20 mins remaining it is highly likely they will just sit back, string bodies across the box and just see the game out. . We need two more wins for safety in my view. So let's get the first tomorrow!! . Up the Cherries!!! . Regards[/p][/quote]I completely agree with needing 2 more wins, I've said from day one we need a minimum 50 points to ensure staying up. But why do you always write so negatively? In my view, if we go at Barnsley from kick-off, get them on the back foot and pressure them, trying to score an early goal, then their heads will drop and their confidence will drain away, meaning we can control the game. Nothing personal against Barnsley though. Talking about more chances of losing is exactly why people have the opinion of you that they do - it sounds so negative. We all know we can lose any game, any team can, but we don't have to talk ourselves into a negative mindset before kick-off. Don't bang on about reading your post properly either - it's about the way it's written. Someone else could include the same information and sound positive and upbeat No offence intended, just trying to explain how a lot of us on here perceive your posts to sound. Though I daresay you'll come back with some kind of name for me as you normally do to people who criticise you. Up the Cherries!!!!!! Come on boys!!![/p][/quote]There is nothing neagtive about my post. It is actual overview of what can happen if we do not get hold of the game. . You have taken post in the wrong context. Any football pundit could say exactly the same thing as a pre match comment i.e. if we let Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins left the game will more than likely be lost for us. We have got to get at them. I said this in my original post and then you have more or less repeated what I have said in your reply. So in fact we agree with each other don't we.? . Try re-reading it and take it in the vain that I have described above. . Regards[/p][/quote]It is negative, your first sentence focuses on Barnsley scoring - why not on us scoring? And how did I know you would say re-read the post? Typical. Thank goodness you aren't the manager, the game would be lost in the dressing room, the team would go out in fear, worrying about the other team scoring first. It's still possible to win even when you concede first..........a shock to you it seems. As long as you have belief in the players.....which you obviously don't - confimed by expecting to lose if we concede first with 20 mins to go. I can remember a game a few years ago being 2-1 down going into injury time under Kevin Bond, we won 3-2. I imagine you weren't there? It's possible and does happen[/p][/quote]When one is way from the odds are usually stacked against you. The chances of Barnsley scoring first is most likely as they are at home.. But funny enough rather like you I do actually hope it is us that scores first because we need to in order to get control of the game. . You must remember they are scrapping for their lives and there home form is not that bad if you look at there recent home results. That is whyt I said that the longer the game stays at 0-0 the higher the risk of losing becomes. . Yes you are right we could score first but seeing that we are away from home and that we are likely to be without Kermorgant to start and we will probably start with one up front, scoring first is less likely than them scoring. . I am just having pre match coffee at Scunthorpe now so I will be watching progress from Oakwell. . I sincerely hope AFCB get a positive result. . I wish you well . Regards smhinto
  • Score: -1

3:26pm Sat 22 Mar 14

STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road says...

smhinto wrote:
rednblack37 wrote:
smhinto wrote:
rednblack37 wrote:
smhinto wrote:
This another game where if we let Barnsley take the lead and get their noses in front it will lift them considerably. We must not switch off as we seemingly did against Charlton during the last half hour.
.
We must get hold of the game within the first 30 mins in order to force them out.
.
The longer the game goes on at nil-nil the more chance we will have of losing. If they take the lead with 20 mins remaining it is highly likely they will just sit back, string bodies across the box and just see the game out.
.
We need two more wins for safety in my view. So let's get the first tomorrow!!
.
Up the Cherries!!!
.
Regards
I completely agree with needing 2 more wins, I've said from day one we need a minimum 50 points to ensure staying up. But why do you always write so negatively? In my view, if we go at Barnsley from kick-off, get them on the back foot and pressure them, trying to score an early goal, then their heads will drop and their confidence will drain away, meaning we can control the game. Nothing personal against Barnsley though. Talking about more chances of losing is exactly why people have the opinion of you that they do - it sounds so negative. We all know we can lose any game, any team can, but we don't have to talk ourselves into a negative mindset before kick-off. Don't bang on about reading your post properly either - it's about the way it's written. Someone else could include the same information and sound positive and upbeat No offence intended, just trying to explain how a lot of us on here perceive your posts to sound. Though I daresay you'll come back with some kind of name for me as you normally do to people who criticise you. Up the Cherries!!!!!! Come on boys!!!
There is nothing neagtive about my post. It is actual overview of what can happen if we do not get hold of the game.
.
You have taken post in the wrong context. Any football pundit could say exactly the same thing as a pre match comment i.e. if we let Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins left the game will more than likely be lost for us. We have got to get at them. I said this in my original post and then you have more or less repeated what I have said in your reply. So in fact we agree with each other don't we.?
.
Try re-reading it and take it in the vain that I have described above.
.
Regards
It is negative, your first sentence focuses on Barnsley scoring - why not on us scoring? And how did I know you would say re-read the post? Typical. Thank goodness you aren't the manager, the game would be lost in the dressing room, the team would go out in fear, worrying about the other team scoring first. It's still possible to win even when you concede first..........a shock to you it seems. As long as you have belief in the players.....which you obviously don't - confimed by expecting to lose if we concede first with 20 mins to go. I can remember a game a few years ago being 2-1 down going into injury time under Kevin Bond, we won 3-2. I imagine you weren't there? It's possible and does happen
When one is way from the odds are usually stacked against you. The chances of Barnsley scoring first is most likely as they are at home.. But funny enough rather like you I do actually hope it is us that scores first because we need to in order to get control of the game.
.
You must remember they are scrapping for their lives and there home form is not that bad if you look at there recent home results. That is whyt I said that the longer the game stays at 0-0 the higher the risk of losing becomes.
.
Yes you are right we could score first but seeing that we are away from home and that we are likely to be without Kermorgant to start and we will probably start with one up front, scoring first is less likely than them scoring.
.
I am just having pre match coffee at Scunthorpe now so I will be watching progress from Oakwell.
.
I sincerely hope AFCB get a positive result.
.
I wish you well
.
Regards
Looks like Eddie has ignored (binned) your scouting report yet again.
Yesterday you stated we will start 4-5-1, WRONG it's 4-4-2.
Today you say we are unlikely to start with Kermorgant, WRONG he started
Any more expert ananylis from you.???
[quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]rednblack37[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]rednblack37[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: This another game where if we let Barnsley take the lead and get their noses in front it will lift them considerably. We must not switch off as we seemingly did against Charlton during the last half hour. . We must get hold of the game within the first 30 mins in order to force them out. . The longer the game goes on at nil-nil the more chance we will have of losing. If they take the lead with 20 mins remaining it is highly likely they will just sit back, string bodies across the box and just see the game out. . We need two more wins for safety in my view. So let's get the first tomorrow!! . Up the Cherries!!! . Regards[/p][/quote]I completely agree with needing 2 more wins, I've said from day one we need a minimum 50 points to ensure staying up. But why do you always write so negatively? In my view, if we go at Barnsley from kick-off, get them on the back foot and pressure them, trying to score an early goal, then their heads will drop and their confidence will drain away, meaning we can control the game. Nothing personal against Barnsley though. Talking about more chances of losing is exactly why people have the opinion of you that they do - it sounds so negative. We all know we can lose any game, any team can, but we don't have to talk ourselves into a negative mindset before kick-off. Don't bang on about reading your post properly either - it's about the way it's written. Someone else could include the same information and sound positive and upbeat No offence intended, just trying to explain how a lot of us on here perceive your posts to sound. Though I daresay you'll come back with some kind of name for me as you normally do to people who criticise you. Up the Cherries!!!!!! Come on boys!!![/p][/quote]There is nothing neagtive about my post. It is actual overview of what can happen if we do not get hold of the game. . You have taken post in the wrong context. Any football pundit could say exactly the same thing as a pre match comment i.e. if we let Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins left the game will more than likely be lost for us. We have got to get at them. I said this in my original post and then you have more or less repeated what I have said in your reply. So in fact we agree with each other don't we.? . Try re-reading it and take it in the vain that I have described above. . Regards[/p][/quote]It is negative, your first sentence focuses on Barnsley scoring - why not on us scoring? And how did I know you would say re-read the post? Typical. Thank goodness you aren't the manager, the game would be lost in the dressing room, the team would go out in fear, worrying about the other team scoring first. It's still possible to win even when you concede first..........a shock to you it seems. As long as you have belief in the players.....which you obviously don't - confimed by expecting to lose if we concede first with 20 mins to go. I can remember a game a few years ago being 2-1 down going into injury time under Kevin Bond, we won 3-2. I imagine you weren't there? It's possible and does happen[/p][/quote]When one is way from the odds are usually stacked against you. The chances of Barnsley scoring first is most likely as they are at home.. But funny enough rather like you I do actually hope it is us that scores first because we need to in order to get control of the game. . You must remember they are scrapping for their lives and there home form is not that bad if you look at there recent home results. That is whyt I said that the longer the game stays at 0-0 the higher the risk of losing becomes. . Yes you are right we could score first but seeing that we are away from home and that we are likely to be without Kermorgant to start and we will probably start with one up front, scoring first is less likely than them scoring. . I am just having pre match coffee at Scunthorpe now so I will be watching progress from Oakwell. . I sincerely hope AFCB get a positive result. . I wish you well . Regards[/p][/quote]Looks like Eddie has ignored (binned) your scouting report yet again. Yesterday you stated we will start 4-5-1, WRONG it's 4-4-2. Today you say we are unlikely to start with Kermorgant, WRONG he started Any more expert ananylis from you.??? STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road
  • Score: 1

5:05pm Sat 22 Mar 14

rednblack37 says...

STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road wrote:
smhinto wrote:
rednblack37 wrote:
smhinto wrote:
rednblack37 wrote:
smhinto wrote:
This another game where if we let Barnsley take the lead and get their noses in front it will lift them considerably. We must not switch off as we seemingly did against Charlton during the last half hour.
.
We must get hold of the game within the first 30 mins in order to force them out.
.
The longer the game goes on at nil-nil the more chance we will have of losing. If they take the lead with 20 mins remaining it is highly likely they will just sit back, string bodies across the box and just see the game out.
.
We need two more wins for safety in my view. So let's get the first tomorrow!!
.
Up the Cherries!!!
.
Regards
I completely agree with needing 2 more wins, I've said from day one we need a minimum 50 points to ensure staying up. But why do you always write so negatively? In my view, if we go at Barnsley from kick-off, get them on the back foot and pressure them, trying to score an early goal, then their heads will drop and their confidence will drain away, meaning we can control the game. Nothing personal against Barnsley though. Talking about more chances of losing is exactly why people have the opinion of you that they do - it sounds so negative. We all know we can lose any game, any team can, but we don't have to talk ourselves into a negative mindset before kick-off. Don't bang on about reading your post properly either - it's about the way it's written. Someone else could include the same information and sound positive and upbeat No offence intended, just trying to explain how a lot of us on here perceive your posts to sound. Though I daresay you'll come back with some kind of name for me as you normally do to people who criticise you. Up the Cherries!!!!!! Come on boys!!!
There is nothing neagtive about my post. It is actual overview of what can happen if we do not get hold of the game.
.
You have taken post in the wrong context. Any football pundit could say exactly the same thing as a pre match comment i.e. if we let Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins left the game will more than likely be lost for us. We have got to get at them. I said this in my original post and then you have more or less repeated what I have said in your reply. So in fact we agree with each other don't we.?
.
Try re-reading it and take it in the vain that I have described above.
.
Regards
It is negative, your first sentence focuses on Barnsley scoring - why not on us scoring? And how did I know you would say re-read the post? Typical. Thank goodness you aren't the manager, the game would be lost in the dressing room, the team would go out in fear, worrying about the other team scoring first. It's still possible to win even when you concede first..........a shock to you it seems. As long as you have belief in the players.....which you obviously don't - confimed by expecting to lose if we concede first with 20 mins to go. I can remember a game a few years ago being 2-1 down going into injury time under Kevin Bond, we won 3-2. I imagine you weren't there? It's possible and does happen
When one is way from the odds are usually stacked against you. The chances of Barnsley scoring first is most likely as they are at home.. But funny enough rather like you I do actually hope it is us that scores first because we need to in order to get control of the game.
.
You must remember they are scrapping for their lives and there home form is not that bad if you look at there recent home results. That is whyt I said that the longer the game stays at 0-0 the higher the risk of losing becomes.
.
Yes you are right we could score first but seeing that we are away from home and that we are likely to be without Kermorgant to start and we will probably start with one up front, scoring first is less likely than them scoring.
.
I am just having pre match coffee at Scunthorpe now so I will be watching progress from Oakwell.
.
I sincerely hope AFCB get a positive result.
.
I wish you well
.
Regards
Looks like Eddie has ignored (binned) your scouting report yet again.
Yesterday you stated we will start 4-5-1, WRONG it's 4-4-2.
Today you say we are unlikely to start with Kermorgant, WRONG he started
Any more expert ananylis from you.???
AND...........it stayed at 0 - 0 until right to the end, we scored and won the match!! Fantastic result! The longer it stays at 0 - 0.......the more likely we are to score......obviously not in smhinto's world though! What garbage he spouts.
[quote][p][bold]STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]rednblack37[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]rednblack37[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: This another game where if we let Barnsley take the lead and get their noses in front it will lift them considerably. We must not switch off as we seemingly did against Charlton during the last half hour. . We must get hold of the game within the first 30 mins in order to force them out. . The longer the game goes on at nil-nil the more chance we will have of losing. If they take the lead with 20 mins remaining it is highly likely they will just sit back, string bodies across the box and just see the game out. . We need two more wins for safety in my view. So let's get the first tomorrow!! . Up the Cherries!!! . Regards[/p][/quote]I completely agree with needing 2 more wins, I've said from day one we need a minimum 50 points to ensure staying up. But why do you always write so negatively? In my view, if we go at Barnsley from kick-off, get them on the back foot and pressure them, trying to score an early goal, then their heads will drop and their confidence will drain away, meaning we can control the game. Nothing personal against Barnsley though. Talking about more chances of losing is exactly why people have the opinion of you that they do - it sounds so negative. We all know we can lose any game, any team can, but we don't have to talk ourselves into a negative mindset before kick-off. Don't bang on about reading your post properly either - it's about the way it's written. Someone else could include the same information and sound positive and upbeat No offence intended, just trying to explain how a lot of us on here perceive your posts to sound. Though I daresay you'll come back with some kind of name for me as you normally do to people who criticise you. Up the Cherries!!!!!! Come on boys!!![/p][/quote]There is nothing neagtive about my post. It is actual overview of what can happen if we do not get hold of the game. . You have taken post in the wrong context. Any football pundit could say exactly the same thing as a pre match comment i.e. if we let Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins left the game will more than likely be lost for us. We have got to get at them. I said this in my original post and then you have more or less repeated what I have said in your reply. So in fact we agree with each other don't we.? . Try re-reading it and take it in the vain that I have described above. . Regards[/p][/quote]It is negative, your first sentence focuses on Barnsley scoring - why not on us scoring? And how did I know you would say re-read the post? Typical. Thank goodness you aren't the manager, the game would be lost in the dressing room, the team would go out in fear, worrying about the other team scoring first. It's still possible to win even when you concede first..........a shock to you it seems. As long as you have belief in the players.....which you obviously don't - confimed by expecting to lose if we concede first with 20 mins to go. I can remember a game a few years ago being 2-1 down going into injury time under Kevin Bond, we won 3-2. I imagine you weren't there? It's possible and does happen[/p][/quote]When one is way from the odds are usually stacked against you. The chances of Barnsley scoring first is most likely as they are at home.. But funny enough rather like you I do actually hope it is us that scores first because we need to in order to get control of the game. . You must remember they are scrapping for their lives and there home form is not that bad if you look at there recent home results. That is whyt I said that the longer the game stays at 0-0 the higher the risk of losing becomes. . Yes you are right we could score first but seeing that we are away from home and that we are likely to be without Kermorgant to start and we will probably start with one up front, scoring first is less likely than them scoring. . I am just having pre match coffee at Scunthorpe now so I will be watching progress from Oakwell. . I sincerely hope AFCB get a positive result. . I wish you well . Regards[/p][/quote]Looks like Eddie has ignored (binned) your scouting report yet again. Yesterday you stated we will start 4-5-1, WRONG it's 4-4-2. Today you say we are unlikely to start with Kermorgant, WRONG he started Any more expert ananylis from you.???[/p][/quote]AND...........it stayed at 0 - 0 until right to the end, we scored and won the match!! Fantastic result! The longer it stays at 0 - 0.......the more likely we are to score......obviously not in smhinto's world though! What garbage he spouts. rednblack37
  • Score: 0

5:14pm Sat 22 Mar 14

STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road says...

rednblack37 wrote:
STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road wrote:
smhinto wrote:
rednblack37 wrote:
smhinto wrote:
rednblack37 wrote:
smhinto wrote:
This another game where if we let Barnsley take the lead and get their noses in front it will lift them considerably. We must not switch off as we seemingly did against Charlton during the last half hour.
.
We must get hold of the game within the first 30 mins in order to force them out.
.
The longer the game goes on at nil-nil the more chance we will have of losing. If they take the lead with 20 mins remaining it is highly likely they will just sit back, string bodies across the box and just see the game out.
.
We need two more wins for safety in my view. So let's get the first tomorrow!!
.
Up the Cherries!!!
.
Regards
I completely agree with needing 2 more wins, I've said from day one we need a minimum 50 points to ensure staying up. But why do you always write so negatively? In my view, if we go at Barnsley from kick-off, get them on the back foot and pressure them, trying to score an early goal, then their heads will drop and their confidence will drain away, meaning we can control the game. Nothing personal against Barnsley though. Talking about more chances of losing is exactly why people have the opinion of you that they do - it sounds so negative. We all know we can lose any game, any team can, but we don't have to talk ourselves into a negative mindset before kick-off. Don't bang on about reading your post properly either - it's about the way it's written. Someone else could include the same information and sound positive and upbeat No offence intended, just trying to explain how a lot of us on here perceive your posts to sound. Though I daresay you'll come back with some kind of name for me as you normally do to people who criticise you. Up the Cherries!!!!!! Come on boys!!!
There is nothing neagtive about my post. It is actual overview of what can happen if we do not get hold of the game.
.
You have taken post in the wrong context. Any football pundit could say exactly the same thing as a pre match comment i.e. if we let Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins left the game will more than likely be lost for us. We have got to get at them. I said this in my original post and then you have more or less repeated what I have said in your reply. So in fact we agree with each other don't we.?
.
Try re-reading it and take it in the vain that I have described above.
.
Regards
It is negative, your first sentence focuses on Barnsley scoring - why not on us scoring? And how did I know you would say re-read the post? Typical. Thank goodness you aren't the manager, the game would be lost in the dressing room, the team would go out in fear, worrying about the other team scoring first. It's still possible to win even when you concede first..........a shock to you it seems. As long as you have belief in the players.....which you obviously don't - confimed by expecting to lose if we concede first with 20 mins to go. I can remember a game a few years ago being 2-1 down going into injury time under Kevin Bond, we won 3-2. I imagine you weren't there? It's possible and does happen
When one is way from the odds are usually stacked against you. The chances of Barnsley scoring first is most likely as they are at home.. But funny enough rather like you I do actually hope it is us that scores first because we need to in order to get control of the game.
.
You must remember they are scrapping for their lives and there home form is not that bad if you look at there recent home results. That is whyt I said that the longer the game stays at 0-0 the higher the risk of losing becomes.
.
Yes you are right we could score first but seeing that we are away from home and that we are likely to be without Kermorgant to start and we will probably start with one up front, scoring first is less likely than them scoring.
.
I am just having pre match coffee at Scunthorpe now so I will be watching progress from Oakwell.
.
I sincerely hope AFCB get a positive result.
.
I wish you well
.
Regards
Looks like Eddie has ignored (binned) your scouting report yet again.
Yesterday you stated we will start 4-5-1, WRONG it's 4-4-2.
Today you say we are unlikely to start with Kermorgant, WRONG he started
Any more expert ananylis from you.???
AND...........it stayed at 0 - 0 until right to the end, we scored and won the match!! Fantastic result! The longer it stays at 0 - 0.......the more likely we are to score......obviously not in smhinto's world though! What garbage he spouts.
Give it a couple of days and he will be on to tell us how he was completely correct with his thoughts, and us pigeon brained, empty heads haven't got a clue. Smhinto the super-scout.??? dip dib dib.!!!
[quote][p][bold]rednblack37[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]rednblack37[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]rednblack37[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: This another game where if we let Barnsley take the lead and get their noses in front it will lift them considerably. We must not switch off as we seemingly did against Charlton during the last half hour. . We must get hold of the game within the first 30 mins in order to force them out. . The longer the game goes on at nil-nil the more chance we will have of losing. If they take the lead with 20 mins remaining it is highly likely they will just sit back, string bodies across the box and just see the game out. . We need two more wins for safety in my view. So let's get the first tomorrow!! . Up the Cherries!!! . Regards[/p][/quote]I completely agree with needing 2 more wins, I've said from day one we need a minimum 50 points to ensure staying up. But why do you always write so negatively? In my view, if we go at Barnsley from kick-off, get them on the back foot and pressure them, trying to score an early goal, then their heads will drop and their confidence will drain away, meaning we can control the game. Nothing personal against Barnsley though. Talking about more chances of losing is exactly why people have the opinion of you that they do - it sounds so negative. We all know we can lose any game, any team can, but we don't have to talk ourselves into a negative mindset before kick-off. Don't bang on about reading your post properly either - it's about the way it's written. Someone else could include the same information and sound positive and upbeat No offence intended, just trying to explain how a lot of us on here perceive your posts to sound. Though I daresay you'll come back with some kind of name for me as you normally do to people who criticise you. Up the Cherries!!!!!! Come on boys!!![/p][/quote]There is nothing neagtive about my post. It is actual overview of what can happen if we do not get hold of the game. . You have taken post in the wrong context. Any football pundit could say exactly the same thing as a pre match comment i.e. if we let Barnsley take the lead with 20 mins left the game will more than likely be lost for us. We have got to get at them. I said this in my original post and then you have more or less repeated what I have said in your reply. So in fact we agree with each other don't we.? . Try re-reading it and take it in the vain that I have described above. . Regards[/p][/quote]It is negative, your first sentence focuses on Barnsley scoring - why not on us scoring? And how did I know you would say re-read the post? Typical. Thank goodness you aren't the manager, the game would be lost in the dressing room, the team would go out in fear, worrying about the other team scoring first. It's still possible to win even when you concede first..........a shock to you it seems. As long as you have belief in the players.....which you obviously don't - confimed by expecting to lose if we concede first with 20 mins to go. I can remember a game a few years ago being 2-1 down going into injury time under Kevin Bond, we won 3-2. I imagine you weren't there? It's possible and does happen[/p][/quote]When one is way from the odds are usually stacked against you. The chances of Barnsley scoring first is most likely as they are at home.. But funny enough rather like you I do actually hope it is us that scores first because we need to in order to get control of the game. . You must remember they are scrapping for their lives and there home form is not that bad if you look at there recent home results. That is whyt I said that the longer the game stays at 0-0 the higher the risk of losing becomes. . Yes you are right we could score first but seeing that we are away from home and that we are likely to be without Kermorgant to start and we will probably start with one up front, scoring first is less likely than them scoring. . I am just having pre match coffee at Scunthorpe now so I will be watching progress from Oakwell. . I sincerely hope AFCB get a positive result. . I wish you well . Regards[/p][/quote]Looks like Eddie has ignored (binned) your scouting report yet again. Yesterday you stated we will start 4-5-1, WRONG it's 4-4-2. Today you say we are unlikely to start with Kermorgant, WRONG he started Any more expert ananylis from you.???[/p][/quote]AND...........it stayed at 0 - 0 until right to the end, we scored and won the match!! Fantastic result! The longer it stays at 0 - 0.......the more likely we are to score......obviously not in smhinto's world though! What garbage he spouts.[/p][/quote]Give it a couple of days and he will be on to tell us how he was completely correct with his thoughts, and us pigeon brained, empty heads haven't got a clue. Smhinto the super-scout.??? dip dib dib.!!! STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road
  • Score: 1

8:06pm Sat 22 Mar 14

smhinto says...

Nor garbage at all it could have easily have happened as well you know it.
.
Yes excellent result, through taking the game to them. I am over the moon. I was beginning to feel that the longer the game went we were going to concede. Well done to Cookie. Very sweet after the Charlton game,
.
Well done AFCB.
.
Regards
.
Nor garbage at all it could have easily have happened as well you know it. . Yes excellent result, through taking the game to them. I am over the moon. I was beginning to feel that the longer the game went we were going to concede. Well done to Cookie. Very sweet after the Charlton game, . Well done AFCB. . Regards . smhinto
  • Score: 0

9:11pm Sat 22 Mar 14

rednblack37 says...

smhinto wrote:
Nor garbage at all it could have easily have happened as well you know it.
.
Yes excellent result, through taking the game to them. I am over the moon. I was beginning to feel that the longer the game went we were going to concede. Well done to Cookie. Very sweet after the Charlton game,
.
Well done AFCB.
.
Regards
.
Basically you're saying you were still thinking negatively through the game, expecting us to let a goal - sums you up I'm afraid. But agreed, nice one Cookie!
[quote][p][bold]smhinto[/bold] wrote: Nor garbage at all it could have easily have happened as well you know it. . Yes excellent result, through taking the game to them. I am over the moon. I was beginning to feel that the longer the game went we were going to concede. Well done to Cookie. Very sweet after the Charlton game, . Well done AFCB. . Regards .[/p][/quote]Basically you're saying you were still thinking negatively through the game, expecting us to let a goal - sums you up I'm afraid. But agreed, nice one Cookie! rednblack37
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree