News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Are Dorset's top public sector earners worth it?


BECAUSE they’re worth it!

Cheryl Cole, Eva Longoria-Parker, Scarlett Johansson and Andie MacDowell have little trouble convincing L’Oreal they’re worth their whopping salaries to promote their beauty products.

But can their famous slogan be applied to public sector workers earning more than £150,000 a year?

Prime Minster Gordon Brown has warned that public sector organisations paying more than that will have to justify the salaries to ministers and to the public.

And two of those who could be affected are Dorset County Council Chief Executive David Jenkins and Tony Spotswood, the Chief Executive of the Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Trust.

But what exactly do they do and are they, as L’Oreal puts it, worth it?

Mr Jenkins, who also acts as Clerk to the Dorset Lieutenancy and Secretary to the Dorset Strategic Partnership, has been in the job for more than 10 years.

He is responsible for 13,000 staff and works closely with elected councillors to deliver leadership, strategic direction, policy advice, partnerships and operational management.

His salary band starts at £145,235 and ends at £164,306 and an outline of his job description and key responsibilities is available to the public.

He is paid to be lead manager of the authority and lead advisor to the county council and is also responsible for providing services for the best possible value.

Mr Jenkins must lead regular reviews to secure efficiency and effectiveness, must promote good communication internally and with the public and must use up-to-date management practices.

Dorset County Council leader Cllr Angus Campbell has also warned that paying any less could lead to the appointment of second-rate people.

“If you don’t pay the rate, you don’t get people to do the job and this idea of naming and shaming is ridiculous” he said.

Tony Spotswood has overall responsibility for the healthcare needs of 550,000 people in Bournemouth, Christchurch, East Dorset and parts of the New Forest. The trust deals with 300,000 patient visits each year.

It has been a foundation trust since April 2005, meaning more vital decisions can be taken locally, and provides a comprehensive range of in and out patient services. Mr Spotswood earns between £166,000 and £170,000 per year, a salary set independently by the trust’s non-executive directors.

A spokesman for the trust said Mr Spotswood’s salary is in line with other trusts with an income of between £200 million and £300 million a year.

We asked shoppers in Bournemouth whether they think public sector bosses are worth their salaries.

Sue Elliott, from Winton, said: “They have a lot of responsibility, especially in the health service. I wouldn’t want to be in charge because there are too many things that can go wrong – they also have to have a lot of training.”

But William Lambert from Christchurch said he believes the salaries are too high and added: “I think it is wrong that people get so much for working for the council.

“They are always cutting services and saying they can’t afford important things for schools but it would help if they took a pay cut.”

l In yesterday’s Daily Echo we said Tony Spotswood had received a 14 per cent pay increase this year.

In fact it was in the financial year 2007-08 that his pay increased from a band of £141,000-£145,000 to £161,000-£165,000, an increase of around 14 per cent. In 2008-09, the increase was around three per cent, to between £166,000 and £170,000.

A trust spokesperson said: “The chief executive has received cost of living increases in line with the rest of the NHS for the past two years and your article is incorrect to say he had received a pay increase of 14 per cent this year, or previously in 2008.”

Comments(8)

Mediclogan5 says...
8:37pm Tue 8 Dec 09

Are they worth it?.....NO... Are the hundreds of public sector pay workers on just £15000 a year worth it? ....Dam right they are.

busguy says...
8:52pm Tue 8 Dec 09

These are big operations that, whether we like it or not, have to be well run for our benefit. These people are only worth it if they are exceptional performers and run a tight ship giving good 'customer service' to the locality. That is where I have some difficulties as I reckon perhaps there are only 25% of them really worth their money.
Maybe they should only get half of their salary amount automatically, and any additional earnings only come if tangible improvements are achieved that an independent local board agree to pay.

idontknowifitistrue says...
9:40pm Tue 8 Dec 09

Let's face, at their level, they are hardly knowledgeable about the work being done 'at the coal-face'.
I suggest that most of their decision making is very 'broad-brush' and delegated the the numerous tiers of management beneath them (both literally and figuratively).

idontknowifitistrue says...
9:41pm Tue 8 Dec 09

Sorry - 'delegated the the numerous tiers' should have read 'delegated to the numerous tiers'

busguy says...
10:19pm Tue 8 Dec 09

idontknowifitistrue wrote:
Let's face, at their level, they are hardly knowledgeable about the work being done 'at the coal-face'.
I suggest that most of their decision making is very 'broad-brush' and delegated the the numerous tiers of management beneath them (both literally and figuratively).
I totally agree but a true leader at the top will always acknowledge that the guys at the sharp end 'make it happen' and will delegate. A competent person at the top supports them and creates an environment where the team can thrive and prosper. The top should deal with the big picture politics, maintain a tight financial control on the middle managers and make sure all objectives are met.
A true leader will die for his/her troops and the troops will die for a true leader they respect.
There should be no difference in a business or public service. Shame there is such a distant and poor relationship in so many public organisations and with their 'customers'.

Bad Rabbit says...
12:25pm Wed 9 Dec 09

OK, maybe I'm just being naive but isn't this where journalism comes in?

As in you don't post a brief synopsis of a job description and then ask people on the street?

As in you pose the question and then try and find out the answers? In an attempt to enlighten and inform?

As in, according to ASHE the median weekly salary for a fully employed male in the UK was GBP 531. That equates to an annual salary of GBP 27,612.

So comparatively, the salaries of David Jenkins and Tony Spotswood seem extremely high.

So if they're providing value for money should be first based on performance. Can this be ascertained from easily sourced information?

Well, Tony Spotswood runs the Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation. According to Direct.gov.uk, the NHS Trust Performance ratings for 08/09, the trust led by Mr. Spotswood rates as Ecellent or Fully Meets (highest possible marks) on the four criteria of:
- Financial Management Score
- Core Standards Score
- Existing Commitments Score
- National Priorities Score

This includes the score for Experience of Patients which is rated as Satisfactory - the highest score. So in terms of performance the Trust is performing at the very highest levels nationally.

According to the Audit Commission Dorset County Council was rated as a 4 Star Category Council. (The highest score - alongside places such as the City of London). As value for money they rated Dorset as 3 stars. Bournemouth scored 3 and 2 and Poole 3 and 3 on the same basis which would certainly indicate that Dorset performs better.

However, Shropshire scored a 4 and 4 as did Worcestershire, the best two rated councils in the UK.

The Shropshire Council Chief Executive earns between GBP 146 and 169,000 per annum.

The Shropshire Council Chief Executive earns GBP 170,000 per annum.

So in terms of performance you could argue that our Dorset County Council Chief Executive is overpaid against better performing councils.

But not by much.

Thanks for the comprehensive reporting job done there Bournemouth Echo, or were you just trying to incite a little talking head class-warfare there...

gerbil112 says...
4:28pm Wed 9 Dec 09

It is often quoted that, in order to draw higher management away from the private sector, the NHS/Local Councils have to pay competitive salaries to people at that level.


At the other end of the scale, the workers (Nurses etc), are on fixed pay-bands and have traditionally done the work for low pay because of dedication and commitment.


It would be interesting to find out if high-flying managers would be prepared to work for the NHS/Council at a rate well below the private sector, because of commitment and love of the service that they provide!

Cyberbia says...
8:44pm Wed 9 Dec 09

Mediclogan5 wrote:
Are they worth it?.....NO... Are the hundreds of public sector pay workers on just £15000 a year worth it? ....Dam right they are.
Thank you Mediclogan5 for standing up for us public servants at the bottom of the pile!!


Sadly though we're going to be the very ones made reduntant, with a next-to-nothing pay-off, when the cull of public services comes along next year, while those at the top will be allowed to retire on a very nice fat pension thank you very much!!


Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses