News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


'Hold the line or risk future flood chaos'


‘HOLD the line at Hengistbury Head – or increase the risk of a flooding disaster’.

These men are fighting a proposed change in the coastal protection plan.

They say in time it could lead to the flooding of Christchurch Harbour, and the erosion of Hengistbury Head.

For the last five years, the council’s policy for the beach at the head has been ‘Hold the Line’ – a commitment to keeping or upgrading the sea defences.

The proposed policy for the next five years is ‘Managed Realignment’ – but the Hengistbury residents association fears that could mean defences are left fatally weak.

They are anxiously waiting to see if the Environment Agency approves the change, when the final Shoreline Management Plan is revealed in April.

The group want extra groynes put in between Double Dykes and Long Groyne to reduce erosion and reduce the chances of a sudden breach during a storm.

A consultants' report says a breach could happen at any time with a bad enough storm – and the group said it would have “disastrous consequences” for people living nearby, and potentially for the whole future of Poole Bay.

Tony Bayliss, 67, building surveyor, said: “The neck of land at Double Dykes is already very narrow and we think that it should be protected from becoming even more flimsy.

“If there is a breach and it is not possible to stop up the new tidal stream, the Long Groyne at Hengistbury Head will be unable to do its job.

“Without the Long Gryone acting as a headland for Poole Bay, there will be huge erosion forces along the sea wall and promenades.”

Cllr Robert Lawton, cabinet member for Environment, said: “For the majority of Bournemouth's coastline, including all the built-up area and Hengistbury Head, the policy is to ‘Hold the line’. “We are proposing to do all we can to ensure that we protect our coastline for future generations and the Shoreline Management Plan is crucial to achieving this.”

Comments(5)

Xchurch-man says...
10:30pm Tue 30 Mar 10

Elsewhere the Environment Agency have allowed countless homes to fall into the sea, describing it as "natural erosion". Natural it may be. However here we are looking at the inundation of Christchurch town centre should the sea breach Double Dykes in a major storm. This cannot be allowed to happen, the damage would run into hundreds of millions, far more cost than maintaining the existing defences.
You can find out the councillors who voted for this, you can identify the party they belong to, there will soon be a General Election.
Punish that party for agreeing to this proposal.

(security word lack-wave!!!)

jobsworthwatch says...
8:40am Wed 31 Mar 10

If a dubious surf reef can be provided for a minority there should be no hesitation in doing whats necessary to protect thousands of properties and the Christchurch harbour habitat, not least the centre of Christchurch its self.
Will a few groynes do the job? Isn't it usual to dump house sized lumps of rock on the beach in such situations. West Bay seem to have gone to considerable trouble to protect their harbour entrance which is in a similarly exposed position.

fedupwithjobsworths says...
11:57am Wed 31 Mar 10

"The proposed policy for the next five years is ‘Managed Realignment’ " - this is Council speak for doing SFA

Glashen says...
12:28pm Wed 31 Mar 10

I hope this policy is changed, sadly it is a case of hoping for the best and keeping fingers crossed. If the worst in fact happens and the sea breaks through turning the Head into an island the consequences for Christchurch, the harbour and Hengistbury Head would be dire. Then the outcry would almost certainly force an expensive emergency operation to close the breach, which preventative works now would prevent. Is this another example of Bournemouth Council only caring about the town centre and not taking any responsibility for the Head and Christchurch harbour 50% of which is within their remit. This policy is short sighted and should be looked at again.

StrikeAChord says...
10:03pm Wed 31 Mar 10

How is 'holding the line' at Hengistbury Head consistent with the dredging of vast quantities of sand & gravel last year close inshore, solely to fill the bags of the new surf reef.
The dredging was removing spoil only a few metres from the narrow, vulnerable spot where a possible breach is forecast in the near future.
Or is the glitzy new artificial surf reef more important to Bournemouth council than the stability of Christchurch Harbour, SSSI's & another authority area?


Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses