Columnists RSS Feed


They haven’t got a clue, have they?


I AM sick of the political row about giving tax breaks to married couples.

David Cameron wants to reward married folks with tax allowances. And Ed Balls thinks this is discriminatory towards unmarried couples and single parents.

And their arguments show that neither of them actually has a clue about what’s going on and what really needs to change.

Where do Cammo and Balls think all these single-parent families came from? How do they think they got like that? Because they didn’t just suddenly appear, did they?

Before splitting up, most of these single parents were in families, the institution derided by so many politically-correct social engineers but actually acknowledged as ‘nature’s masterpiece’ when it comes to the successful raising of children. Certainly the statistics point to better health, wealth, education and a longer life for kids who have been placed at the centre of two parents’ lives.

I know this is traditionally the divorce season – plenty of lawyers are telling us that. But this year it’s ridiculous. Sadly I know of four couples who are splitting up. And I think it’s no coincidence that ALL of them ran their own businesses or were self-employed or sole traders.

They have struggled and fought and given their all to make a go of their enterprise. But thanks to the terminal meddling in small businesses’ affairs by this government; the bureaucracy, the VAT, the diversity and multi-cultural and petty health and safety legislation, thanks to the European directives and the constant raiding of their finances by successive Chancellors they have buckled under the strain. And it’s the marriage which has paid the price, drowned in a sea of rows and stress over money.

If challenged about these issues, Gordon Brown’s stock reply is to reel of a list of ‘measures’ his government has put in place to help ‘hard-working families’.

For families with kids it's the Child Tax Credit, an iniquitous arrangement that only works if mum and dad are in fixed jobs on a fixed low income. If your wages fluctuate as they tend to when you are a self-employed brickie or run a corner shop, it is worse than useless.

This isn’t extra money, it’s money these people have already earned and had snatched away from them by the taxman. The simple thing to do would be to raise the threshold at which tax kicks in. It would save money, cut out the middle-man and allow everyone, married or otherwise, to spend their income as they saw fit.

But that would stop so many people being reliant on the state. And Gordon can’t risk that. He wants us all to feel pathetically grateful for what we get.

And that’s why thousands of people this week trooped miserably off to the solicitor to start the divorce ball rolling. Ignored when they were married and trying to make a go of things, they know that once they are single, the benefits will come cascading in.


Your Say YourEcho

upontown, poole says...
7:19pm Fri 22 Jan 10

If I ran my finances like the Gov't I'd be on the street in a cardboard box...what a bunch of numptys....

traindriver3ss, bournemouth says...
8:15pm Fri 22 Jan 10

thanks for your comments about petty health and safety legislation and European directives but that is what stops employers all over the country putting profit before the health and safety of their staff. If it wern't for these directives your paper would be reporting on an awful lot more staff killed by penny pinching business owners. Of course because they commit their crimes in a suit the worst the courts would give them is a slap on the wrist but that's alright isn't it???

Mike Pickering, Bournemouth says...
4:14am Sat 23 Jan 10

There should be no reward or encouragement for people who get married - no incentives from the state will ever sway any rational sane adult, or the man she's going to marry to take the plunge, and similarly as grown ups we don't want a reward from a 3rd party for something we've done in our own interests. Certainly any variety of family (and there are many effective ones in this culture and others present and past) gives children the best grounding to be happy successful adults, but a tax credit for a married couple is just paid for by those unlucky enough not to have been blessed with a spouse - surely not something the state needs to be weighing in with an impersonal ill-informed and ultimately self-serving opinion upon.
I don't want to bribe anyone to get or stay married and don't particularly want anyone else running a book on my marriage either.

traindriver3ss, bournemouth says...
10:19am Sat 23 Jan 10

well said mike, they have taken one unfair situation where single parents get a financial advantage and just made it unfair on another group. If they get in and sadly its likely they will remove the advantage for single parents but do not put one in for married couples!!

lemontree, France says...
11:11am Sat 23 Jan 10

What a crap article. We.all know the worlds current financial situation is hostile to most businesses, large or small, but it is how each individual busness is run that dictates the end result.... re: the Avalon Hotel article. So many people choose to be self employed but are simply not prepared for a rainy day, and also want large rewards for little effort. It is so easy to blame someone else.

ekimnoslen, says...
11:11am Sat 23 Jan 10

The main objective should be to ensure that there is no financial advantage to be gained in partners producing offspring then splitting up or producing children outside of a stable relationship.
There is possibly a case for a tax "reward" for "staying together" but how can a couples habitation status be verified?
Whilst on the subect may I also suggest that child allowance be only applied to the first two children. After all we are desperately trying to keep our population below 70 million. Why encourage people to breed like rabbits!

free wessex, Bridport says...
9:29pm Sat 23 Jan 10

It is not just central government who have lost the plot over the family.
I am in dispute with the space heads up here in local government in Dorchester who are doing there best to keep my family apart..

I assert that West Dorset District Council are in breech of my Human Rights
Under Article 8: Private life and family.

Under the act I have the right to respect for my private and family life,

Article 8 is an example of a qualified right in the ECHR. This means that there is a framework in place against which any interference with my rights by the state must be judged to see if it is acceptable.

My right to respect for family life includes the right to have family relationships recognised by the law.

It also includes the right for a family to live together and enjoy each other’s company.

By stopping me applying for consideration without condition and prejudice for a housing transfer to a 2 bedroom property In Dorchester Dorset it has an adverse disruptive and damaging effect on my 11 year old child and our relationship with each other her development, safety, security and well being.

a.g.o.g., bournemouth says...
1:18pm Sun 24 Jan 10

From the divergence of obviously self-interested opinion on the matter of State intervention in all things it would seem that it is presently as around-about right as it is wrong but is, as ever was or will be, an absolute must for a spot of political tweeking.

Trifecta, Southbourne says...
3:28pm Sun 24 Jan 10

I am interested as to why you have chosen to illustrate your diatribe about the government with a picture of the leader of the opposition next to an emotive headline ? I realise that you do not pick your headlines or supporting pictures but this is like the sports desk running a piece about the Cherries and using a picture of Mick Channon to illustrate it.

caz-caz, wallisdown says...
4:17am Mon 25 Jan 10

Cameron is such a pig ,god help us if that self righteous maggot ever becomes prime minister. i have been very happily unmarried to my partner for 26 years and we have a son of 21 and as a family couldnt be better - what difference could a £10000 marriage and a piece of paper make to it ? sorry but I fail to understand what the act of marriage achieves when so many married friends have split up - partnerships are a personal commitment and if you get it right they are for ever ,get it wrong and eventually they break down . nothing changes its human nature

Bad Rabbit, Kuala Lumpur - Ex Winton says...
9:30am Mon 25 Jan 10

Dear Faith,

Thanks for demonstrating once again that modern British columnists are nothing more than blow-hards.

I would heartily suggest you put-up or shut-up. If you have the courage of your opinions, stand for national office. Don't just moan, see if you could do something about it.

Or are you too worried that most voters would just laugh at you.

All mouth, no brains.

Comments are closed on this article.

REWARD: David Cameron STOCK REPLY: Gordon Brown DISCRIMINATORY: Ed Balls

REWARD: David Cameron

STOCK REPLY: Gordon Brown

DISCRIMINATORY: Ed Balls




Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »