When news happens text pix and video to 80360. Start your message with BE then leave a space.
To buy this photo of Bournemouth seafront and to see more pictures, click here
1:30pm Tuesday 9th March 2010 in
TWO dozen “super” beach huts overlooking one of Bournemouth’s Blue Flag beaches are having to be repainted, a year after being installed.
The 24 huts of the Purbeck View development at Alum Chine attracted protests at the planning stage because they were built on the site of a children’s paddling pool.
But a water play area was incorporated into the scheme and the first of the 11 ft by 8ft prefabricated huts hoisted into place in March last year.
Nine were snapped up quickly, with buyers paying out just under £40,000 – £34,000 plus £5,500 VAT – for a 25-year lease. Owners also have to pay ground rent of several hundred pounds a year.
But a year on, nine of the New England-style wooden huts are still empty and apparently in need of urgent attention.
Bournemouth seafront development manager Chris Saunders explained: “It is always a possibility that we will need to undertake work to maintain beach huts due to the harsh marine environment.
“The Alum Chine beach huts have been in place for up to 18 months and we have started to notice that the knots in the wood are starting to show through in some places. This is as a result of wear and tear and may also be due, in part, to a different finish that we trialled for the beach huts. We are therefore repainting them so that they are in excellent condition in time for the Easter holidays.”
Comments(5)
georgina dean
says...
7:53pm Tue 9 Mar 10
eyesropen
says...
10:38pm Tue 9 Mar 10
georgina dean wrote:Slightly off topic but are you suggesting that there shoud be no dog waste bins on the sea front? One man & a van isn't a big price to pay for a clean(ish) seafront. I'm sure you'll be the first to complain when the seafront is knee deep in dog dirt. Not what I'd call a waste of money...there are plenty of real wastes of money you could have used to make your point (Imax & surf reef for a start!) rather than picking on a man actually doing a useful job.
we walked along the seafront and saw 5 perfect beach huts being smashed up by council workers......surely these could have been sold or something....trouble is these councils think in millions now and smash and replace.....we had to ask where the famous 'surf' reef was and burst out laughing when we were told.....also interesting employing a man and lorry to drive along the seafront boscombe to southbourne just picking up dogs muck.....if they think of the saying look after the pennies and the pounds will look after themselves.....maybe they would get somewhere.....the millions this council has wasted is immoral and we should get rid of all of them and get some fresh new thinking
gudmenrmist
says...
7:49am Wed 10 Mar 10
Syd Poumen
says...
8:23am Wed 10 Mar 10
gudmenrmist wrote:Joanna CODD would be like a fish out of water if she became an investigative reporter for the Echo!
Mr. Saunders states that he trialled an acceptable finish, why then did he use an alternative? Joanna could YOU not have asked him?
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
grimreaper says...
4:58pm Tue 9 Mar 10
.
How long can this go on ??