Pay review shake up at Bournemouth council

STRUCTURE CHANGES: Bournemouth Town Hall STRUCTURE CHANGES: Bournemouth Town Hall

A PROPOSED shake-up at the top of Bournemouth council could see bosses forego a small proportion of their pay if the council’s customer satisfaction score doesn’t improve.

New chief executive Tony Williams is planning to alter the council’s senior management structure, axing an executive director post and two service director posts to save £450,000 a year.

He is also proposing a new “earn-back” scheme, where one per cent of senior managers’ salary is retained until the council’s customer satisfaction score – currently 51 per cent – improves annually.

A report going to cabinet next Wednesday said this will demonstrate the council’s “commitment to improvement in customer satisfaction” and will foster team spirit amongst managers, who will succeed or fail together.

But as the chief executive post comes with a basic salary of £125,481, critics question how strong an incentive the potential loss of £1,254 will be. Executive directors are paid around £103,000 – a potential loss of £1,030 – and service directors are paid between £75,000 and £80,000 and so could potentially lose £750 to £800.

Cllr Carol Ainge, leader of the Liberal Democrats, said: “It’s a little bit of a farce. I can’t believe that one per cent is enough of an incentive to people who are earning an awful lot per month.

“But in any case, council officers should not need any sort of incentive to try and improve the council’s performance; that is their job and it should be their number one priority.”

And Cllr Anne Rey, leader of the Independents, said: “You can’t compare different departments of the council and it seems unfair to try and do so.

“I think this will have an adverse effect on staff morale, which is not very good anyway.”

She said she was also concerned about Mr Williams’ plan to merge adult and children’s services into a single directorate.

“The Munro Review of Child Protection has urged caution to councils doing this, warning it could mean a loss of focus on children’s services.

But Mr Williams said the merger would create a seamless service between children’s social care and adult’s social care, increase efficiency and flexibility and strengthen the directorate’s commissioning capability.

Redundancy trawl

A VOLUNTARY redundancy trawl is one of a raft of proposals aimed at saving Poole council £750,000.

Other suggestions approved by full council on Wednesday include a staff pay freeze, using fewer agency workers, charging staff for car parking and reviewing and cutting standby, call-out and unsocial hours payments for the last few cases of contractual overtime.

There is also a proposal to pay overtime “at plain time” under the cost-cutting methods drawn up by strategic director Andrew Flockhart.

The trade unions put forward a voluntary redundancy ‘trawl’ and the sale of the number plate on the Mayor’s official vehicle. It is hoped the unions and the council can reach a collective agreement by the end of July and for the Cabinet to hear a report in September.

Mr Flockhart said: “It is hoped that staff will appreciate the reasons for these changes, particularly as the need to make savings in these areas remain and is becoming more acute as restrictions on public finances increase and demand for services grows.”

Comments(10)

Norwegian Justice says...
1:34pm Tue 19 Jun 12

Clearly these people deserve every penny they get. Just like the bankers.

Bob49 says...
1:35pm Tue 19 Jun 12

Perhaps Mr Williams could start the ball rolling by adjusting his salary to a figure commensurate with ' customers' satisfaction with regard to his overseeing of the surf reef project.

Phixer says...
1:46pm Tue 19 Jun 12

"Other suggestions include charging staff for car parking."

Well, if private employees have to pay to park in the town centre then council staff receiving free parking is a perk which should be declared for tax .

If nurses have to pay for car parking..........

itsallgammon says...
1:49pm Tue 19 Jun 12

How's this for a suggestion - why don't we introduce them all to the concept of the P45? In the real world (where Councillors clearly don't live and don't even want to hear about) people who don't perform don't keep their jobs.

As they are employees paid by the local tax payers why are they not fully accountable?

They don't even have to stand for re-election. The only measure of their "performance" is in the satisfaction the tax payers feel. I accept that you can't please all the people all the time but an attitude of one out of two (that's 50%) finding ones work acceptable just won't do.

I suggest that they are only paid the proportion of their salary (I can't say "Earnings") that is shown in the satisfaction survey. So 51% of £125,421 would be £63,966 and that's still £40,000 more than the jobs worth. Oh Dear, I said Jobsworth!

wonderway says...
3:00pm Tue 19 Jun 12

perhaps theres a easier way the council apply for reclassification of planning consent for town hall to...............

B3-B7 - Special Industrial Classes which have potential for environmental harm.

muscliffman says...
3:44pm Tue 19 Jun 12

There is a credibility problem here.
How can someone who would quite surely have been sacked by their employer in the real world accountable private sector (if reports of their role in the disgraceful surf-reef fiasco are correct) now require anyone else at the Town Hall to be more accountable for their own over generous pay and conditions.
A complete top end clearout is probably the only way to bring fresh air, daylight and vital competence back into these dark cosy Town Hall offices.
That would of course meet with every resistance from the current beneficieries of the exclusive, unacountable - and some may say dodgy - existing arrangement.

s-pb2 says...
6:41pm Tue 19 Jun 12

What worries me here is the bit tagged on the end of this report that Williams wants to merge adult social care with children social care. Its clear he has no idea how social care works and is completely out of his depth as Chief Exxec. Its a bit like asking the police, fire service and ambulance service all to merge just because they use the same phone number.

The Liberal says...
7:05pm Tue 19 Jun 12

They should all have their pay slashed anyhow. They are paid far too much. And before they go on about how they could earn more for a comparable job in the private sector, it's not comparable! For one, they don't have to worry about competing with rivals and making a profit. They get money given to them, from the council taxpayers and central government, and simply have to spend it.

BBC Escapee says...
11:00pm Tue 19 Jun 12

I don't think the surf reef was a fiasco!!

The end result was the one that everybody was expecting so it actually delivered to expectations!!

That surely deserves a whacking big bonus for The Chief Executive!

These plans seem like a fantastic smoke screen being stoked up - the best form of defence is always attack!

boverboy says...
11:42pm Tue 19 Jun 12

Not such a big deal Tony as in reality after allowing for tax,pension and NI a withholding of 1% of salary is not such a big deal. As for reducing Executive Directors by one why were you advertising for one on the Council website recently? You are all wind with no substance!!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree