When news happens text pix and video to 80360. Start your message with BE then leave a space.
To buy this photo of Bournemouth seafront and to see more pictures, click here
8:00am Friday 2nd July 2010 in
PROSPECTIVE Imax developers are being told what the town wants to see on the controversial Waterfront site.
A draft planning brief informs would-be developers they need to provide a commercially viable attraction which can be proven to enjoy public support.
The redevelopment should improve the vista, open up sea views from Bath Road and lower the height of the building.
Careful thought must also be given to the facades and roof so the building doesn’t look too big or box-like.
Any replacement building will have to have “real architectural merit” and meet with the approval of experts from the Commission of Architecture and the Built Environ-ment and the South West Design Panel.
A recent public consultation found a combination of tropical gardens, water park, interactive arts, museum and performing arts space were the most popular choices to replace the Imax.
Residents are being urged to comment before the brief goes out to developers. It will be available online at bournemouth.gov.uk /waterfront from 4pm today. Comments must be received by August 4.
Council leader Stephen MacLoughlin said: “The brief is a guide for developers so they understand the public and the council’s aspirations for the site. We will expect them to put their own interpretation on Bournemouth’s requirements and come forward with inspirational schemes.
“At that stage, we will look at their proposals and start to determine exactly what might replace the Imax.
“This is a very exciting time for Bournemouth – we have the opportunity to create a fantastic all-weather attraction in a building that finally everyone can be proud of.”
Comments(22)
sussexcherry
says...
9:38am Fri 2 Jul 10
Mediclogan5
says...
9:48am Fri 2 Jul 10
Corrupto
says...
10:07am Fri 2 Jul 10
Ian Rathbone
says...
10:09am Fri 2 Jul 10
Haveasaytoday
says...
10:58am Fri 2 Jul 10
contric
says...
11:14am Fri 2 Jul 10
kingsgreen
says...
11:20am Fri 2 Jul 10
High Treason
says...
11:51am Fri 2 Jul 10
Dorset Mitch
says...
12:32pm Fri 2 Jul 10
glennzilla
says...
2:02pm Fri 2 Jul 10
jeebuscripes
says...
2:10pm Fri 2 Jul 10
boracay
says...
3:12pm Fri 2 Jul 10
SillyGirl
says...
3:13pm Fri 2 Jul 10
Bormuf Boy
says...
3:39pm Fri 2 Jul 10
Azphreal
says...
3:55pm Fri 2 Jul 10
H2oHara
says...
4:14pm Fri 2 Jul 10
Boscomite
says...
4:42pm Fri 2 Jul 10
Bournefre
says...
4:44pm Fri 2 Jul 10
Bormuf Boy wrote:I agree. If you want to look at something 'iconic' go to the surf reef - that was a waste of money as well.
We don't have to put anything 'iconic' there. Why not return it as part of the general pier approach area possibly as a garden with seating. In years to come, if someone comes up with a great idea for the space , then we can build something. At the moment we've got this space and we HAVE to fill it. But we don't.
McVICAR
says...
7:01pm Fri 2 Jul 10
EGHH
says...
6:12am Sat 3 Jul 10
caz-caz
says...
10:48am Sat 3 Jul 10
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
BourneRed says...
8:32am Fri 2 Jul 10
From a distance the area looks nice and tropical, but also suits a purpose as a tourist attraction with a water park.
Flumes finish in a medium size pool, which is also able to be covered over as a stage for performances.