When news happens text pix and video to 80360. Start your message with BE then leave a space.
To buy this photo of Bournemouth seafront and to see more pictures, click here
9:00am Friday 9th July 2010 in
A TOP Bournemouth councillor has spoken of the “intolerable” position he has been put in by the lengthy investigation which has cost him his job as chairman of planning.
Deputy council leader Cllr John Beesley will not be standing for the vacant post of council leader when the Conservative group chooses its nomination for the job tonight.
Cllr Beesley, who is being investigated over a complaint about his friendship with a planning consultant, has also bowed to pressure to resign as chairman of the borough’s planning board.
But he is angry that the council’s standards committee has already taken months to investigate his case, with no conclusion in sight.
Cllr Beesley said: “Initially, I had anticipated that the process would take only six to eight weeks and have repeatedly asked why the inquiry cannot be conducted sooner but have not received any satisfactory response.”
He added: “I fully expect to be vindicated by the inquiry of the unfounded and politically motivated accusations against me.”
Joy Postings, the council’s service director for law and governance, said the case was being dealt with by an independent investigator, who also had day-to-day work commitments and had recently been on leave following an operation.
The case involved complex allegations, with evidence to be assessed and questions put to Cllr Beesley.
“While it is not in anyone’s interests to keep the matter open longer than it needs to, it is important that the report produced is an accurate, complete and thorough record into the complaint made,” she said.
“It is anticipated that a draft report may be ready later in the summer.”
As deputy leader, Cllr Beesley remains the senior member of the Conservative administration until the full council picks a new leader following the resignation of Cllr Stephen MacLoughlin last week.
The Conservative group wields a big majority on the council and will tonight choose between Cllr Bob Lawton and Cllr Peter Charon as its nominee for the leadership.
Comments have now been switched off, thanks for your contributions.
Comments(20)
Sam Shepherd
says...
9:35am Fri 9 Jul 10
Bob49
says...
10:14am Fri 9 Jul 10
fedupwithjobsworths
says...
11:02am Fri 9 Jul 10
Capt. Ahab (ret.)
says...
11:02am Fri 9 Jul 10
FOSF
says...
11:12am Fri 9 Jul 10
Sam Shepherd
says...
11:16am Fri 9 Jul 10
Capt. Ahab (ret.)
says...
11:41am Fri 9 Jul 10
Sam Shepherd wrote:Ahoy Miss Shepherd,
Well ahoy there Captain Ahab...
That is exactly what we'll do - I'm just politely reminding people not to post things they know will cause trouble. We chose not to reopen the comments on yesterday's story because they were closed down so early but feel free to post your comments here.
oh, and it's Miss, not Mr ;)
BmthNewshound
says...
11:48am Fri 9 Jul 10
Adrian Fudge
says...
11:55am Fri 9 Jul 10
busguy
says...
12:11pm Fri 9 Jul 10
Adrian Fudge wrote:Nice one, Mr Fudge!
Perhaps Cllr Beesley might like to reflect on his and his colleagues acusation at the time of the last election that I had crept into the Town Hall at midnight on the night of the election and signed a contract for a casino on the side of the Pavilion They subsequently held an "enquiry" where it was substantiated that I did neither especially since Councillors are not empowered to sign contracts I received a lot of abusive comments over that completley untrue claim including the attempt to withhold the Alderman honary title following 20 years service but the one thing that was never forthcoming was an appology from him or his Leader If he is found to be inocent perhaps he will now know what it feels like to have such accusations made against him and refrain from such smear tacticts in the future
busguy
says...
12:14pm Fri 9 Jul 10
Capt. Ahab (ret.)
says...
12:32pm Fri 9 Jul 10
Adrian Fudge
says...
12:37pm Fri 9 Jul 10
busguy wrote:The one thing I can assure you is that I have and never would be party to a Con/Lib Dem pact, at least not with those currently in "power"
Apologies, typo. Of course it is ConDemLib.
butlincat
says...
1:22pm Fri 9 Jul 10
Sam Shepherd wrote:As far as im concerned theres such a thing as free speech, and if i ever say anythng you disagree with - SUE ME!
Morning everyone. As usual, can we issue a plea for caution in your comments - please note no allegations have been proved and anyone suggesting the allegations are fact will find their comments suspended. Thanks for your co-operation.
busguy
says...
1:31pm Fri 9 Jul 10
Adrian Fudge wrote:I wouldn't argue with that.
busguy wrote: Apologies, typo. Of course it is ConDemLib.The one thing I can assure you is that I have and never would be party to a Con/Lib Dem pact, at least not with those currently in "power" What everbody overlooks is that Bournemouth had a hung council for 8 years and although there was no "pact" with anyone by keeping members of other parties fully informed an lot was achieved
OnYerBike
says...
1:56pm Fri 9 Jul 10
Capt. Ahab (ret.)
says...
2:32pm Fri 9 Jul 10
butlincat wrote:Ahoy ‘butlincat’
Sam Shepherd wrote:As far as im concerned theres such a thing as free speech, and if i ever say anythng you disagree with - SUE ME!
Morning everyone. As usual, can we issue a plea for caution in your comments - please note no allegations have been proved and anyone suggesting the allegations are fact will find their comments suspended. Thanks for your co-operation.
marjorie01
says...
2:53pm Fri 9 Jul 10
Sam Shepherd
says...
5:09pm Fri 9 Jul 10
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
busguy says...
9:31am Fri 9 Jul 10
Whatever the rights and wrongs of this case, the person under investigation is owed a reasonably quick decision. Most of the 'reasons' given for the delay are inexcusable. What was the guidance given to the investigator on the urgency of the matter? Why pick someone with day-to-day work to attend to? To me the person was probably contracted to do one day a week on this with no time limit. I might be wrong, and will willingly stand corrected, but I have been there, done it, and seen it to do with council environmental cases that are subcontracted out and drag on without the necessary controls.
Of course, having an operation is unfortunate for the individual and I wish them well, but in the cold light of day it just adds further to the delay.
The public want this sorting out quickly, one way or another too!