When news happens text pix and video to 80360. Start your message with BE then leave a space.
7:00am Friday 19th March 2010 in
CHERRIES chairman Eddie Mitchell fears the bottom end of the Football League could start to disappear unless the distribution of wealth is spread more evenly.
Mitchell’s comments come after the league this week announced a lucrative new three-year sponsorship deal with energy firm Npower, worth £21m.
His observations also follow Labour peer Lord Dubs recently telling the House of Lords that the financial problems of a number of clubs had left the national game “in a mess”.
Cherries face a date in the High Court at the end of this month after being served with a winding-up petition by HM Revenue & Customs over tax arrears of £314,000.
The club, which revealed debts of around £850,000 earlier this month, has also been subject to a strict transfer embargo for the past 14 months due to its parlous financial position.
Mitchell told the Daily Echo: “First and foremost, I think the league are doing a great job. I do think they need to be as hard as they can with clubs that fall behind with their payments. I still believe the embargo is the right punishment, it pushes us on and helps us try to see sense.”
Cherries received a welcome cash boost when they made a rare appearance on Sky Sports on Monday, while the club will this season bank a £431,000 basic award payment from the league.
Mitchell added: “I think the money should be apportioned more generously and I also think they should try to get the cameras down more to the lower leagues. We are all trying to play football in our division and it was great entertainment on Monday.
“In my opinion, they need to spread the money a little bit wider, otherwise some of the lower leagues are going to fall away in the future.
“Maybe it won’t happen if people could be more sensible about the way things are run, but I think a little bit of financial encouragement would also go a long way as well. We all get a proportion of the money but, at the top end, it is saturated.”
Asked whether he felt the league should adopt a prevention-rather-than-cure policy for all member clubs, Mitchell replied: “I don’t think that is possible because there are so many people that can pull the wool over the eyes of others. We have seen it with our club where promises have been made which have got the club into trouble because they haven’t been kept.
“We want to move on from that. We are not promising anything other than to keep the club afloat and to try to play some decent football. We’ve got to gradually get rid of the debt, creep up on everybody and, hopefully, try to establish ourselves in the top half of the division above.”
Meanwhile, Mitchell said he anticipated no problems with Cherries receiving their agreed share of the Sky Sports £40,000 broadcast fee after Notts County said they would split the kitty 50-50.
Mitchell also said the club would be opening its Club 11 Gym on April 1. The facility, which will be open to the public, will also be used by Eddie Howe’s squad.
Comments(26)
TowerRed
says...
8:12am Fri 19 Mar 10
KENETHOMEROD
says...
8:15am Fri 19 Mar 10
cherrychris75
says...
8:33am Fri 19 Mar 10
Bournemouth person
says...
8:41am Fri 19 Mar 10
AFCB1223
says...
9:06am Fri 19 Mar 10
TowerRed wrote:An independent article which backs up the feelings of many fans.
Agree with the sentiment but the troubles have already started lower down. Chester and Farsley Celtic. Also Salisbury. as for promises being kept that's a bit rich. What about the deal the current board made with HMRC to keep up to date?? An independent article on AFCB makes an interesting read: http://footballmanag ement.wordpress.com/ 2010/03/18/meanwhile -back-at-bournemouth /
TowerRed
says...
9:29am Fri 19 Mar 10
cherrychris75 wrote:Chris all the council did was to have a vote to back the relaxing of the FL embargo. So in other words pretty pointless seeing as if the FL embargo was relaxed we'd have another one for owing tax.
What happened to the council saying they were helping us? Or has that died of death as well?
Good luck tomorrow, fed up of talk of embargo, HMRC,donations etc.
Good luck tomorrow lads, the derby with Saints is getting ever closer!!
Square Old Codger
says...
9:50am Fri 19 Mar 10
enotsnihple
says...
9:53am Fri 19 Mar 10
alasdair1967
says...
10:12am Fri 19 Mar 10
KENETHOMEROD wrote:the gym facilities where donated by a company who where using the dean court facilities the same company that have had to move out after there rent was increased the same company that wanted to sponser the northstand for a 6 figure sum but walked away as after there due deligence could see it was not worth the investment
L O L Where did the money come from to provide a Gym ? Is this bloke real ? L O L
Blackpoolcherry
says...
10:19am Fri 19 Mar 10
In Absentia
says...
10:32am Fri 19 Mar 10
cherrychris75 wrote:Sorry, but what help is the council supposed to provide? There is no justification for any financial support from local council tax payers.
What happened to the council saying they were helping us? Or has that died of death as well? Good luck tomorrow, fed up of talk of embargo, HMRC,donations etc. Good luck tomorrow lads, the derby with Saints is getting ever closer!!
TowerRed
says...
11:36am Fri 19 Mar 10
Blackpoolcherry wrote:More Thornton-Cleveleys than Blackpool BC you??
Towerred which part of Blackpool r u at?
High Treason
says...
12:23pm Fri 19 Mar 10
cherrychris75 wrote:Thats a bit rich. Why should the council bail out the club whilst they charge a fourtune for home care. Its only football and not the welfare of the elderly.
What happened to the council saying they were helping us? Or has that died of death as well? Good luck tomorrow, fed up of talk of embargo, HMRC,donations etc. Good luck tomorrow lads, the derby with Saints is getting ever closer!!
molbol
says...
12:33pm Fri 19 Mar 10
High Treason wrote:A fair enough comparison High Treason and no one could dispute the lack of priorities in this country regarding that type of thing - But they were happy to shell out millions for the Imax though. Was that money well spent? They seem happy to waste money on that entertainment outlet.
cherrychris75 wrote: What happened to the council saying they were helping us? Or has that died of death as well? Good luck tomorrow, fed up of talk of embargo, HMRC,donations etc. Good luck tomorrow lads, the derby with Saints is getting ever closer!!Thats a bit rich. Why should the council bail out the club whilst they charge a fourtune for home care. Its only football and not the welfare of the elderly.
old red git
says...
1:50pm Fri 19 Mar 10
KENETHOMEROD
says...
3:11pm Fri 19 Mar 10
alasdair1967
says...
4:59pm Fri 19 Mar 10
Julian1967
says...
5:03pm Fri 19 Mar 10
KENETHOMEROD wrote:Well done to all those whoa are doing the walk which i really admire.I hope Eddie Mitchell turns out and thank those that are doing this to keep our club going.
Well said `old red git` you make some very good points. We the fans get `used` all the time. The next event is a sponsored walk and i believe the Directors are taking part and have been told by Mitchell to get at least £1,000 each . Whilst i applaud all the people taking part surely the money raised will only go towards paying the cost of the winding up petition, a bill that could and should have been avoided. We need funds of £800,000 and above so surely the Directors should be putting in at least £200,000 each and not a measly £1,000 , raised again from local people. Good luck to those taking part in the `walk`.
winton50
says...
5:21pm Fri 19 Mar 10
alasdair1967
says...
5:25pm Fri 19 Mar 10
winton50 wrote:here here yet again the fans are being asked to do there bit for the club that they love ,yet the people who own the club do sweet fa 850 k to mr mitchell is like 850 pounds to the man on the street how much property does the man own ??
Hold on a minute Eddie - you want the football league to pay for your club, you want the fans to pay for your club and yet the very people that stand to gain from owning AFCB are you and your fellow directors who have publicly stated that they won't pay for owning the club Bit rich don't you think?
alasdair1967
says...
5:54pm Fri 19 Mar 10
jamyjames
says...
5:54pm Fri 19 Mar 10
WIGGINSv
says...
9:38pm Fri 19 Mar 10
Blackpoolcherry wrote:He is on the Tram.
Towerred which part of Blackpool r u at?
Poole Mick
says...
9:46pm Fri 19 Mar 10
imhomenow
says...
10:59pm Fri 19 Mar 10
Poole Mick wrote:Define big wages they certainly get paid less than me and I dont consider mine big @ £30,000
I doubt If EM and his fellow directors are millionairs, they might to think they are and for us to think they are. The money needed is small beer to proper millionairs to invest in a new business All fur coats and no kickers All EM's properties are properly hocked to the banks and investers, can not sell most of them, count the for sale boards. Who else would employ EM's son & son in law, what skills did they bring to DC, to be paid big wages. What happend to Gee Develoments, another EM & son rip off, went bust last year. This is all a con trick to get DC , the building plot "The supporters let the club go bust" not the board
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
TowerRed says...
8:07am Fri 19 Mar 10
as for promises being kept that's a bit rich. What about the deal the current board made with HMRC to keep up to date??
An independent article on AFCB makes an interesting read:
http://footballmanag
ement.wordpress.com/
2010/03/18/meanwhile
-back-at-bournemouth
/