Confusion over the future of the lollipops

Lollipop patrols ARE still under threat, says Dorset County Council Lollipop patrols ARE still under threat, says Dorset County Council

CONFUSION reigns over the future of lollipop crossing patrols at Dorset schools.

Two senior councillors have made conflicting statements over the future of the service, which could end next March if Dorset County Council carries through a proposal to withdraw salaries for crossing guards.

The cash-strapped council – which needs to save £55million by 2014/15 after massive cuts to funding from central government – has proposed withdrawing salaries from lollipop patrols in a bid to save £200,000 a year.

But yesterday in a national radio broadcast, the council’s education portfolio holder, Cllr Toni Coombs, said the school crossing service would escape the cuts.

“Unfortunately, we’ve had no responses back from the community anywhere in Dorset from people wanting to take on the role of school crossing patrols and I think that’s very sad,” she said.

“If we can’t find volunteers or schools or town and parish councils to take over the funding then we will continue to fund them.

“We will still have to make cuts but we won’t make the cuts in the school crossing patrols.”

Her comments were made to a 12-year-old schoolgirl at Verwood’s Emmanuel Middle School and recorded as part of the BBC’s School Report initiative. They were broadcast yesterday on Radio Four’s You And Yours programme.

Teacher Elaine Robertson said: “Breanne, who interviewed Cllr Coombs, really impressed the journalists with her interview technique and they quite liked our story.

“If we have done anything to help save the lollipops, we’re very glad.”

But in a statement issued by County Hall to “clarify” the situation, transport portfolio holder Cllr Peter Finney said it would be wrong to pre-empt the results of a consultation on withdrawal of the salaries.

“The level of savings needed means we need to look at the services, including discretionary ones such as school crossing patrols,” he said.

The council wants schools and parish and town councils to fund lollipop staff salaries, but has pledged to continue to foot the bill for training, equipment, and insurance.

It had planned to stop paying salaries in July, but extended the deadline in January to March 2012, when a public consultation ends.

Comments(12)

fedupwithjobsworths says...
11:39am Fri 18 Mar 11

Getting rid of two or three "super non-jobs-worths" at County Hall would save enough money to keep these lollipop patrols going. Remember this is the Council that wasted £1 million on building a lizard fench down the A338 Spur Road (enough money to keep these patrols going for 5 years).

fossilmole says...
11:56am Fri 18 Mar 11

Dorset Country Council will have carried out Risk Assessments in order to arrive at decisions as to where these crossing patrols were needed.

In the event of a child being injured as a result of a r.t.a., at a site where a patrol has been withdrawn, this will leave the County Council open to being challenged in the courts for liability on negligence grounds.

EGHH says...
3:07pm Fri 18 Mar 11

Disgusting! DCC are playing with kids lives. Why not sack some of the overpaid executives at county Hall. No one would miss them.

EGHH says...
12:45pm Sat 19 Mar 11

Cllr Toni Coombs was shown on BBC South Today saying the exact same thing. Perhaps they need to talk to each other!

OldStuffRocks says...
12:58pm Sat 19 Mar 11

what about the ones that stand by crossings and press the button for people to cross? surely the general public are able to press a button without help?

ianexams says...
4:48pm Sat 19 Mar 11

Sack them at DCC the lies just role out, they dont believe in team work, as an authority, just look at Bournemouth Council for gaffs. Well done to the young girl from Verwood who asked the question, I think she is 100% more alert than the authorities. Perhaps like mostly council Managers and Councillors the NUMPY season has arrived?

contric says...
6:44pm Sat 19 Mar 11

have a swap round the idiots in the town halls to see the kids over the road and the lollipop people to run the council i expect it would be a big improvement

Veryhappyincomer says...
8:09pm Sat 19 Mar 11

Try reading Andrew Gilligan's blog in the Telegraph from a couple of weeks ago. He managed to get a look at the accounts of a London council (Newham I think) through the Freedom of Information Act. The council there is hacking and slashing at front-line services, yet is actually in receipt of the same amount of money as last year, yet is claiming that it is having to make £26million in cuts. The £26million is a balancing item which they seem to have intented out of nowhere, and now it needs to be "cut".
.
We all know that it doesn't matter which party is in charge - councils have their own policy regardless of the decision of the electorate. Perhaps if someone were to do a FOI request on DCC's finances then we could see what the comrades who actually run the council are really spending the money on, and whether the "cuts" are necessary or even exist.

Ophilum says...
9:24pm Sat 19 Mar 11

The council wants schools and parish and town councils to fund lollipop staff salaries, but has pledged to continue to foot the bill for training, equipment, and insurance.
This is from a council that over pays it,s top staff and sends around a propaganda sheet showing the top Chief opening this and that spending money like it has gone out of fashion, Get real and cut the over paying of top staff and you can then cut the rates as well. That would be news.

penhale says...
9:31pm Sat 19 Mar 11

Why get rid of these people who do an important job in all weathers to keep the kids safe and cost such a small amount of money when they could get shot of some fat office dwelling moron on a wage that most of us can only dream of, plus of course all the expenses claims they submit.
Better to sack two jobs worth on a £100,000 per year each than get rid of all the lollipop patrols.

slightlyperturbed says...
8:11am Mon 21 Mar 11

The management team at DCC (I worked there until recently and I know!) are so incompetent and are currently engaged in interdepartmental battles to see who looks the best. There are some good people but they are all sharpening swords for when the current Chief Exec retires so they can fill his boots. They are chasing tails at the moment and have no clear idea. Talking about lollipop people and emotive issues like that is a distraction from the real issues of inefficiency and bungling

AshDev says...
9:14pm Sat 26 Mar 11

What does this mean?

Internal Server Error

Error: Please add ArchiveModule to this site - as Search functionality depends on it

in /var/www/html/martin
i-tng/src/modules/Se
archModule.php at line 601

#0 /var/www/html/martin
i-tng/src/modules/Se
archModule.php(310): SearchModule->genera
teResultsPage(Array, Array, 0)
#1 /var/www/html/martin
i-tng/src/modules/Se
archModule.php(55): SearchModule->proces
sSearchQuery()
#2 /var/www/html/martin
i-tng/src/web.php(69
6): SearchModule->handle
DisplayRequest(Objec
t(HttpRequest))
#3 /var/www/html/martin
i-tng/src/web.php(47
): RequestHandler->hand
leRequestInternal(Ob
ject(HttpRequest))
#4 /var/www/html/martin
i-tng/lib/http.php(8
7): RequestHandler->hand
leRequest(Object(Htt
pRequest))
#5 /var/www/html/martin
i-tng/htdocs/index.p
hp(119): HttpApplication->run
()
#6 {main}

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree