News RSS Feed


the social media rolling gif

Get social with the Echo - click to find out how and where!


Battle lost to save Point House Cafe in Southbourne


DEVELOPERS have won a long battle to transform the site of an historic cliff-top cafe into a two-and-a-half-storey block of flats.

Harrison Developments appealed against a decision by Bournemouth planners to refuse permission for the Point House Cafe in Southbourne to be bulldozed and transformed into seven self-contained apartments with basement parking.

The Harbour Road cafe – a favourite haunt for many, including Bournemouth’s Alex James from ’90s chart-toppers Blur – was the subject of a third appeal hearing on June 8.

Protestors have tirelessly fought against the plans to demolish the cafe and develop the site, claiming it would “destroy that bit of coastline”.

The borough’s head of tourism Mark Smith also opposed the development claiming it would “damage the appeal of Bournemouth’s tourism”.

Protestors won support from Bournemouth East MP Tobias Ellwood, who described the plans as “totally inappropriate for the seafront”.

After dismissing one of two unsuccessful former appeals, on the grounds that the development “would harm the character and appearance of the surrounding area”, inspector Richard Marshall allowed an appeal against a failure to give notice, within the prescribed period, of a decision on the planning permission.

The inspector described the appeal site as “a fairly isolated cliff-top position” adding: “The building that would be demolished is of no great architectural merit,” “out of keeping with its attractive coastal location” and “an unwelcome intrusion in the views towards the sea.”

He added: “It appears to have been extended over time and there are some notably unsympathetic single-storey extensions.

“Far from detracting from the character and appearance of the site, the proposed development would be an improvement.”

Planning board vice-chairman Cllr Ron Whittaker told the Daily Echo: “I am taken aback by this approval.

“I cannot believe the inspector has approved these plans for a more bulky development closer to the cliff edge than the existing building.

“This section of the cliff-top should be part of our tourism core area which would give it greater protection when we are fighting appeals.”


Your Say YourEcho

divingdave, Southbourne says...
1:40pm Fri 30 Jul 10

To be fair, the current building is in a terrible state. It's very run down with parts of it crumbling away. It's an eyesore at present and made this little bit of cliff-top look quite messy.

I'm not in favour of the flats, but it hasn't been open as a cafe for a very long time so something did need to be done with it.

eyesropen, bournemouth says...
1:58pm Fri 30 Jul 10

So, in one breath the inspector is saying that the cafe is blocking views and in the next he's saying it's OK to build flat's there...go figure!!! If the current building can't be renovated and reopened as a cafe again, or a new low key cafe built, it ought to be just knocked down and left as open clifftop. This is no place for flats.

divingdave, Southbourne says...
2:00pm Fri 30 Jul 10

Totally agree with you eyesropen. It's an isolated position there, so it'd be much better to have nothing there at all and open up the views.

Huey, says...
2:54pm Fri 30 Jul 10

divingdave wrote:
Totally agree with you eyesropen. It's an isolated position there, so it'd be much better to have nothing there at all and open up the views.
Being realistic, whoever owns the land isn't going to clear it and leave nothing there, as it was clearly bought as an investment.
So you might as well have a nice building as opposed to a crumbling old one that no-one uses.
I were a local resisdent I would be pleased the old building is going, it looks a state.
Few people used the cafe when it was open, hence it being closed.

Glashen, Christchurch says...
3:28pm Fri 30 Jul 10

divingdave wrote:
To be fair, the current building is in a terrible state. It's very run down with parts of it crumbling away. It's an eyesore at present and made this little bit of cliff-top look quite messy.

I'm not in favour of the flats, but it hasn't been open as a cafe for a very long time so something did need to be done with it.
Is it right that you get your way by allowing a building to decay and fall into disrepair. The most that should have been permitted is a same size replacement.

GB916, christchurch says...
4:38pm Fri 30 Jul 10

I pity the mugs that buy one of the flats,how long before they eventually crumble away into the sea,and i agree in one comment the inspector said the building obscures the views and in another he approves a larger building to more obscure the view,was this man the same man that approved the sandbag hill off boscombe beach(opps sorry surf reef)

jobsworthwatch, Bournemouth says...
5:15pm Fri 30 Jul 10

Another reason for the axe to fall and hopefully especially on the out of town super jobsworths. This is an affront to local democracy so lets hope this government really does something about it by abolishing the regional assemblies.

madfromdorset, Bournemouth says...
5:37pm Fri 30 Jul 10

How would Mr. Marshall like is home demolished. This building has been on this site for years, regardless of use. Surely it could have been made more presentable. Perhaps the same bulldozers could be hired once the foundations of the flats are in place. Flats, are they not going to block views, and make a blot on the landscape.

jeebuscripes, Westbourne says...
6:11pm Fri 30 Jul 10

Posting here because there are no comments on the smoke alarm family story.

If that family had rang the fire service and asked for a smoke alarm they would've come and fitted it for free.

Some of these people must have the Echo's newsdesk on speed-dial.

Corrupto, Boscombe says...
8:35pm Fri 30 Jul 10

I wonder if our developer Council have anything to earn/do with it.

Bob49, Bournemouth says...
9:31pm Fri 30 Jul 10

"inspector Richard Marshall allowed an appeal against a failure to give notice, within the prescribed period, of a decision on the planning permission. "


.


So who failed to give notice "within the prescribed period" and on what basis is this inspector allowed to over ride that failure ?

.

Could the Echo clarify this bit please ?

.

dribble, Boscombe says...
10:14pm Fri 30 Jul 10

Bob49 wrote:
"inspector Richard Marshall allowed an appeal against a failure to give notice, within the prescribed period, of a decision on the planning permission. "


.


So who failed to give notice "within the prescribed period" and on what basis is this inspector allowed to over ride that failure ?

.

Could the Echo clarify this bit please ?

.
My thoughts exactly. Seems, according to the report, the appeal wasn't won over the development itself but on a technicality over the failure of the officers and members of the council to deal with it in an appropriate timescale. Questions need to be asked about this...
.
I'm with GB906 - who'd actually be reckless enough to buy a property on the edge of the cliff there anyway?

Corrupto, Boscombe says...
8:12pm Sun 1 Aug 10

Were these Developers of 'Honest John' Beesley or the Developer head of Concil?

s-pb2, Boscombe says...
1:08am Mon 2 Aug 10

When you pass the cafe it looks like its about to fall into the sea. You must be an idiot to buy a flat there. More like a deathtrap!

Comments are closed on this article.

‘DISMAY’: Protestors have lost their long-running battle to prevent the cliff-top Point House Cafe in Harbour Road, Southbourne, from being turned into flats ‘DISMAY’: Protestors have lost their long-running battle to prevent the cliff-top Point House Cafe in Harbour Road, Southbourne, from being turned into flats

Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »