Cherries: Goalscorer Matt means business (From Bournemouth Echo)
When news happens text pix and video to 80360. Start your message with BE then leave a space.
Cherries: Goalscorer Matt means business
7:00am Monday 11th March 2013 in Sport
By Neil Perrett
MATT FINISH: Matt Tubbs celebrates his goal on Saturday
STRIKER Matt Tubbs is keen to shed his impact sub tag and grab the goals to help revive Cherries’ faltering promotion push.
Tubbs came off the bench to notch his fifth goal of the season as Cherries were sentenced to an unjust 2-1 defeat by League One leaders Doncaster on Saturday.
The 28-year-old appeared to have salvaged a deserved share of the spoils for Eddie Howe’s men after pouncing on defender Jamie McCombe’s error to bag a delightful late leveller.
However, just seconds later, Rovers mounted a swift counter-attack and put another spoke through Cherries’ promotion hopes when James Husband scored a dramatic winner.
Defeat – Cherries’ fifth in succession – has left them seven points adrift of second-placed Sheffield United and three behind Brentford, who occupy the last play-off berth.
Tubbs told the Daily Echo: “I thought we deserved all three points. Doncaster came here with a game-plan and put out all their big boys and tried to rough us up a bit. But we still should have won.
“There are nine games remaining and still a lot of points to play for. We went on a long unbeaten run earlier in the season and there is no reason why we can’t do it again.”
Although Tubbs has made 26 league appearances this season, he has been restricted to just four starts – at home to Brentford and Coventry and away to Swindon and Bury.
His chances have been limited by the form of Lewis Grabban and Brett Pitman who have netted 13 and 10 goals, respectively.
Tubbs, whose strike against Doncaster was his first in 16 league appearances, with all but two coming from the bench, added: “I am willing the lads to win every game and am willing the strikers to score as many goals as they can. I want to be a Championship player next season and, if we all stick together, there is no reason why we can’t get there.
“All I can do is keep plugging away and, hopefully, take my chances when they come. If I am on the bench, I am more than happy to come on and try to get goals like I did against Doncaster. It is a team game.
“Brett and Lewis have done a great job all season and have got a partnership which has worked for so long. All I can do is wait in the wings.
“I would be stupid to say I don’t want to start games. It is my job and I get paid to play football. I don’t really want to be on the bench for the whole season and want to grab a shirt. I am 29 in the summer and am not getting any younger. I want us to go up to the next level.”
Comments(49)
Frankiesbackfromhollywood
says...
7:54am Mon 11 Mar 13
nonnogeppetto
says...
8:23am Mon 11 Mar 13
It ain’t what you say it is the way that you say it!
So whilst some long distance supporter may have some very good points to make the way that they are made puts the backs up of those who actually attend games including me.
Those of us who were there on Saturday witnessed some very good football and if half of the chances that went begging were converted into goals we would have won hands down. Alas it wasn’t to be.
In my previous post I said we should play intelligent football by that I mean ‘keep it simple’ I know that the opposing team doesn’t always allow you to play the way you want but I do think that it is possible. For example more one time passes instead of back and forth and risk losing the ball to the opposition.
How often do we see a player like Pugh make a run into space only to see the ball delivered to another player who is surrounded by defenders thus lose possession. I do wonder sometimes whether the touchline is the best place for the manager to see the game but who am I to criticise. UTCIAD
merley girl
says...
8:41am Mon 11 Mar 13
cherrygood
says...
8:44am Mon 11 Mar 13
Is thst right that Elphick might be back Tuesday, last week someone said it could be 6-8 weeks? I like many others are desperate to see Ritchie in an attacking role so hope that is true.
Agree that Tubbs would be better served by playing alongside a target man to feed off the knock downs, but I think he now deserves a start on Tuesday beside whoever.
John T
says...
8:45am Mon 11 Mar 13
FrankiesbackfromhollREGARDS!!
ywood wrote:
Take this one on the chin and go for the win Tuesday. Every game has become a must win game now. Hopefully this goal will give Tubbs his chance ahead of an out of form Grabban, the joy he showed when he scored said it all, let's hope Eddie gives him a run in the side. Also hope Tommy is fit for Tuesday night, Ritchie is keen to get back to his attacking duties and also push us forward, surely with Tommy back and the adjustments that would make to our defence we can once again enjoy a run of wins. I am certain this run is all but at an end and Tuesday night will be that win we need to lift all our spirits!! and before I get accused of having my head in the clouds by you know who, I always support the team and wish them well before a game!!
TedMacsCherryPants
says...
9:12am Mon 11 Mar 13
johnimpey
says...
9:17am Mon 11 Mar 13
Bmthboys
says...
9:41am Mon 11 Mar 13
smhinto
says...
9:58am Mon 11 Mar 13
Bmthboys wrote:The answer is very simple. The style of football in the Netherlands is very different in a number of ways. It is more akin to our Premiership reserve matches where there is very little physical contact. The term often used is - splashing around in a duck pond.
Agree with comments already made,especially the tubbs comments!so why send demouge out on loan?thought he would be perfect for tubbs to play alongside!!why they didn't get a fair crack of the whip I'll never know! UTC
.
Demouge is NOT up to the physical rigours of our League One. ENDEX
smhinto
says...
10:09am Mon 11 Mar 13
nonnogeppetto wrote:With regards to Elphick and Daniels. We cannot just place them back into the first team straight away.
I have to say that if we had a younger Steve Fletcher the team would benefit more from Tubbs than the present strike force. Pitman has always seemed lazy to me and does not compete for the ball he expects the ball to fall perfectly at his feet. Yes he does score some great goals. I feel that we try to make it too complicated rather than play intelligent football. Come on the Cherries start winning again. I hope that Elphick and Daniels will soon be fit again.
.
They need game time i.e. one, preferably two reserve games to regain match fitness after such a lay-off. It is not as if they have just missed one game or two. They have been out for a while especially Daniels.
.
If we put them back in straight away we will in fact be weakening the back line more than it is at the moment throu their lack fitness and pace.
.
Maybe it is time to recruit a target man in on loan of which would benefit us more in our current situation than placing Elphick and Daniels striaght back into the first team after injury.
.
Regards.
P.S. I am now waiting for the first 'twerp' to disparage this valid point.
Afcbpete
says...
10:16am Mon 11 Mar 13
nonnogeppetto wrote:Hi Nonno, hope your ok.... Totally agree with your comments. The fact we are creating so many chances PROVES we are fine without James in goal, and managing the loss of Charlie and Tommy. You could argue we're losing goals at the back because James is'nt Marshalling the defence, but he himself was making too many mistakes for my liking. Which takes me back to those chances, take them, and we'd of won several of those 5 games. Tubbs in for Grabban would be my choice, but as you say, I'm certainly not going to criticise Eddie...
I wanted to comment on Saturday’s game Saturday evening however by the time I got to my PC so much rubbish was being bandied about that I decided not bother and leave the usual tit for tat posters to get on with it.
It ain’t what you say it is the way that you say it!
So whilst some long distance supporter may have some very good points to make the way that they are made puts the backs up of those who actually attend games including me.
Those of us who were there on Saturday witnessed some very good football and if half of the chances that went begging were converted into goals we would have won hands down. Alas it wasn’t to be.
In my previous post I said we should play intelligent football by that I mean ‘keep it simple’ I know that the opposing team doesn’t always allow you to play the way you want but I do think that it is possible. For example more one time passes instead of back and forth and risk losing the ball to the opposition.
How often do we see a player like Pugh make a run into space only to see the ball delivered to another player who is surrounded by defenders thus lose possession. I do wonder sometimes whether the touchline is the best place for the manager to see the game but who am I to criticise. UTCIAD
TedMacsCherryPants
says...
10:23am Mon 11 Mar 13
smhinto wrote:FFS! If I was the size of big Frank and wasn’t up to the physical rigours of League 1 I’d ditch football and take up ballet, origami or synchronised swimming!
Bmthboys wrote: Agree with comments already made,especially the tubbs comments!so why send demouge out on loan?thought he would be perfect for tubbs to play alongside!!why they didn't get a fair crack of the whip I'll never know! UTCThe answer is very simple. The style of football in the Netherlands is very different in a number of ways. It is more akin to our Premiership reserve matches where there is very little physical contact. The term often used is - splashing around in a duck pond. . Demouge is NOT up to the physical rigours of our League One. ENDEX
coxes pippin
says...
10:39am Mon 11 Mar 13
STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road
says...
11:08am Mon 11 Mar 13
TedMacsCherryPants wrote:Tedmac, dont engage with the Loony from Linclon, he will soon get fed up and slither away.
smhinto wrote:FFS! If I was the size of big Frank and wasn’t up to the physical rigours of League 1 I’d ditch football and take up ballet, origami or synchronised swimming!
Bmthboys wrote: Agree with comments already made,especially the tubbs comments!so why send demouge out on loan?thought he would be perfect for tubbs to play alongside!!why they didn't get a fair crack of the whip I'll never know! UTCThe answer is very simple. The style of football in the Netherlands is very different in a number of ways. It is more akin to our Premiership reserve matches where there is very little physical contact. The term often used is - splashing around in a duck pond. . Demouge is NOT up to the physical rigours of our League One. ENDEX
cherrybee01
says...
11:13am Mon 11 Mar 13
TedMacsCherryPants
says...
11:18am Mon 11 Mar 13
STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road wrote:Hear what ur saying Steady, I must admit I’ve had my fill of “smug-arrogance” for one season ;-|
TedMacsCherryPants wrote:Tedmac, dont engage with the Loony from Linclon, he will soon get fed up and slither away.smhinto wrote:FFS! If I was the size of big Frank and wasn’t up to the physical rigours of League 1 I’d ditch football and take up ballet, origami or synchronised swimming!Bmthboys wrote: Agree with comments already made,especially the tubbs comments!so why send demouge out on loan?thought he would be perfect for tubbs to play alongside!!why they didn't get a fair crack of the whip I'll never know! UTCThe answer is very simple. The style of football in the Netherlands is very different in a number of ways. It is more akin to our Premiership reserve matches where there is very little physical contact. The term often used is - splashing around in a duck pond. . Demouge is NOT up to the physical rigours of our League One. ENDEX
STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road
says...
11:21am Mon 11 Mar 13
smhinto
says...
11:29am Mon 11 Mar 13
TedMacsCherryPants wrote:Here we again you see !!!
STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road wrote:Hear what ur saying Steady, I must admit I’ve had my fill of “smug-arrogance” for one season ;-|
TedMacsCherryPants wrote:Tedmac, dont engage with the Loony from Linclon, he will soon get fed up and slither away.smhinto wrote:FFS! If I was the size of big Frank and wasn’t up to the physical rigours of League 1 I’d ditch football and take up ballet, origami or synchronised swimming!Bmthboys wrote: Agree with comments already made,especially the tubbs comments!so why send demouge out on loan?thought he would be perfect for tubbs to play alongside!!why they didn't get a fair crack of the whip I'll never know! UTCThe answer is very simple. The style of football in the Netherlands is very different in a number of ways. It is more akin to our Premiership reserve matches where there is very little physical contact. The term often used is - splashing around in a duck pond. . Demouge is NOT up to the physical rigours of our League One. ENDEX
.
What I have made is a true, poingent and vald comment regarding why Demouge was sent out on loan. There is nothing smug or arrogant about it.
.
If Demouge was going to contribute effectively I am sure Ed would have kept him, or pehaps you are implying that Ed is also a Loony.
.
Perhap you should re-read and
re-evaluate my post and respond to it in an adult manner.
.
Regards
fletch for manager
says...
11:46am Mon 11 Mar 13
johnimpey wrote:Sensible post!
5 wins from 15 games since we beat Crawley 3-0.This slump started months ago.The 5 wins in a row we had recently were against the 3 worst /out of form teams in the league at that time,Mk Dons, Hartlepool and Pompey and 2 wins against Crewe when we had 3 fortunate penalties.Promotion now looks unlikely if you look at the bigger picture.
STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road
says...
12:05pm Mon 11 Mar 13
johnimpey wrote:Most of the teams around us have suffered similar patches of bad form and will no doubt suffer more setbacks before the season is out. It says a lot about this league that we can lose 5 on the spin, dropping 15 potential points and STILL be in contention for play-offs(3pts adrift) even if top 2 does look beyond us now. If Donny are the benchmark, clearly we need not be to concerned, beat Stevenage and things will look far better.
5 wins from 15 games since we beat Crawley 3-0.This slump started months ago.The 5 wins in a row we had recently were against the 3 worst /out of form teams in the league at that time,Mk Dons, Hartlepool and Pompey and 2 wins against Crewe when we had 3 fortunate penalties.Promotion now looks unlikely if you look at the bigger picture.
John T
says...
12:12pm Mon 11 Mar 13
STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road wrote:Yes, most of us on here would prefer to give the Lincolnshire sausage a good stuffing, despite him being the sage he claims to be!
TedMacsCherryPants wrote:Tedmac, dont engage with the Loony from Linclon, he will soon get fed up and slither away.
smhinto wrote:FFS! If I was the size of big Frank and wasn’t up to the physical rigours of League 1 I’d ditch football and take up ballet, origami or synchronised swimming!
Bmthboys wrote: Agree with comments already made,especially the tubbs comments!so why send demouge out on loan?thought he would be perfect for tubbs to play alongside!!why they didn't get a fair crack of the whip I'll never know! UTCThe answer is very simple. The style of football in the Netherlands is very different in a number of ways. It is more akin to our Premiership reserve matches where there is very little physical contact. The term often used is - splashing around in a duck pond. . Demouge is NOT up to the physical rigours of our League One. ENDEX
nonnogeppetto
says...
12:45pm Mon 11 Mar 13
smhinto wrote:Smhinto as much as I respect your views and some of the comments that you make I have to say that your reply without the the P.S. would, in my view, merited a more balanced consideration, however by referring to those who disagree with you as 'twerps' makes people go against you even if they agreed with your sentiments.
nonnogeppetto wrote:With regards to Elphick and Daniels. We cannot just place them back into the first team straight away.
I have to say that if we had a younger Steve Fletcher the team would benefit more from Tubbs than the present strike force. Pitman has always seemed lazy to me and does not compete for the ball he expects the ball to fall perfectly at his feet. Yes he does score some great goals. I feel that we try to make it too complicated rather than play intelligent football. Come on the Cherries start winning again. I hope that Elphick and Daniels will soon be fit again.
.
They need game time i.e. one, preferably two reserve games to regain match fitness after such a lay-off. It is not as if they have just missed one game or two. They have been out for a while especially Daniels.
.
If we put them back in straight away we will in fact be weakening the back line more than it is at the moment throu their lack fitness and pace.
.
Maybe it is time to recruit a target man in on loan of which would benefit us more in our current situation than placing Elphick and Daniels striaght back into the first team after injury.
.
Regards.
P.S. I am now waiting for the first 'twerp' to disparage this valid point.
I think that we can have a debate about our beloved club without name calling.
As for your point I would hope that EH would not throw Daniels and Elphick back into the team without some test of match fitness. I would take it as read that would be the case.
nonnogeppetto
says...
12:51pm Mon 11 Mar 13
Afcbpete wrote:Thank you for asking AFCBPETE things are progressing as well as it can I will be plucking up the courage to visit my brother's grave soon possibly when the season is over so that I can share with him our success into the championship!
nonnogeppetto wrote:Hi Nonno, hope your ok.... Totally agree with your comments. The fact we are creating so many chances PROVES we are fine without James in goal, and managing the loss of Charlie and Tommy. You could argue we're losing goals at the back because James is'nt Marshalling the defence, but he himself was making too many mistakes for my liking. Which takes me back to those chances, take them, and we'd of won several of those 5 games. Tubbs in for Grabban would be my choice, but as you say, I'm certainly not going to criticise Eddie...
I wanted to comment on Saturday’s game Saturday evening however by the time I got to my PC so much rubbish was being bandied about that I decided not bother and leave the usual tit for tat posters to get on with it.
It ain’t what you say it is the way that you say it!
So whilst some long distance supporter may have some very good points to make the way that they are made puts the backs up of those who actually attend games including me.
Those of us who were there on Saturday witnessed some very good football and if half of the chances that went begging were converted into goals we would have won hands down. Alas it wasn’t to be.
In my previous post I said we should play intelligent football by that I mean ‘keep it simple’ I know that the opposing team doesn’t always allow you to play the way you want but I do think that it is possible. For example more one time passes instead of back and forth and risk losing the ball to the opposition.
How often do we see a player like Pugh make a run into space only to see the ball delivered to another player who is surrounded by defenders thus lose possession. I do wonder sometimes whether the touchline is the best place for the manager to see the game but who am I to criticise. UTCIAD
I think that whilst we create chances there is always hope that the ball will end up in the net for us it can't go on much longer the way it has been over the last few games when we did everything but score. Up the mighty cherries
Justin Otherfan
says...
12:53pm Mon 11 Mar 13
smhinto wrote:Did you see him play in League 1? On what basis are you saying he wasn't up to it? A broken nose is a broken nose whatever league you play in! I that that is an incredibly sweeping statement to make about a player who had such little game time to show his ability.
Bmthboys wrote:The answer is very simple. The style of football in the Netherlands is very different in a number of ways. It is more akin to our Premiership reserve matches where there is very little physical contact. The term often used is - splashing around in a duck pond.
Agree with comments already made,especially the tubbs comments!so why send demouge out on loan?thought he would be perfect for tubbs to play alongside!!why they didn't get a fair crack of the whip I'll never know! UTC
.
Demouge is NOT up to the physical rigours of our League One. ENDEX
Bmthboys
says...
1:40pm Mon 11 Mar 13
Justin Otherfan wrote:How much Dutch footy do u watch?u don't even watch bmth u pr!?k!apparently watch alot of prem reserve games tho!footys the same the world over.perhaps they don't make any tackles or challenges in holland.I don't think so pal!get real.
smhinto wrote:Did you see him play in League 1? On what basis are you saying he wasn't up to it? A broken nose is a broken nose whatever league you play in! I that that is an incredibly sweeping statement to make about a player who had such little game time to show his ability.
Bmthboys wrote:The answer is very simple. The style of football in the Netherlands is very different in a number of ways. It is more akin to our Premiership reserve matches where there is very little physical contact. The term often used is - splashing around in a duck pond.
Agree with comments already made,especially the tubbs comments!so why send demouge out on loan?thought he would be perfect for tubbs to play alongside!!why they didn't get a fair crack of the whip I'll never know! UTC
.
Demouge is NOT up to the physical rigours of our League One. ENDEX
TedMacsCherryPants
says...
1:57pm Mon 11 Mar 13
Bmthboys wrote:Maybe they're too stoned to tackle in Holland right? :-).........
Justin Otherfan wrote:How much Dutch footy do u watch?u don't even watch bmth u pr!?k!apparently watch alot of prem reserve games tho!footys the same the world over.perhaps they don't make any tackles or challenges in holland.I don't think so pal!get real.smhinto wrote:Did you see him play in League 1? On what basis are you saying he wasn't up to it? A broken nose is a broken nose whatever league you play in! I that that is an incredibly sweeping statement to make about a player who had such little game time to show his ability.Bmthboys wrote: Agree with comments already made,especially the tubbs comments!so why send demouge out on loan?thought he would be perfect for tubbs to play alongside!!why they didn't get a fair crack of the whip I'll never know! UTCThe answer is very simple. The style of football in the Netherlands is very different in a number of ways. It is more akin to our Premiership reserve matches where there is very little physical contact. The term often used is - splashing around in a duck pond. . Demouge is NOT up to the physical rigours of our League One. ENDEX
phil1965
says...
2:32pm Mon 11 Mar 13
Masirah Mick
says...
2:33pm Mon 11 Mar 13
smhinto wrote:"Here we again you see","poignent", "pehaps", "vald". If you could try using the Queen's English I may treat your comments with more respect. With your arrogance I thought you may have been an officer when you were in the Royal Air Force. Quite clearly you were not.
TedMacsCherryPants wrote:Here we again you see !!!
STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road wrote:Hear what ur saying Steady, I must admit I’ve had my fill of “smug-arrogance” for one season ;-|
TedMacsCherryPants wrote:Tedmac, dont engage with the Loony from Linclon, he will soon get fed up and slither away.smhinto wrote:FFS! If I was the size of big Frank and wasn’t up to the physical rigours of League 1 I’d ditch football and take up ballet, origami or synchronised swimming!Bmthboys wrote: Agree with comments already made,especially the tubbs comments!so why send demouge out on loan?thought he would be perfect for tubbs to play alongside!!why they didn't get a fair crack of the whip I'll never know! UTCThe answer is very simple. The style of football in the Netherlands is very different in a number of ways. It is more akin to our Premiership reserve matches where there is very little physical contact. The term often used is - splashing around in a duck pond. . Demouge is NOT up to the physical rigours of our League One. ENDEX
.
What I have made is a true, poingent and vald comment regarding why Demouge was sent out on loan. There is nothing smug or arrogant about it.
.
If Demouge was going to contribute effectively I am sure Ed would have kept him, or pehaps you are implying that Ed is also a Loony.
.
Perhap you should re-read and
re-evaluate my post and respond to it in an adult manner.
.
Regards
Ashleyafcb
says...
2:35pm Mon 11 Mar 13
ducky24
says...
3:12pm Mon 11 Mar 13
Tubbs, Pitman,
Pugh, Arter, O'Kane, McQuiod,
Ritchie, Seaborne, Cook, Francis,
Alsop.
Bench:
Fletcher, MacDonald, McDermott, Fogden, Fraser, Hughes, Jalal.
With the injuries we have the team actually picks itself! Eddie shouldn't tinker too much this late on anyway.
MUST win against Stevenage or the season is over! No Play-Offs. Mid table finish.
jontee
says...
3:16pm Mon 11 Mar 13
.
It has also been apparent that the team/squad was never good enough to go up. It is (still) unbalanced and remember it was thrown together by Groves. They did very well during an extended honeymoon, with Eddie getting the team to punch above its weight. That can't last.
.
Mistakes have also not helped. We had the 'spine' (GK/CD/CF) in place and looked good. Then we sent back Barnard who led the line well. We dropped James to avoid giving him a new contract. Why not give him a new contract ? A goalkeeper who commanded his area and defenders felt good about. And we sent Zubar away, depriving ourselves of ideal cover for the injury which then almost inevitably occurred.
.
And what is Mr Demin making of all this ? The club is no good to him in league 1. Already economies have been made with the realisation that promotion is now off the agenda. But will it end there ? Within a year of coming on board, Mr Demin was on his third manager. Now we all know that Eddie is about as good a manager as AFCB can get, but does Mr Demin know that. He knows nothing about football and there is no-one there to advise him properly. If as now seems likely we drop away to upper mid table, Mr Demin may well feel that he needs to make a further change. He probably regards himself as the Abramovic of League 1 and I wonder if he might not have the same ethos with regard to managers
TedMacsCherryPants
says...
3:43pm Mon 11 Mar 13
ducky24 wrote:I'll buy that if you replace McQuiod with Fraser as he looks like he needs a rest too.
Tubbsy should be given a rare start tomorrow night. Grabban is tired and slow so in need of a rest anyway. Recall Demouge. Pity we don't have any more defenders though. maybe Eddie should get a good left back on loan. I suppose Painter has put him off! Tueday's starting 11 : Tubbs, Pitman, Pugh, Arter, O'Kane, McQuiod, Ritchie, Seaborne, Cook, Francis, Alsop. Bench: Fletcher, MacDonald, McDermott, Fogden, Fraser, Hughes, Jalal. With the injuries we have the team actually picks itself! Eddie shouldn't tinker too much this late on anyway. MUST win against Stevenage or the season is over! No Play-Offs. Mid table finish.
ryanuk86
says...
3:45pm Mon 11 Mar 13
Luffbracherry
says...
4:12pm Mon 11 Mar 13
There is a long way to go yet
raybren
says...
4:16pm Mon 11 Mar 13
Or maybe ( pehaps ) your scouting dossiers are for Paris SG ?
p.s. Anybody want a game-off at Stevenage ? more recovery time for Tom & Charlie . REGARDS
Bmthboys
says...
4:36pm Mon 11 Mar 13
TedMacsCherryPants wrote:Hahaha! Sh@tmo will b able to tell us the answer to that!he knows everything!Dutch footy,prem reserve games,the mighty cherries.and he don't even watch em!(the kn@b)
Bmthboys wrote:Maybe they're too stoned to tackle in Holland right? :-).........
Justin Otherfan wrote:How much Dutch footy do u watch?u don't even watch bmth u pr!?k!apparently watch alot of prem reserve games tho!footys the same the world over.perhaps they don't make any tackles or challenges in holland.I don't think so pal!get real.smhinto wrote:Did you see him play in League 1? On what basis are you saying he wasn't up to it? A broken nose is a broken nose whatever league you play in! I that that is an incredibly sweeping statement to make about a player who had such little game time to show his ability.Bmthboys wrote: Agree with comments already made,especially the tubbs comments!so why send demouge out on loan?thought he would be perfect for tubbs to play alongside!!why they didn't get a fair crack of the whip I'll never know! UTCThe answer is very simple. The style of football in the Netherlands is very different in a number of ways. It is more akin to our Premiership reserve matches where there is very little physical contact. The term often used is - splashing around in a duck pond. . Demouge is NOT up to the physical rigours of our League One. ENDEX
ducky24
says...
4:36pm Mon 11 Mar 13
TedMacsCherryPants wrote:Yes on reflection Fraser did look pretty hungry when he came on. Tubbs and Fraser up front it is then! if only we could pick the team........come on Eddie, read this and at least think about it......
ducky24 wrote:I'll buy that if you replace McQuiod with Fraser as he looks like he needs a rest too.
Tubbsy should be given a rare start tomorrow night. Grabban is tired and slow so in need of a rest anyway. Recall Demouge. Pity we don't have any more defenders though. maybe Eddie should get a good left back on loan. I suppose Painter has put him off! Tueday's starting 11 : Tubbs, Pitman, Pugh, Arter, O'Kane, McQuiod, Ritchie, Seaborne, Cook, Francis, Alsop. Bench: Fletcher, MacDonald, McDermott, Fogden, Fraser, Hughes, Jalal. With the injuries we have the team actually picks itself! Eddie shouldn't tinker too much this late on anyway. MUST win against Stevenage or the season is over! No Play-Offs. Mid table finish.
smhinto
says...
6:20pm Mon 11 Mar 13
nonnogeppetto wrote:Dear Nonno
smhinto wrote:Smhinto as much as I respect your views and some of the comments that you make I have to say that your reply without the the P.S. would, in my view, merited a more balanced consideration, however by referring to those who disagree with you as 'twerps' makes people go against you even if they agreed with your sentiments.
nonnogeppetto wrote:With regards to Elphick and Daniels. We cannot just place them back into the first team straight away.
I have to say that if we had a younger Steve Fletcher the team would benefit more from Tubbs than the present strike force. Pitman has always seemed lazy to me and does not compete for the ball he expects the ball to fall perfectly at his feet. Yes he does score some great goals. I feel that we try to make it too complicated rather than play intelligent football. Come on the Cherries start winning again. I hope that Elphick and Daniels will soon be fit again.
.
They need game time i.e. one, preferably two reserve games to regain match fitness after such a lay-off. It is not as if they have just missed one game or two. They have been out for a while especially Daniels.
.
If we put them back in straight away we will in fact be weakening the back line more than it is at the moment throu their lack fitness and pace.
.
Maybe it is time to recruit a target man in on loan of which would benefit us more in our current situation than placing Elphick and Daniels striaght back into the first team after injury.
.
Regards.
P.S. I am now waiting for the first 'twerp' to disparage this valid point.
I think that we can have a debate about our beloved club without name calling.
As for your point I would hope that EH would not throw Daniels and Elphick back into the team without some test of match fitness. I would take it as read that would be the case.
.
I sincerely hope you are well ??
.
I should point out that I do NOT have a problem with people dis-agreeing with my posts. There is nothing wrong with healthy and fair counter-argument and banter.
.
My P.S. today refering to 'twerps' is aimed at the gnorant idiots who see my posts and notice 'smhinto' at the top of it and then automatiacally assume it must a load of drivel without actually reading it and assessing weather or not it maybe a valid point or not. Then replying to it in a stupid uncalled fr manner
.
This has been the case today if you care to go back at this thread earlier and note the stupid responses posted covering my post about Demouge. Absolutely unbelievble !!
.
In fairness I have to say that there are a number of people who have posted sensibly regarding my points over the last few days.
.
Kindest regards
.
smhinto
says...
6:24pm Mon 11 Mar 13
raybren wrote:Obviously you are not aware that there is an ongoing fault with missed characters on this forum of which many people have commented on.
Smhinto - As Mick says , "poignent" "vald" "pehaps" , you sound like the French policeman in "Allo Allo" ! I was just **** the door etc.
Or maybe ( pehaps ) your scouting dossiers are for Paris SG ?
p.s. Anybody want a game-off at Stevenage ? more recovery time for Tom & Charlie . REGARDS
.
I do not suppose you will acknowledge this should you find out weather this is true or not.
.
Regards
smhinto
says...
6:38pm Mon 11 Mar 13
STEADY EDDIE 1 for the road wrote:Has it ever occured to you Mr SteddyEddy that I just might have a valid point. A sensible reply is all that was required.
TedMacsCherryPants wrote:Tedmac, dont engage with the Loony from Linclon, he will soon get fed up and slither away.
smhinto wrote:FFS! If I was the size of big Frank and wasn’t up to the physical rigours of League 1 I’d ditch football and take up ballet, origami or synchronised swimming!
Bmthboys wrote: Agree with comments already made,especially the tubbs comments!so why send demouge out on loan?thought he would be perfect for tubbs to play alongside!!why they didn't get a fair crack of the whip I'll never know! UTCThe answer is very simple. The style of football in the Netherlands is very different in a number of ways. It is more akin to our Premiership reserve matches where there is very little physical contact. The term often used is - splashing around in a duck pond. . Demouge is NOT up to the physical rigours of our League One. ENDEX
.
Regards
nonnogeppetto
says...
6:44pm Mon 11 Mar 13
smhinto wrote:Careful smhinto weather whether!!!!! no characters missing just not in the right order or right spelling!!!
raybren wrote:Obviously you are not aware that there is an ongoing fault with missed characters on this forum of which many people have commented on.
Smhinto - As Mick says , "poignent" "vald" "pehaps" , you sound like the French policeman in "Allo Allo" ! I was just **** the door etc.
Or maybe ( pehaps ) your scouting dossiers are for Paris SG ?
p.s. Anybody want a game-off at Stevenage ? more recovery time for Tom & Charlie . REGARDS
.
I do not suppose you will acknowledge this should you find out weather this is true or not.
.
Regards
Regards
smhinto
says...
7:13pm Mon 11 Mar 13
nonnogeppetto wrote:Very true, you are quite right, more out of laziness I would say.
smhinto wrote:Careful smhinto weather whether!!!!! no characters missing just not in the right order or right spelling!!!
raybren wrote:Obviously you are not aware that there is an ongoing fault with missed characters on this forum of which many people have commented on.
Smhinto - As Mick says , "poignent" "vald" "pehaps" , you sound like the French policeman in "Allo Allo" ! I was just **** the door etc.
Or maybe ( pehaps ) your scouting dossiers are for Paris SG ?
p.s. Anybody want a game-off at Stevenage ? more recovery time for Tom & Charlie . REGARDS
.
I do not suppose you will acknowledge this should you find out weather this is true or not.
.
Regards
Regards
.
I have replied to your earlier post and reply today if you care to note.
.
Kindest regards
West moors 1
says...
7:26pm Mon 11 Mar 13
nonnogeppetto
says...
7:31pm Mon 11 Mar 13
smhinto wrote:I have read it smhinto I cannot speak for others as they have to argue their case as they see it. Unfortunately, once you get a reputation on this comment board there is a tendency for people to jump to conclusions without really give a thought to what is being said.
nonnogeppetto wrote:Very true, you are quite right, more out of laziness I would say.
smhinto wrote:Careful smhinto weather whether!!!!! no characters missing just not in the right order or right spelling!!!
raybren wrote:Obviously you are not aware that there is an ongoing fault with missed characters on this forum of which many people have commented on.
Smhinto - As Mick says , "poignent" "vald" "pehaps" , you sound like the French policeman in "Allo Allo" ! I was just **** the door etc.
Or maybe ( pehaps ) your scouting dossiers are for Paris SG ?
p.s. Anybody want a game-off at Stevenage ? more recovery time for Tom & Charlie . REGARDS
.
I do not suppose you will acknowledge this should you find out weather this is true or not.
.
Regards
Regards
.
I have replied to your earlier post and reply today if you care to note.
.
Kindest regards
The wonderful thing about opinions is that if they are well put they can be thought provoking, however none of us can claim superiority (at least that is true of myself!) because the minute we do that we are sticking our heads above the parapet.
I would only ask that you to do is to refrain from referring to others as 'twerps' empty heads etc and see if you get a different response. It must be worth a try!
Kind regards
nonnogeppetto
says...
7:33pm Mon 11 Mar 13
charlie2004
says...
10:41pm Mon 11 Mar 13
Masirah Mick
says...
10:47pm Mon 11 Mar 13
smhinto wrote:Oh dear! "weather" or not? Thats got nothing to do with "missed" characters! Do get a grip! Your becoming more of a laughing stock every day. Not a very good advert for the Royal Air Force. Thankfully, I managed to avoid you during my service career.
raybren wrote:Obviously you are not aware that there is an ongoing fault with missed characters on this forum of which many people have commented on.
Smhinto - As Mick says , "poignent" "vald" "pehaps" , you sound like the French policeman in "Allo Allo" ! I was just **** the door etc.
Or maybe ( pehaps ) your scouting dossiers are for Paris SG ?
p.s. Anybody want a game-off at Stevenage ? more recovery time for Tom & Charlie . REGARDS
.
I do not suppose you will acknowledge this should you find out weather this is true or not.
.
Regards
ducky24
says...
1:01pm Tue 12 Mar 13

nonnogeppetto says...
7:45am Mon 11 Mar 13