Twin Sails glitches past the point of teething troubles

Twin Sails glitches past the point of teething troubles Twin Sails glitches past the point of teething troubles

THERE’S no denying that Poole’s Twin Sails bridge is quite something to look at.

Its opening in March attracted the kind of community interest and pride that isn’t often seen these days.

But the trouble with creating a highly visible landmark is that any problems it suffers will also have a high profile.

Yesterday, the bridge was out of action for two and a half hours in the middle of the day. That frustrating episode followed another closure of an hour and 45 minutes on Sunday.

The bridge works most of the time. It is certainly not Poole’s equivalent of Boscombe’s surf reef.

Yet it’s been nearly seven months since that grand opening and surely we’re past the point where such glitches can still be called teething troubles.

Fortunately, the repairs are not costing the taxpayer money, because they are still the responsibility of contractors. But these troubles are starting to cost the town in credibility.

Comments(4)

live-and-let-live says...
1:16pm Wed 3 Oct 12

when we were told there wouldnt be a bridge across holes bay,we accepted second best. and thats what we got. cheap rubbish.

portia6 says...
5:08pm Wed 3 Oct 12

Its too late baby its too late though
we really did try to make it something
went wrong so wrong and then we had
to FAKE it!

hamworthygirl says...
4:30pm Thu 4 Oct 12

live-and-let-live wrote:
when we were told there wouldnt be a bridge across holes bay,we accepted second best. and thats what we got. cheap rubbish.
Agree absolutely many years ago we had another plan put forward. My husband and I went and viewed the model, it went from Hamworthy, near to the power station site to Holes Bay no lifting at all, would have been perfect.

paul.p says...
5:21pm Tue 9 Oct 12

A Swing bridge may have been the best option. Twice as quick, and half the price. Not a lot will go wrong with them and you get 2 lanes of boat traffic.

Apparently the fixed span option didn't get used because it didn't have enough space for a proper run up to the bridge. plus it would've been under used ie no pedestrians or cyclists and also had to be high enough for the boat masts to go under. Throw in some wild birds and molluscs and you have enough excuses not to build one....

The argument for a fixed span bridge will run and run, it was and will forever be the only option for removing traffic from the Port only that's not going to happen for a while.

If and when Poole does decide to welcome back thousands of people a day to the town the new bridge will do nothing to help people get on to their other destinations so therefore a large amount of money was wasted.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree