The letter below is similar to a letter handed to Bournemouth council before a recent meeting regarding plans for a casino alongside the Pavilion Theatre. I have not had a personal acknowledgement.

I, like many others, was against the casino when the idea was first suggested and I am still against it.

Those who think it a jewel in the crown of Bournemouth obviously cannot appreciate the difference between diamond and paste.

Apparently the idea is to make money, but at what expense? Bournemouth already has too many alcohol problems because of the over-relaxation of the old rules, but at least it is possible to realise the problems of alcoholic behaviour.

A gambler betting more than he can afford shows no outward signs until the bills pile up.

The recession will make gambling more attractive, more destructive, and destroy more families who will then need help from the state.

Betting at a casino is an individual pursuit – gamblers are not much interested in who else is present. Gambling is not something the whole family can enjoy, and it is generally destructive of family life.

Residents and visitors do need something to do and there is a solution.

Evidently restaurants and businesses in New York are setting aside rooms and areas of parkland for, of all things, table tennis.

This activity is proving extremely popular with all ages.

It is something that can be played with very little expense, players come in all shapes and sizes and with a variety of skills.

It is very physical, providing an activity which many living in towns generally lack and is extremely social as not only are the players playing, their audience gets a great deal of pleasure from watching.

Please, no casino. Bournemouth is not and never will be Monte Carlo.

Mrs D Mitchell, William Road, Bournemouth