News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


All of today's content from across the site, all in one place at bournemouthecho.co.uk/today

Poole council accused of misleading residents over town green applications


PLANNING Sanity has accused Poole council of misleading residents over town green applications.

The Campaign for Planning Sanity, which is representing residents over the Branksome Rec and the Baiter applications, has hit out after the head of leisure services explained why he was opposing the rec application on council-owned land.

A formal letter of complaint has been submitted to Borough of Poole by the national organisation’s director Chris Maile, citing “errors of law and fact”.

“There is clearly considerable misunderstanding of the effects and impacts of land being registered as a village green by officers of the borough,” said Mr Maile.

Clive Smith, head of leisure, told the Daily Echo he was opposing the application by Branksome residents for the 17-acre open space after taking legal advice.

He said a town green designation would restrict activities and improvements and curtail events such as organised football and the circus that regularly visits.

However Mr Maile said land registered as a town green does not have its previous usage curtailed. “While a landowner cannot develop the land for commercial purposes, small scale developments that are for the benefit of those using the land are permitted, such as new play or sports equipment,” he said.

“Similarly the use of recreation grounds by formal clubs for things such as football or cricket would continue as they always have,” he added.

But the circus would probably not be allowed he said, and disputed the possible £50,000 cost saying the average cost of a local inquiry to the council was closer to £15,000.

Borough of Poole strategic director Andrew Flockhart said: “We have received Mr Maile’s letter and will respond to the points raised in due course.”

*A total of four objections have been received to the application and these have been passed to the applicant, Branksome Rec Action Group.


Comments(8)

flossjill says...
9:24am Sun 21 Mar 10

Surely with the current Town Green applications going through Poole Council should know the legal position by now. The applications are going in because of the fear of losing our open spaces in the future. If they had not made such a mess of the Branksome Rec & PTFC application maybe Poole residents would not be so untrusting of the council, and wouldn't feel the need to apply for Town Green status.
There are places in the country where the councils themselves have designated the areas as Town Greens, the cost is minimal for them to do this rather than fight applications which they say are irrelevant as the spaces are safe anyway. Does anyone really understand why the council is fighting against something that shouldn't need more than a simple agreement?

Syd Poumen says...
10:44am Sun 21 Mar 10

This Council is taking this stance, because it is in hock to developers, and hence does not wish to stifle future opportunity to build on public open space or expansion near heathland.
The fact that its Planning Department was recently the subject of an expensive investigation says it all.

sea poole says...
12:43pm Sun 21 Mar 10

What is of concern to me is that I understand the council has taken INDEPENDENT legal advice...and still got it wrong. It would be interesting to discover the cost of this independent erroneous advice and whether the costs are recoverable. In them meanwhile, should the head of Leisure Services done his own homework, before uttering false information? After all, what do we pay him to do?
So where does that leave our elected councillors who have spouted forth, and are now sitting with egg on their faces?
So many questions...and I wonder how many will get a CORRECT answer!

bea says...
1:13pm Sun 21 Mar 10

Indeed, in the case of the Slades Farm application I understand a Council officer telephoned the organisers of the various football and cricket matches, encouraging them to object to the application for Town Green status, because it would stop the teams using the facilities.

BH10et says...
3:02pm Sun 21 Mar 10

bea wrote:
Indeed, in the case of the Slades Farm application I understand a Council officer telephoned the organisers of the various football and cricket matches, encouraging them to object to the application for Town Green status, because it would stop the teams using the facilities.
That is right, this did happen, and we corresponded with the many clubs and associations, as well as letters to the Council Planning. Alas to no avail, and I had no response from any of the open space users.

Tictock says...
6:09pm Sun 21 Mar 10

Methinks there is an odious smell in the area of the council offices, not related to drains. Too much eyes on turning a fast buck and not enough of looking towards the peoples view.

peter beneather benifit cheater says...
8:37pm Sun 21 Mar 10

he who smelt it dealt it

Trooper2 says...
6:54pm Tue 23 Mar 10

Perhaps now that the Supreme Court has ruled in favour of the appellant and against the Council in the Town Green case in Redcar our Councillors & Council Officers will be able to realize that at best they have been misguided or misinformed and at worst have been telling downright lies. Perhaps those guilty of so doing may feel it appropriate to offer retractions and apologies, but I expect the 'flying pig squadron' to be passing shortly!
The shameful behaviour of Councillor Gregory who refferred to 'short sighted residents and Hysterical attitudes' Presumably referring to the good citizens who may now feel they made a serious error of judgement in voting him onto Council.

QUOTE
Common sense to keep greens fresh.
I would like to congratulate MrPauley for his letter ( Have your Say March 2) highlighting the disservice that a minority of short-sighted residents are intent on inflicting on the enjoyment of our wonderful open spaces by the majority of residents.
It is refreshing to see a letter that speaks common sense and endorses the opinion of the Friends of Hamworthy Park who have decided, after looking at all the pros and cons, to ignore the hysteria for wanting every open space in the borough to be a town green, thus curbing improvements which could be of significant benefit to fellow residents.
Let us hope that more residents will be forthcoming in wanting our open spaces to be places of continuous improvement and not stuck for ever in the 20th century
Cllr R A GREGORY
UNQUOTE


Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses