When news happens text pix and video to 80360. Start your message with BE then leave a space.
Did you know you can now get match reports emailed to you after a game? Click here to find out how...
7:00am Monday 1st March 2010 in
IF it had not centred on AFC Bournemouth, this story would have been barely believable.
Just one professional player on the bench, two crocked stars forced to watch from the stands and a 16-year-old schoolboy making a last-gasp 216-mile dash to ease the crisis.
It might sound like the latest episode of Dream Team, but Harchester United this was not.
For the football club based in sleepy Dorset, this was just another average day. Dean Court and dramas go hand in hand – the club has previous.
From protracted takeover sagas, transfer embargoes and winding-up petitions to great escapes, Cherries’ long-suffering fans have experienced it all. And that’s just in the past year.
Saturday was another classic plot from the Cherries soap opera.
As Eddie Howe explained the build-up his side had endured, two seasoned reporters from Shrewsbury shook their heads as they tried to take it all in. It was easy to understand their disbelief.
Captain Jason Pearce and winger Liam Feeney both went down with last-minute training-ground injuries on Friday.
With just one fit pro to sit on the bench, Howe revealed that he made a last-ditch approach to the Football League for permission to recruit an emergency loanee – on the morning of the game.
Howe reported that the league asked for medical evidence on injuries and – given the tight timeframe – that all but ruled out the hope of reinforcements and forced depleted Cherries to soldier on.
Sitting alongside substitute Jeff Goulding was youth team keeper Dan Thomas, numerous times-retired assistant boss Jason Tindall and rookie Jayden Stockley. The latter, adding to the irresistible tale, arrived late for kick-off and missed the warm-up due to the 11th hour nature of his call-up. He didn’t even have a shirt with his name or number on it.
The league’s strict embargo on new signings is in place for a good reason – Thursday’s revelations about the club’s latest scrape with the tax man is proof of that.
But it was hard not to sympathise with Howe when he described the “ridiculous” circumstances he found himself in just hours before a vital match. Surely leaving out a captain and another star player is evidence enough of their injuries. But perhaps not for the Football League.
All this was hardly an ideal build-up for such an important promotion showdown.
With the likes of makeshift centre-half Warren Cummings forced to play out of position, a difficult afternoon looked on the cards.
But Howe’s team have proven before that they are not quick to conform to the predictable.
Against an in-form Shrewsbury side also intent on escaping English football’s basement division, the men from Dean Court produced a purposeful first-half performance which belied their problems.
Even Shrews boss Paul Simpson confessed his team were second best in the opening 45 minutes.
He admitted: “Bournemouth put us under a lot of pressure and we struggled against them in the first half – we accept that.
“I thought we struggled in the first half against Steve Fletcher – he was a handful – and against Brett Pitman, who I think is a very good player.”
Howe added: “We will just plough on. There are only a few games to go and we are still in there fighting for automatic promotion, which would be a miracle really.”
And regardless of the result at the Prostar Stadium, Cherries showed enough to suggest they could take the race down to the wire. Despite what preceded the match, Howe’s side looked the livelier team in the early stages.
With Pitman taking up some intelligent positions between the hosts’ midfield and defence – and Cherries putting together some confident passing sequences – an unlikely victory was not out of the question.
Top scorer Pitman again posed virtually all the goal threat and he shot wide and headed over after twice being expertly teed up by Lee Bradbury.
Sickeningly for Cherries, though, they were made to pay the ultimate price for not capitalising on their good work when Simpson’s men took the lead soon after the interval via a frustratingly scrappy strike.
After Jamie Cureton had weaved his way into the box, the loose ball was expertly finished by Terry Dunfield, who redeemed himself for the own goal he scored at Dean Court in December by firing low past Shwan Jalal from 12 yards.
As Cherries chased the game, Alan Connell and Pitman had decent goal attempts, but the cutting edge of the first half was not replicated and holes were being left at the other end for Cureton-inspired Shrewsbury to exploit.
The Norwich City loan man was only denied a goal when his vicious volley was kept out by a truly terrific reaction save from Jalal, who blotted his copybook with some wayward kicking.
Only the woodwork and a goal-line clearance by Connell prevented the Shrews from extending their lead late on, with Jake Robinson and the impressive Lewis Neal the unlucky players.
When asked whether leading Cherries to promotion would rank as the finest achievement of his career, Howe answered emphatically: “Without a shadow of a doubt – by a long, long way. Not just for me but for every individual player as well. I would be surprised if they had a better story to tell come the end of their careers.”
The embargo and injuries could scupper persistent, second-placed Cherries. But this most unlikely of Dean Court stories may yet have a happy ending.
Comments(35)
KENETHOMEROD
says...
8:35am Mon 1 Mar 10
High Treason
says...
9:17am Mon 1 Mar 10
swanagefan
says...
9:22am Mon 1 Mar 10
Square Old Codger
says...
9:33am Mon 1 Mar 10
swanagefan wrote:It's not the current cost base that is a problem, but the repayment of the debts left by Baker and Savi, that is causing all the difficulties. It is such a peculiar business football, a successful team in Div 1 would bring more revenue, from the League, TV and travelling supporters ,with a small cost increase, but an unsuccessful one!! As for loan players, it depends on the arrangements with their home Club, who may well pay the bulk or the whole of their salaries. I am rather more worried as where the £214,000 for HMRC is to come from before the month end!
Now I'm no expert on finance but if we can't manage now with the wage bill we have how can we hope to manage if the embargo is lifted and we get more player's ???. All that will happen is we will get in more debt, if we do get promoted and have to sell players to survive the summer we will probably sit and watch our team loose most games then the gates will dive downwards making things even worse. EM said the other day we will play at a level we can afford maybe that's league 2 not for the team or fans but for the owners we have I'm not knocking the owners I just don't think they can afford to play at a higher level.
nonnogeppetto
says...
10:44am Mon 1 Mar 10
Bournemouth person wrote:"Our town is so fortunate to be home to such a superb team" Yes indeed and where are those who went to the Autoglass Cup Final and Cardiff? OK we do have a financial crisis (recession) but the fact remains that the only way AFCB will ever come out of the current financial troubles is if more people came to support the team. All too often we have a bigger crowd and for whatever reasons (actually we know the reason!!) the team don't deliver on the pitch and the gates fall again. Come on sleepy Bournemouth wake up and smell the coffee AFCB needs you/us.
Ian's excellent article sums up much of the situation. Its beyond comprehension why AFCB has to suffer this injustice and its miraculous that we are second in the league! Our town is so fortunate to be home to such a superb team. From top to bottom - all on AFCB's payroll (and the many who help for no pay) are stars.
cherrymad
says...
11:09am Mon 1 Mar 10
molbol
says...
11:17am Mon 1 Mar 10
cherries59
says...
11:46am Mon 1 Mar 10
cherrymad
says...
11:58am Mon 1 Mar 10
molbol wrote:Not claiming to be a better judge - just observations from the Echo, Youth Team - 3rd in their league at the mo, furthest position in FA Youth Cup for about 8 years plus pretty much propping up Reserve Team for whole of season. They can't be all bad can they, esp. when we need more players?
Cheerymad - You consider the youth team players good enough yet Eddie doesn't. Why is your understanding of them better than Eddie's and what qualifies you to be a better judge?
molbol
says...
12:05pm Mon 1 Mar 10
cherrymad wrote:I fully appreciate what you're saying and just thought you might have some inside knowledge, hence my question back to you. The fact is Eddie has gone on record as saying that they will only get their chance when he feels that they can step up to the plate without it being of detriment to themselves or the team. He says he wil only select on merit, not just because the bench needs filling. When he feels they've earnt their chance he will give it to them. I personally am surprised Stockley hasn't been given a few more Cameos but, as the saying goes - In Eddie We Trust...
molbol wrote: Cheerymad - You consider the youth team players good enough yet Eddie doesn't. Why is your understanding of them better than Eddie's and what qualifies you to be a better judge?Not claiming to be a better judge - just observations from the Echo, Youth Team - 3rd in their league at the mo, furthest position in FA Youth Cup for about 8 years plus pretty much propping up Reserve Team for whole of season. They can't be all bad can they, esp. when we need more players?
djd
says...
12:32pm Mon 1 Mar 10
smhinto
says...
1:26pm Mon 1 Mar 10
nonnogeppetto
says...
2:05pm Mon 1 Mar 10
smhinto wrote:Amongst one of the most sensible post you have submitted on this site. You are so right about the previous regimes. And if there is still a link with the past (I very much hope not) the FL will indeed be reluctant to give in on the embargo. You keep being sensible and who knows we may not be so critical about you!! cheers smhinto!
Let's be sensible here, with the issuing of a new writ from HRMC. It is very unlikely that anybody will influence the FL weather it be the Council or indeed her Majesty herself. I suppose the clubs past board(s) including the Gardener regime have got us into this mess and we are now paying the price.
The obvious route is to get this debt paid off by hook or by crook. Only then will we see the embargo lifted.
Regards
KENETHOMEROD
says...
2:41pm Mon 1 Mar 10
molbol
says...
2:52pm Mon 1 Mar 10
KENETHOMEROD wrote:As i said earlier Keith, it's Eddie's call. Who are we to question him?
Cherrymads comments seem valid and my view is that any youth team player on the bench and there is plenty of room, will get lots of experience and see first hand how EH operates and may get even get on the field of play. If the present youth team players are that bad then it does not look as if any will be kept on which looks bad for Joe Roach ?
nonnogeppetto
says...
3:10pm Mon 1 Mar 10
KENETHOMEROD wrote:I am sure that players from the youth team are not barred from attending games! they do not need to sit on the bench to find out how Eddie operates they can clearly see it sitting in the stands amongst the rest of us. Eddie is a professional man and knows when a young player is ready for the big time so I for one would not wish to tell him what to do on that score!
Cherrymads comments seem valid and my view is that any youth team player on the bench and there is plenty of room, will get lots of experience and see first hand how EH operates and may get even get on the field of play. If the present youth team players are that bad then it does not look as if any will be kept on which looks bad for Joe Roach ?
In Absentia
says...
4:09pm Mon 1 Mar 10
sea poole
says...
4:59pm Mon 1 Mar 10
bibocherry
says...
5:24pm Mon 1 Mar 10
wickerman
says...
5:38pm Mon 1 Mar 10
scottie190
says...
8:03pm Mon 1 Mar 10
swanagefan wrote:It is common knowlege now that we are once more in debt to the taxman and again fighting a winding up order. A reporter was speaking to the new Notts County owner and he admitted that they were almost 7 million in debt but they are still not under threat from anyone and are still paying inflated wages to their players. Is it just AFCB who are treated like lepers who have to ring a bell. level playing field my a^%^
Now I'm no expert on finance but if we can't manage now with the wage bill we have how can we hope to manage if the embargo is lifted and we get more player's ???. All that will happen is we will get in more debt, if we do get promoted and have to sell players to survive the summer we will probably sit and watch our team loose most games then the gates will dive downwards making things even worse. EM said the other day we will play at a level we can afford maybe that's league 2 not for the team or fans but for the owners we have I'm not knocking the owners I just don't think they can afford to play at a higher level.
KENETHOMEROD
says...
8:11pm Mon 1 Mar 10
jamyjames
says...
8:28pm Mon 1 Mar 10
bibocherry
says...
8:42pm Mon 1 Mar 10
KENETHOMEROD wrote:agree on this one Ken/Keith. No substitute for gaining experience.
The point about experience is being in the dressing room and hearing the team talk etc not about sitting in the stand. The whole experience of being involved is priceless and part of any players apprenticeship.
bibocherry
says...
8:49pm Mon 1 Mar 10
winton50
says...
8:56pm Mon 1 Mar 10
molbol
says...
9:25pm Mon 1 Mar 10
Luffbracherry
says...
9:59pm Mon 1 Mar 10
molbol wrote:Totally agree. What many posters don't seem to understand is the massive step up in class and experience that the youth players would need undertake. While they may be great prospects, I think we should trust Eddies judgement - he obviously does not believe that they have the maturity to manage this yet
cherrymad wrote:I fully appreciate what you're saying and just thought you might have some inside knowledge, hence my question back to you. The fact is Eddie has gone on record as saying that they will only get their chance when he feels that they can step up to the plate without it being of detriment to themselves or the team. He says he wil only select on merit, not just because the bench needs filling. When he feels they've earnt their chance he will give it to them. I personally am surprised Stockley hasn't been given a few more Cameos but, as the saying goes - In Eddie We Trust... UTC!!molbol wrote: Cheerymad - You consider the youth team players good enough yet Eddie doesn't. Why is your understanding of them better than Eddie's and what qualifies you to be a better judge?Not claiming to be a better judge - just observations from the Echo, Youth Team - 3rd in their league at the mo, furthest position in FA Youth Cup for about 8 years plus pretty much propping up Reserve Team for whole of season. They can't be all bad can they, esp. when we need more players?
stjxf12
says...
10:16pm Mon 1 Mar 10
Luffbracherry
says...
10:22pm Mon 1 Mar 10
stjxf12 wrote:Sounds like common sense to me
Oh Dear Oh Dear ,How rediculous to suggest that youth team players can step up to 1st team football.Yes the odd one or two possibly but such a massive jump could finish such a young talent.The Managers of the 1st Team know themselves whether the individual concerned could make the vast transition.Men against boys.The simple fact is Mr Howe had no alternative on Saturday but to turn to a youth player to help as his plea for help from the FL was smacked in his face yet again.How are Notts County allowed to be 7 million in debt with no transfer embargo and with a far superior wage bill than ours.????Yes we are in the mucky moo but level playing field i don't think so.
lionheart
says...
11:08pm Mon 1 Mar 10
elvispresleysking
says...
11:59pm Mon 1 Mar 10
Square Old Codger wrote:Hi SOC, I wouldn't worry too much about where the £214k is going to come from! EM will just revert to his 'rob Peter to pay Paul' routine to ensure he has the money to pay the HMRC debt. However I think this is a dangerous ploy to adopt. All the other creditors owed money would be looking at the HMRC case and thinking "hmmmm, HMRC threaten AFCB with a winding up order and look, they get paid"
swanagefan wrote: Now I'm no expert on finance but if we can't manage now with the wage bill we have how can we hope to manage if the embargo is lifted and we get more player's ???. All that will happen is we will get in more debt, if we do get promoted and have to sell players to survive the summer we will probably sit and watch our team loose most games then the gates will dive downwards making things even worse. EM said the other day we will play at a level we can afford maybe that's league 2 not for the team or fans but for the owners we have I'm not knocking the owners I just don't think they can afford to play at a higher level.It's not the current cost base that is a problem, but the repayment of the debts left by Baker and Savi, that is causing all the difficulties. It is such a peculiar business football, a successful team in Div 1 would bring more revenue, from the League, TV and travelling supporters ,with a small cost increase, but an unsuccessful one!! As for loan players, it depends on the arrangements with their home Club, who may well pay the bulk or the whole of their salaries. I am rather more worried as where the £214,000 for HMRC is to come from before the month end!
flyingleaper
says...
12:10am Tue 2 Mar 10
flyingleaper
says...
12:10am Tue 2 Mar 10
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Bournemouth person says...
8:04am Mon 1 Mar 10