News RSS Feed


the social media rolling gif

Get social with the Echo - click to find out how and where!


Poole hospital warned over its financial woes


A NATIONAL regulator has warned Poole Hospital that it will step in unless the trust can sort out its troubled finances.

Monitor says the hospital is in “significant” breach of the terms under which it was allowed to become a foundation trust in November 2007.

The finding is based on concerns about Poole’s finances and the way they were managed last year, when the trust had a deficit of £4.5 million instead of a planned £2.1 million surplus.

Monitor has the power to remove directors and the chief executive, but for the time being it will be keeping a close watch on Poole’s progress.

New chief executive Chris Bown is leading the drive to save £10 million in the current financial year.

An interim finance and recovery director has stepped in until new finance director Paul Turner takes up his post in September.

Mr Bown said: “We need to submit a forecast in October this year of where we’re going to be by the end of 2011-12. We want to recover our financial position as quickly as we can and there are key milestones Monitor is expecting us to deliver.

“A £4.5 million deficit is not a great start, and with increasing costs of healthcare, we’re having to find savings every year to ensure we keep pace with that.”

He admitted that one of the contributing causes of last year’s deficit was the focus on delivering the Dorset target of 13 weeks from GP referral to hospital treatment. The national target is 18 weeks.

Mr Bown said that patient safety remained the trust’s top priority. “The cornerstone of the plan is about improving clinical quality. The by-product is saving money,” he insisted.

Savings measures include cutting the use of agency staff, increasing day case surgery, and putting the planned new maternity hospital on hold.

Mr Bown said the entire workforce was being reviewed to make sure people were being used in the most effective way. “We will try to keep redundancy to an absolute minimum,” he pledged.


Your Say YourEcho

peekay, Poole says...
9:41am Fri 30 Jul 10

Is the former finance director still being paid to be on gardening leave?

likestocomplain, Bournemouth says...
9:52am Fri 30 Jul 10

should not have contracted out to private suppliers.

gudmenrmist, wimborne says...
11:23am Fri 30 Jul 10

It is all down to management ,have a good clear out, take back a few of the undeserved gongs and let them all apply for positions in the private sector that they have been denying (supposedly for our benefit) for so long.

Kris42, Charminster says...
12:38pm Fri 30 Jul 10

Think they should learn how to pay their bank staff first, who slave their guts off for this hospital. With-holding staff wages on a weekly basis for well over 8 weeks, paying them incorrectly the list goes on. I know of somebody paid £139.08 for 3 night shifts and 1 afternoon shift and was told her pay was correct. That's 39 hours a week earning £3.97 for being a front line nurse, Mr CEO is paid on time every month for his work, so why cant the other 162 bank staff. This hospital is a f**king joke

ngdragon, says...
3:20pm Fri 30 Jul 10

Read the truth here, at the bottom click on letter sent to Chair. A fine condemnation.

http://www.monitor-n
hsft.gov.uk/home/abo
ut-nhs-foundation-tr
usts/regulatory-acti
on/nhs-foundation-tr
usts-significant-bre
ach-their-au

Pepper Pig, Poole says...
4:17pm Fri 30 Jul 10

peekay wrote:
Is the former finance director still being paid to be on gardening leave?
No, he left before the s**t it the fan and probably now has a job a director of finance in another hospital!!!!!!!!!!

marmite man, Yeastville says...
11:15am Sat 31 Jul 10

Just like GP's who prescribe certain drugs get a 'reward' from the pharmaceutical company, do the procurement officers at Poole Hospital get the same if ordering for their own gain and not purchasing the lowest cost as they then wouldn’t get a ‘reward’.

Whether it’s the civil service. the private sector or public sectors, it’s the procurement side that needs to be looked at. When I was a Civil Servant I sourced pencils at 2p each, but when I approached a manager I was firmly told that Whitehall dealt with procurement and there was only one company that we could purchase from and the same pencil from them cost 75p each!! So who was getting the benefit from such a high profit? The supply company? The officer in Whitehall who chose this company? Whoever it is, is costing this country many millions of pounds.

Procurement should be open to all suppliers and then perhaps we will get realistic pricing instead of the fact that one company can charge what they like as they know they are the only company that can be dealt with.
into-tone

Comments are closed on this article.

Poole Hospital cash crisis Poole hospital warned over its financial woes

Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »