Residents win battle to get rebound wall at Alexandra Park moved

The rebound wall The rebound wall

A REBOUND wall installed in a park two years ago has been moved at a cost of nearly £2,000.

The wall, which serves as a goal and a wicket for a small all-weather pitch, was originally installed in March 2010 as part of a £60,000 investment in new play equipment at Alexandra Park, Parkstone.

At the time, the development, funded by the government’s Playbuilder scheme, caused controversy in the neighbourhood, with some residents claiming the council had not carried out a thorough consultation.

After a public meeting, the council agreed to make changes, including altering the planned orientation of the rebound wall to minimise potential disruption to local householders.

The wall was installed towards a path separating the multi-use games area from trees behind the back gardens of houses in Palmerston Road.

But a few days ago the area was fenced off and a notice put up to say it would be closed for two weeks while workers relocated the rebound wall.

A spokeswoman for the Borough of Poole said the work, which is costing £1,940, was being carried out in response to “public demand” and would change the direction of play away from the properties, reducing the number of balls going over fences and cutting disturbance to residents.

One resident, Sue Hockey explained: “Everybody that backs on to the park has had lots of balls coming into their gardens. One had her fence broken with lads climbing over to get their balls back. We had four balls coming into our garden in an afternoon.

“We were all against them putting in the wall anyway. The problem was they had already ordered it. For years, children put sweaters down for goalposts, but they played further up in the park.”

Comments(9)

norwood70 says...
3:27pm Wed 3 Oct 12

NIMBY of the month award goes to Sue Hockey “Everybody that backs on to the park has had lots of balls coming into their gardens". Was the park there when you moved there?? I suppose you would be happier with a waste ground area full of kids smoking and drinking. More of these facilities are needed to keep the youths off the street and give them somewhere to go.

Morrigan says...
3:37pm Wed 3 Oct 12

I daresay the park was there when she moved into her house, as the park is over 100 years old - however, she says there was no problems when the kids used sweaters for goal posts as they played further into the park - and presumable away from the properties.

I wonder how you would feel if you constantly have kids breaking down *your* fence, or multiple knocks at the door every day by kids asking to get their footballs back?

The fact is Alexandra Park is fairly large, so it would surely make sense to have sited the goalpost wall away from housing?

pete woodley says...
3:39pm Wed 3 Oct 12

norwood70 wrote:
NIMBY of the month award goes to Sue Hockey “Everybody that backs on to the park has had lots of balls coming into their gardens". Was the park there when you moved there?? I suppose you would be happier with a waste ground area full of kids smoking and drinking. More of these facilities are needed to keep the youths off the street and give them somewhere to go.
Very good comment and so true.

norwood70 says...
3:43pm Wed 3 Oct 12

But times have moved on. The youth of today deserve and expect better facilities than "jumpers for goalposts" - that went out in the 70's. People will always find something to moan about when it comes to providing modern facilities for our youth.
If all these people have to moan about in life than a few football occasionaly coming into their garden then the good on them.

rayc says...
4:25pm Wed 3 Oct 12

norwood70 wrote:
But times have moved on. The youth of today deserve and expect better facilities than "jumpers for goalposts" - that went out in the 70's. People will always find something to moan about when it comes to providing modern facilities for our youth.
If all these people have to moan about in life than a few football occasionaly coming into their garden then the good on them.
How do you know that is all they have to moan about in life?

ctrewyou says...
4:37pm Wed 3 Oct 12

Sorry, Sue Hockey, what a load of rubbish. There are 3 properties that back on to the park where the wall is. And there are some blooming great big trees between the wall and the gardens, so it would be almost impossible to kick a ball from the pitch into one those gardens.
If you have a garden that backs on to a park then, yes, you are likely to have the odd football come over, perhaps even a broken window or fence. It happens, sorry, and really is not the end of the world, but not the most anti-social behaviour in the world. If you would rather the kids were inside on their computers, then fine, but most reasonable people with think differently. And as has been said, the park was there before you moved in. And, Morrigan, another load of rubbish, you wont have kids 'constantly' breaking your fence down or knocks at your door 'every day'. A lot of kids go to school, and did you see the weather this summer? Not many football-playing days unfortunately, so I doubt anyone was inconvinienced 'every day'. Again, this would have been nothing to do with the wall.
And to say 'we were all against them putting the wall up anyway' is another load of rubbish. I am a local resident, and was at a number of meetings, where the majority of people were in favour of the wall. I do agree the new position for the wall is better though, as less balls will end up in the trees (not the gardens)

BarrHumbug says...
5:22pm Wed 3 Oct 12

Oh, those Brazilians, you know? Circa 1970? Broke the mould. Theory out the window. Free expression of football. Uncategorisable. Is that a word? It is now! You know? Far cry from small boys in the park, jumpers for goalposts. Rush goalie. Two at the back, three in the middle, four up front, one's gone home for his tea. Beans on toast? Possibly, don't quote me on that. Marvellous.

Peggy Babcock says...
7:54pm Wed 3 Oct 12

So now when they miss the wall it will fly into all the kids using the play equipment. Great one. It was fine where it was and I wonder if any of the moaning neighbours had kids who use it.

rotcoddam says...
9:52pm Wed 3 Oct 12

And not one person has asked for an explanation of how a days, at most work, for two men moving it a few yards cost 2 grand

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree