Complaints mount over merger of Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch hospitals

Complaints mount over merger of Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch hospitals

RBCH chief executive Tony Spotswood

First published in News by

COMPLAINTS have been made about the way the merger of Poole and the Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals is being carried out.

The complaints to the independent regulator Monitor follow the announcement of a Bournemouth-dominated shadow board of directors for the proposed merged trust.

On Tuesday night, 36 out of the 40 Poole councillors present backed an emergency motion expressing “mounting concern” over the process. The other four abstained.

The merger will be the first in the country of two foundation trusts if it is given the go-ahead and could take place next summer.

All seven of the shadow executive directors – the chief executive, medical director, finance director and the directors of strategy, operations, human resources and nursing – are from the current RBCH board, as is chairman Jane Stichbury.

Three of the seven non-executive directors are from Poole.

One of the complainants contacted by the Daily Echo said: “I am totally in favour of a merger but it was an unfair process. It’s no longer a merger, it’s a takeover.

“That’s how it must appear to many of the staff and patients from Poole.”

In a joint statement, RBCH chief executive Tony Spotswood and Poole Hospital chief Chris Bown said the recruitment process for the shadow board was fair and independent and had been agreed beforehand by both trusts’ boards and councils of governors.

“This merger is not about individuals, nor indeed the organisations, but is essential to ensure not only the further development of patient services but their sustainability over the coming years,” said the pair.

“The proposed board will now consider how the knowledge and experience at Poole is best represented in the future. In developing the culture of the new organisation, the board will look to the best of both trusts.”

Mr Spotswood added: “I think we have made the appointments that were necessary in order to take the new organisation forward.”

A spokeswoman for Monitor said: “There is no evidence that the due process has not been followed. This is a local matter for the trusts.

“We will look at the merger in detail when the trusts submit their application to us.”

How selection system worked

  • Recruitment of shadow chairman led by equal number of governors from each trust.
  • She and an equal number of governors from each trust appoint seven shadow non-executive directors.
  • She leads appointment of shadow chief executive with two shadow non-executive directors from each trust.
  • Proposed shadow executive directors each interviewed by panel including proposed chairman, chief executive and one non-executive director from each of Poole and RBCH.

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:02pm Mon 23 Jul 12

penhale says...

Why would a hospital trust that has controlled its finances and been in the black for years want to merge with a trust that has been in debt up to it's eyeballs and beyond since it opened.
Have to say that when this first started the chief exec of Poole was the favorite as he was much more popular, Tony Spotswood on the other hand was not liked or wanted as the head of both trusts, was there a fix here, only time will tell I suppose.
Why would a hospital trust that has controlled its finances and been in the black for years want to merge with a trust that has been in debt up to it's eyeballs and beyond since it opened. Have to say that when this first started the chief exec of Poole was the favorite as he was much more popular, Tony Spotswood on the other hand was not liked or wanted as the head of both trusts, was there a fix here, only time will tell I suppose. penhale
  • Score: 0

12:34pm Mon 23 Jul 12

sea poole says...

Mr Spotwood and Mr Brown -any frontline staff involved in the selection process? Guess not- it would smack too much like democracy...Yes, mr Spotwood, you would say that about making the appointments necessary...after all most were your sycophants...
Mr Spotwood and Mr Brown -any frontline staff involved in the selection process? Guess not- it would smack too much like democracy...Yes, mr Spotwood, you would say that about making the appointments necessary...after all most were your sycophants... sea poole
  • Score: 0

3:52pm Mon 23 Jul 12

justanoldie says...

Looks like bits of these two Unitary Authorities are to re-merge. Fifteen years apart is too long, the efficiencies of scale should return. Will it still be jobs for all the old boys and even more though?
Looks like bits of these two Unitary Authorities are to re-merge. Fifteen years apart is too long, the efficiencies of scale should return. Will it still be jobs for all the old boys and even more though? justanoldie
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree