Bournemouth RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Bournemouth from the Bournemouth Eye Balloom in the Lower Gardens. Picture by Richard Crease, Bournemouth Echo. To buy this photo of Bournemouth seafront and to see more pictures, click here

Bournemouth councillor John Beesley hits out at ‘intolerable’ investigation delay


A TOP Bournemouth councillor has spoken of the “intolerable” position he has been put in by the lengthy investigation which has cost him his job as chairman of planning.

Deputy council leader Cllr John Beesley will not be standing for the vacant post of council leader when the Conservative group chooses its nomination for the job tonight.

Cllr Beesley, who is being investigated over a complaint about his friendship with a planning consultant, has also bowed to pressure to resign as chairman of the borough’s planning board.

But he is angry that the council’s standards committee has already taken months to investigate his case, with no conclusion in sight.

Cllr Beesley said: “Initially, I had anticipated that the process would take only six to eight weeks and have repeatedly asked why the inquiry cannot be conducted sooner but have not received any satisfactory response.”

He added: “I fully expect to be vindicated by the inquiry of the unfounded and politically motivated accusations against me.”

Joy Postings, the council’s service director for law and governance, said the case was being dealt with by an independent investigator, who also had day-to-day work commitments and had recently been on leave following an operation.

The case involved complex allegations, with evidence to be assessed and questions put to Cllr Beesley.

“While it is not in anyone’s interests to keep the matter open longer than it needs to, it is important that the report produced is an accurate, complete and thorough record into the complaint made,” she said.

“It is anticipated that a draft report may be ready later in the summer.”

As deputy leader, Cllr Beesley remains the senior member of the Conservative administration until the full council picks a new leader following the resignation of Cllr Stephen MacLoughlin last week.

The Conservative group wields a big majority on the council and will tonight choose between Cllr Bob Lawton and Cllr Peter Charon as its nominee for the leadership.

Comments have now been switched off, thanks for your contributions.


Comments(20)

busguy says...
9:31am Fri 9 Jul 10

Mr Beasley has been, unfortunately for him, subject to a type of inefficiency that could not and would not be tolerated in a private business.
Whatever the rights and wrongs of this case, the person under investigation is owed a reasonably quick decision. Most of the 'reasons' given for the delay are inexcusable. What was the guidance given to the investigator on the urgency of the matter? Why pick someone with day-to-day work to attend to? To me the person was probably contracted to do one day a week on this with no time limit. I might be wrong, and will willingly stand corrected, but I have been there, done it, and seen it to do with council environmental cases that are subcontracted out and drag on without the necessary controls.
Of course, having an operation is unfortunate for the individual and I wish them well, but in the cold light of day it just adds further to the delay.
The public want this sorting out quickly, one way or another too!

Sam Shepherd says...
9:35am Fri 9 Jul 10

Morning everyone. As usual, can we issue a plea for caution in your comments - please note no allegations have been proved and anyone suggesting the allegations are fact will find their comments suspended. Thanks for your co-operation.

Bob49 says...
10:14am Fri 9 Jul 10

Maybe the council is using the same methods of operation for this investigation as they did with the surf reef.

fedupwithjobsworths says...
11:02am Fri 9 Jul 10

This delay is unacceptable, and is a symptom of a dysfunctional Council. If serious allegations against Cllr Beesley have been made it is only right that these should be investigated in a speedy and thorough manner. I think the Council’s “Standards Committee” needs a kick up the backside - if the “independent investigator” they chose has too many “other work commitments” and health issues to complete the task then they should have given the work to someone who can devote the necessary time and effort to get the job done. We are all presumed innocent unless proven guilty – except in the eyes of the Council who appear to be a law unto themselves. Perhaps the competence of the Standards Committee should be investigated.

Capt. Ahab (ret.) says...
11:02am Fri 9 Jul 10

Ahoy Mr Shepherd,
I note with interest yet again ye are about pleading with the Brethren to temper their comments lest they be ‘illegal’ I wholeheartedly agree with ye but as most of ‘us’ aboard ‘Peapod’ do not have a learned mans education it be right difficult to ascertain what be contentious and what be illegal? I do take full account of terms of slander and libel but also they be treated differently in differing courts of the land.
So if I may presume ye be advising thy Echo (or be that the ‘Royal WE thou used) on what they be liable fer printing, and I be sure ye have the Brethrens interests at heart, what they say be of a legal nature I still stand by what I thought to be fair and reasonable, thy Echo delete what have bin deemed illegal (professionally, not decided with bias) and leave in print ALL other comments however ‘stimulating’ they be. Do that sound reasonable?

P.S. Me thanks to thy Echo fer reinstating comments, however aint it a tad early to close yer article fer further postings. Thy Brethren still have the democratic right to add ‘legal’ comments don’t they??

FOSF says...
11:12am Fri 9 Jul 10

Perhaps the allegations against Mr. Beesley could have been dealt with sooner, if allegations against a number of other members of the Tory Council had not got in the way. However, one must assume that all were happy with what they have alleged to have done, until the time they were actually caught out.
.
Incidentally, as a matter of interest, serving Armed Forces are guilty until found innocent. And they do more for the country, than Councillors do for their towns.

Sam Shepherd says...
11:16am Fri 9 Jul 10

Well ahoy there Captain Ahab...

That is exactly what we'll do - I'm just politely reminding people not to post things they know will cause trouble. We chose not to reopen the comments on yesterday's story because they were closed down so early but feel free to post your comments here.

oh, and it's Miss, not Mr ;)

Capt. Ahab (ret.) says...
11:41am Fri 9 Jul 10

Sam Shepherd wrote:
Well ahoy there Captain Ahab...

That is exactly what we'll do - I'm just politely reminding people not to post things they know will cause trouble. We chose not to reopen the comments on yesterday's story because they were closed down so early but feel free to post your comments here.

oh, and it's Miss, not Mr ;)
Ahoy Miss Shepherd,
Thou has fair taken me breath away with thy speed of reply, stamp me ivory ‘Peapod’ aint responded that quick in many a year.
I AM right pleased thou has explained to me crew any possible shortfalls of libel etiquette they post via me scribe will be dealt with accordingly and NO penalty be paid by other erstwhile Brethrens comments by being deleted as a result.
I do rightly promise, any offending crewmember will be placed in the chain locker with me Boson (the mans quite mad, I’m sure) that will surely prevent any reoccurrence. Not wishing to place ideas into minds but the proposal ye do offer will help to eliminate any ‘scurrilous’, quite deliberate false and quite provocative postings from closing thy whole article down.

Regards, Ahab.

BmthNewshound says...
11:48am Fri 9 Jul 10

Isn’t it amazing how when the public are demanding answers about matters like the surf reef and Imax the Council including Mr Beesley are happy to play political games and use delaying tactics to stop the public from being told what is really going on in the hope that they lose interest and that Council decisions can be quietly swept under the carpet and forgotten.
.
Well Mr Beesley, you reap what you sow and now it’s your turn to be kept waiting whilst others delay and dither. It’s not just the standards committee that Mr Beesley has to fear, however, as I am sure the new Council Leader will want to distance himself from the sleaze which has engulfed the Tory group over the past few months.

Adrian Fudge says...
11:55am Fri 9 Jul 10

Perhaps Cllr Beesley might like to reflect on his and his colleagues acusation at the time of the last election that I had crept into the Town Hall at midnight on the night of the election and signed a contract for a casino on the side of the Pavilion
They subsequently held an "enquiry" where it was substantiated that I did neither especially since Councillors are not empowered to sign contracts
I received a lot of abusive comments over that completley untrue claim including the attempt to withhold the Alderman honary title following 20 years service but the one thing that was never forthcoming was an appology from him or his Leader
If he is found to be inocent perhaps he will now know what it feels like to have such accusations made against him and refrain from such smear tacticts in the future

busguy says...
12:11pm Fri 9 Jul 10

Adrian Fudge wrote:
Perhaps Cllr Beesley might like to reflect on his and his colleagues acusation at the time of the last election that I had crept into the Town Hall at midnight on the night of the election and signed a contract for a casino on the side of the Pavilion They subsequently held an "enquiry" where it was substantiated that I did neither especially since Councillors are not empowered to sign contracts I received a lot of abusive comments over that completley untrue claim including the attempt to withhold the Alderman honary title following 20 years service but the one thing that was never forthcoming was an appology from him or his Leader If he is found to be inocent perhaps he will now know what it feels like to have such accusations made against him and refrain from such smear tacticts in the future
Nice one, Mr Fudge!
A ConDebLib comment with feeling, and a touch of Miaowwww.

busguy says...
12:14pm Fri 9 Jul 10

Apologies, typo. Of course it is ConDemLib.

Capt. Ahab (ret.) says...
12:32pm Fri 9 Jul 10

Ahoy Mr Fudge,
I know very little of thy past service to thy Brethren community,also suspect thee will have followers and antagonists. However if what ye do say be true then tis a right shame ye did not take further proceedings?
As fer Mr Beesley, let us all pray,innocent or not that he do NOT hold any position of power to ‘korrupt’(lackin
g integrity,with mercenary motives and to demoralise) intelligent decision making in the future.

Adrian Fudge says...
12:37pm Fri 9 Jul 10

busguy wrote:
Apologies, typo. Of course it is ConDemLib.
The one thing I can assure you is that I have and never would be party to a Con/Lib Dem pact, at least not with those currently in "power"
What everbody overlooks is that Bournemouth had a hung council for 8 years and although there was no "pact" with anyone by keeping members of other parties fully informed an lot was achieved

butlincat says...
1:22pm Fri 9 Jul 10

Sam Shepherd wrote:
Morning everyone. As usual, can we issue a plea for caution in your comments - please note no allegations have been proved and anyone suggesting the allegations are fact will find their comments suspended. Thanks for your co-operation.
As far as im concerned theres such a thing as free speech, and if i ever say anythng you disagree with - SUE ME!

busguy says...
1:31pm Fri 9 Jul 10

Adrian Fudge wrote:
busguy wrote: Apologies, typo. Of course it is ConDemLib.
The one thing I can assure you is that I have and never would be party to a Con/Lib Dem pact, at least not with those currently in "power" What everbody overlooks is that Bournemouth had a hung council for 8 years and although there was no "pact" with anyone by keeping members of other parties fully informed an lot was achieved
I wouldn't argue with that.
Many a hung council has performed well in a far fairer and common-sense way, and produced better results than any individual party would have done in the same position.

OnYerBike says...
1:56pm Fri 9 Jul 10

In response to Adrian Fudge, if Bournemouth ever decide to hang their council, can I offer my services free of charge? (I'll even supply the rope)

Capt. Ahab (ret.) says...
2:32pm Fri 9 Jul 10

butlincat wrote:
Sam Shepherd wrote:
Morning everyone. As usual, can we issue a plea for caution in your comments - please note no allegations have been proved and anyone suggesting the allegations are fact will find their comments suspended. Thanks for your co-operation.
As far as im concerned theres such a thing as free speech, and if i ever say anythng you disagree with - SUE ME!
Ahoy ‘butlincat’
I do right agree with yer fervent defending of free speech, it be the very essence of a democracy. However when thy comments be (professionally) deemed to be flagitiously unsubstantiated then ye risk ALL of our rights to free speech by having them taken down and that sir just aint fair on the rest of thy Brethren. In any event MISS Shepherds request to all of us seemed reasonable enough. To assume the Echo would sue thee fer monies or other valuables ye have about thee be far more energetic than just ‘casting yer adrift’.

Yer servant, Ahab.

marjorie01 says...
2:53pm Fri 9 Jul 10

I see that the 'famous four' appear in Private eye AGAIN this month. Now the whole nation is capable of reading what a sham we have as a council - must make Beesley and co so proud to feature in a national magazine.

Sam Shepherd says...
5:09pm Fri 9 Jul 10

Hi Butlincat; you're right, of course, about free speech, but there's also such a thing as the law, and if you post libellous comments it won't be us that sues you, but the person you've libelled sueing both us and you.

Despite what you may think you don't have the right to say whatever you like without consequences - and here, the consequences are your comment gets deleted and your account may be suspended.

We really don't like having to take comments down, hence my request. We're not trying to stifle anyone's opinions, just make sure that as many opinions as possible are heard.

We'll be closing the comments on this story shortly, given what's been said by some, but there will of course be another story posted tomorrow morning when we know who's won the leadership, so see you then!


Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses