TEXT PHOTOS, VIDEOS + NEWS TO 80360, TYPE BE, THEN LEAVE A SPACE BEFORE YOUR MESSAGE OR E-MAIL »
7:00pm Sunday 11th May 2008
THE company behind the controversial East Stoke wind farm has cut its number of proposed turbines by a third.
Infinergy, which wanted to build six 125-metre turbines at Masters Pit, Puddletown Road, now plans just four for the site.
Project bosses say this downsize is a response to residents' concerns, an explanation that has been rubbished by wind farm opponents.
Dorset Against Rural Turbines (Dart) president Terry Stewart said: "The main reason we are against these proposals, and we are still very much against them, is the visual impact they will have in an area of outstanding natural beauty.
"Each of these turbines is taller than Salisbury Cathedral, so reducing the number from six to four makes no real difference."
Dart has already amassed a 1,000-signature petition calling for district planners to scrap the scheme.
Infinergy, which lodged a detailed planning application with Purbeck District Council in March, will lodge this addendum within the next few weeks.
Project director Herb Lindlahr said: "Infinergy has continued to consult with statutory consultees and the wider public. We have taken on board comments from all consultees and have subsequently revised the scheme.
"The environment and neighbours are our priority and removing these two turbines demonstrates our commitment to consultation.
"Despite the reduction in the number of turbines the project still gives us the opportunity to provide a renewable energy source for Dorset."
Infinergy will contact local residents and key stakeholders over the coming weeks. Meanwhile, Dart insists opposition to the farm is steadily growing, with 150 residents attending a recent meeting to voice their concerns.
The revised farm should be capable of generating at least 12 megawatts of electricity - enough to serve around 7,000 homes.
Figures suggest a two-megawatt turbine can save 5,400 tonnes of C02 emissions each year.
2Much, New Forest says...
6:17am Mon 12 May 08
Tru Belle, purbeck says...
7:06am Mon 12 May 08
John Rowley, Swanage says...
12:29pm Mon 12 May 08
knocker, christchurch says...
2:07pm Mon 12 May 08
2Much, New Forest says...
2:28pm Mon 12 May 08
John Rowley wrote:If you're going to attack, you might find it less embarrassing if you did a bit of research first!!!
Sierra Navada is a desert!!!! Over the last week ant turbines would not have been producing electricity. PV cells would have and they would have every day and they cost a lot less than those eyesores.
Proff_Lupin DADA, Hogwarts says...
6:05pm Sat 17 May 08
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
bob_bournemouth, Christchurch says...
12:07am Mon 12 May 08
The cost of these ridiculous monstrosities is spiralling skywards. They are now far from the marvelous source of "free" renewable energy they were once vaunted to be.
The blight on the beautiful Dorset landscape which these enormous towers will cause, will not supply Dorset with everlasting cheap power. It will merely be sufficient to supply a tiny minority of homes with power for a percentage of days per year.
Do not let the sandal wearing 2cv drivers convince you otherwise.