Pay review shake up at Bournemouth council (From Bournemouth Echo)
When news happens text pix and video to 80360. Start your message with BE then leave a space.
Pay review shake up at Bournemouth council
1:00pm Tuesday 19th June 2012 in Bournemouth By Melanie Vass
A PROPOSED shake-up at the top of Bournemouth council could see bosses forego a small proportion of their pay if the council’s customer satisfaction score doesn’t improve.
New chief executive Tony Williams is planning to alter the council’s senior management structure, axing an executive director post and two service director posts to save £450,000 a year.
He is also proposing a new “earn-back” scheme, where one per cent of senior managers’ salary is retained until the council’s customer satisfaction score – currently 51 per cent – improves annually.
A report going to cabinet next Wednesday said this will demonstrate the council’s “commitment to improvement in customer satisfaction” and will foster team spirit amongst managers, who will succeed or fail together.
But as the chief executive post comes with a basic salary of £125,481, critics question how strong an incentive the potential loss of £1,254 will be. Executive directors are paid around £103,000 – a potential loss of £1,030 – and service directors are paid between £75,000 and £80,000 and so could potentially lose £750 to £800.
Cllr Carol Ainge, leader of the Liberal Democrats, said: “It’s a little bit of a farce. I can’t believe that one per cent is enough of an incentive to people who are earning an awful lot per month.
“But in any case, council officers should not need any sort of incentive to try and improve the council’s performance; that is their job and it should be their number one priority.”
And Cllr Anne Rey, leader of the Independents, said: “You can’t compare different departments of the council and it seems unfair to try and do so.
“I think this will have an adverse effect on staff morale, which is not very good anyway.”
She said she was also concerned about Mr Williams’ plan to merge adult and children’s services into a single directorate.
“The Munro Review of Child Protection has urged caution to councils doing this, warning it could mean a loss of focus on children’s services.
But Mr Williams said the merger would create a seamless service between children’s social care and adult’s social care, increase efficiency and flexibility and strengthen the directorate’s commissioning capability.
Redundancy trawl
A VOLUNTARY redundancy trawl is one of a raft of proposals aimed at saving Poole council £750,000.
Other suggestions approved by full council on Wednesday include a staff pay freeze, using fewer agency workers, charging staff for car parking and reviewing and cutting standby, call-out and unsocial hours payments for the last few cases of contractual overtime.
There is also a proposal to pay overtime “at plain time” under the cost-cutting methods drawn up by strategic director Andrew Flockhart.
The trade unions put forward a voluntary redundancy ‘trawl’ and the sale of the number plate on the Mayor’s official vehicle. It is hoped the unions and the council can reach a collective agreement by the end of July and for the Cabinet to hear a report in September.
Mr Flockhart said: “It is hoped that staff will appreciate the reasons for these changes, particularly as the need to make savings in these areas remain and is becoming more acute as restrictions on public finances increase and demand for services grows.”
Comments(10)
Bob49
says...
1:35pm Tue 19 Jun 12
Phixer
says...
1:46pm Tue 19 Jun 12
Well, if private employees have to pay to park in the town centre then council staff receiving free parking is a perk which should be declared for tax .
If nurses have to pay for car parking..........
itsallgammon
says...
1:49pm Tue 19 Jun 12
As they are employees paid by the local tax payers why are they not fully accountable?
They don't even have to stand for re-election. The only measure of their "performance" is in the satisfaction the tax payers feel. I accept that you can't please all the people all the time but an attitude of one out of two (that's 50%) finding ones work acceptable just won't do.
I suggest that they are only paid the proportion of their salary (I can't say "Earnings") that is shown in the satisfaction survey. So 51% of £125,421 would be £63,966 and that's still £40,000 more than the jobs worth. Oh Dear, I said Jobsworth!
wonderway
says...
3:00pm Tue 19 Jun 12
B3-B7 - Special Industrial Classes which have potential for environmental harm.
muscliffman
says...
3:44pm Tue 19 Jun 12
How can someone who would quite surely have been sacked by their employer in the real world accountable private sector (if reports of their role in the disgraceful surf-reef fiasco are correct) now require anyone else at the Town Hall to be more accountable for their own over generous pay and conditions.
A complete top end clearout is probably the only way to bring fresh air, daylight and vital competence back into these dark cosy Town Hall offices.
That would of course meet with every resistance from the current beneficieries of the exclusive, unacountable - and some may say dodgy - existing arrangement.
s-pb2
says...
6:41pm Tue 19 Jun 12
The Liberal
says...
7:05pm Tue 19 Jun 12
BBC Escapee
says...
11:00pm Tue 19 Jun 12
The end result was the one that everybody was expecting so it actually delivered to expectations!!
That surely deserves a whacking big bonus for The Chief Executive!
These plans seem like a fantastic smoke screen being stoked up - the best form of defence is always attack!
boverboy
says...
11:42pm Tue 19 Jun 12
Norwegian Justice says...
1:34pm Tue 19 Jun 12