Mostyns goes into administration (From Bournemouth Echo)
When news happens text pix and video to 80360. Start your message with BE then leave a space.
Mostyns goes into administration
4:10pm Thursday 13th September 2012 in Christchurch By Katie Clark
A CHRISTCHURCH-based business has been placed into administration after years of difficult trading conditions.
Curtain and soft-furnishings company, Mostyns, who have their head office at Avon Works in Bridge Street, has been sold by administrators.
Joint administrators Julie Palmer and Simon Campbell, from business rescue group Begbies Traynor, have sold the business, which operates 35 stores throughout the UK as well as an online curtain and fabrics service, to WCDI Limited.
Mostyns, which has an annual turnover of £7million, has been trading since 1950 and employs 128 staff across its 35 retail outlets nationwide, as well as 59 employees at its head office and manufacturing operation in Christchurch.
The vast majority of jobs have been safeguarded.
Administrator, Julie Palmer, said: “Mostyns is a very well-known business with a good reputation not just as an excellent local employer in the Christchurch area but for its stores in high streets up and down the country.
“We are delighted that the business has been sold as a going concern, safeguarding the vast majority of jobs.”
She added: “Despite a solid underlying business and sales, difficult trading conditions together with the costs of dealing with certain historical problems including onerous property leases has resulted in the company being put into administration.”
Steve Lane of WCDI said: “Mostyns has an excellent reputation for quality products manufactured in Dorset. WCDI are delighted to have purchased such a well-known brand both locally and nationally in a deal that now enables investment into the business and a brighter future.”
Comments(19)
robsmith123
says...
4:40pm Thu 13 Sep 12
burgerboy wrote:hehehe.
After a news "blackout "the administrators told the managment "It could be curtains for them if they did not pull themselves together" And "were they blind on not seeing this one coming".(;o).
made me snigger.
Couchy125
says...
4:47pm Thu 13 Sep 12
dobrojoe
says...
4:47pm Thu 13 Sep 12
Couchy125
says...
4:49pm Thu 13 Sep 12
dobrojoe wrote:Why would you want a picture?
Apart from a very dull range of products, the service was very poor. I asked for a 'measure up' twice and neither time did anyone turn up or photo to apologise. I went elsewhere!
Old Colonial
says...
5:14pm Thu 13 Sep 12
PigWhistle0709
says...
5:23pm Thu 13 Sep 12
Nahh-naa-na-naah -na?
Amelia_40
says...
5:44pm Thu 13 Sep 12
robsmith123 wrote:Hahaha - like it!
burgerboy wrote:hehehe.
After a news "blackout "the administrators told the managment "It could be curtains for them if they did not pull themselves together" And "were they blind on not seeing this one coming".(;o).
made me snigger.
West Howe Sean
says...
7:00pm Thu 13 Sep 12
Surely not the same Steven Lane of WCDI that has just bought the company.
Why is that some people appear to owe a rather a lot of money and then walk away from the business. While retaining their own personal wealth, possibly taken from the company when perhaps that money should have been used to pay its creditors.
Then believe it or not they bounce back. Apparently still owning the old company but now legally reconstituted with a new name. And suddenly all those beastly debts have disappeared.
But I'm sure that is not what would have happened in the case.
Old Colonial
says...
7:24pm Thu 13 Sep 12
West Howe Sean wrote:No, surely not.
A quick on-line check shows that a Steven Lane has been a director of Mostyns since 2004.
Surely not the same Steven Lane of WCDI that has just bought the company.
Why is that some people appear to owe a rather a lot of money and then walk away from the business. While retaining their own personal wealth, possibly taken from the company when perhaps that money should have been used to pay its creditors.
Then believe it or not they bounce back. Apparently still owning the old company but now legally reconstituted with a new name. And suddenly all those beastly debts have disappeared.
But I'm sure that is not what would have happened in the case.
Phixer
says...
7:54pm Thu 13 Sep 12
Old Colonial wrote:You weren't expecting the Echo to do any 'investigative journalism' were you?
West Howe Sean wrote:No, surely not.
A quick on-line check shows that a Steven Lane has been a director of Mostyns since 2004.
Surely not the same Steven Lane of WCDI that has just bought the company.
Why is that some people appear to owe a rather a lot of money and then walk away from the business. While retaining their own personal wealth, possibly taken from the company when perhaps that money should have been used to pay its creditors.
Then believe it or not they bounce back. Apparently still owning the old company but now legally reconstituted with a new name. And suddenly all those beastly debts have disappeared.
But I'm sure that is not what would have happened in the case.
TheBogeyMan
says...
8:26pm Thu 13 Sep 12
Old Colonial wrote:So what? It's called business. Something you seem to know nothing about. It's business law and its that way so that jobs can be preserved when a company goes bust or is about to. Learn about it then you'll know what you're talking about. People put a lot into a business which is a lot more than can be said for people who just go to work every day and don't have to put up with all the stress running a business entails. Why shouldn't they take money. What do you expect them to do - give it to charity>?
West Howe Sean wrote:No, surely not.
A quick on-line check shows that a Steven Lane has been a director of Mostyns since 2004.
Surely not the same Steven Lane of WCDI that has just bought the company.
Why is that some people appear to owe a rather a lot of money and then walk away from the business. While retaining their own personal wealth, possibly taken from the company when perhaps that money should have been used to pay its creditors.
Then believe it or not they bounce back. Apparently still owning the old company but now legally reconstituted with a new name. And suddenly all those beastly debts have disappeared.
But I'm sure that is not what would have happened in the case.
dburrells
says...
8:46pm Thu 13 Sep 12
BBC Escapee
says...
12:24am Fri 14 Sep 12
Yes in "business law" it may be legal but is it moral, ask that question to anybody that has had an outstanding debt with a company that has risen from the ashes and continued to trade whilst they have lost their money or had a nominal payment from the administrators.
The Liberal
says...
11:26am Fri 14 Sep 12
TheBogeyMan wrote:It might be business, but it's not good business. People also take a lot out of their business, which is fine - unless it's at a time when they also owe thousands to creditors. How's about a thought for the latter?
Old Colonial wrote:So what? It's called business. Something you seem to know nothing about. It's business law and its that way so that jobs can be preserved when a company goes bust or is about to. Learn about it then you'll know what you're talking about. People put a lot into a business which is a lot more than can be said for people who just go to work every day and don't have to put up with all the stress running a business entails. Why shouldn't they take money. What do you expect them to do - give it to charity>?
West Howe Sean wrote:No, surely not.
A quick on-line check shows that a Steven Lane has been a director of Mostyns since 2004.
Surely not the same Steven Lane of WCDI that has just bought the company.
Why is that some people appear to owe a rather a lot of money and then walk away from the business. While retaining their own personal wealth, possibly taken from the company when perhaps that money should have been used to pay its creditors.
Then believe it or not they bounce back. Apparently still owning the old company but now legally reconstituted with a new name. And suddenly all those beastly debts have disappeared.
But I'm sure that is not what would have happened in the case.
l'anglais
says...
1:22pm Fri 14 Sep 12
TheBogeyMan wrote:It's the workers that keeps a business ticking over, not capital investment.
Old Colonial wrote:So what? It's called business. Something you seem to know nothing about. It's business law and its that way so that jobs can be preserved when a company goes bust or is about to. Learn about it then you'll know what you're talking about. People put a lot into a business which is a lot more than can be said for people who just go to work every day and don't have to put up with all the stress running a business entails. Why shouldn't they take money. What do you expect them to do - give it to charity>?
West Howe Sean wrote:No, surely not.
A quick on-line check shows that a Steven Lane has been a director of Mostyns since 2004.
Surely not the same Steven Lane of WCDI that has just bought the company.
Why is that some people appear to owe a rather a lot of money and then walk away from the business. While retaining their own personal wealth, possibly taken from the company when perhaps that money should have been used to pay its creditors.
Then believe it or not they bounce back. Apparently still owning the old company but now legally reconstituted with a new name. And suddenly all those beastly debts have disappeared.
But I'm sure that is not what would have happened in the case.
As a true blue capitalist, (I'm all right jack, put up the ladder) I'm sure you are most concerned about the unpaid bills the creditors were left with by Mostyns.
madras
says...
1:33pm Fri 14 Sep 12
Couchy125 wrote:Think they meant to type 'phone
dobrojoe wrote:Why would you want a picture?
Apart from a very dull range of products, the service was very poor. I asked for a 'measure up' twice and neither time did anyone turn up or photo to apologise. I went elsewhere!
4stands
says...
9:01am Sat 15 Sep 12
TheBogeyMan wrote:Nice one Steve!
Old Colonial wrote:So what? It's called business. Something you seem to know nothing about. It's business law and its that way so that jobs can be preserved when a company goes bust or is about to. Learn about it then you'll know what you're talking about. People put a lot into a business which is a lot more than can be said for people who just go to work every day and don't have to put up with all the stress running a business entails. Why shouldn't they take money. What do you expect them to do - give it to charity>?
West Howe Sean wrote:No, surely not.
A quick on-line check shows that a Steven Lane has been a director of Mostyns since 2004.
Surely not the same Steven Lane of WCDI that has just bought the company.
Why is that some people appear to owe a rather a lot of money and then walk away from the business. While retaining their own personal wealth, possibly taken from the company when perhaps that money should have been used to pay its creditors.
Then believe it or not they bounce back. Apparently still owning the old company but now legally reconstituted with a new name. And suddenly all those beastly debts have disappeared.
But I'm sure that is not what would have happened in the case.
pete woodley
says...
12:01pm Sun 16 Sep 12
West Howe Sean wrote:Sean is not alone in his thoughts,why when a company goes bust,is a director allowed to carry on in a different name,creditors mainly do not get paid off,but he can still draw a salary,i personally know someone who went down 6 times(no not mitchell) he now has a lot of property and money in the bank,and of course is a mason.
A quick on-line check shows that a Steven Lane has been a director of Mostyns since 2004.
Surely not the same Steven Lane of WCDI that has just bought the company.
Why is that some people appear to owe a rather a lot of money and then walk away from the business. While retaining their own personal wealth, possibly taken from the company when perhaps that money should have been used to pay its creditors.
Then believe it or not they bounce back. Apparently still owning the old company but now legally reconstituted with a new name. And suddenly all those beastly debts have disappeared.
But I'm sure that is not what would have happened in the case.
burgerboy says...
4:30pm Thu 13 Sep 12