Plans refused for flats in Bargates, Christchurch

Thatchers Construction Ltd applied to build two flats at 115 Bargates, to the rear of an existing mid-terrace building at the site.

The developer had plans for a double-storey building, with associated bin and cycle stores, which would be accessible from the existing rear access off Fairfield.

A planning statement prepared by Studio Arkell on its behalf said, “the dimensions of the proposed unit build allow for the proposed two one bed units to fully meet current space standards for a one-person, one bed residential unit at 37/43sqm”.

But, BCP Council said the scheme would result in the creation of two “uncharacteristically small” and “cramped” plots that would “fail to respect the setting and character of the site and surrounding area”.

Proposed elevations (Image: Studio Arkell)

In refusing the application, the local authority also said the development would appear “out of character” when viewed from Fairfield.

Future occupants would overlook neighbouring properties, and be overlooked themselves, warned BCP Council.

Thatchers Construction Ltd said the development was designed to be “sympathetic to the neighbouring properties by minimising overlooking”, with only the side windows being obscured.

BCP Council also raised concerns over access, and said the application provided "inadequate information" with regards to this.

It said it was "unclear" how occupants could exit or enter the site with their bikes or bins for collection.

The local authority made considerations to new policies relating to the River Avon, adding in its decision notice: "The site, by reason of its location, will result in wastewater generated by the new residential development creating an additional phosphate load in the River Avon, which could harm the water quality of the River Avon."

Concerns were also raised relating to the development’s close proximity to heathland.

BCP Council said: "It is considered that the proposed flats would in combination with other plans and projects within close proximity to heathland and in the absence of any form of acceptable mitigation have a significant adverse effect on the heathland special features."

The application was refused by BCP Council on April 19.