News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Sarah's Law uncovers seven perverts with access to children in Dorset

Sarah Payne Sarah Payne

SEVEN child sex offenders with regular access to children have been uncovered in Dorset, thanks to the introduction of Sarah’s Law.

More than 60 concerned families have also contacted Dorset Police to find out if their child is safe.

Sarah’s Law, known as the Child Sex Offender Disclosure Scheme, came into place in the county last October after campaigning from parents and Sarah’s Law supporters.

It was introduced after a successful trial in four police forces and Dorset is now one of 18 forces that have it.

The scheme allows parents controlled access to information about whether a sex offender is in their area.

It was named after eight-year-old Sarah Payne, who was murdered by convicted paedophile Roy Whiting in 2000.

Martyn Underhill of Poole was the detective who led the inquiry into Sarah Payne’s murder in 2000.

He said at the launch of Sarah’s Law: “This is great news for Dorset – empowering parents in the fight against paedophiles can only be a good thing.”

The mum of a 15-year-old sex abuse victim, whose attacker faced a two-year-sentence, said the introduction of the scheme was a real step forward for parents in Dorset.

She said: “When the unimaginable happens you can’t help but blame yourself for not being perceptive enough to keep these monsters away from our children. But in reality it was very difficult to find out and I just wish this was around four years ago.”

She was surprised only 60 families had contacted the force.

Annette Brooke, MP for Mid Dorset and North Poole and former Liberal Democrat spokesperson for children, said last night she was “absolutely staggered” that seven sex offenders had been able to have regular contact with children.

“One really needs to know more details about the cases. It’s really important that we protect our children, but on the other hand we have to try to get the situation where somebody can be let out of prison without a witch hunt. “That means we put our trust in the police and other authorities to monitor them. This is one area where we can’t save scarce resources. We have to do this job.”

Claire Smith, Bournemouth’s former children’s champion, said: “I welcomed Sarah’s Law at the time and I still welcome it.”

She said the law was encouraging more cross-referencing of information by the authorities. “For parents who perhaps have asked someone in authority for reassurance in the past but felt they were fobbed off a bit, this can be another way for them to get reassurance,” she said.

And she said the law could quash unfounded rumours about innocent people being abusers.

Kidscape deputy director Peter Bradley told the Echo: “The uptake of parents using Sarah’s Law is a similar picture around the country.

“Sarah’s Law is very important for parents to be able to find out if their child is safe and it’s an avenue they can use to investigate any concerns they have.”

Detective Inspector Joan Carmichael said: “Since January 2011, seven child sex offenders with regular access to children have been uncovered in Dorset and 60 concerned families have contacted the force.

“The relevant parties have had a face to face meeting with officers and safeguarding measures have been put in place for the children.”

• You can make enquiries online, at a police station, or by calling 01202 222 222.

The campaign for Sarah’s Law

Sarah Payne disappeared on July 1 2000 from a cornfield near her grandparents’ home in West Sussex.

Her body was found on July 17 in a field nearly 20 miles away.

Roy Whiting was found guilty 17 months later of of killing SarahSarah Payne, and it was revealed that he already had a conviction for abducting and indecently assaulting an eight-year-old girl.

The campaign for Sarah's Law was spearheaded by the now-defunct News of the World. Sarah’s mother Sara Payne appeared with the paper’s editor Rebekah Wade (now Rebekah Brooks) at the Conservative Party conference in Bourne-mouth in 2002 to promote its aim of controlled access to the Sex Offender Register.

Comments(32)

Huey says...
11:07am Fri 27 Jan 12

Oh come on just chop their bits off and let's be done with this.

Northstand_dan says...
12:04pm Fri 27 Jan 12

Put a "P" tatoo on their foreheads and teach your kids not to go near them.. or chop off one of their hands.

Arjay says...
12:07pm Fri 27 Jan 12

So, these 7 offenders have 'regular access to children'?
If that is officially known, remind me why they still have that 'access'?

Something's seriously adrift here......

Mikeebar says...
12:34pm Fri 27 Jan 12

So the 7 with access are registered peodophiles? Known risk to children? Do you know the reality behind these blind figurees? No, of course you don't. But that shouldn't get in the way of a moralistic judgement, now, should it?

puglove says...
12:41pm Fri 27 Jan 12

So where are they then? how just printing something like this help with no further detail?

puglove says...
12:52pm Fri 27 Jan 12

Just phoned the number given, they don't know anything about it yet! Excellent system NOT

Omni314 says...
1:14pm Fri 27 Jan 12

"Roy Whiting was found guilty 17 months later of of killing SarahSarah Payne"
Need a proof reader?

Bob49 says...
1:26pm Fri 27 Jan 12

Whilst it might be easy to dismiss this as a harmless stunt to delude the terminally stupid that 'something is being done', there is a greater danger to this idiocy.

Every convicted paedophile is at some point a first time offender. No branding, mutilation etc will address that. Unfurtunately however, it will merely expend time and energy on a pretty worthless distraction.

Lets wait until a child/children are abused then we can inact extreme vengeance. A few over excited dimwits can march through the streets, bang on prison van doors and parade their 'decency' and outrage for all to see.


In the meantime we, as a society, will continue to accept a growing over sexualisation of children through innapropriate dress, behaviour and roles model. Whilst that acceptance may not be the major cause or should ever be used as an excuse for such abhorent actions it does highlight the sickening hypocricy behind such absurd witch hunts.

That this lunacy was championed by that paragon of virtue, Rebecca Brooks, whose newspaper was tapping the phone of the already murdered Milly Dowler speaks volumes for what this execise in stupidity is all about.

585 says...
1:46pm Fri 27 Jan 12

"offenders with regular access to children have been uncovered in Dorset"
Does he mean discovered? they must have already been 'known' to the police.

PokesdownMark says...
2:17pm Fri 27 Jan 12

If 60 requests led to 7 hits, doesn't this suggest that typically around 5% of families contain abusive adults? I've long suspected only a tiny number of abusive adults have their behaviour uncovered. By which I mean it comes to the attention of the authorities. Its about time a method was found to properly measure this.
(5% not 11.6% because I assume something triggered a level of concern leading to a check. So it's not a random sample. Maybe it's 1% or 0.1%? We should know.)

pete woodley says...
4:17pm Fri 27 Jan 12

It is a very serious matter,but now we will see it turned into a political talking point,with the usual same politicians seeking press publicity.Arjay is right why have they still got access.

justsayithowitis says...
4:24pm Fri 27 Jan 12

Most paedophiles are never found out because they abuse family and threaten them with being taken into care if they tell anyone. Even if the child eventually tells someone they very rarely press charges. The figures are much higher than anyone could imagine

ZooeyGlass says...
4:40pm Fri 27 Jan 12

Huey wrote:
Oh come on just chop their bits off and let's be done with this.
How does that work for women?

static kill says...
5:27pm Fri 27 Jan 12

Genetically, paedophiles have more genes in common with crabs than they do with you and me. Now that is scientific fact. There's no real evidence for it but it's scientific fact.

mmm2008 says...
6:47pm Fri 27 Jan 12

static kill wrote:
Genetically, paedophiles have more genes in common with crabs than they do with you and me. Now that is scientific fact. There's no real evidence for it but it's scientific fact.
Well that's the kind of comments that separates the 'them' from 'us' and allows abuse to go on because society attempts to convince the ignorant amongst us that 'they' are hideous, monsterous characters and therefore we never suspect that it could be our uncle, brother, grandma, lovely neighbour, teacher etc. And the use of the term 'paedophile'??? Why? This is a term that child sex offenders have chosen for themselves in attempt to justify their crimes, as paedophile means 'lover of children'. Let's not go along with child sex offenders justifying their abuse please and let's not keep thinking that evil monsters commit these crimes, it's getting innocent children nowhere.

mansak_hunt says...
8:02pm Fri 27 Jan 12

ZooeyGlass wrote:
Huey wrote:
Oh come on just chop their bits off and let's be done with this.
How does that work for women?
chop their bits off.
from the neck down.

i hate do-gooders says...
9:21pm Fri 27 Jan 12

oh dear i seem to have some read some do gooders comments on here ,no ifs no buts they should be shot at dawn or let the family members of the victms have a couple of hours alone in a room the them,to serve real justice

dickie darcy says...
10:25pm Fri 27 Jan 12

Do you really need more nullo's in your area I dont think so
jail em for life i say.

puglove says...
10:35pm Fri 27 Jan 12

i hate do-gooders wrote:
oh dear i seem to have some read some do gooders comments on here ,no ifs no buts they should be shot at dawn or let the family members of the victms have a couple of hours alone in a room the them,to serve real justice
Agreed!

mansak_hunt says...
11:00pm Fri 27 Jan 12

puglove wrote:
i hate do-gooders wrote:
oh dear i seem to have some read some do gooders comments on here ,no ifs no buts they should be shot at dawn or let the family members of the victms have a couple of hours alone in a room the them,to serve real justice
Agreed!
agreed

Arjay says...
11:14pm Fri 27 Jan 12

As usual - half the comments above want the offenders shot (or worse!), the other half want the poor dears to be 'helped'.
While you're arguing about these extreme options (that will not happen), I repeat my earlier point:
If these 7 convicted paedophiles still have 'access to children' -- WHY ???
That reality needs to be addressed NOW.

boby says...
11:27pm Fri 27 Jan 12

My dad sexually abused my sister , still walking around ferndown. My mother has moved away and lost all contact , my sisters not well enough physically or mentally to press charges and I am left living in the same area. Where is the justice in this ????. I have lived with this all my life , he now says he has bi polar well that never stopped him doing what he did. I think justice has left the justice system

boby says...
11:39pm Fri 27 Jan 12

I have to regularly have to have to hide or change where I go, in case I come across him. I am living a sentence, it's all a disgrace. He lives on benefits, and hand outs of the state. He beat me , abused my sister smashed up the house and now his living a life of Reilly. I cannot tell you in words how I feel, the pain he has caused. My family does not live , we just exist. I hope one day, I find happiness in the misery these people cause. The system does not protect the victims , only the abusers

boby says...
11:49pm Fri 27 Jan 12

This is when I wish I could tell you his name, but I can't because me the victim would be in trouble. I will take this to my grave , he has blighted my families lives. Can anybody see if this is right ???.

denmarmat says...
10:55am Sat 28 Jan 12

boby wrote:
This is when I wish I could tell you his name, but I can't because me the victim would be in trouble. I will take this to my grave , he has blighted my families lives. Can anybody see if this is right ???.
Please dont take this the wrong way but there are a few people who get their kicks by making comments up and posting them on here,If what you have posted is true then you need to name him not on here but with the police irrespective if you can or wont press charges they will advise you as what alternatives there are but you cannot live the rest of your life in his shadow the way you say ring someone today

boby says...
11:26am Sat 28 Jan 12

I agree full hearted with your comments I have been in contact with the police. They have been in contact with my family members , and because my sister has not had the mental or physical strength to press charges there is nothing I can do. I have had no communication with my mother for 15 years and she has moved out of the area. I feel extremely let down, the police are fully aware and as a brother to my sister can only do the right thing by standing by her. I was with my partner in a pub in ferndown a couple of weeks ago when it walked in , I had to leave and hide in the toilets until I could leave . This is not what life should be like for me , I have struggled all my life and find myself in this situation. I have a business in the area and did not realise he was here . What more can I do , I am happy to name him and get it over with but I have my sister to think of. Is it normal for a child to find his dad kicking in the bath room door with a knife in his hand. He hit me so hard once he broke his hand . He came home and took a knife to the plaster cast and cut it of is that normal. Im sorry I can not name him and that's what I mean by injustice. All I have said is true I hope this explains

boby says...
11:40am Sat 28 Jan 12

My sister has had a nervous breakdown in the past and has chromes disease. She has been remarkable in the fact she has kept going under the circumstances
I find the whole thing in tolerable, I have had no contact with other family members for twenty years and I find now it's just me and my sister a extremely difficult position to be in.

boby says...
11:57am Sat 28 Jan 12

I used to have to sleep on the floor in the front room , while my dad had my room he would play music all night singing to the music whilst drunk . He would then go into my sisters room. He would regularly go to head but me but would laugh while doing it. When I would go into the front room which was my bed room he would sit on a chair in the dark and laugh at me being frightened as I came in and try to intimidate me . He stalked my sister also all this is true,I ended living in a hospital quarters after having no where to go .

Veryhappyincomer says...
12:47pm Sat 28 Jan 12

Bob49 wrote:
Whilst it might be easy to dismiss this as a harmless stunt to delude the terminally stupid that 'something is being done', there is a greater danger to this idiocy. Every convicted paedophile is at some point a first time offender. No branding, mutilation etc will address that. Unfurtunately however, it will merely expend time and energy on a pretty worthless distraction. Lets wait until a child/children are abused then we can inact extreme vengeance. A few over excited dimwits can march through the streets, bang on prison van doors and parade their 'decency' and outrage for all to see. In the meantime we, as a society, will continue to accept a growing over sexualisation of children through innapropriate dress, behaviour and roles model. Whilst that acceptance may not be the major cause or should ever be used as an excuse for such abhorent actions it does highlight the sickening hypocricy behind such absurd witch hunts. That this lunacy was championed by that paragon of virtue, Rebecca Brooks, whose newspaper was tapping the phone of the already murdered Milly Dowler speaks volumes for what this execise in stupidity is all about.
Unfortunately the "overexcited dimwits" can end up doing jury service. I had to do jury service on a historical child abuse case some time ago. The defendant was clearly innocent and the "victim" was blatently making it up to avenge some perceived slight. However several members of the jury had obviously made their minds up before the case started, on the basis that "if it has gone to trial he must be guilty" and "he looks a bit weird so he must be a paedo". It took some persuading by the sensible majority to bring it down to a majority not guilty verdict. The real victim though had lost his job and his home as a result of the false allegations.
.
In historical cases like this, if a "guilty" verdict is delivered there is no chance of an appeal, as the defence can produce no new evidence, simply because if the crime never happened how can you provide new evidence that you never did it.
.
My experience has definitely raised doubts in my mind about the jury system. The case was paper thin, but had to be brought because of the "overexcited dimwits" that you mentioned, and then the same sort of people end up trying the case. Talk about playing with a double headed penny.

ShuttleX says...
5:35pm Sat 28 Jan 12

Boby--- I am sure others have already told you, but you must get some help. Not so much to prosecute your dad, but for your own peace of mind. Your anger, fully justified as it is, will destroy you in the end. So please, please please, do yourself a favour, and talk to somebody about YOUR feelings. Only then will you be able to move forward.

ashleycross says...
10:55pm Sun 29 Jan 12

Unfortunately by the time you have recovered enough to go to the police the CPS say a jury won't believe you as you've left it too long. And if you want to get other witnesses who aren't in your family they say they'd have to be in a separate trial, so your family name would come out. The best thing to do to catch pedophiles is to start listening to their own children instead of telling us that we won't be believed by a jury and if we bring in the neighbours children, our childhood friends, we'll lose our anonymity.

Hardy Lass says...
11:19am Mon 30 Jan 12

Can the residents of Dorset be guarenteed that paedophiles from any other part of Britain have not been hidden and relocated to any backwater of Dorset.

There were rumours that Gary Glitter of all people is in residence here, as are some of the very worst child murderers being hidden away locally incognito .

Can parents be reassured by the social services and the courts?

Local Businesses

Most popular