Perrett's Verdict: Bury 2 Cherries 2

Bournemouth Echo: CENTRE OF ATTENTION: Ref Carl Boyeson CENTRE OF ATTENTION: Ref Carl Boyeson

HOW many times have you heard it said?

“Don’t argue with the referee, he isn’t going to change his mind.”

For the first time in his 17-year career, Carl Boyeson decided to disprove the quotation in his role as pantomime villain at Bury on Saturday.

The spotlight fell on the Hull-based official after he had awarded Cherries a hotly-disputed second-half penalty and then controversially reversed his decision.

Boyeson took an age to point to the spot after Bury defender Matt Doherty had appeared to handle a cross from Simon Francis.

The major talking point came early in the second half and with Bury leading 1-0 but with Cherries having gained a foothold in proceedings following an indifferent first-half showing.

However, and after having been surrounded by irate Bury players, Boyeson decided to consult assistant Ian Dudley before changing his mind and signalling for a corner.

Bury midfielder Peter Sweeney told the Daily Echo: “I am always going to say it hit his head! Maybe some of the Bournemouth players thought it hit his hand but I genuinely believe he headed it.”

Asked if the boot had been on the other foot, Sweeney, wearing a Cheshire cat-like grin, replied: “Maybe I would have shouted for a penalty!”

While it is rare for a referee to reverse a decision, it did happen in the 1982 World Cup after France had scored against Kuwait, with the Kuwaiti team claiming they had stopped playing upon hearing a whistle from the crowd.

A member of the Kuwaiti royal family took to the pitch to voice his displeasure before the Soviet referee cancelled the goal. There were no Bury dignitaries present at Gigg Lane.

Although few wrongs have been righted, numerous incorrect decisions have been allowed to stand, two infamous examples being Reading’s ghost goal against Watford, given by referee Stuart Attwell, and Frank Lampard’s goal that never was, chalked off by referee Jorge Larrionda, in the 2010 World Cup.

Fortunately for Cherries, the decision, whether correct or otherwise, failed to dampen their spirits and, just minutes later, striker Lewis Grabban ended a superb team move to level the scores, the striker’s adept finish earning him his fourth goal in three games.

Grabban swept home an inviting cross from Charlie Daniels, the roving left-back having galloped from inside his own half before being found by Harry Arter’s defence-splitting pass.

Boss Howe said: “You fear something like that will give the home team a lift and maybe lead to a psychological dip for us because we didn’t get the penalty. But the lads recovered well. I felt we would go on to win and we had enough chances. I thought we were by far the better team.”

Cherries took time to settle with Bury’s uncompromising but effective direct style seeing them ruffle the visitors’ feathers during the early exchanges.

The hosts, boasting four wins in their previous six games, took the lead through Troy Hewitt’s crisp volley after 14 minutes, the QPR loan striker picked out by Doherty’s cross.

“It would have graced the Premier League,” said Shakers boss Kevin Blackwell. “The movement, the clever step-over, the delivery and the finish were all first class.”

Although one local reporter suggested “Bournemouth’s second goal was also a good finish”, Blackwell tried to score points when he retorted: “Our first one was the pick of the goals by a mile.”

But for an excellent save from David James, the Cherries goalkeeper turning Sweeney’s free-kick around the post in the 35th minute, Howe’s men could have fallen further behind.

And there was another let-off when Doherty arrived to meet Sweeney’s corner with a bullet header, only to see team-mate Tom Soares inadvertently block.

A role reversal in the second half started with Bury goalkeeper Trevor Carson saving from Grabban, dispelling Blackwell’s observation that “I don’t think Trevor had too many, if any, saves to make”.

Hesitation from Arter as he prepared to pull the trigger with the goal at his mercy allowed Bury to recover, while another reason Trevor did not have many, if any, saves to make was because Miles Addison had two goalbound headers heroically blocked on the line by defenders.

Bury regained the lead with a goal described by Howe as “messy”. David Worrall must have thought he was the Argentinean superstar with the same name (different spelling) when he profited from some charitable defending to make it 2-1.

Having watched his initial shot balloon off Addison and into the air, Worrall must have been delighted to see James race off his line in a futile attempt to beat him to the rebound, the Bury man slipping the ball past the Cherries goalkeeper.

Trevor (too many, if any, saves) was soundly beaten twice in stoppage time. Firstly, second-half substitute Brett Pitman placed a majestic left-foot strike past his outstretched right hand and into the bottom corner to restore parity.

And Marc Pugh’s venomous drive had the goalkeeper clutching nothing but thin air before it came back off the crossbar.

Match facts and Echo merit marks

Cherries: James 5.5, Francis 6.5, Addison 6, Elphick 6, Daniels 6.5, McQuoid 5.5 (McDermott, 82), MacDonald 8, Arter 6 (O’Kane, 87), Pugh 6.5, Tubbs 6 (Pitman, 73), Grabban 7.5.

Unused subs: Fogden, Barnard, Cook, Jalal (g/k).

Booked: Addison, Arter.

Shakers: Carson, Doherty, Ebanks-Landell, Hughes, Skarz, Worrall, Thompson, Sweeney, Soares, Hewitt, Hopper (John-Lewis, 79).

Unused subs: Carrington, C Jones, A Jones, Sodje, Belford (g/k).

Attendance: 2,541 (including 259 visiting supporters).

Referee: Carl Boyeson (Hull).

Star man

Shaun MacDonald Cool, calm and collected.

The midfielder was a model of commitment and consistency and kept things ticking over in the Cherries engine room.

He stuck to his defensive duties as Cherries came under attack in the first half and made good use of the ball when the tables were turned in the second.

Lewis Grabban put in another shift up front and got Cherries back on level terms with an excellent goal before Brett Pitman showed his class with the second equaliser.

Comments (8)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:48pm Sun 25 Nov 12

Luffbracherry says...

The ref is entitled to check with his assistant if in doubt - that is what he should do - we have to accept that

It sounds like a decent performance in a game that we should have won really.. irrespective of the referee's decision
The ref is entitled to check with his assistant if in doubt - that is what he should do - we have to accept that It sounds like a decent performance in a game that we should have won really.. irrespective of the referee's decision Luffbracherry

11:46pm Sun 25 Nov 12

Noel. says...

Luffbracherry wrote:
The ref is entitled to check with his assistant if in doubt - that is what he should do - we have to accept that

It sounds like a decent performance in a game that we should have won really.. irrespective of the referee's decision
That's true, but It's probably wiser to check before giving a decision rather than give one and change it with in a few moments.
[quote][p][bold]Luffbracherry[/bold] wrote: The ref is entitled to check with his assistant if in doubt - that is what he should do - we have to accept that It sounds like a decent performance in a game that we should have won really.. irrespective of the referee's decision[/p][/quote]That's true, but It's probably wiser to check before giving a decision rather than give one and change it with in a few moments. Noel.

7:01am Mon 26 Nov 12

cheeriedriteup says...

Noel. wrote:
Luffbracherry wrote:
The ref is entitled to check with his assistant if in doubt - that is what he should do - we have to accept that

It sounds like a decent performance in a game that we should have won really.. irrespective of the referee's decision
That's true, but It's probably wiser to check before giving a decision rather than give one and change it with in a few moments.
once he has pointed to the spot the decision is made and can not and should not be reversed.
[quote][p][bold]Noel.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Luffbracherry[/bold] wrote: The ref is entitled to check with his assistant if in doubt - that is what he should do - we have to accept that It sounds like a decent performance in a game that we should have won really.. irrespective of the referee's decision[/p][/quote]That's true, but It's probably wiser to check before giving a decision rather than give one and change it with in a few moments.[/p][/quote]once he has pointed to the spot the decision is made and can not and should not be reversed. cheeriedriteup

7:26am Mon 26 Nov 12

tricky1007 says...

cheeriedriteup wrote:
Noel. wrote:
Luffbracherry wrote:
The ref is entitled to check with his assistant if in doubt - that is what he should do - we have to accept that

It sounds like a decent performance in a game that we should have won really.. irrespective of the referee's decision
That's true, but It's probably wiser to check before giving a decision rather than give one and change it with in a few moments.
once he has pointed to the spot the decision is made and can not and should not be reversed.
did Robbie Fowler not once win a penalty for Liverpool, but said straight away it was not one, but the ref had already given it? I know he then missed on purpose, but it seems refs make it up as they go
[quote][p][bold]cheeriedriteup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Noel.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Luffbracherry[/bold] wrote: The ref is entitled to check with his assistant if in doubt - that is what he should do - we have to accept that It sounds like a decent performance in a game that we should have won really.. irrespective of the referee's decision[/p][/quote]That's true, but It's probably wiser to check before giving a decision rather than give one and change it with in a few moments.[/p][/quote]once he has pointed to the spot the decision is made and can not and should not be reversed.[/p][/quote]did Robbie Fowler not once win a penalty for Liverpool, but said straight away it was not one, but the ref had already given it? I know he then missed on purpose, but it seems refs make it up as they go tricky1007

7:55am Mon 26 Nov 12

Frankiesbackfromhollywood says...

The ref should never have given the penalty simple as that, if he had any doubts he should not have pointed to the spot, surely once the decsion is given then it must stand rightly or wrongly? He has set himself up now in future games for players to dispute his calls! Another valuable point should have been three, that's twice this week our luck has been against us, good thing though is that we have picked up points. Arter needs to shut up, can't keep doing this, it costs more than just missing a game, great to see Shauny Mac continue his imperious form! Now for a good cup win next week, been a while since we had a decent run in the cup!
The ref should never have given the penalty simple as that, if he had any doubts he should not have pointed to the spot, surely once the decsion is given then it must stand rightly or wrongly? He has set himself up now in future games for players to dispute his calls! Another valuable point should have been three, that's twice this week our luck has been against us, good thing though is that we have picked up points. Arter needs to shut up, can't keep doing this, it costs more than just missing a game, great to see Shauny Mac continue his imperious form! Now for a good cup win next week, been a while since we had a decent run in the cup! Frankiesbackfromhollywood

8:13am Mon 26 Nov 12

mrsrat says...

...another 'be kind to Cherries fans' Monday morning piece by Perrett, but still, I suppose it sends us readers off to work in a little happier mood!

Good thinking Neil.

I wasn't at the game, listened to Solent but you sure got it right about Shauny Mac, my fav,... our silent executioner. Brill
...another 'be kind to Cherries fans' Monday morning piece by Perrett, but still, I suppose it sends us readers off to work in a little happier mood! Good thinking Neil. I wasn't at the game, listened to Solent but you sure got it right about Shauny Mac, my fav,... our silent executioner. Brill mrsrat

9:33am Mon 26 Nov 12

Jim_Springbourne says...

cheeriedriteup wrote:
Noel. wrote:
Luffbracherry wrote: The ref is entitled to check with his assistant if in doubt - that is what he should do - we have to accept that It sounds like a decent performance in a game that we should have won really.. irrespective of the referee's decision
That's true, but It's probably wiser to check before giving a decision rather than give one and change it with in a few moments.
once he has pointed to the spot the decision is made and can not and should not be reversed.
That is wrong in law.
The referee may change his decision as long as play has not restarted.
[quote][p][bold]cheeriedriteup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Noel.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Luffbracherry[/bold] wrote: The ref is entitled to check with his assistant if in doubt - that is what he should do - we have to accept that It sounds like a decent performance in a game that we should have won really.. irrespective of the referee's decision[/p][/quote]That's true, but It's probably wiser to check before giving a decision rather than give one and change it with in a few moments.[/p][/quote]once he has pointed to the spot the decision is made and can not and should not be reversed.[/p][/quote]That is wrong in law. The referee may change his decision as long as play has not restarted. Jim_Springbourne

4:14pm Mon 26 Nov 12

let football be the winner says...

Good second half performance first half was like the weather dire. Mcquoid jut didnt want to be there for the 3rd match in a row and how it took Eddie 85 MINUTES to take him off is a mystery to everyone there. no passion, heart, controlled the ball like a brick wall completly one dimensional obviously an Eddie favorite should of been replaced with Mcdermott after 5 minutes let alone 85. big squad but same players seems to me that some people know they will be picked
Good second half performance first half was like the weather dire. Mcquoid jut didnt want to be there for the 3rd match in a row and how it took Eddie 85 MINUTES to take him off is a mystery to everyone there. no passion, heart, controlled the ball like a brick wall completly one dimensional obviously an Eddie favorite should of been replaced with Mcdermott after 5 minutes let alone 85. big squad but same players seems to me that some people know they will be picked let football be the winner

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

Get Adobe Flash player
About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree