When news happens text pix and video to 80360. Start your message with BE then leave a space.
All of today's content from across the site, all in one place at bournemouthecho.co.uk/today
9:00am Wednesday 21st April 2010 in
THE people have spoken – and the most popular choice to replace the much-hated IMAX building on Bournemouth’s seafront is tropical gardens.
More than 3,500 people took part in public consultation over seven possible options for the prestigious site near Bournemouth Pier. Supporters of the tropical gardens thought they would blend in well with the surroundings, providing a relaxing attraction without interfering with the sea views.
The second-favourite option was an all-weather water park, although opponents expressed concern over the potential height of the building and water slides and its possible “tacky” appearance.
In third place was an interactive arts, museum and entertainment development; and fourth came a performing arts space or amphitheatre. Least popular as stand-alone attractions were boutiques and bistros, a spa, and family play park.
Council leader Stephen MacLoughlin said: “I am particularly pleased that, of those who took part, 96 per cent supported at least one of the options, which gives me confidence that we got this initial list right.
“The results show that a mixture of attractions is most likely to appeal to a broad range of people, with water park and performing arts, water park and tropical gardens, and water park and interactive arts facility the most popular combinations.”
Three-quarters of the responses came from Bournemouth residents, and 2,000 took the trouble to add extra comments. Many of those were in support of improving sea views and making sure any replacement building is attractive.
Cllr MacLoughlin said he wanted a building of which the town could be proud. “We know how much people value the view, and have pledged that whatever building we have on that site, the architecture will be sympathetic to its setting.”
The results of the consultation will be discussed by Cabinet on April 28, when members will decide which option or options merit a feasibility study.
The study, which will look at how likely the chosen scheme is to attract private investment, will go to Cabinet on June 26 for a final decision on the future of the site.
Comments(16)
CharminChap
says...
10:50am Wed 21 Apr 10
BH10et
says...
12:32pm Wed 21 Apr 10
roysses
says...
12:44pm Wed 21 Apr 10
jamyjames
says...
12:49pm Wed 21 Apr 10
Aviewoneverything
says...
1:09pm Wed 21 Apr 10
BmthNewshound
says...
1:30pm Wed 21 Apr 10
Dorset Mitch
says...
2:23pm Wed 21 Apr 10
thewave
says...
3:11pm Wed 21 Apr 10
grimreaper
says...
3:40pm Wed 21 Apr 10
ski
says...
4:28pm Wed 21 Apr 10
glennzilla
says...
4:31pm Wed 21 Apr 10
likestocomplain
says...
4:59pm Wed 21 Apr 10
ski wrote:I agree, there was nothing wrong with an Imax it was just in the wrong place, badly promoted. its the buliding not whats in that was the problem.
Oh sure the kids on holiday with their familys are really going to enjoy looking at plants,most kids would prefer a 3d Imax film,what idiot thought that one up?
boardstiff
says...
5:34pm Wed 21 Apr 10
Kamanchi Sly
says...
11:34pm Wed 21 Apr 10
Dudsbury
says...
10:10am Thu 22 Apr 10
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Ian Rathbone says...
9:27am Wed 21 Apr 10
The list was made by somebody living in the 1970's. I think a lot of people thought they didn't have any choice to ask for anything else.