When news happens text pix and video to 80360. Start your message with BE then leave a space.
Don't miss our new Youth Sport supplement every Thursday inside your Echo
All of today's content from across the site, all in one place at bournemouthecho.co.uk/today
8:00am Wednesday 30th September 2009 in
A photographer was stunned to be told he couldn’t take pictures on Sandbanks beach without a permit.
Steve Cook was in the middle of a charity shoot for Help for Heroes on Monday morning when he was stopped.
A beach warden insisted that commercial photography on the beach was prohibited by a Borough of Poole bylaw, unless you had the correct permit.
The council has now admitted that was an error – but insists commercial and professional photographers must seek permission.
Steve, 42, of Poole based Seeker Photography Ltd, told the Echo he had photographed on the town’s beaches countless times during his 13 years’ experience, and he was “shaking with annoyance” following the incident on the empty beach, which he described as “ludicrous.”
He said: “It’s not something you expect to happen on a beach in Poole. You might expect that from a police officer outside parliament – but even then they haven’t got to right to stop you taking photos.”
Anthony Rogers, recreation manager, said the council had to balance requests to film or take photographs on the beaches “with the interests of other beach users and our duty to ensure public safety.”
While there was no bylaw, he added: “We do ask that any organisation or professional wishing to use council-owned land for commercial photography or filming to seek permission beforehand and provide evidence of public liability insurance. This is standard practice in the industry.”
Mr Cook said he had the relevant insurance, but added: “This is a policy that I've never heard of in all these years of beach photoshoots.
“If this truly is the case then all of the dozens of wedding photographers who do bridal shoots every week throughout the year on the beach or parks are breaking the council’s rules.”
The photos were to be used to promote a 110-mile charity walk through the Sahara being undertaken next month by Barbara Cox, founder of healthy meal delivery company Nutrichef, in a bid to raise £5,000 for Help for Heroes.
To sponsor her visit helpmehelptheheroes.org
Comments(37)
Lord Spring
says...
8:37am Wed 30 Sep 09
Adrian XX
says...
8:38am Wed 30 Sep 09
Upkeep
says...
9:02am Wed 30 Sep 09
souwest
says...
9:06am Wed 30 Sep 09
poolebabe
says...
9:32am Wed 30 Sep 09
cantique
says...
9:46am Wed 30 Sep 09
62131115661144495
says...
10:06am Wed 30 Sep 09
Adrian XX
says...
10:17am Wed 30 Sep 09
62131115661144495 wrote:Or when they cordoned off a huge section of beach so they could cut up a dead sea mammal. Oh - that was Bournemouth council. Still, the same mentality prevails.
Mr Rogers: “…with the interests of other beach users”. A shame Pool Council didn't think about that when they cordoned off a whole chunk of the beach for their precious polo tournament. Hypocrites.
beachhutman
says...
12:14pm Wed 30 Sep 09
Perry_Winkle
says...
12:53pm Wed 30 Sep 09
Grant David Read
says...
1:14pm Wed 30 Sep 09
terry1965
says...
2:23pm Wed 30 Sep 09
souwest
says...
2:53pm Wed 30 Sep 09
Tig
says...
4:26pm Wed 30 Sep 09
legaleagle
says...
4:57pm Wed 30 Sep 09
PokesdownMark
says...
7:52pm Wed 30 Sep 09
BIGTONE
says...
10:02pm Wed 30 Sep 09
The Sage
says...
10:02pm Wed 30 Sep 09
WIGGINSv
says...
10:50pm Wed 30 Sep 09
The Sage wrote:It's all right for them to spy on us with their cameras. People who trot out the old trope:..."they work for us," are sadly deluded.
I will expect the council or private contractor to give me proper notice if they intend to install a camera on a wheelie bin which is kept on my property I still cannot understand that in the same week we were told that altering the day of collection would save money but the council were employing a private firm to spy on the contents of rubbish bins with all the risk of identity theft that implies as they were not using the information to aid bin collection the decision had already been made. another case of big brother B.O.Poole
rook
says...
10:58pm Wed 30 Sep 09
ferret38
says...
11:13pm Wed 30 Sep 09
SeekerPhoto
says...
8:20am Thu 1 Oct 09
SeekerPhoto
says...
8:22am Thu 1 Oct 09
rook
says...
8:35am Thu 1 Oct 09
SeekerPhoto wrote:I wouldn't let it worry you Steve - just tell them to F-off.
Open letter to all Poole Councillors, Annette Brooke MP and Robert Syms MP (sent 30/9/09):
This week I have had a run in with petty officialdom when I was told that I couldn't take photos on Sandbanks beach whilst doing a PR shoot for Help for Heroes.
http://www.bournemou
thecho.co.uk/news/46
55283.You_need_permi
t_to_take_pictures_o
n_Sandbanks_beach__s
napper_told/?ref=mr.
.. Read more
http://www.bjp-onlin
e.com/public/showPag
e.html?page=869427
Originally I was told that it was a Poole bylaw, now it just seems that there is a secret (ie no-one knows about it) directive that all professional photographers need a permit to take photographs anywhere in the Borough of Poole inc pavements and public highways.
Not only is this blatantly an infringement of civil liberties, going against Home Office and No10 advice but it is also totally unworkable - I would need in excess of 20-30 permits a week to carry out my work (as would all other pro photographers inc the Daily Echo).
No-one from the council has been in touch with me to apologise for the error over bylaws or to explain the position, despite having my contact details since Monday morning.
I would be grateful for any assistance that you could give me in helping to remove these outrageous restrictions on both the livelihood and civil liberties of all professional photographers.
Regards
Steve Cook
Seeker Photography Ltd
karateman1964
says...
9:29am Thu 1 Oct 09
karateman1964
says...
9:29am Thu 1 Oct 09
Tig
says...
9:41am Thu 1 Oct 09
In Absentia
says...
11:36am Thu 1 Oct 09
karateman1964 wrote:Sorry, but you totally miss the point. We cannot allow this continued erosion of civil liberties by petty officialdom.
As usual a lot of fuss about nothing
In Absentia
says...
11:39am Thu 1 Oct 09
poolebabe
says...
12:09pm Thu 1 Oct 09
PokesdownMark wrote:Unless you are an owner of an ASBO of course!
Tell me what a police state looks like? THIS is what a police state looks like!
poolebabe
says...
12:09pm Thu 1 Oct 09
PokesdownMark wrote:Unless you are an owner of an ASBO of course!
Tell me what a police state looks like? THIS is what a police state looks like!
MOTRP
says...
7:36pm Thu 1 Oct 09
karateman1964
says...
9:24pm Thu 1 Oct 09
In Absentia wrote:We cannot allow this continued erosion of civil liberties by petty officialdom? still dont see why the Echo had to print it ..I mean its not exactly gut busting news is it.
karateman1964 wrote: As usual a lot of fuss about nothingSorry, but you totally miss the point. We cannot allow this continued erosion of civil liberties by petty officialdom. The law regarding photography in public places is quite clear. If you are on public land you do not need anyone's permission to take photographs. Police Officers cannot confiscate your equipment or have pictures deleted with a court order. That also applies even if a photographer is stopped under the provisions of the Terrorism Act. If the Echo has any NUJ members then they ought to be aware of the national campaign they've taken up with the Government to get proper guidance issued to the Police, many of whom are incredibly ignorant of the law in this area.
SeekerPhoto
says...
9:00am Fri 2 Oct 09
karateman1964
says...
11:42am Fri 2 Oct 09
AngryABBERS
says...
12:44pm Fri 16 Oct 09
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
KMB65 says...
8:18am Wed 30 Sep 09