Cherries star Hughes: I might be owed by Pompey, but I want them to survive

AS a long-serving crew member of the good ship Portsmouth, Richard Hughes experienced both calm and choppy waters during his time at Fratton Park.

Hughes left Dean Court to set sail on his Pompey career in 2002, plying his trade in the Premier League in all but the first and last of his nine seasons with the club.

Capped five times by Scotland, he played in the UEFA Cup, was involved in Pompey’s 2008 FA Cup win and was once head butted by Manchester United’s Cristiano Ronaldo.

Far from being one of the top earners as the club prospered under former Cherries boss Harry Redknapp, Hughes was well paid and lived comfortably if not luxuriously.

However, after the rug had been pulled by backer Sacha Gaydamak in 2008 and Pompey had started to pay for their excesses, Hughes and other players became a strain on the balance sheet.

Despite offering to take a 50 per cent wage cut, Hughes played his final game for Pompey in December 2010 and severed ties with the club just six months later.

Pompey, who are said to be £61 million in debt, have been in administration for a year and are facing a second successive relegation, with a 10-point deduction still on the cards.

Their fate is expected to be decided in the courts with the administrators having agreed to sell the club to a supporters’ trust, on condition they buy Fratton Park from former owner Balram Chainrai.

In the meantime, Hughes, who came out of retirement to rejoin Cherries at the start of this season, remains a creditor and continues to monitor developments.

Discussing Pompey’s plight in an interview with the Daily Echo, Hughes said: “The club is still going because of the supporters and that’s why they deserve to take ownership. There will always be a Portsmouth Football Club because of them.

“Those of us with a financial interest going back to the Premier League days are kept up to date on a weekly basis. In the past couple of years, there have been a few occasions when a chink of light seems to appear and then it quickly goes back to uncertainty.

“Throughout it all, the fans have been unbelievable. From my conversations with the trust, I think it would be beneficial if they could take over because they could bring it forward. You just feel other people’s interests may be more short term.

“I am not the only player who is owed money from my time there. It is not as if I am expecting it today or tomorrow because I know it is a drawn-out process. Money or no money, I want the club to keep going and I want the supporters to have the club they deserve.”

Hughes added: “I don’t think you can level any blame at the door of the players. I don’t think you can foresee a situation like that materialising.

“We were a successful team in the Premier League and were competing for European places. We had a wealthy backer.

“Players like myself, Gary O’Neil and Matt Taylor made a career at Portsmouth. There were also players who came with fantastic reputations. If Pompey had n’t had the money to pay them, it would have been someone else.

“The wages they were paying at the time were unsustainable unless there was a backer who was prepared and capable to pay them. When that ceased to be the case then clearly there wasn’t the income through other areas of the club to sustain the wages. It was always going to be a recipe for disaster so long as the owner wasn’t there to continue backing it.

“I don’t know the ins and outs under Gaydamak. The future looked rosy but, for one reason or another, it ceased to be the case.”

Comments (8)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:35am Fri 8 Feb 13

Piston_Broke says...

The penultimate paragraph is interesting. I wonder how many clubs, including AFCB, could be viewed in this way? It's just not a sustainable situation.
The penultimate paragraph is interesting. I wonder how many clubs, including AFCB, could be viewed in this way? It's just not a sustainable situation. Piston_Broke
  • Score: 0

8:39am Fri 8 Feb 13

Red Sky says...

Another interesting point- is holding a stake in a rival club not considered conflict of interest?
Another interesting point- is holding a stake in a rival club not considered conflict of interest? Red Sky
  • Score: 0

9:07am Fri 8 Feb 13

TedMacsCherryPants says...

No Worries Hughsie, we'll be paying them back tommorrow!!!
COYR!!!
No Worries Hughsie, we'll be paying them back tommorrow!!! COYR!!! TedMacsCherryPants
  • Score: 0

10:35am Fri 8 Feb 13

Piston_Broke says...

Red Sky wrote:
Another interesting point- is holding a stake in a rival club not considered conflict of interest?
He doesn't hold a stake in Pompey (and xx% of something worth nothing is still nothing!). He is a creditor, and being a former player, a preferred creditor, along with many,many others.
[quote][p][bold]Red Sky[/bold] wrote: Another interesting point- is holding a stake in a rival club not considered conflict of interest?[/p][/quote]He doesn't hold a stake in Pompey (and xx% of something worth nothing is still nothing!). He is a creditor, and being a former player, a preferred creditor, along with many,many others. Piston_Broke
  • Score: 0

5:37pm Fri 8 Feb 13

michael mead says...

it could happen to the cherries,if our main source of finance went.
it could happen to the cherries,if our main source of finance went. michael mead
  • Score: 0

9:04pm Fri 8 Feb 13

ifordcherry says...

so what ???? What can you,me or anyone else do about it ??? Absolutely nothing !! So go with the ride or take your partner to the Cinema on a Saturday afternoon.!!Worry and quote all you want on this site or any other but YOU can have no say in any of the outcome so stop whinging !!
so what ???? What can you,me or anyone else do about it ??? Absolutely nothing !! So go with the ride or take your partner to the Cinema on a Saturday afternoon.!!Worry and quote all you want on this site or any other but YOU can have no say in any of the outcome so stop whinging !! ifordcherry
  • Score: 0

9:12pm Fri 8 Feb 13

ifordcherry says...

And as for Richard Hughes still bleating about his owed money ???...Why not do the decent thing (Not what Redknapp done)and tell cash strapped Pompey that you are prepared to forget what they owe you....I`m sure you aint skint Hughsey boy,,!!....Here i am slagging off one of my team....Sorry all but too much money too few morals...Im quite sure we will not be seeing you down the dole queue when your career is over ??
And as for Richard Hughes still bleating about his owed money ???...Why not do the decent thing (Not what Redknapp done)and tell cash strapped Pompey that you are prepared to forget what they owe you....I`m sure you aint skint Hughsey boy,,!!....Here i am slagging off one of my team....Sorry all but too much money too few morals...Im quite sure we will not be seeing you down the dole queue when your career is over ?? ifordcherry
  • Score: 0

11:49pm Fri 8 Feb 13

boscombewizard says...

I didn't read it as Hughes 'bleating on' about being owed money. Where do you get that from?
I didn't read it as Hughes 'bleating on' about being owed money. Where do you get that from? boscombewizard
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

Get Adobe Flash player
About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree