News RSS Feed


Taste

Slow down for drivers on A338


A NEW 40mph speed limit is to be tried along a section of the Wessex Way in a bid to cut the number of road accidents.

Police and council chiefs have agreed to slash the speed limit on the A338 between County Gates and the approach to St Paul’s roundabout.

See link below for Echo comment

The change will come into effect early in the New Year and the existing speed cameras on that stretch will be recalibrated to reflect the lower limit.

The stretch in question, and in particular the area around the Richmond Hill eastbound slip road, has been regularly blighted by “clusters” of road accidents.

Highways chiefs had previously attempted to deal with the accident rate by dropping the limit to 50mph in the 1990s and introducing speed cameras.

But a total of 198 people have been injured in collisions on this section of road between 2004 and 2008.

An alternative option of closing the eastbound nearside lane of the Wessex Way between the Bournemouth West roundabout and St Paul’s Roundabout was considered but rejected.

The lower speed limit is to be trialled for six months, during which time public consultation will be carried out to see whether there is support for making it permanent.

John Satchwell, Bournemouth’s road safety manager, said: “This project is about improving road safety not causing disruption, but is an experimental scheme during which public opinion will be tested.

“Major disruptions to traffic arise from road accidents, especially on the A338, and these proposals are aimed at reducing the severity and large number of crashes on this stretch. It is expected that overall safe journey times will be improved by this trial.

“The works to replace the signage are deliberately being carried out at night time to avoid causing disruption to those coming into the town to visit, shop and work.”

As well as changing the speed limit signs, the council we will be installing two interactive signs at Richmond Hill junction – one on the slip road to warn of queuing vehicles and one on the Wessex Way to warn of merging traffic.

The signs will not be installed until after Christmas.



Your Say YourEcho

grumps999, Kinson says...
8:54am Sat 28 Nov 09

why not put up a sign saying please switch of your engines exit your vehicles and push. The lowered speed limit would not make any difference.

Jim_Springbourne, Bournemouth says...
9:14am Sat 28 Nov 09

I am no fan of stupidly low speed limits and speed cameras, but this really is a nasty bit of road with short slip roads at the Richmond Hill junction. I think this is a fair enough idea. I have felt for a long time that something similar should be done at Blackwater junction southbound. Joining there from the B3073 is tricky at the best of times due to the short slip roads.

blogit2, blogit2 says...
9:29am Sat 28 Nov 09

well i have never been able to go above 40mph any way so it will make no difference to me .

ferret38, bournemouth says...
9:36am Sat 28 Nov 09

Its not the speed thats the problem it that short stupid slipway that connects to the wessex way , you either have to come to a stop , or put your foot down and hit 50 as fast as you can to get on .. AS for he speed limts PHA most people just slow down for the cams and put there foot down and get up to a decent speed that suites the road like 60 , i do it all the time

Lord Spring, says...
9:41am Sat 28 Nov 09

Average speed cameras make more sense than static cameras the smart Alecs can then not put their foot down between them.
I have noticed that most drivers in my experience on the M25 road works observe them and adhere to the imposed limit.
I much prefer to do the imposed limit and advance than become static, because some plonker has created an incident being in ruddy blush.

doubletop, bournemouth says...
10:08am Sat 28 Nov 09

blogit2 wrote:
well i have never been able to go above 40mph any way so it will make no difference to me .
Its about time you bought a decent car then

doubletop, bournemouth says...
10:22am Sat 28 Nov 09

Its not speed thats the problem, its the stupid short slip roads that causes most of the accidents, its also the stupid drivers that try and push their way onto the wessex way from the slip roads rather than wait for a gap.
Just latley every time there is an accident its always speed that gets blamed when in most cases its down to bad driving and being to impatient to wait for a few seconds.
Seems to me the best way is to seperate the two lanes by a massive brick wall which allows vehicles from the slip roads to join the carriage way without slamming into other cars, i would also suggest that because of the camera situated between richmond hill and st pauls lane is a distraction to other drivers as they will be checking their speedos rather than watching where they are going, in the end its all down to bad design of the roads in this country that causes accidents not speed.
The autobans in germany and other countries dont suffer the amount of accident that we do and just look at the speed that they travel at.
Bad design of roads is most of the problem.

baldyn, says...
10:24am Sat 28 Nov 09

well it won't bother me I can only just reach the pedals, so i cannot depress them more than a centimetre.

Bournemouthstorm, Bournemouth (Town Centre) says...
10:31am Sat 28 Nov 09

This reduction in the speed limit should help. Yes it is bad road design and bad driving that cause accidents. It is obvious that if the speed of the traffic is reduced then drivers have more time to react to others poor driving. What we need is average speed cameras that record average speeds so avoiding car slowing down for cameras and then speeding up again. Dropping the speed limit will be much cheaper than improving sliproads.

Maureen Arthur, Hamlet of Poole says...
10:31am Sat 28 Nov 09

doubletop wrote:
blogit2 wrote: well i have never been able to go above 40mph any way so it will make no difference to me .
Its about time you bought a decent car then
she rides a shire horse.. called Plodder!

poole_god, says...
10:32am Sat 28 Nov 09

Step in the right direction and is more cost effective than building a new slip road.

poole_god, says...
10:32am Sat 28 Nov 09

Step in the right direction and is more cost effective than building a new slip road.

Maureen Arthur, Hamlet of Poole says...
10:33am Sat 28 Nov 09

baldyn wrote:
well it won't bother me I can only just reach the pedals, so i cannot depress them more than a centimetre.
I have a lizard called Jeremy.

Rich_Enduro, bournemouth says...
10:56am Sat 28 Nov 09

its not the speed that causes the accidents, its bad driving. i realise that the slip road is too short and when i'm travelling down the a338 i always move to the outside lane just in case someone is trying to join the road. some people refuse to move over to let traffic join and this is what can cause accidents. the interactive signs sound like a good idea if they instruct traffic to move over to allow the awaiting traffic to join the road

r50mini, Blandford says...
11:10am Sat 28 Nov 09

It's not the speed that is the problem it is idiots who can't stick to the speed limit, the abysmally low standards of driving, and ignorant drivers that seems to blight the roads of Poole and Bournemouth. There are to many idiots on the roads who think they have sole right to the roads and can do whatever they want.

r50mini, Blandford says...
11:12am Sat 28 Nov 09

Better still why not have a Variable speed limit along there with speed cameras that adjust, similar to the M25.

PokesdownMark, Bournemouth says...
11:14am Sat 28 Nov 09

Vehicles will be quite a lot closer together at 40. I expect to see MORE accidents at the slip road when this starts. It will take much more precise driving to get out into the gaps. Probably beyond a much larger subset of drivers to get it right. Many more will end up stopping at the end of the slip road.
With it being then much harder to get out into the traffic flow. So you may get a queue extending back and blocking Richmond Hill roundabout?

I hope they are prepared to call and early halt if its all goes pear shaped on us!

rumplestiltskin, christchurch says...
11:20am Sat 28 Nov 09

It's not the speed that is the problem it is idiots who can't stick to the speed limit, the abysmally low standards of driving, and ignorant drivers that seems to blight the roads of Poole and Bournemouth. There are to many idiots on the roads who think they have sole right to the roads and can do whatever they want.

precisely

charley farley west parley, bournemouth says...
11:24am Sat 28 Nov 09

Of course it only applies to the 20 yards of rd through the actual part covered by the camera.The correct speed limits travelling from County Gates will be 60, brake hard ,40,excellerate back to 60 asap.Get caught by the camera,feel hard done by,put burning tyre over camera.

RichmondWood, Bournemouth says...
11:29am Sat 28 Nov 09

An alternative option of closing the eastbound nearside lane of the Wessex Way between the Bournemouth West roundabout and St Paul’s Roundabout was considered but rejected.

Why was this alternative rejected? I would think reducing the traffic to one lane through the junction, in both directions, so that the slip roads joining could have a dedicated lane would improve safety as the main problem is the current short length of these slip roads, Reducing the speed to 40mph will help but not cut out the problem.

John T, Poole says...
11:55am Sat 28 Nov 09

John Satchwell, Bournemouth's road safety manager, said: ' This project is about improving road safety, not causing disruption'.
Congratulations on this change of policy by Bournemouth Council! I hope it continues.

amadrumma, Bournemouth says...
12:41pm Sat 28 Nov 09

I think this is ridiculous and once again drives home the Fear Factor and Big Brother ethos that's gradually taking over this country. We are constantly sold the line that speed is the cause of all horror on the roads, rather than the truth of the matter which is poor road infrastructure. I would also contend that plodders cause more accidents through making everybody else get impatient, and take unnecessary chances.

Per causa non violenter, Parkstone says...
12:42pm Sat 28 Nov 09

It is abundantly clear that the issue on the Wessex Way is the layout of the road. The biggest problem on that stretch is the incredibly short and blind Richmond Hill Northbound on-slip (Permanently close the slip road is the best fix.) In another article, Neal Butterworth makes mention of the traffic “whizzing” down the southbound on-slip to join traffic “barrelling” over the rise in the road beyond the underpass. But he forgets that the council have forced all traffic wishing to go straight on towards Poole at the next roundabout to be in the right hand lane, even though there are two lanes the other side of the roundabout.
The council needs to do some professional investigation in to resolving the real problems. So far the list of charges against Bournemouth Council includes the IMAX centre, the hopefully abandoned plan to remove the seafront overpass to finish cutting the town in half, that stupid camera car, over inflated car park charges; they couldn’t do a better job of trying to wreck the town if they tried.
Reducing speed is cheap, avoids real resolutions and of course is great for raising revenue.
When the national speed limit for a single carriageway can be 60mph and can include junctions, pedestrians walking alongside, gardens backing onto the road, etc; how can they justify a ridiculous 40mph on a dual carriageway with all the safety barriers, no pedestrians and no junctions without slip roads? Even the 50mph speed limit is too low beyond the St Pauls roundabout heading out of town. Get the road right you idiots. Speed is not the problem.

poolebabe, poole says...
1:36pm Sat 28 Nov 09

ferret38 wrote:
Its not the speed thats the problem it that short stupid slipway that connects to the wessex way , you either have to come to a stop , or put your foot down and hit 50 as fast as you can to get on .. AS for he speed limts PHA most people just slow down for the cams and put there foot down and get up to a decent speed that suites the road like 60 , i do it all the time
I agree the design of the road is poor and that is part of the problem. So reducing speed is obviously going to help people react quicker, and a slower speed means less chance of injury. In theory anyway.
.
However, the Wessex way is a complete joke in design. It is a duel carriageway, and several speed limits, fixed and mobile camera's. Locals who are familiar with the road, should be able to adhere to the various speed limits and hazzards as they know the road, but what concerns me is visitors to the area. The Wessex way is the main route in and out of Bournemouth to and from the north, and it's different speed limits, confusing and dangerous layouts, make it a problem. The council are not addressing the issues of design, but prefering to fine people for not sticking to silly limits imposed on a duel carriageway!
.
We are not talking about roads by schools, or narrow lanes in the New Forest but a duel carriageway! I think the limits are questionable, especially when people will be fined. It's no wonder people get cynical, when the council prefer to fine people rather than pay to fix the problem. If I was a Bournemouth resident, I would want to see evidence this new limit, in fact all the limits have reduced the number of accidents in order to justify the amount of revenue in fines. Bournemouth council are raking it in at the moment!

paul2, bournemouth says...
2:05pm Sat 28 Nov 09

poolebabe wrote:
ferret38 wrote: Its not the speed thats the problem it that short stupid slipway that connects to the wessex way , you either have to come to a stop , or put your foot down and hit 50 as fast as you can to get on .. AS for he speed limts PHA most people just slow down for the cams and put there foot down and get up to a decent speed that suites the road like 60 , i do it all the time
I agree the design of the road is poor and that is part of the problem. So reducing speed is obviously going to help people react quicker, and a slower speed means less chance of injury. In theory anyway. . However, the Wessex way is a complete joke in design. It is a duel carriageway, and several speed limits, fixed and mobile camera's. Locals who are familiar with the road, should be able to adhere to the various speed limits and hazzards as they know the road, but what concerns me is visitors to the area. The Wessex way is the main route in and out of Bournemouth to and from the north, and it's different speed limits, confusing and dangerous layouts, make it a problem. The council are not addressing the issues of design, but prefering to fine people for not sticking to silly limits imposed on a duel carriageway! . We are not talking about roads by schools, or narrow lanes in the New Forest but a duel carriageway! I think the limits are questionable, especially when people will be fined. It's no wonder people get cynical, when the council prefer to fine people rather than pay to fix the problem. If I was a Bournemouth resident, I would want to see evidence this new limit, in fact all the limits have reduced the number of accidents in order to justify the amount of revenue in fines. Bournemouth council are raking it in at the moment!
This road is now so busy, it makes no difference to the speed limit there will still be the drivers weaving in and out and too close to the car in front. A lower speed limit definitely would reduce the number of serious casulties to a person inside their vehicle if an impact or collision occurs at 30-40mph as opposed to 50-60mph. Point 2: If you are still going to speed over the new 40mph limit then maybe 50mph will be safer than speeding at 60mph with the current 50mph limit. Point 3: Anyone who has moved down to this area (from London or anywhere) in the last thirty years does not really have the right to complain about all the congestion and traffic!

terry1965, bournemouth says...
2:11pm Sat 28 Nov 09

Here we go again. The revenue from the fixed "safety" cameras has reduced to virtually nothing these days, so in an attempt to screw the motorist yet again the partnerships will reduce the speed limit on this busy road to a ridiculously low level, knowing they will catch a few people out and rake in some more money.

Mark my words, the whole of the Wessex Way will be a 30mph limit within the next two years, with more fixed cameras all along it and the morons in their mobile vans lurking round each bend trying to catch us out.

Don't bother addressing REAL safety concerns. Just fine the motorist for doing 5mph over an absurdly low limit on a road as good as any motorway instead.

M0Z, Bournemouth says...
2:31pm Sat 28 Nov 09

I nearly had a serious accident whilst merging from the Richmond Hill eastbound sliproad in 1985, when the speed limit was 70. Completely my own fault, due to driving inexperience. Speed limits and signage were not a factor. I recall a rather humbling exchange of words at St Paul’s roundabout!!

It is a lethal junction, and I have avoided it ever since. The sliproad is far too short, and I have no objection to it being closed on safety grounds. It’s hardly a new problem though.

But what really angers me is the relentless and idiotic assault on speed limits. It’s supposed to be a major dual carriageway, part of the most important road in the area!!

The morons at the council take the dumbed-down approach yet again, no doubt expecting extra camera revenue as a bi-product.

If they properly researched the accidents, I wonder how many would be due to inexperience, old age, bad eyesight, talking on the phone, distraction by passengers (esp kids) or impairment by drugs (including legal ones that cause drowsiness or affect reactions, such as anti-depressants and allergy treatments). Perhaps that analysis would be too controversial for them – easier to blame it on speed. So the cretins come up with another ‘initiative’ for the sake of their careers, and the rest of us suffer the consequences for ever more.

Of course speed is a factor - if we were all stationary there would be no traffic accidents. But the economy would collapse - no money, no food – we’d all die anyway . . . . Morons. I wonder how many deaths have/will occur as a consequence of the recent traffic chaos at Bournemouth hospital?

flyingkipper, Poole says...
3:04pm Sat 28 Nov 09

Sounds like the cash generators along there aren't making enough money!!!!!! Why don't Bournemouth council just go the whole hog and bring in a congestion charge!!!!!!!

grimreaper, Ensbury Park says...
4:04pm Sat 28 Nov 09

Just make every Motorway, Dual carriageway and A road a 20MPH Zone ! YAAAAAAAAAAAWN
.

It's so much easier than catching CR*P drivers


Maggie69, bournemouth says...
4:09pm Sat 28 Nov 09

I've said it before & I'll say it again till it sinks in. The people to blame for reduced speed limits and speed cameras are the very people who blatantly ignore them & drive like idiots, weaving in & out of traffic & harrassing drivers who choose to adhere to the speed limits. Clearly a number of you post on here. Average speed cameras are what's needed, & more mobile speed cameras. Fixed ones are pointless when arrogant idiots know exactly where they are & speed between them.

grimreaper, Ensbury Park says...
5:31pm Sat 28 Nov 09

"So why don’t you think average cameras are used?"

I can't remember, you tell me !

paul2, bournemouth says...
6:12pm Sat 28 Nov 09

If this is a trial period for 40mph, why not have a another trial afterwards for a different speed limit, such as 60mph to observe any differences.

djd, bournemouth says...
6:45pm Sat 28 Nov 09

Is the 40 mph speed limit a maximum spped or a challenge to reach it ???

jeremy gobsite, Kinson says...
8:06pm Sat 28 Nov 09

Average speed cameras are definitely the only solution. Experience over decades and countrywide shows these are an effective means to deter speeders. Reduce the limit on Wessex Way to 40 by all means, but ensure compliance with real muscle. Couple this with frequent high profile police presence and deter the silly, arrogant ****-wipes we have to contend with on our roads.

T.BH1, Bournemouth says...
9:00pm Sat 28 Nov 09

I blame the cyclists.

rotcoddam, pokesdown says...
10:38pm Sat 28 Nov 09

The solution is to rebuild the road to the standard that drivers have a right to expect given the extortionate fees they pay to drive a car.

This road was designed in the late sixties and built early seventies. At the time the speed limit on this type of road was 70mph.
The highway authourity are apprently now admitting that this work was so unbelievably incompetently carried out that despite unimaginable improvements in vehicle design, better braking, steering, handling etc on even the roughest old banger now on the roads than on formula one cars of the design era, this road is now unsafe at half the design speed.

lovellracing, Broadstone says...
10:39pm Sat 28 Nov 09

power steering, abs, traction control,
and 40mph...............
.........ridiculous

rotcoddam, pokesdown says...
10:59pm Sat 28 Nov 09

So just as the cash cow in Kings park runs dry Bournemouth council have a new one waiting in the wings. They have to be admired for this level of forward planning, I always thought they where far too stupid too plan ahead like this.

Just think the revenue from this camera will make the Kings park fiasco look like pin money. How many motorists, even locals, will expect a dual carraigeway like this to have a 40mph limit. The road toll camera will be flashing so often it will look like a permanent light.

M0Z, Bournemouth says...
11:33pm Sat 28 Nov 09

When was the last time anyone saw a blue speed sign (a minimum limit)?? What a great idea, still listed in the current highway code. I remember the good old days when idiots driving too slowly on motorways and dual carriageways were prosecuted. What went wrong?? How come today’s ultra-safe cars with their ABS, air bags, crumple zones and pre-tensioned seatbelts are deemed less capable of moving at the same speed as cars from 30/40 years ago?? Madness!!

If there is a section of dual carriageway too unsafe to be driven at the national speed limit, the transport folk should acknowledge their failing and upgrade it. Reducing the speed limit is the wrong response and doesn’t address the true problem. No doubt it’s the easiest and most lucrative choice for our inept councillors though.

Congratulations to Swindon council for banning the use of speed cameras on safety grounds. **** good move. Motorists should be paying attention to the traffic in front, alongside and behind them - not worrying about speed cameras and reading unnecessary signs.

My observation is that today’s speed limits are generally about 15mph lower than they should be, and I would welcome the sensible increases to motorway limits proposed by the police. I do, however, strongly support 20mph zones outside primary schools (my first RTA was at age five, when I ran across the road outside school . . . bang, ouch, still have the scars!!).

M0Z, Bournemouth says...
11:41pm Sat 28 Nov 09

Blimey - the thought police at the Echo has replaced my word "D-A-M-N" with four asterisks!! What a bunch of ****s (my asterisks this time - I wouldn't be that rude!!).

EGHH, says...
6:48am Sun 29 Nov 09

Why not go the whole hog and introduce a man with a red flag walking in front of the vehicles. That'll slow the traffic down nicely and cut the town's unemployment.

poolebabe, poole says...
7:29am Sun 29 Nov 09

EGHH wrote:
Why not go the whole hog and introduce a man with a red flag walking in front of the vehicles. That'll slow the traffic down nicely and cut the town's unemployment.
They could use convicted Paedophiles to do the job. It may not cut down on accidents, but it would make driving at 40 mph on a duel carriageway more interesting.

jobsworthwatch, Bournemouth says...
8:15am Sun 29 Nov 09

You would have thought that by now, that dangerous east bound slip road that 'drops you' down onto wessex way from the top of richmond hill would have been sorted by now. They medled with a few years ago to no effect when what they should have done was made it three lanes up to St Pauls roundabout.
They could have used the millions made from ripping off the motorist by way of speed cameras, parking penalties etc.
At 40 mph this junction will still be dangerous, the slip road needs to match of the east bound side of the junction.

Pineview, Poole says...
8:22am Sun 29 Nov 09

Where the fixed camera is now (before junc) people have slowed and now are speeding up again as the they go under the bridge.
Add the fact that the nervous drivers are already worryiing about getting into the outside lane to turn right into the town,makes this junc so dangerous.
Just close the east bound slip road.
How busy is it anyway ?
We all seem so strongly opinionated here,just wondering how many of you vote in local council elections .
After all ,the people voted in at those elections seem to be making all the decisions we dislike.

Lord Spring, says...
9:06am Sun 29 Nov 09

Will the 8.7seconds lost over the said 2 mile 40 mph stretch make any difference to anyones day
What always baffles me is what do the speed merchants do when they get to their destinations have a cup of tea and brag it only took me X amount of time. After zooming from the outside lane across all lanes to a slip road at 70 mph is that safe practice or vice versa emerge from a slip road and immediately want access to the outside lane

ferret38, bournemouth says...
10:34am Sun 29 Nov 09

poolebabe wrote:
EGHH wrote:
Why not go the whole hog and introduce a man with a red flag walking in front of the vehicles. That'll slow the traffic down nicely and cut the town's unemployment.
They could use convicted Paedophiles to do the job. It may not cut down on accidents, but it would make driving at 40 mph on a duel carriageway more interesting.
hahahhaa very good indeed :)

upontown, poole says...
11:52am Sun 29 Nov 09

Dorset = VERY SLOW

M0Z, Bournemouth says...
2:46pm Sun 29 Nov 09

Perhaps it’s no coincidence that East Dorset District Council is an anagram of “Cult Road Sect, Idiots, Cretins”.

[Chris], WWW says...
4:36pm Sun 29 Nov 09

Maggie69 wrote:
I've said it before & I'll say it again till it sinks in. The people to blame for reduced speed limits and speed cameras are the very people who blatantly ignore them & drive like idiots, weaving in & out of traffic & harrassing drivers who choose to adhere to the speed limits. Clearly a number of you post on here. Average speed cameras are what's needed, & more mobile speed cameras. Fixed ones are pointless when arrogant idiots know exactly where they are & speed between them.
Well said Maggie69; could not agree more. Less than 10 secs lost over that short stretch. Is this really going to effect the time it takes to get from A to B drivers. Of course not, but it might save a few accidents, or worse. Which could be some of you in time.

poolebabe, poole says...
5:12pm Sun 29 Nov 09

wrote:
Maggie69 wrote: I've said it before & I'll say it again till it sinks in. The people to blame for reduced speed limits and speed cameras are the very people who blatantly ignore them & drive like idiots, weaving in & out of traffic & harrassing drivers who choose to adhere to the speed limits. Clearly a number of you post on here. Average speed cameras are what's needed, & more mobile speed cameras. Fixed ones are pointless when arrogant idiots know exactly where they are & speed between them.
Well said Maggie69; could not agree more. Less than 10 secs lost over that short stretch. Is this really going to effect the time it takes to get from A to B drivers. Of course not, but it might save a few accidents, or worse. Which could be some of you in time.
Where ever you go there are idiots on the road. The other day I was cut up on the Dorset Way by a lorry driver, then he switched lanes, weaving in and out of traffic, and cut several people up at Fleets Bridge. I had to swerve to stop him hitting me, and others had to as well. He was driving far too fast but not "speeding" in a long, high topped lorry and I'm surprised he actually kept control of his lorry, idiot. The problem is, the speed camera's only address the issue of speed, not moronic, dangerous drivers.

The Seasider, Poole says...
5:43pm Sun 29 Nov 09

Jim_Springbourne wrote:
I am no fan of stupidly low speed limits and speed cameras, but this really is a nasty bit of road with short slip roads at the Richmond Hill junction. I think this is a fair enough idea. I have felt for a long time that something similar should be done at Blackwater junction southbound. Joining there from the B3073 is tricky at the best of times due to the short slip roads.
Absolutely spot on.
.
I said the same in a similar news article about 6 months ago- the Richmond Hill junction and Blackwater junction (along with the Texaco onslip at Ringwood) are all very dangerous bits of road. Drivers doing 50 - 60 mph swerving out of way of slow moving vehicles which had just joined the carriageway. Lower speed limits at these spots makes sense, lets do the necessary before lives are lost.
.
For once, it seems, common sense will prevail.

Bournemouthstorm, Bournemouth (Town Centre) says...
6:03pm Sun 29 Nov 09

lovellracing wrote:
power steering, abs, traction control, and 40mph............... .........ridiculous
power steering, abs, traction control.............
. You might have, I might have but lots of clapped out old bangers havent.

weevie, Bournemouth says...
6:23pm Sun 29 Nov 09

This really has gone far enough.
There is no way on God's earth that this is 40mph stretch of road.
If some idiot cannot manage the slipways - then they shouldn't be driving.
Are we REALLY going to put up with this? democracy?

dorsetspeed, Poole says...
9:45pm Sun 29 Nov 09

There is no such thing as a dangerous road. No matter what the characteristics or speed limit of any particular road are, it is possible to drive safely, or dangerously, either well above or well below the speed limit.

Driving standards have reached an all time low, mostly because of the dependence on low speeds limits and only speed enforcement to achieve road safety. As long as this continues, accidents and congestion will increase and limits will decrease. It really is incredible that those who set road policy are so incompetent.

rotcoddam, pokesdown says...
10:29pm Sun 29 Nov 09

Nobody was complaining about the limit increasing their journey times.So fail to see the point those contributors where making.

The point under discussion was that this is a dual carraigeway with a hard shoulder, two lanes a central reservation with crash barriers,no pedestrians or cyclists. It is listed as a major road. The origanol design was plainly incompetent, like most of Bournemouth councils efforts. It is totally unacceptable that a slip road should be constructed so as to act like a "T" junction on to a high speed road.

Instead of seeing it as an oportunity to generate revenue from a road toll camera they should be sorting out the problem.

If I had equipment in my factory which was dangerous in NORMAL operation due to inept design and construction and people kept injuring themselves on it. I would,and quite rightly, be in deep sh*t with the council. I very much doubt that they would accept my simply instructing stuff to be a bit more careful using it.

.

Perihelion, Bournemouth says...
11:40am Mon 30 Nov 09

The 70mph speed limit was reduced to 50mph a few years back, I believe, because the crash barriers did not comply with the 70mph test. Lets just wait and see if 40mph past the short on-slip will help the situation here.

mrllcoolj, Bournemouth says...
11:40am Thu 3 Dec 09

See link below for Echo commentSomeone else has retorted with a smart-alec answer, but I really don't understand why average speed cameras aren't used for such highly sensitive (and important) sections of road. Clearly traffic black spots such as the Richmond Hill slip road, the Black water junction and others require these type of cameras and are issues that need to be addressed seriously and appropriately? If the issue of capital expenditure/disrupti
on to traffic to re-configure the sliproad in question is the stumbling block, then surely improving the technology of speed cameras would be a cheaper and more cost effective answer in the short term? Imposing limits on sections of dangerous road like this is NOT about generating cash (if you were driving properly and in accordance with the road conditions and regulations you wouldn't secure a penalty), instead it is about preventing disastrous accidents occurring - anyone remember the latest one that held Bournemouth in gridlock around Richmond Hill? And in summary, what is the case AGAINST having average speed cameras in these particular situations, eg the whole stretch of the Wessex Way between Cambridge Road roundabout and St Pauls Road roundabout?

mark.s, Bournemouth says...
5:12pm Thu 3 Dec 09

The two major blackspots in the area (Richmond Hill and Blackwater) are both because of ridiculously short slip roads. The solution is pretty obvious really!!

Improving the road will COST money to the Council, where as altering the speed limit will MAKE money for them.

Easy to see why they choose this option.

Rally, Bournemouth says...
9:10pm Thu 3 Dec 09

weevie wrote:
This really has gone far enough. There is no way on God's earth that this is 40mph stretch of road. If some idiot cannot manage the slipways - then they shouldn't be driving. Are we REALLY going to put up with this? democracy?
Weevie,

You are, of course, quite correct: only people with your implied high standard driving skills should be allowed on our roads.

I can see your arrogance taking a blow if you were to try and pass a driving test without first taking a driving refresher course.

Rally, Bournemouth says...
9:18pm Thu 3 Dec 09

amadrumma wrote:
I think this is ridiculous and once again drives home the Fear Factor and Big Brother ethos that's gradually taking over this country. We are constantly sold the line that speed is the cause of all horror on the roads, rather than the truth of the matter which is poor road infrastructure. I would also contend that plodders cause more accidents through making everybody else get impatient, and take unnecessary chances.
"Plodders" cause accidents because they make other drivers act impatiently!!!!
What complete and utter nonsense.
It's yet another example of how in our society today nobody is responsible for their own actions - it's always somebody else's fault.
If I were driving at, say, 25mph in a 30mph zone and another driver overtook me and piled into a car coming the other way, would it be my fault for being a 'plodder', or would it be the other driver's fault for being impatient?

Comments are closed on this article.

SLOW MOTION: Sections of the Wessex Way will trial a temporary new speed of 40mph rather than the normal 50mph in the New Year SLOW MOTION: Sections of the Wessex Way will trial a temporary new speed of 40mph rather than the normal 50mph in the New Year

Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »