All About The Bike RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


All About the Bike

Forget stupid arguments, let's concentrate on what really matters


This week there are two specific things that I want to write about...

Firstly I feel the need to make comment on the story about the death of Kevin Watts whilst cycling near Boscombe Pier.

As the verdict of the inquest stated this was a tragic accident, but from a personal point of view I am surprised to see that two particular things attracted a large amount of quite heated debate.

The fact that he did not wear a helmet whilst cycling was his personal choice. I do wear a helmet whilst cycling and that is my choice.

There are various studies and both support and refute the benefits of cycling helmets in equal measures.

Whether a helmet would have reduced his injuries or prevented his death is not clear, but the choice was his to make, so the debate is both unfair and irrelevant.

The other point that seems to have sparked debate and argument is the fact that he was travelling at nearly 30mph. I don't understand why this is a point of discussion, he wasn't breaking the speed limit and if he had been in a car or on a motorcycle this fact would not have been mentioned.

I regularly exceed 30mph whilst cycling both on road (where permitted) and off road. This is not an excessive speed for an experienced cyclist. During the Tour de France the professional racers reach speeds of over 60mph whilst descending from the mountains.

From what I have read Kevin Watts died from injuries received in a tragic accident, you could argue that the pedestrian should not have stepped out into the road without looking, but the only comments that we should be making are to give our sympathies to those who knew him and miss him.


The second story that has attracted my attention over the last few days was in Mondays Echo covering the case of Nicholas Rowntree who assaulted two people whilst cycling along the seafront in June of last year.

I'm not going to make any comments on this particular incident but I am going to talk about the whole issue of seafront cycling in Bournemouth and Poole.

Our local byelaws do not permit cycling along the seafront; however these rules have been relaxed in order to allow people to use this fantastic stretch of promenade as a traffic free route through our conurbation.

There are three things to remember whilst riding along the seafront: 1. You can cycle along this stretch at any time apart from 10am-6pm during July and August. This is an enforceable rule and people have been fined for not abiding by these restrictions.

2. There is a speed limit of 10mph along the seafront. This is not specific to cyclists and applies to all movement on the promenade. Cyclists are not required by law to be able to measure their speed so this is difficult to enforce. Common sense also shows that there are times when 10mph is too fast due to the number of people using the seafront.

3. Cycle with care! This is a shared facility and it just makes sense to be careful and have consideration for others.

Cycling on the promenade is a wonderful way to get about and it's a fantastic place to be. I love watching the sunrise or sunset as I cycle along the seafront in the mornings or evenings.

However, being able to use this is a privilege and every year this is re-evaluated to see whether the relaxation of the byelaws should remain in place.

I will be furious if this privilege is taken away because of the selfish actions of a few inconsiderate people, so from this one cyclist to others, please abide by the rules so that we can continue to use the seafront.

Comments(6)

traindriver3ss says...
6:01pm Tue 9 Mar 10

Exactly you have summed it up perfect its PRIVILEGE that we enjoy with a few simple rules!!! not hard is it??

mikey2gorgeous says...
9:29am Wed 10 Mar 10

David, are there any stats on the number of incidents along the prom? It would be interesting to know and so far the Echo has failed to inform its readers of whether there IS any particular problem.
.
I feel the issue of cyclists and pedestrians sharing space is probably a red herring. There will always be idiots (as per the story - and the prom is a special issue separate from other spaces) but so much time, effort and money is spent trying to separate the 2 - I don't believe there is a particular issue to address. This segregation only enforces anti-bike feeling.

sprint says...
2:00pm Wed 10 Mar 10

I'm always amazed at how newspapers seem to manage to apportion blame to cyclists whenever they are involved in an incident, no matter who was at "fault".

I used to enjoy cylcing along the promenade too, and particlarly after a long ride on the Purbecks. I stopped last year however after I was assaulted by an old man weilding his walking stick like a club. My crime? Having the temerity to cycle past him. At the time I was cycling more slowly than most were walking... The only way I could have been more careful to avoid causing conflict with him would have been to turn around and go back the other way!

nodder1 says...
9:53pm Wed 10 Mar 10

good post David.
reference to first item, this very paper dosent do much for cycling with shock headlines like
'cyclist dies in seafront collision'
conflating an incident with seafront cycling,
he died on the hill, colliding with a vehicle, and was a very regrettable,
r.i.p.
poor writing like that reinforces the popular view of cycling as dangerous and something for 'those'people, whilst stoking the fuel of the second item of your piece.
r.e second item,
absolutely, take responsibility.its shared space, as much as it infuriates me when the peds walk as if they are on mars,
walking speed is the way to ride amongst the peds.
its two months when cycling is banned too, not ten,
during july/august I regularly have to walk bits with the bike, if I shout 'take responsibility' at you whilst riding along then you know who it was.

nodder1 says...
7:06am Thu 11 Mar 10

sprint wrote:
I'm always amazed at how newspapers seem to manage to apportion blame to cyclists whenever they are involved in an incident, no matter who was at "fault". I used to enjoy cylcing along the promenade too, and particlarly after a long ride on the Purbecks. I stopped last year however after I was assaulted by an old man weilding his walking stick like a club. My crime? Having the temerity to cycle past him. At the time I was cycling more slowly than most were walking... The only way I could have been more careful to avoid causing conflict with him would have been to turn around and go back the other way!
well observed ^ the line is always something like "a cyclist was i collision with...."
loading the sentance towards the action coming from the rider,
i would argue most collisions are caused by drivers that dont/cant/wont see riders.

Roginthesouth says...
8:23am Thu 11 Mar 10

Good comments David which I am sure are shared by many.
I also agree with Nodder1 concerning the unnecessary shock headline approach for both articles, which out of respect for Kevin Watts in particular was unnecessary.
However there are unfortunately, minority groups who take the Nicholas Rountree approach to life, whatever they do, with total disregard for the law and for others. So don’t provide them with the satisfaction of headlines. Especially at a sensitive time of year when the majority of genuine cyclists are looking forward to the summer and riding sensibly along the seafront.


Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses