PLANS to build 25 homes on a “landlocked” site in Shaftesbury have been unanimously refused by councillors, despite being supported by planning officers.

The application to develop the land between Enmore Court and New Road attracted more than 200 letters of objection due to concerns about the safety of its would-be residents.

Their views were backed by councillors who warned the development would “totally change” the character of the area.

Developer Nylo Homes said the site was “ideal” for development and that there was a “clear need” for new housing in north Dorset.

They also said eight of the homes would be made available on an ‘affordable’ basis.

But the scheme was opposed by people living in the town who raised concerns about the safety of access for people to and from the site, despite a new crossing being proposed, and the impact it would have on the heritage of the area.

As a result of the level of opposition, the application was referred to the northern area planning committee of Dorset Council to decide.

Speaking at the meeting on Tuesday, Shaftesbury town councillor Philip Proctor said: “Anyone trying to use that crossing will not be visible to cars coming down the hill.

“Once this site it approved before you know it people will be applying for development in the apron of Shaftesbury.”

Council planning officer Robert Lennis had recommended that councillors approve the scheme.

In a report he said the impacts of the development would be “less than significant” and that the negatives did not outweigh the benefits of new housing.

However, councillors unanimously agreed to refused planning permission.

Cllr Belinda Ridout said: “Shaftesbury is a hilltop town and that is how it should remain.

“I feel if we approve this development we risk setting in motion the slippery slope of development into Gillingham.

“This would totally change the character of that area.”

Councillors agreed to reject the application on the grounds that it was not sustainable and the impact it would have on the character of the area.

Committee chairman, Cllr Sherry Jespersen, said it was "very rare" for the council to go against the recommendation of its planning officers but supported the move to refuse.