When news happens text pix and video to 80360. Start your message with BE then leave a space.
To buy this photo of Milton Abbey and to
see more pictures of North Dorset, click here
10:01am Friday 3rd July 2009 in
PLANS for a wind farm in a picturesque North Dorset setting were sensationally thrown out on July 2.
Despite a recommendation to approve the six 120m-high turbines at Silton, near Gillingham, district councillors unanimously voted to refuse the application.
Hundreds of objectors had earlier protested outside the Olive Bowl conference centre before the tumultuous meeting and around 200 packed out the inside of the hall.
Ultimately the public outcry to Ecotricity’s scheme told, as the council’s development control committee voted to scrap the turbine plans.
Chris Langham, chairman of the Save Our Silton protest group, said: “It was a great result. We couldn’t have asked for more.
“There were great arguments and a fantastic turnout. Overturning a recommendation is not easy but it has been worth the battle.”
Arguments against the turbines, which would have been as tall as Egypt’s largest pyramid, centred on the fact of the area’s outstanding natural beauty would be spoilt.
Protestors said the giant structures would only be 550m from the nearest resident’s front door.
Ecotricity expressed disappointment at the decision and tore into the district council for their lack of “backbone”.
Dale Vince. managing director of Ecotricity, said: “It shows once again that councils are just not capable of making these decisions.
“North Dorset council have taken 12 months to make a decision, which is supposed to have been made in four.
“Even though their own planning officers have recommended approval in a 106-page document, councillors have not had the backbone to endorse that.”
Mr Vince confirmed Ecotricity would appeal the decision.
He said: “Councils like North Dorset prove themselves unfit for the job time and again.
“We will now take this to the government – that’s where the decision needs to be taken from the start, to save a lot of time and hassle.”
Comments(14)
585
says...
11:38am Fri 3 Jul 09
AF_Cherry
says...
12:19pm Fri 3 Jul 09
JaCubz
says...
12:43pm Fri 3 Jul 09
winton50
says...
1:04pm Fri 3 Jul 09
JaCubz
says...
1:31pm Fri 3 Jul 09
winton50 wrote:Most of the time we do, no street lights, no gas, no mobile signal, and when the wind does blow, the power drops out.
I suspect that all of those that objected have now decided to do without electricity as a sign of their solidarity with those that live next to coal or nuclear power stations. Or does that not count because it's not near you?
Laurie H Marsh
says...
1:51pm Fri 3 Jul 09
thesyrup1
says...
3:31pm Fri 3 Jul 09
Chris...
says...
4:17pm Fri 3 Jul 09
Perry_Winkle
says...
7:30pm Fri 3 Jul 09
thesyrup1
says...
11:15pm Fri 3 Jul 09
Chris...
says...
11:56pm Fri 3 Jul 09
Perry_Winkle wrote:Once they have been transported, and constructed, thats it. How can once be a problem cost to the environment.
Fascinating how 'nimby' has come to mean selfish and anti-progressive. And funny how all those using it don't seem to be the ones whose local area is under threat...
The reality is that wind turbines just aren't that economic or even green - what's the environmental cost of fabrication, transport, and construction of these monsters, plus the impact of laying in the cables to carry the meagre power output into the national grid?
JaCubz
says...
8:58am Mon 6 Jul 09
no vested interest
says...
4:06pm Mon 6 Jul 09
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
djd says...
11:20am Fri 3 Jul 09
Look at countries on the continent, they all have wind turbines and they're not such a blot on the landscape.
No doubt the Government will reverse the decision.