Report this comment
  • "
    LordLilliput wrote:
    Adrian XX wrote:
    step up wrote:
    No excuse for tormenting mute and defenceless animals. They are total dependant on our goodwill and to ignore that fact is indefensible. So five hours of fear in a car followed by six hours of fear in a bathroom only to be sent out into the night without a clue where they were or what to do. And the result a petty fine. Think they should a have had a suspended jail sentence to wake the yobs up to the fact that we don't accept this behaviour and for lying about gift for mother. Thugs
    Unless you are a strict vegan, I think your comment is hypocritical since far "worse" things happen in chicken and egg production.

    We don't know where the chickens came from - perhaps running free outside was the high point in their lives.
    Adrian and Bournemouthmum, you both sound like a couple of arrogant fools. Why are you of the opinion that unless one is a strict vegan, they are not entitled to an opinion on animal welfare? What an awful judgemental and silly attitude.

    Animals are an inherent part of the food chain. Whether one chooses to eat meat is a personal choice. The important thing is that the animal is reared in a healthy, safe environment and is afforded a level of care that allows them a decent quality of life - as many are. You seem to be confusing this with active neglect and abuse of an animal and concluding that they both constitute cruelty?

    Blurring together controlled, responsible farming, with cruelty shows your naivety and lack of compassion for an animal. And judging a persons right to an opinion based solely around the proviso that by eating meat one automatically negates any moral standing to speak in favour of an animal's welfare shows not only a complete contempt and misunderstanding for the subject but also unfortunately, for the animal too.
    Oh dear! I suggest you educate yourself about what REALLY goes on in the farming industry and slaughter of livestock. The horrendous conditions hens are kept in, not to mention some animals being fully conscious when their throat is cut and dying in agonising pain. I suggest you watch the videos which are freely availably on the internet (as I have) then return and continue your argument. My bet is that you'll choose not to though and will prefer to stay comfortably ignorant. I eat meat, but I am not ignorant about it."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

VIDEO: Brothers who took six chickens on stag do prosecuted after "prank" goes wrong

Brothers who took six chickens on stag do prosecuted after prank goes wrong Brothers who took six chickens on stag do prosecuted after prank goes wrong

TWO brothers have been fined for a “foolish prank” in which they took a brood of live hens on a stag do.

Craig Barnett, 23, and his 21-year-old brother Bradley kept six chickens in boxes in the back of a car for around five-and-a-half hours last July, while they and their friends went to watch greyhound racing at Poole Stadium.

They then released them into a hotel bathroom, where they were intended to be a “surprise for the stag,” prosecutor Matthew Knight said, He said the chickens were left in the bathroom for a further six hours before a member of the stag party, clad in his boxer shorts, took them down to the lobby of the Lynden Court Hotel at around 3.30am.

A member of hotel staff then ushered the chickens outside. Bournemouth Magistrates Court heard that one was taken by a fox, one was found dead the next morning, two were never found and two were rescued and rehomed.

Craig, of Long Burton in Sherborne, and Bradley, of Rudwick in Horsham, both pleaded guilty to a charge of failing to take reasonable steps to provide four chickens with a suitable environment.

Craig, who works for a communications company, was fined £315, while university student Bradley was fined £125. Both were also ordered to pay £375 each in costs.

Their solicitor, Nigel Ley, said both brothers had grown up working on farms and had a good track record with animals but were guilty of a “moment of madness.”

“My clients now realise what a stupid thing it was to do,” he said.

“It was done in a moment of absolute stupidity, they just didn’t think it through.

“This was a one-off incident that will never occur again.”

The brothers had claimed the chickens were intended to be a present for their mother and had denied they were carrying out a prank.

But presiding magistrate Francis Vine said: “We believe that the incident started out as a foolish prank which went wrong and that you are now fully aware of the consequences of this type of behaviour and your actions.”

Following the hearing, RSPCA Inspector Graham Hammond said: “Using animals of any sort for a prank or entertainment is socially and legally unacceptable.

“Even if they didn’t give it much thought beforehand, they really should have done. We all want stag and hen parties to have a fantastic time when they come to Bournemouth but that entertainment should be purely within the party, it shouldn’t affect animals or other people.”

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree