News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Are hundreds of Bournemouth parking fines set to be refunded?


HUNDREDS of motorists stung by parking fines after being caught on film by Bournemouth council’s camera car could receive refunds after a landmark legal ruling.

A tribunal has ruled that unless local authorities have put up signs warning drivers the ‘spy cameras’ are in operation, tickets are invalid.

A camera car scheme was launched in Bournemouth on June 17 to target drivers who park at bus stops and outside schools. Warning signs were not erected.

In the past seven weeks 370 drivers, including disabled Southbourne man Roger Ryder, were caught parking at bus stops.

Eleven motorists were captured on camera parking at school entrances. Each received a £70 fixed penalty notice through the post.

Retired businessman Mr Ryder, 65, didn’t realise his red Jaguar had been photographed on July 7. He said: “I popped into the Co-op store in Tuckton for a newspaper – there wasn’t anywhere else near the shop to park.

“I was shocked when the fine notice dropped through my door. I paid it within a couple of days so it cost me £35 instead of £70, which is the penalty if you don’t pay within 30 days.

“I’ll definitely be appealing, now I know what has happened elsewhere. There weren’t any signs saying the camera car was operating in the area and I think that is wrong. Motorists should be warned.”

The ruling came after businesswoman Rachel Johnson received three £70 parking fines in the same week after being snapped by a ‘spy camera’ in Merseyside.

Ms Johnson, 34, who runs an off-licence, challenged Wirral Borough Council and took her case to a Traffic Penalty Tribunal. All three fines were quashed.

The tribunal ruled that the tickets were invalid because of the lack of signage warning motorists they might be photographed.

The ruling could open the floodgates for thousands of other appeals from motorists across the UK.

Following the case Wirral council launched a review into the way it uses its ‘spy car’ to enforce parking regulations.

Bournemouth council confirmed yesterday that there are no signs warning motorists of the camera car but stressed that the vehicle was marked with “camera enforcement signage.”

Head of transport James Duncan said: “We believe that all the signage associated with the Traffic Regulations Orders in Bournemouth meets with the requirements but keep everything under constant review. The tribunal decision related to a different situation; we do not use the camera car for that purpose. In Bournemouth we do not currently use the vehicle in stationary mode, unlike the case in Wirral.”

He added that the council would not be issuing any refunds.

Comments(67)

cooperman says...
7:53am Thu 6 Aug 09

as usual bournemouth wriggles ,but to be honest if you park in places that are not designated parking then you deserve the fine if you are caught as they are kept clear for a purpose and lets face it we all know what is and what isnt the right place to park - if you choose to be a chancer then you know what can happen,its your gamble nothing more

miketheplumb says...
8:07am Thu 6 Aug 09

And Bournemouth Council responded "....the vehicle was marked with “camera enforcement signage.”
AND?
If there's nothing linking the camera enforcement vehicle to the crime being commited, how does "Joe Bloggs" link the fact they are breaking the law and are aware of that fact, with such a vehicle?
Oops!
Another case of Big Brother is watching you, yet doesn't tell you why (even though it may be patently obvious). But with speedcams pedestrian area camera, camera's on the seafront, the only time I feel I'm not watched is at home.
Are we expected to accept "...“camera enforcement signage.” as "We are ready to fine you for whatever you plan to do next..."

EdBmth says...
8:29am Thu 6 Aug 09

I might be able to help here. I have this product that will enable people to avoid getting tickets when parking and not have to worry about being caught by the camera car. Its called the Highway Code. It states quite clearly that it is an offence to park at amongst other places a Bus Stop. Therefore follow the Highway Code and you should be ok (Terms and conditions apply – product assumes motorist has basic level of intelligence and common sense)

With the exception of Mr Ryder who without knowing his disability it is not fair to comment, all these other motorists deserve what they got. They parked in such a way as to cause an inconvenience and possibly even a danger to other people. Why should they think that they can get away with doing something like that, because there were no signs warning them they might get a ticket.

rayc says...
8:33am Thu 6 Aug 09

In Broadstone yesterday there were 3 vehicles parked on double yellow lines, a BT van and two cars. The BT van was issued a ticket but not the two cars. The cars were showing blue Disabled badges and obviously the yellow lines, which we are told are there for safety and congestion reasons, don't apply to them. It is a farce, if the lines are neccessary then they should apply to all.

mark0peters says...
8:40am Thu 6 Aug 09

Bournemouth & Poole council need to REMOVE yellow lines from the areas where they have put them unnecessarily and allow people to park safley once again.

10 years ago you could quite hapily park outside a local shop and most people did not need to "park illegally".

Remove the yellow lines (where its safe) and allow people to park freely again....

unsubscribe says...
8:45am Thu 6 Aug 09

mark0peters wrote:
Bournemouth & Poole council need to REMOVE yellow lines from the areas where they have put them unnecessarily and allow people to park safley once again.

10 years ago you could quite hapily park outside a local shop and most people did not need to "park illegally".

Remove the yellow lines (where its safe) and allow people to park freely again....
If the town wasn't covered in yellow lines then the Council wouldn't be able to operate this sting.

Was Charlie says...
8:46am Thu 6 Aug 09

"The cars were showing blue Disabled badges and obviously the yellow lines, which we are told are there for safety and congestion reasons, don't apply to them. It is a farce, if the lines are neccessary then they should apply to all."

The rule is that disabled drivers can park on double yellow lines (but not where there are 'no loading' markes on the pavement for up to three hours PROVIDED there are no other free parking areas close by and PROVIDED they are not breaking any other traffic rules. The reason being that able-bodied motorists can walk from a distance away from where they want to be, but disabled people cannot.

Are you aying that the disabled shouldn't be able to get to places that you can just because they are unable to walk far?

blogit2 says...
8:46am Thu 6 Aug 09

EdBmth wrote:
I might be able to help here. I have this product that will enable people to avoid getting tickets when parking and not have to worry about being caught by the camera car. Its called the Highway Code. It states quite clearly that it is an offence to park at amongst other places a Bus Stop. Therefore follow the Highway Code and you should be ok (Terms and conditions apply – product assumes motorist has basic level of intelligence and common sense) With the exception of Mr Ryder who without knowing his disability it is not fair to comment, all these other motorists deserve what they got. They parked in such a way as to cause an inconvenience and possibly even a danger to other people. Why should they think that they can get away with doing something like that, because there were no signs warning them they might get a ticket.
I totaly agree with you

a.g.o.g. says...
8:48am Thu 6 Aug 09

Yes markO, those yellow tendrils are more bent on cash collection rather than parking correction.

rook says...
8:56am Thu 6 Aug 09

blogit2 wrote:
EdBmth wrote:
I might be able to help here. I have this product that will enable people to avoid getting tickets when parking and not have to worry about being caught by the camera car. Its called the Highway Code. It states quite clearly that it is an offence to park at amongst other places a Bus Stop. Therefore follow the Highway Code and you should be ok (Terms and conditions apply – product assumes motorist has basic level of intelligence and common sense) With the exception of Mr Ryder who without knowing his disability it is not fair to comment, all these other motorists deserve what they got. They parked in such a way as to cause an inconvenience and possibly even a danger to other people. Why should they think that they can get away with doing something like that, because there were no signs warning them they might get a ticket.
I totaly agree with you
... and I'll third that!

rayc says...
8:57am Thu 6 Aug 09

Was Charlie wrote:
"The cars were showing blue Disabled badges and obviously the yellow lines, which we are told are there for safety and congestion reasons, don't apply to them. It is a farce, if the lines are neccessary then they should apply to all." The rule is that disabled drivers can park on double yellow lines (but not where there are 'no loading' markes on the pavement for up to three hours PROVIDED there are no other free parking areas close by and PROVIDED they are not breaking any other traffic rules. The reason being that able-bodied motorists can walk from a distance away from where they want to be, but disabled people cannot. Are you aying that the disabled shouldn't be able to get to places that you can just because they are unable to walk far?
I never said that. I asked, reasonably I thought, what is so different about disabled drivers cars that they do not cause the obstruction that abled bodied drivers cars do?
Provide disabled drivers parking bays by all means but don't allow them to park in a place where other drivers would be prosecuted.
After all the double yellow lines have only been located at places that really need them - they have havn't they.
If you want able bodied drivers to have sympathy and understanding for disabled drivers the system has to be seen to be fair and not open to abuse.

ukdragon says...
9:03am Thu 6 Aug 09

rook wrote:
blogit2 wrote:
EdBmth wrote:
I might be able to help here. I have this product that will enable people to avoid getting tickets when parking and not have to worry about being caught by the camera car. Its called the Highway Code. It states quite clearly that it is an offence to park at amongst other places a Bus Stop. Therefore follow the Highway Code and you should be ok (Terms and conditions apply – product assumes motorist has basic level of intelligence and common sense) With the exception of Mr Ryder who without knowing his disability it is not fair to comment, all these other motorists deserve what they got. They parked in such a way as to cause an inconvenience and possibly even a danger to other people. Why should they think that they can get away with doing something like that, because there were no signs warning them they might get a ticket.
I totaly agree with you
... and I'll third that!
I also agree!

BIGTONE says...
9:20am Thu 6 Aug 09

The following statement is a legal requirement in the UK.............."Sig
ns should be placed to warn that the public are entering an area covered by CCTV."

GB916 says...
9:21am Thu 6 Aug 09

The tribunal ruled that the tickets were invalid because of the lack of signage warning motorists they might be photographed.

Sorry but why do you need to warn people of a parking enforcement camera,did these idiots that got the tickets not see the double yellow lines,maybe they need to read the highway code again,sorry they all deserve the tickets they were given,park legally and you have nothing to worry about,so pay your tickets and stop moaning because your too lazy to walk a short distance!

Lol security word book-sale,amybe some of these idiots that parked illehally need to go to a book sale to aquire a copy of the highway code

addenuf says...
9:41am Thu 6 Aug 09

Can anyone tell me where it says in the Highway Code that it is ok to park half-way on the pavement? On Kinson Road there are always loads of cars parked in this way and it isn't as though it is a narrow road. Why don't the traffic police ever slap tickets on them?

Perry_Winkle says...
9:44am Thu 6 Aug 09

"There weren’t any signs saying the camera car was operating in the area and I think that is wrong. Motorists should be warned."

How many warnings do you need that breaking the law will lead to penalties? You know perfectly well you broke the law parking where you did, so what's your problem with paying the fine?

wayneofafcb says...
10:00am Thu 6 Aug 09

We know all about pavements blocked by cars round here on Canford Heath. Had several months this year whern all our close was blocked by cars parking on pavements. Police would not or could not do a thing.
As for those caught parking on bus stops, outside school entrances, that's their fault.
It's in the Highway Code not to do so. Most schools have signs saying don't block entrances.
Most schools are always asking parents not to block entrances to schools and houses, the lazy malority ignore these requests.Turn up early and park properly, or park 5 mins away and WALK, you know, those things your legs use to do once upon a time.
It all boils down to a lazy nation, who park where they want, care not a hoot if they block people's drives etc.
Minor stuff compared to the dangerous idiots the police have to catch, yes, but time traffic wardens went after these people, not someone who is two minutes late back to the car park

Derf says...
10:07am Thu 6 Aug 09

There was no sign in the post-office warning me i could be prosecuted if i demanded money from the staff whilst wearing a pair of tights over my head.
I shall be appealing my 7 year sentence post-haste!

ferret38 says...
10:08am Thu 6 Aug 09

That camera car is a pain the jobsworths driving it must be think skinned and hated by most.
Be nice to see clarkson blow up on bbc topgear with a RPG . :)

matthewsad says...
10:15am Thu 6 Aug 09

With the state of Bournemouth Borough Council's finances due to the mis-management of ; Macloughlin, Beesley & Judith Martin, does this mean that Bournemouth Borough Council is in danger of being capped when the Budget is next set?? If this is the case it won't be the useless Directors who will lose their jobs but workers on modest salaries!!!!!

Lord Spring says...
10:15am Thu 6 Aug 09

mark0peters wrote:
Bournemouth & Poole council need to REMOVE yellow lines from the areas where they have put them unnecessarily and allow people to park safley once again. 10 years ago you could quite hapily park outside a local shop and most people did not need to "park illegally". Remove the yellow lines (where its safe) and allow people to park freely again....
A couple of good examples which need reviewing are Avon Road (Cul de Sac apart from hammer head turning) and the link road twixt Capstone Road and Shelbourne Road by the Wessex Way very little traffic use these but still traffic restrictions apply for historical reasons. Agreed these are not near shops but a review is needed by jobsworths

West Howe Sean says...
10:23am Thu 6 Aug 09

Bournemouth Council Parking Enforcement team are acting like a bunch of thugs extorting money with menaces - What sort of people do these jobs? - they act like criminals but think they are in the right - these people are very dangerous.

ferret38 says...
10:28am Thu 6 Aug 09

West Howe Sean wrote:
Bournemouth Council Parking Enforcement team are acting like a bunch of thugs extorting money with menaces - What sort of people do these jobs? - they act like criminals but think they are in the right - these people are very dangerous.
RPG the car with them in it .. sorted :)

West Howe Sean says...
10:29am Thu 6 Aug 09

mark0peters wrote:
Bournemouth & Poole council need to REMOVE yellow lines from the areas where they have put them unnecessarily and allow people to park safley once again.

10 years ago you could quite hapily park outside a local shop and most people did not need to "park illegally".

Remove the yellow lines (where its safe) and allow people to park freely again....
This is such a sensible idea - most of the parking restrictions are not needed - there needs to be a re-evaluation.

But of course it won't happen with the half wits we have running and working for Bournemouth Council - They seem incapable of making decisions that might actually benefit residents.

Far better to snoop and issue fines isn't it? Idiots.

585 says...
10:51am Thu 6 Aug 09

It is always easier to have double yellows painted than it is to remove them, just think of all the paperwork that the poor jobsworths have to do to justify the removal.

Perry_Winkle says...
11:04am Thu 6 Aug 09

So right, 585. When was the last time restrictions were removed anywhere? Whatever the problem, the answer always seems to be more restrictions or financial penalties. A bit of fresh thinking would go a long way, but I'm not holding my breath.

ekimnoslen says...
11:05am Thu 6 Aug 09

Do we have signs on our houses saying "if you burgle this property you will be prosecuted"? Of course not. Why therefore signs to warn of parking or speed cameras. This ruling should be challenged

cardomon says...
11:47am Thu 6 Aug 09

What a disgrace.
If you park at a bus stop it should be dangerous parking with a 3 point penalty. As for Mr Ryders claim “I’ll definitely be appealing, now I know what has happened elsewhere. There weren’t any signs saying the camera car was operating in the area and I think that is wrong. Motorists should be warned.”
Why should you be warned ? Its a bus stop if you dont know not to park there you shouldn't have a licence.

dunketh says...
12:01pm Thu 6 Aug 09

Parking in a bus stop is a pain in the bottom.
Parking on yellow lines outside a school is plain deadly.
I bet they'd soon change their minds if their kids were mown down because drivers couldn't see them crossing.
£70 fine - should have had the car crushed and charged them for the job!

BrianBrain says...
12:11pm Thu 6 Aug 09

Many fine comments on hear.

I have to toally agree that these tickets should be enforced.

We all know where are not supposed to park if you take that chance to "just pop in to get a paper" then you take the chance that you might just get caught and might just have to pay the fine.

There does however need to a review on disabled parking and the suggestion that some double yellow lines could be remarked to show temporary 20 minutes bays for disabled people would be a fine change in policy.

However I have seen many crazy bits of parking by our blue badge holding friends and it is a shame that a few of these seem to feel that the blue badge gives them the right to park wherever they feel like anytime they like.

Temporary bays would change this and provide both shop owners and blue bage holders with a good solution.

For the rest of us its a walk but thats not a bad thing.

rayc says...
12:41pm Thu 6 Aug 09

dunketh wrote:
Parking in a bus stop is a pain in the bottom. Parking on yellow lines outside a school is plain deadly. I bet they'd soon change their minds if their kids were mown down because drivers couldn't see them crossing. £70 fine - should have had the car crushed and charged them for the job!
How about those double yellow lines outside schools only being operative during school hours? If a restriction is there for a purpose then it needs to be sensibly applied if it is not to fall into disrepute.
The Camera Partnership regularly have atrap outside Corfe Hills School at the weekends and summer evenings - never when pupils are going to and from school.

Bournemouthstorm says...
12:54pm Thu 6 Aug 09

miketheplumb wrote:
And Bournemouth Council responded "....the vehicle was marked with “camera enforcement signage.” AND? If there's nothing linking the camera enforcement vehicle to the crime being commited, how does "Joe Bloggs" link the fact they are breaking the law and are aware of that fact, with such a vehicle? Oops! Another case of Big Brother is watching you, yet doesn't tell you why (even though it may be patently obvious). But with speedcams pedestrian area camera, camera's on the seafront, the only time I feel I'm not watched is at home. Are we expected to accept "...“camera enforcement signage.” as "We are ready to fine you for whatever you plan to do next..."
Er.. Joe public will know by checking the are signs at the side of the road saying when you can and cannot park. The camera car is just recording people that are already breaking the law.

djd says...
12:54pm Thu 6 Aug 09

The problem is that drivers have been allowed to flout the parking laws for so long that they see it as their right to park where they want and when they want.

Residents have been asking for enforcement and now those who are caught are complaining.

If you take by parking where you shouldn't, you must also take the chance of getting caught.

Bournemouthstorm says...
12:56pm Thu 6 Aug 09

addenuf wrote:
Can anyone tell me where it says in the Highway Code that it is ok to park half-way on the pavement? On Kinson Road there are always loads of cars parked in this way and it isn't as though it is a narrow road. Why don't the traffic police ever slap tickets on them?
It is illegal to park with one or more wheels on the pavement unless there are markings/signs showing that it is permitted.

Bournemouthstorm says...
1:06pm Thu 6 Aug 09

You think is strict here. You should see what the traffic wardens are like in Brighton or London. Drivers here who park illegally here get away with it most of the time.

pipistrollers says...
1:36pm Thu 6 Aug 09

Have to agree with you Bournemouthstorm. We lived in London and the parking wardens were crazy. They used to prowl in packs. They would watch someone park and check their watch. Sometimes when it was almost time to give out a ticket, the warden would stand there waiting to pounce and give a ticket.

Here we have noticed parking is much more easy-osy. People park where they want but now when the rules are being used, they don't like it.

Where disabled people are concerned, we have seen many cars parked in disabled parking bays so where are disabled people to park?

We also know of a communal parking area for 3 blocks of flats where one resident has decided who can and cannot park in that communal area. There are 10 parking spaces in the communal area but one person has taken it upon themselves to decide which residents can park there and who can not.

If the Council are getting stroppy about peoples' parking, why don't they do something about these issues?

GB916 says...
1:55pm Thu 6 Aug 09

I think the idea of parking outside schools at weekends would work,so long as emergency access to the school was still not blocked,but everywhere else where you are not allowed to park you take the chance,i have only been driving for 23 years and i have not had a parking ticket,i have had a speeding ticket,and i excepted my fine and points,i broke the law so i took my punishment and did not go moaning oh its not fair its not right,and the the people who have been caught by the camera car you got what you deserve,break the law take your punishment and stop moaning about it.

TD61 says...
1:57pm Thu 6 Aug 09

I sincerely hope that this so called "disabled" driver does NOT get his fine quashed.

EVERYONE who is issued with a Blue Badge - ie: Disabled drivers - are also given a user handbook in which it states "you may NOT use your blue badge to park in bust stops. Doing so may result in you being issued with a parking fine or having your car towed away"

So, since he should have known it was illegal to park there in the first place - regardless of whether there were any signs erected or not - how can he suggest otherwise?

Also, the Highway Code does also state it is not permissable to park in bus stops ........

Personally, I feel he should pay his fine and also have his blue badge taken away for flouting the rules of using it, but knowing this namby-pamby society we live in, neither will happen.


West Howe Sean says...
2:33pm Thu 6 Aug 09

TD61 wrote:
I sincerely hope that this so called "disabled" driver does NOT get his fine quashed.

EVERYONE who is issued with a Blue Badge - ie: Disabled drivers - are also given a user handbook in which it states "you may NOT use your blue badge to park in bust stops. Doing so may result in you being issued with a parking fine or having your car towed away"

So, since he should have known it was illegal to park there in the first place - regardless of whether there were any signs erected or not - how can he suggest otherwise?

Also, the Highway Code does also state it is not permissable to park in bus stops ........

Personally, I feel he should pay his fine and also have his blue badge taken away for flouting the rules of using it, but knowing this namby-pamby society we live in, neither will happen.

TD61 - You should work for the council - they employ lots of people like you

dyrck says...
2:58pm Thu 6 Aug 09

Actually Mr Rider, there's a car park at the back of the Co op in Tuckton. Naughty boy, shouldn't park in bus stops.

Jonkers says...
3:19pm Thu 6 Aug 09

BrianBrain wrote:
Many fine comments on hear. I have to toally agree that these tickets should be enforced. We all know where are not supposed to park if you take that chance to "just pop in to get a paper" then you take the chance that you might just get caught and might just have to pay the fine. There does however need to a review on disabled parking and the suggestion that some double yellow lines could be remarked to show temporary 20 minutes bays for disabled people would be a fine change in policy. However I have seen many crazy bits of parking by our blue badge holding friends and it is a shame that a few of these seem to feel that the blue badge gives them the right to park wherever they feel like anytime they like. Temporary bays would change this and provide both shop owners and blue bage holders with a good solution. For the rest of us its a walk but thats not a bad thing.
Agreed. Westbourne seems particularly bad. At least half of the designated spaces are for disabled only and yet they park where they want to irrespective of the fact that they are in front of the traffic lights and so far away from the kerb they have quite a walk even before they get to the pavement.

As for poor old Roger, I quite agree there are not enough disabled spaces or yellow lines around for you to park on so you park where you want mate and of course you should get your money back - with compensation too.

Poor chap had to take a rest on his car just to take a photo.

Some of you people are so heartless and synical....



thesyrup1 says...
3:20pm Thu 6 Aug 09

West Howe Sean wrote:
TD61 wrote: I sincerely hope that this so called "disabled" driver does NOT get his fine quashed. EVERYONE who is issued with a Blue Badge - ie: Disabled drivers - are also given a user handbook in which it states "you may NOT use your blue badge to park in bust stops. Doing so may result in you being issued with a parking fine or having your car towed away" So, since he should have known it was illegal to park there in the first place - regardless of whether there were any signs erected or not - how can he suggest otherwise? Also, the Highway Code does also state it is not permissable to park in bus stops ........ Personally, I feel he should pay his fine and also have his blue badge taken away for flouting the rules of using it, but knowing this namby-pamby society we live in, neither will happen.
TD61 - You should work for the council - they employ lots of people like you
I disagree Sean, TD61 has a very valid point. I know the Blue Badge scheme is a bit of a nightmare in different parts of the country,( where you can park, whether its free to park etc,) but parking in bus stops is against the rules in all parts of the country. This driver was just unlucky, as I see other cars/vans using that bus stop all the time. I also agree with the posts regards to yellowlines. In the Broadway area of Southbourne they are all over the place. If I didnt know better, I would say its to force the tourists into the council car parks, where of course they have to pay.

Jonkers says...
3:22pm Thu 6 Aug 09

*cynical

Mike Pickering says...
3:27pm Thu 6 Aug 09

The truth is that the maintenance of commerce in the area demands that allowances are made for an amount of parking in an around shops - without people being able to pull up and 'pop in' to local places, they would die, and we would all be up in arms about 'the death of the corner shop'..
99 times out of a 100, the very short term parking offences cause no real safety or access problems - they might garner a quick 'tut' from someone who has to go round, or wait a few seconds for traffic to pass, but that's life: we have to allow for the fact that there are other people in the world, and sometimes move around or wait for them.
If every currently designated no-parking-no-waitin
g-no-nothing area were somehow magically and automatically enforced, most of the little shops would just dry up and disappear.
There does need to be clearly marked, convenient ample parking provision made near shops - they provide a public service. Why do 5 people on a bus (a privately owned business operation) every 20 minutes have any more right to use the section of highway outside a parade of shops, than the customers of those shops ?
People always complain when there's someone 'in their way'; well guess what - it's not YOUR way, it's all of our way, and as you should have been taught when you were a kid, you sometimes have to go round people or wait.
If you were in that much of a hurry to get someone before I got there, maybe you should have left earlier - now just wait there for 2 minutes while I pop in to get my paper.

GB916 says...
3:35pm Thu 6 Aug 09

99 times out of a 100, the very short term parking offences cause no real safety or access problems - they might garner a quick 'tut' from someone who has to go round, or wait a few seconds for traffic to pass


The only problem with what you say here is in Tuckton the bus stop has cars stopped on it most of the day so the obstruction is constant,i have seen disabled people struggle to get on the bus because it has to stop in the road to pick up passengers,this then causes traffic to queue,if it was just the odd car now and again i guess it would not be a major issue but im afraid in most cases the illegal parking continues throughout the day

psatlast says...
4:07pm Thu 6 Aug 09

It's my understanding that disabled drivers are subject to the rules concerning obstruction just like the rest of us.If you decide to use a bus-stop as a parking bay then you can expect to get a ticket.You broke the law,stop moaning and pay up!! If your vehicle is damaged while being illegally parked,I think you may be on a sticky wicket insurance-wise. As for cars parked partly on the pave ment,perhaps a few mothers with pushchairs could "accidentally" scratch them!

nessie says...
4:20pm Thu 6 Aug 09

the highway code is set for a reason but everyday it is flaunted by 1 and all as for disabled drivers when they 1st recieve their blue badge they are sent guide lines to which they must adhere to and as for the bus stop at tuckton it is constantly full with cars who think it is ok for ust 1 minute to pop in for a paper and so i as a bus driver have to block the road to unsafely drop of an elderly passenger and then put up with abuse from other road users because i was inconsiderate not to get into a blocked bus stop so bring back the camera car if you dont break the rules you got nothing to cry about and as for paying within so many days tough make the fine a straight £100 no ifs or buts

PokesdownMark says...
5:06pm Thu 6 Aug 09

GB916 wrote:
99 times out of a 100, the very short term parking offences cause no real safety or access problems - they might garner a quick 'tut' from someone who has to go round, or wait a few seconds for traffic to pass


The only problem with what you say here is in Tuckton the bus stop has cars stopped on it most of the day so the obstruction is constant,i have seen disabled people struggle to get on the bus because it has to stop in the road to pick up passengers,this then causes traffic to queue,if it was just the odd car now and again i guess it would not be a major issue but im afraid in most cases the illegal parking continues throughout the day
Here here. I don't like the idea of a camera car at all. But the cars parked in the bus stop at tuckton are a right pain. I was stuck behind a bus because of this only last week. Its pretty selfish. But easy to fix if the council really cared.
But don't send a scamera car around. Send a person!

This sign business is a worry. What with this and the bloke under the cliff the other day. If we are not careful we are going to end up living in a world with signs literally everywhere. Masses of them. It will be horrible and the side effects (no-one will take responsibility for anything) will be very bad for us too.


fedupwithjobsworths says...
5:24pm Thu 6 Aug 09

This is what you get when the Country is run by Jobsworths - Council Jobsworths stopped from enforcing the law by other Jobsworths. Time to cull these useless individuals.

Perry_Winkle says...
5:37pm Thu 6 Aug 09

Careful - you'll probably find that Jobsworths are covered by the Race Relations Act, and this comment stream will get pulled!

West Howe Sean says...
5:40pm Thu 6 Aug 09

Mind you it's usually a bus that's parked up causing tail backs - At the bottom of Moore Avenue you often have two busses on either side of the road causing chaos - That is far more dangerous than a car waiting at a bus stop.

what will they do about the busses. FA

Rossi 27 says...
6:06pm Thu 6 Aug 09

Once again the law breakers in our society complain when they get caught out , bleat about this and getting caught speeding, the rules are there to stop anarchy. WHY do we need to be told about these cameras when there are existing signs telling us not to park on double yellow lines and at Bus stops. Do we require signs to tell us that there are traffic wardens around NO which makes this ruling a total farce, accept your punishment and get on with life.

glennzilla says...
6:26pm Thu 6 Aug 09

Why run the risk of a parking fine to buy a newspaper when most newsagents provide a delivery service?!

Trifecta says...
6:37pm Thu 6 Aug 09

Mike Pickering wrote:
The truth is that the maintenance of commerce in the area demands that allowances are made for an amount of parking in an around shops - without people being able to pull up and 'pop in' to local places, they would die, and we would all be up in arms about 'the death of the corner shop'.. 99 times out of a 100, the very short term parking offences cause no real safety or access problems - they might garner a quick 'tut' from someone who has to go round, or wait a few seconds for traffic to pass, but that's life: we have to allow for the fact that there are other people in the world, and sometimes move around or wait for them. If every currently designated no-parking-no-waitin g-no-nothing area were somehow magically and automatically enforced, most of the little shops would just dry up and disappear. There does need to be clearly marked, convenient ample parking provision made near shops - they provide a public service. Why do 5 people on a bus (a privately owned business operation) every 20 minutes have any more right to use the section of highway outside a parade of shops, than the customers of those shops ? People always complain when there's someone 'in their way'; well guess what - it's not YOUR way, it's all of our way, and as you should have been taught when you were a kid, you sometimes have to go round people or wait. If you were in that much of a hurry to get someone before I got there, maybe you should have left earlier - now just wait there for 2 minutes while I pop in to get my paper.
Sorry about the massive quote Mike but there is no way to edit, your first paragraph is wrong, at least in this case. The shop involved is one of the revolting Co-Op convenience stores that seem to exist purely for the local teenagers to stock up on cheap cigarettes and 7.5% cider.

Across the road is a "local" newsagent which this behemoth is slowly strangling.

But that would mean the likes of Mr.Ryder actually having to make an effort and parking legally on the other side of the road.

Zzzz says...
6:46pm Thu 6 Aug 09

What a stupid ruling. These offenders knew they were doing wrong when they parked illegally.

Next they'll be ruling that a traffic warden can't give them a ticket unless he or she is carrying massive sign saying they're on patrol in the area.

Mike Pickering says...
9:12pm Thu 6 Aug 09

Trifecta, thanks for the injection of facts into the debate. Living nowhere near Tuckton, nor being disabled, nor a driver, I nevertheless waded into the argument half-cocked with no real thought about the claims I was making.
I would support your notion that the CoOp is 'revolting', and encourage your assertions of their serving of lazy errant teenagers with fags and booze, probably illegally, and with nothing other than corporate profit as a motivation.
I would have thought that disabled drivers of Jaguar cars would have had more community spirit than is laughingly shown in the photo above.

cooperman says...
5:51am Fri 7 Aug 09

the sign already exists .... it says 'bus stop' .... the message is ,dont park there - argument over !!

BIGTONE says...
6:18am Fri 7 Aug 09

A lot of people are missing the point in this thread.Yes the said offences are illegal however the point is, in how the council have secured the said convictions that is in doubt.Clearly the boss who enforces this did not do his/her homework properly.Its that simple.Commonly known as a loophole.The more rules you have the more chance there is of a loophole.

collarge says...
11:09am Fri 7 Aug 09

I am fed up of seeing these posts and seeing Mr Boring cooperman, make his comments. He must work for the council, no normal person could be that dull.

Rossi 27 says...
11:54am Fri 7 Aug 09

collarge wrote:
I am fed up of seeing these posts and seeing Mr Boring cooperman, make his comments. He must work for the council, no normal person could be that dull.
If being honest and sensible is dull then I hope that there are many more "dull" people around than mindless M####s like you.Its not compulsary to read the posts

yelhsawm says...
12:41pm Fri 7 Aug 09

Bottom line - these people were in the wrong!!! Take some responsibility for your actions rather than taking advantage of our nanny state to get out of it.

Should murderers also be released from prison simply because when they committed the act there wasn't a sign there that said "Murder Prohibited"!

ShaneCulwick says...
1:58pm Fri 7 Aug 09

I have a three year old will be four in september obviously she is on holiday from school but when i had to pick her up the amount of cars that were illegaly parked on School lines and Bus Stops was unbelievable. I'm supprised that there has not been an accident yet but believe me it is inevitable. People have become too lazy and want to park right outside the door of where they want to go its about time people park in the appropriate spaces then they would not get caught. So they got caught by a hidden camera they still did the crime. If a traffic warden was walking past they'd get a fine. So all those that got caught out for parking in prohibited areas get over it becuase you will be the ones that cause an accident soon or the first to moan if someone else is the cause of an accident becuase the were parked illegaly

cooperman says...
2:04pm Fri 7 Aug 09

Rossi 27 wrote:
collarge wrote:
I am fed up of seeing these posts and seeing Mr Boring cooperman, make his comments. He must work for the council, no normal person could be that dull.
If being honest and sensible is dull then I hope that there are many more "dull" people around than mindless M####s like you.Its not compulsary to read the posts
thanks,you are quite right - it seems that unless you have the same oppinion as collarge that you cant be right.well at least i have got an oppinion

tuckton693 says...
8:59pm Fri 7 Aug 09

The Tuckton C0-OP has its own car park at the rear! So why park in the bus stop as so many do? It actually becomes such a danger for honest people parking at the rear who try to pull out as you cannot see traffic coming from the left.
Im glad the ticket was issued in this case as ive had a very close call with my baby in the rear due to irresponsible parking at this bus stop.
Blue Badges have rules as well.
I hope an example is made of you if you appeal!

tuckton693 says...
9:03pm Fri 7 Aug 09

tuckton693 wrote:
The Tuckton C0-OP has its own car park at the rear! So why park in the bus stop as so many do? It actually becomes such a danger for honest people parking at the rear who try to pull out as you cannot see traffic coming from the left. Im glad the ticket was issued in this case as ive had a very close call with my baby in the rear due to irresponsible parking at this bus stop. Blue Badges have rules as well. I hope an example is made of you if you appeal!
Excuse me i in fact meant to say "traffic from the Right"

Mike Pickering says...
10:19pm Fri 7 Aug 09

Excuse me i in fact meant to say "traffic from the Right"

You should be looking BOTH ways when you leave the carpark.
To encourage people to only look one way on a website like this is tantamount to pushing them out in the road.

Think before you post.

poolebabe says...
9:32am Sun 9 Aug 09

Not all double yellow lines are put up for safety reasons. If you look round the area you will see yellow lines near paying car parks and close to schools. Some yellow lines are put down in response to residents. They are not always there to prevent accidents. That's why blue badge holders are allowed to park on some of them, but they do have to stick to restrictions like everyone else in that they are not allowed to cause obstruction, or park where there are chevrons on the pavement. I can't actually believe the attitude of some against blue badge holders. Often the blue badge holders can't park where they need to because of selfish, lazy able bodied drivers, and that's why they have to park on yellow lines.

As for this story, I don't agree with getting of on a technicality. People know where they can and can't park, and to rely on stupid pedantic rules from the EU to have fines quashed is rediculous. Most people are quick enough to complain about the nanny state stupid EU rules that get prisoners off, give rights to paedophiles, and soffocate society, but see fit to take advantage of them when it suits. No wonder our council taxes keep rising. No wonder the councils have to employ advisers, setting up committies and spending far too much money on putting up signs and road markings spelling out what should be common sense and part of the high way code anyway, just to stop people taking advantage of the system. This story is typical of the hypocricy in our society.



OUTRAGED: Roger Ryder who is calling for a refund after a CCTV camera car ticketed him for parking in a bus stop OUTRAGED: Roger Ryder who is calling for a refund after a CCTV camera car ticketed him for parking in a bus stop

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses