News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Can you replace Boscombe's green fountain?


RESIDENTS are being asked to vote on what should replace the much-maligned Boscombe fountain.

In a recent meeting Bournemouth council and Dorset Police jointly decided to remove the fountain to improve the area as part of the Boscombe Regeneration Project.

The fountain will be replaced by either bike racks or paving and local residents can vote online on which they prefer.

Boscombe Traders Association treasurer Austin Kinsley recently launched a last ditch bid to save the much-criticised structure claiming it was “relaxing and calming for everyone”.

Cabinet member for Communities Cllr David Smith said it was “unfortunate” that the fountain had become a place that attracts litter, vandalism and antisocial behaviour.

He added: “Despite every effort to maintain the fountain and keep it free from damage and litter, we feel it would be better to remove it.

“We are determined to clean up the area and to make it a far more safe and pleasant place to visit. I would encourage local residents to have their say in order to help improve the precinct.”

The online vote ends on Monday, March 22.

People can vote by visiting bournemouth.gov.uk/|boscomberegeneration and residents can also vote using free internet access at Boscombe Library.

Comments(25)

ben111 says...
9:03am Tue 16 Mar 10

BIKE RACKS or PAVING , now who would win , Their is only one way to find out .... FIGHT ....

ben111 says...
9:10am Tue 16 Mar 10

But really bike racks or paving what a choice to vote on

BmthNewshound says...
9:23am Tue 16 Mar 10

And bikes left on bike racks won't attract vandals and antisocial behaviour.
It seems that the Boscombe Regeneration Project has been given a blank cheque to waste £m's of tax payers money without having done any real good.
Removing the fountain will not stop vandalism or antisocial behaviour, those responsible for these acts will simply congregate somewhere else. Remove the criminals not the fountain.

boardstiff says...
9:50am Tue 16 Mar 10

Bike racks in the middle of a pedestrian precinct where cycling is, understandably, prohibited? Surely at either end - where they will continue to be vandalised, with saddles stolen and tyres slashed.

BmthNewshound is right - remove the criminals.

And if you want to replace the fountain, replace it with the main Christchurch Road as before.

Lord Spring says...
10:01am Tue 16 Mar 10

Reminds me of a Billy Connonlly joke about somewhere to put your bike

beachhut says...
10:30am Tue 16 Mar 10

Turn it back into a through road with chevron parking on oneside with timer or meter parking, trees and paved area. This will improve footfall, cut out much of the street problems and improve the look. You can still have market days similar to Christchurch, but anything to stop people hanging around, or cruising on push bikes to mug someone.

Dorset_Born_n_Bread ! says...
10:53am Tue 16 Mar 10

Wouldnt the fountain be better located inside the shopping centre as a charity money raising wishing well? Instead of drunks and local tramps and druggies peeing in it!

What about a fenced off - dancing /flying water feature - like the ones that throw tubes of watter thru the air?

Jumping water jets!

http://www.water-gar
den.co.uk/jumping_je
ts.php

Dorset_Born_n_Bread ! says...
10:54am Tue 16 Mar 10

Watter? I must be Scottish all of a sudden :D Och Aye Jimmy!

jinglebell says...
11:36am Tue 16 Mar 10

beachhut wrote:
Turn it back into a through road with chevron parking on oneside with timer or meter parking, trees and paved area. This will improve footfall, cut out much of the street problems and improve the look. You can still have market days similar to Christchurch, but anything to stop people hanging around, or cruising on push bikes to mug someone.
Extensive research by large companies such as Next, Gap, Chanel, Monsoon, Marks and Spencer etc. show that there is more trade in pedestrianised areas than in areas which are non-pedestrianised. This is why even in cities which were ravaged by war or civil disruption a few years ago (e.g. Belgrade; Bucharest etc.) these companies have selected pedestrianised areas to site their shops. Areas which have been "reverted" to street front experience a reduction in trade with customers only spending on average in 2 shops in comparison to those in pedestrianised areas where customers spend in 4 shops. These large companies have enormous power - more than governments - such is the power of globalisation and their financial hold; they would not continue to push for pedestrianised areas such as Castle Point or the centre of Bournemouth if they lost money.

Phixer says...
12:17pm Tue 16 Mar 10

So, the police get a say but not the residents?

The residents are given Hobson's choice.

How about some decent shops and residential above to bring some proper life to the area.

Phixer says...
12:19pm Tue 16 Mar 10

Connect mains electric to the water supply. That'll sort the men from the boys!

ben111 says...
12:44pm Tue 16 Mar 10

with the down turn in the economy are really going to change Boscombe

djd says...
1:14pm Tue 16 Mar 10

Dig a hole and put all the rubbish in Boscombe down it.

djd says...
1:18pm Tue 16 Mar 10

Typical Boscombe, put bike racks there, cycling is prohibited through the pedestrian area, obviously a law that doesn't apply in Boscombe and that behaviour will be condoned if they put bike racks in.
Why not put a runway there....oopps, planes cannot land there, can they ???? But don't worry, this is Boscombe.

Markmag says...
1:23pm Tue 16 Mar 10

The council needs to refresh all the paving in the pedestrianised precinct not just where the fountain is. Despite using paving subject to breaks and resistant to cleaning, and running market viechles over it two days a week it's not been replaced for 22 years. Rip up all the paving, replace with higher quality and seating, proper trees and CCTV monitoring and create a respectible place for people to shop.

rainbowkisses says...
1:37pm Tue 16 Mar 10

Markmag wrote:
The council needs to refresh all the paving in the pedestrianised precinct not just where the fountain is. Despite using paving subject to breaks and resistant to cleaning, and running market viechles over it two days a week it's not been replaced for 22 years. Rip up all the paving, replace with higher quality and seating, proper trees and CCTV monitoring and create a respectible place for people to shop.
Thats the most sensible post I've seen, but will never happen. Council will say theres no point in wasting money on seats that will get vandalised, trees that will get damaged, lights that will get broke pavement that will get covered in filth etc. I also agree with those that said get rid of the vandals not the furniture. Typical of this Council though. No guts. To worried about the rights of the filth, not the residents. While the Council still have this menatility, nothing they do will make Boscombe, or any part of town, better. Get more Police WALKING through Boscombe and have a zero tolerance policy and you will see the anti social behaviour levels fall. Get rid of the toytown cops who nobody takes seriously and get ones in that have the power to nick the inbreds. As usual with this Council though, they talk talk talk, but do sod all. What was the name of that woman who was appointed to clean Boscombe up? How much has she earned so far and just what has she done for the money? Like I said, talk talk talk.

sollie says...
4:27pm Tue 16 Mar 10

Bournemouth Democracy - Decide on something ask the public to vote on something else and do something completely different.

WIGGINSv says...
4:32pm Tue 16 Mar 10

jinglebell wrote:
beachhut wrote: Turn it back into a through road with chevron parking on oneside with timer or meter parking, trees and paved area. This will improve footfall, cut out much of the street problems and improve the look. You can still have market days similar to Christchurch, but anything to stop people hanging around, or cruising on push bikes to mug someone.
Extensive research by large companies such as Next, Gap, Chanel, Monsoon, Marks and Spencer etc. show that there is more trade in pedestrianised areas than in areas which are non-pedestrianised. This is why even in cities which were ravaged by war or civil disruption a few years ago (e.g. Belgrade; Bucharest etc.) these companies have selected pedestrianised areas to site their shops. Areas which have been "reverted" to street front experience a reduction in trade with customers only spending on average in 2 shops in comparison to those in pedestrianised areas where customers spend in 4 shops. These large companies have enormous power - more than governments - such is the power of globalisation and their financial hold; they would not continue to push for pedestrianised areas such as Castle Point or the centre of Bournemouth if they lost money.
If people didn't go into their shops they wouldn't have any power.
Visit the Charity Shops for a year and 'Spanner' the B*******.

peter beneather benifit cheater says...
4:43pm Tue 16 Mar 10

sell it on ebay a fiver ,collection only.

bigjohn says...
5:37pm Tue 16 Mar 10

Why put some stocks and then put the council members in each day so we can all throw rotten eggs and veg at them! Now this would cheer us all up I am sure, especially if you have just received your new council tax bill for 2010. Who's first?

charliesgirl says...
6:32pm Tue 16 Mar 10

In one word nothing lets use the money for something worth while

jamyjames says...
7:22pm Tue 16 Mar 10

It seems everyone thinks something fishy went/is going on in Boscombe.

The Reef is a con/flop dependent on your view. The rumors abound town that those who are supposed to serve us helped themselves in some insider deals with the Honeycombe development. How else could they have got away with building beyond the given planning permission? Friends in high places?
If that were you or I trying to put on an extra few floors we would be taken to court and forced to knock it back down.
How come the local media are not pursuing this?

Anyway, the reef doesn't work and Honeycombe's luxury flats for the few are selling. However problem is for Barrett they are only selling a to a few and the monstrosity is left nearly unsold. The Pods? they are empty too. In fact it is hard to see anyone really winning here, but the town and its future generations are the losers as they appear to have been mugged of some of its most valuable land and another fine view. For what? a failed reef and an irreparable collapse in trust for the Council. I would love to see the paper go after those who may have profited for their personal greed and the flagrant detriment of the town.

Which brings us to the Fountain. Just leave it because whatever the Council try will no doubt be another little con or yet another humiliating and expensive failure.

While were are at it, Don't let these Councilors sell of any more of the beach front to multi-national companies (is this the game at IMAX).

Its like Bournemouth for sale but at what a price, and who (the media should ask), gets the commission?

jinglebell says...
1:22pm Wed 17 Mar 10

WIGGINSv wrote:
jinglebell wrote:
beachhut wrote: Turn it back into a through road with chevron parking on oneside with timer or meter parking, trees and paved area. This will improve footfall, cut out much of the street problems and improve the look. You can still have market days similar to Christchurch, but anything to stop people hanging around, or cruising on push bikes to mug someone.
Extensive research by large companies such as Next, Gap, Chanel, Monsoon, Marks and Spencer etc. show that there is more trade in pedestrianised areas than in areas which are non-pedestrianised. This is why even in cities which were ravaged by war or civil disruption a few years ago (e.g. Belgrade; Bucharest etc.) these companies have selected pedestrianised areas to site their shops. Areas which have been "reverted" to street front experience a reduction in trade with customers only spending on average in 2 shops in comparison to those in pedestrianised areas where customers spend in 4 shops. These large companies have enormous power - more than governments - such is the power of globalisation and their financial hold; they would not continue to push for pedestrianised areas such as Castle Point or the centre of Bournemouth if they lost money.
If people didn't go into their shops they wouldn't have any power. Visit the Charity Shops for a year and 'Spanner' the B*******.
I'm not saying big chain stores should have this kind of power; but they have and they use it to impose their shops where they wish frequently to the detriment of local shops and therefore community. Tesco has done this all over the country and it is a rare Council that has the integrity to withstands their wishes.
Boscombe could aim at being the area of Bournemouth without a dominance of these chain stores. Individual, unusual businesses would create an eclectic range to choose from instead of the same humdrum stuff from chain stores.
Some already do this - the cafe, Boscanova has superb food and a really funky decor as does Urban Beach and the new restaurant on the corner of St. John's Road and Christchurch Road.
A more enlightened Council would encourage independent shop keepers in Boscombe and particularly those with unique products for sale - this happens elsewhere in the country.
It would appear, however, that Boscombe is seen by our Conservative Council as the cash-cow for Bournemouth since it is in the 1% most deprived in the country. This means Bournemouth Council can access grants supposedly for Boscombe fairly easily - unfortunately it would appear that once received, the monies seem to disappear - and Boscombe has not benefited once again. When I hear David Cameron talking, I just think of the reality of having a Conservative Council, who smother any democratic debate - if they got in power it would be even worse - self-seeking, arrogant, dubious integrity, out of touch with the public, uncaring and seeing themselves as having every right to be so.

jinglebell says...
1:51pm Wed 17 Mar 10

Getting back to the fountain - I would like to see the figures regarding how much it costs to clean up etc. in comparison to how much it will cost to remove and put something else in place before the Council do anything. In this economic climate it seems most odd to be proposing to do anything unless it's really economically viable to do so. So then one wonders if this is simply another attempt by the Conservative Council to improve their image and appear to be listening to the community.

madras says...
11:15am Thu 18 Mar 10

hmm, I wonder if they have the same debate in Italy - should we replace the Trevi fountain with bike racks? Of course not, it's a feature that people respect. Not suggesting Boscombe is Rome (far from it) but why make the place even less attractive because of the antisocial behaviour of others - perhaps a few police on the streets of an evening and investment by the council in a more family-friendly day/evening/night life in the immediate area would pay dividends - families (and surfers!) need somewhere to go when the sun goes down - how amazing it would be if the pedestrianised high street could 'come to life' of an evening...


TROUBLED WATERS: The fountain Can you replace Boscombe's green fountain?

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses