Residents told: "It's not a village, it's a rural service centre"

BURTON residents are aghast at suggestions their community could be labelled a “rural service centre” rather than a traditional village.

The proposal has been made by landowners Meyrick Estates, who say that because of the range of facilities Burton is too big to be classified as a village.

The notion, which is included in Meyrick’s response to Christchurch Borough Council ’s core strategy, has prompted outrage from residents, campaigning to retain their precious village environment from house building.

In the document, drafted by Jackson Planning, it says: “MEM (Meyrick Estate Management) believes it is wrong to class Burton as Village; it should be classified as rural service centre.

“The definition by function in the hierarchy suggests that villages are those that serve the home community only.

“Burton serves a wider rural hinterland in particular for the school/GP practice/churches and shop.”

The response also says that the re-classification would allow for more development, something which has caused controversy in the village.

Residents rallied earlier this year to oppose plans for 45 houses on land currently occupied by Burton Farm.

Now, Meyrick Estates is suggesting that between 90-150 houses could be built on the land, to make the most use of the site.

And in response to concerns about the suitability of the development land, Meyrick says it has moved the scheme to the “less visually sensitive” parts of the site.

Residents have set up a petition against the proposals for Burton, calling on the council to remove proposals for house building from the strategy as well as plans to re-locate the allotments to Burton as well.

Villager Alison Ramsey, who has helped to organise the petition, said: “I just think Meyrick have got a cheek.”

No one at Meyrick Estates was available for comment.

Contact Alison Ramsey for details about the petition on 07902 921940.

Comments(10)

Azphreal says...
9:41am Fri 31 Aug 12

'the re-classification would allow for more development' Says it all really!

Winstonchilled says...
9:52am Fri 31 Aug 12

1. Burton is a village -try getting a bus.
2. Its almost impossible for children (who grew up in Burton) to buy a property in Burton as adults.
3. Its a fact that Burton needs more houses for teh younger generation.
4. But estate agents should not be granted permision to change the status, land grab, or build rabit warren flats.
5. Proper afordable houses please!!!!!!!!!

Winstonchilled says...
9:53am Fri 31 Aug 12

6. with gardens

nothingtofear says...
11:49am Fri 31 Aug 12

Rural service centre! Wessex City anyone?

HRH of Boscombe says...
12:42pm Fri 31 Aug 12

Rural service centre? What kind of American real estate clap trap is that??
.
Just a cheesy ploy to gain more planning permission.
.
Villages do have school/GP practice/churches and shops. Even some hamlets have a pub and shop.
.
Frankly who cares what Meyrick believe it should be called? I know what I believe they should be called.

I-H-S says...
12:43pm Fri 31 Aug 12

If a village expands beyond the definition it surely becomes a town, if it shrinks it becomes a hamlet.

In Verwood there is a plethora of signs indicating village centre and town centre, nowhere have I seen service centre except at the garage.

richt says...
12:46pm Fri 31 Aug 12

Bransgore has more shops and facilities (though a more infrequent bus service), and I imagine a similar sized population - but I can't see anyone wanting to 'reclassify' it from a village to something else!

spooki says...
1:07pm Fri 31 Aug 12

Why don't they stop wasting time & money on what to call it and get on and build affordable housing for locals or at least a decent bus service? Oh, sorry, that's because that's what the residents want isn't it...silly me

Loyal2AFCB says...
6:28pm Fri 31 Aug 12

The development proposed for Burton will be dwarved by the sprawling London overspill planned for land south of the railway line which will stretch from Salisbury Road to Roeshot Hill, much of it on land that is part of the same farm the villagers say they want to save. Strange then that there seems to be no organised opposition apart from the allotment holders at Roeshot Hill. Why the deafening silence from our elected representatives in particular?

Wageslave says...
7:30pm Fri 31 Aug 12

Nowhere in England needs more houses,it just needs less people.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree