Poole RSS Feed


Poole

Officials warn Poole harbour swimmer about safety


AN OVER-enthusiastic swimmer is proving a headache for Portland coastguards.

The middle-aged man regularly swims across the entrance to Poole Harbour, apparently with scant regard for the dozens of boats and other sea vehicles ploughing through the channel each day.

Coastguards have been trying to warn the man about the dangers of his choice of swimming location, but so far to no avail.

On Wednesday morning, the man greeted officials aboard the harbour safety boat with a volley of abuse after they were sent out to reason with him.

Though Portland coastguard called for police back up, the man swam ashore and rode away from the scene on his bike before they could arrive.

While the man is entitled to swim anywhere around the coastline, coastguards are growing increasingly frustrated with his seemingly blasé attitude to sea safety.

A spokesman for Portland coastguards said: “He happily swims across minding his own business and has been doing it for quite some time.

“There is obviously risk involved with the amount of traffic coming in and out of the harbour at any time.

“As short as the entrance is, there is also the danger of waves, strong tides and rips.”

The spokesman said the man had begun to become quite abusive to officials in recent times.

He added: “If the gentleman chooses to swim across the harbour entrance we can’t do anything about it.

“He is quite at liberty to do so but there are far better places to swim.

“We don’t want to spoil anyone’s fun, but would just urge people to bear in mind their own safety and that of others.”


Your Say YourEcho

godzillareturns, poole says...
7:34am Fri 7 Aug 09

This man is a danger to others by the sound of it, if the coastguards have gone to the trouble to rescue him why should they put up with abuse. I would say let him drown but he will probably cause an accident and some other poor person will be hurt.

ferret38, bournemouth says...
7:35am Fri 7 Aug 09

good on the fella hope he continues and dont let busy body do gooders tell him what to do .

weevie, Bournemouth says...
8:23am Fri 7 Aug 09

You know, it is just this sort of mis-placed insistence on personal 'choice' that has brought us all to this place where 'do gooders' are forced to interfere. The man's a bloody idiot.

ry8000, Bournemouth says...
8:28am Fri 7 Aug 09

The harbour isn't as busy as they make out, and the entrance is tiny. I doubt he's in any danger, and it just sounds more like a tit-for-tat situation now.

cantique, bournemouth says...
9:12am Fri 7 Aug 09

No doubt he is hoping someone in a boat will collide with him so that he can claim extortionate damages!

MJD, HAMWORTHY says...
9:13am Fri 7 Aug 09

This is nothing new back in the 1950s we used to swim from sandbanks to lovell's cafe and back all to save paying Harvey ferry fare so we could have a ice lolly. Mind you i would not want to do it today due to vastly increased number of vessels useing the entrance.

godzillareturns, poole says...
9:59am Fri 7 Aug 09

MJD wrote:
This is nothing new back in the 1950s we used to swim from sandbanks to lovell's cafe and back all to save paying Harvey ferry fare so we could have a ice lolly. Mind you i would not want to do it today due to vastly increased number of vessels useing the entrance.
Exactly in the 50's when we were young it was quieter, I dont begrudge this man his man his swim but if he causes an accident he will never forgive hiself.

thesyrup1, Bournemouth says...
10:42am Fri 7 Aug 09

godzillareturns wrote:
This man is a danger to others by the sound of it, if the coastguards have gone to the trouble to rescue him why should they put up with abuse. I would say let him drown but he will probably cause an accident and some other poor person will be hurt.
The Coastguard didn't "rescue" him, then tried to explain to him about the dangers of swimming acroos this gad. That's their job. They shouldn't have to take a mouthful of abuse for doing it. They are not "do gooders" sticking their nose in, they are dedicated men and women who have the safety of the public at heart. If you read the report propery, they state that the man is entitled to swim where he likes, they are just concerned about his safety.

Julie G, Christchurch says...
11:00am Fri 7 Aug 09

Let him get on with it. If he is involved in an accident you cant say he wasnt warned. I personally think it is selfish of him to act this way - his family would be devestated if anything happened to him.

GB916, christchurch says...
11:12am Fri 7 Aug 09

Julie G wrote:
Let him get on with it. If he is involved in an accident you cant say he wasnt warned. I personally think it is selfish of him to act this way - his family would be devestated if anything happened to him.
I totally agree,its up to him where he swims,but if he gets badly injured after being hit by a boat i would expect him not to claim any compensation,he has been warned by the coastguard about the dangers,so it willbe his fault if he gets injured.All respect to the coastguards they are doing a great job,and how dare some people call them jobsworth,im dam sure you would not think that if you needed rescuing from the water.

All i would like to add is this,i no longer find it surprising when young people disobey safety advice or break the law,the read stories like this about older people who should no better ignoring advice etc so why should they,the phrase lead by example comes to mind.

godzillareturns, poole says...
12:44pm Fri 7 Aug 09

thesyrup1 wrote:
godzillareturns wrote: This man is a danger to others by the sound of it, if the coastguards have gone to the trouble to rescue him why should they put up with abuse. I would say let him drown but he will probably cause an accident and some other poor person will be hurt.
The Coastguard didn't "rescue" him, then tried to explain to him about the dangers of swimming acroos this gad. That's their job. They shouldn't have to take a mouthful of abuse for doing it. They are not "do gooders" sticking their nose in, they are dedicated men and women who have the safety of the public at heart. If you read the report propery, they state that the man is entitled to swim where he likes, they are just concerned about his safety.
pardon me for reading without glasses either way the coastguard should as you say not have to put up with and yes it is their job to rescue idiots who do not heed their warnings, as you so rightly pointed out they are a dedicated service and (i promise i will read all the report correctly next time)

Chris..., says...
3:22pm Fri 7 Aug 09

I thought there would be some sort of law against the misuse of a registered and charted shipping lane. Perhaps he will get sucked in by the Normandie Vitesse on Monday morning, or the Balfleur tomorrow.

Apt security word for him: free-boat

Lord Spring, says...
3:52pm Fri 7 Aug 09

Let his bike tyres down !!

djd, bournemouth says...
4:33pm Fri 7 Aug 09

He's only looking for a free ride to France.

Let him get on with it. I just hope he doesn't expect those who he so readily abuses to come to his rescue.

samsmith, Dorset says...
5:10pm Fri 7 Aug 09

I thought it was the undercurrents at the mouth of Poole Harbour that are the main dangers, not so much the boats....

hismac, Poole says...
5:40pm Fri 7 Aug 09

This man has been doing this for ages and will eventually come to a sticky end. I will feel sorry for the boat driver who inadvertently hits himand not for the swimmer - a complete idiot.

KLH, bournemouth says...
5:58pm Fri 7 Aug 09

Getting up close and personal with the Condor ferry while I'm having a swim isn't my cup of tea - would imagine the sight of that looming above you would kind of give you the message....

Let him carry on, and if he drowns, or gets injured, tough, but if he causes an accident which hurts or kills others, then sue his trunks off!!

grimreaper, Ensbury Park says...
6:00pm Fri 7 Aug 09

Can someone please explain the difference between Jay Swimming and Jay Walking ?
1 guy swimming the Haven makes NEWS ?

20,000 foreign students wandering and cycling the roads of Bournemouth and Poole
Don't count ??

paperreader, poole says...
8:22pm Fri 7 Aug 09

Just a small comment: There's a 10knot speed limit at thia area of the harbour, and there are clear regulations for what and where water craft go when at sea. so he is in ni fret from any water craft except those that may break these rules and regs. therefore the only danger to the swimmer is as the article says the tides, rips and waves. assuming the swimmer times his swim at such a time that these are least powerful, or at least within his abilities. Then I really cant see what the fuss is about.

rook, wimborne says...
9:24am Sat 8 Aug 09

I'm sure it's fun to swim across there, but bearing in mind all the warnings and the problems which will be caused when something happens, it does seem very selfish.

It will be the same 'do-gooder' coastguards and boat-owners who have to rescue him when he's hit.

It is very difficult to spot a person if the water is the slightest bit choppy, particularly in something like a RIB which is very low in the water. The fish will be in for a treat if the SBS boats were to hit him.

BIGTONE, POOLE says...
12:19pm Sat 8 Aug 09

Give him a verbal warning that the coastguards do not condone his choice of location and if he has to be rescued or causes an accident he will be invoiced for all costs involved.
It his choice then.

kevvo's daughter, says...
7:49pm Sat 8 Aug 09

it am two costly on the ferry dat is why he am swimming

Comments are closed on this article.

BUSY: Watercraft at the busy entrance to Poole Harbour. Picture: Richard Crease with thanks to Bournemouth Helicopters. BUSY: Watercraft at the busy entrance to Poole Harbour. Picture: Richard Crease with thanks to Bournemouth Helicopters.

Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »