AN investigation into the controversial beach huts at Highcliffe will be undertaken by Christchurch council’s scrutiny committee.

Yesterday, the Daily Echo revealed Christchurch council was considering pulling out of the deal with Plum Pictures.

The competition between the council and production company for George Clarke’s Amazing Spaces would see 12 new beach retreats built at Highcliffe cliff side.

Thousands of people have signed a petition calling for the plans to be thrown out.

Members of the council’s policy and resources committee discussed the contentious issue in private last week.

And following the meeting, an investigation into the agreement with Plum Pictures was set to be carried out by leader Ray Nottage, chair of resources Trevor Watts and environment portfolio holder, Margaret Phipps, with chief executive David McIntosh to look at the decision making process.

But yesterday, Cllr Colin Jamieson, chair of scrutiny, confirmed the issue would be looked at by his committee next month.

He told the Echo: “We will investigate thoroughly in depth and without fear, favour or interference.”

Welcoming the inquiry, deputy chair, Cllr Lesley Dedman, said she had not been included in the decision making process either.

“There has been a huge amount of concern, indeed anger, from Highcliffe residents about how the decisions have been made and the lack of any information. People have been kept in the dark.”

Josephine Pollen from the Friends of Highcliffe Beaches and Cliffs said they welcomed the investigation by the scrutiny committee.

Commenting on the council’s initial investigation plans, she added: “How can it be left to the very people who have been pushing this project through and ignoring their electorate to make the final decision?”

As part of the concessions, the beach huts could become day huts only and not be available for overnight stays.

No toilet and shower facilities is also being considered, and the selected designers would be given £1,000 to compensate for the loss of holiday time they were set be given as part of their prize.

Total withdrawal from the scheme would be considered a last resort due to the financial implications and damage to the council’s reputation.

The council has declined to comment.