News RSS Feed


the social media rolling gif

Get social with the Echo - click to find out how and where!


Dorset drivers caught up in safety check Vortex


MORE than 100 drivers were issued with fixed penalty tickets in just three days following road safety checks across Dorset.

During Operation Vortex dedicated teams of traffic officers used marked and unmarked cars as well as motorcycles to patrol the county’s roads.

The operation was part of a concerted campaign in the South West to promote road safety and tackle motorists who flout road traffic laws.

The figures are released as Britain’s magistrates said police could not be “relied on” to hand out £60 fixed penalty fines for careless driving because it was a “certainty” that officers would misuse their powers.

Between August 11 and August 13 a total of 134 fixed penalty tickets were issued in Dorset including 55 motorists detected for failing to wear a seat belt and 45 motorists found to be using their mobile phone while at the wheel. Other tickets were issued for a range of motoring offences including speeding and driving without insurance or a valid MOT.

Chief Inspector Bob Nichols said: “The number of drivers caught in just three days is alarming and what is especially worrying is the number of motorists using a mobile when driving or not wearing a seat belt. Even careful drivers can be distracted by a call or text message.

“Offences such as not wearing a seat belt and using a mobile phone while driving can have devastating consequences; at the very least a £60 fine as well as three penalty points for mobile phone offences. I’d urge people to consider whether it’s really worth it.

“We need the support and co-operation of all motorists to help to reduce the number of people killed and seriously injured on our roads.”

The Magistrates Association this week issued its comments in response to the government’s plans to allow police to issue £60 fixed penalties for careless driving.

Dorset Police said they were in agreement with the comments of Mick Giannasi, Chief Constable of Gwent Police and ACPO lead on Roads Policing.

He said they broadly supported the proposed option of fixed penalty notices for careless driving offences but that education was the key and driver improvement schemes would be used as an alternative to fines and penalty points.


Your Say YourEcho

karateman1964, Poole says...
8:32pm Tue 18 Aug 09

Seklfish drivers deserve all they get..and hopefully more will be caught

karateman1964, Poole says...
8:32pm Tue 18 Aug 09

Seklfish drivers deserve all they get..and hopefully more will be caught

ferret38, bournemouth says...
8:33pm Tue 18 Aug 09

Yeah Yeah its just a money making event ! Admit it ?

karateman1964, Poole says...
8:37pm Tue 18 Aug 09

Every driver caught at the wheel with their phone should be made to re-take their test..there is not 1 driver out there skilled enough to do both

Tautologist, says...
8:38pm Tue 18 Aug 09

.
Vortex = a whirling mass, especially a whirlpool or whirlwind. (OED)
.
If the word mass was replaced with mess, I would agree with the use of the word vortex in this context.
.
I can just picture all these "whirling" policemen surrounding each car that is stopped !

richw, Bournemouth says...
9:02pm Tue 18 Aug 09

Dorset plod should get off their high horses over their own (in)competences. OK, plod, dish out tickets like confetti when you see someone using a mobile phone, stopping in a yellow box junction, or ignoring a red light. Either they did it or they didn't.
Sadly, though, traffic coppers are not the sharpest tools in the shed..they tend to be power-hungry control-freaks who are too thick to get promotion so they take their frustrations out on their motorist victims by bullying them.

Giving them the right to dish out tickets over 'subjective' matters such as 'careless driving' will lead the average 'fik' copper to say 'u gonna argue wiv me sunshine...eres a ticket to do it wiv'.

cantique, bournemouth says...
9:54pm Tue 18 Aug 09

The only people complaining about this operation are either those who get caught or those who think they have the right to flout the law. Every responsible motorist will applaud the efforts of the police to curb those who endanger the lives of others.

peterdw777, says...
9:58pm Tue 18 Aug 09

Offences such as not wearing a seat belt.....devastating consequences".

Not wearing a seat belt does not cause accidents. In fact wearing a seat belt causes more internal injuries to the victim in an accident than if he had not been wearing one.

gudmenrmist, wimborne says...
10:07pm Tue 18 Aug 09

NOW COULD THE POLICE HAVE A BLITZ ON REAL CRIME!

PokesdownMark, Bournemouth says...
10:11pm Tue 18 Aug 09

There are not many ways for ordinary folks to end up in prison. Well I say ordinary, but you know what I mean. Very few ways in fact. To lose your liberty. Then your job. Then possibly your spouse. But one way is to use a mobile phone and be involved in a serious accident. Even if its not their fault. Its very very very stupid. Because the consequences can be so bad.
If you use a mobile when driving then you really ought to think along these lines and think hard.


(security word: term-life. spooky!)

djd, bournemouth says...
10:16pm Tue 18 Aug 09

Drivers who drive without wearing a seat belt or use a mobile phone whilst driving are idiots. FULL STOP.

ta2, Bournemouth says...
10:18pm Tue 18 Aug 09

There should be more of these patrols about, and with the numbers of idiots on the road they should be self-sufficient!!

PokesdownMark, Bournemouth says...
10:18pm Tue 18 Aug 09

peterdw777 wrote:
Offences such as not wearing a seat belt.....devastating consequences".

Not wearing a seat belt does not cause accidents. In fact wearing a seat belt causes more internal injuries to the victim in an accident than if he had not been wearing one.
Sorry, but that is incorrect.

In all collision scenarios a seat belt will reduce injury. I am prepared to change my mind if you point to a number of convincing, well founded scientific studies. But good luck with that.

Just to add... any car built in recent years (decade) will have crumple zones. So that days where a car would transmit excessive loads through the seat belt anchor points is long gone.


rainbowkisses, Bournemouth says...
10:19pm Tue 18 Aug 09

peterdw777 wrote:
Offences such as not wearing a seat belt.....devastating consequences". Not wearing a seat belt does not cause accidents. In fact wearing a seat belt causes more internal injuries to the victim in an accident than if he had not been wearing one.
Got to disagree with you over this one peter. Without seatbelts, I, and my two daughters, would have been dead four years ago.

cooperman, bournemouth says...
10:21pm Tue 18 Aug 09

and i still see loads of people on mobiles every day - how so ? obviously the penalty is not a deterent to some . i think the use of a mobile on the move is on a par with drink driving and should attract the same penalty - an automatic ban.plain and simple

mikeh2000, Poole says...
10:24pm Tue 18 Aug 09

richw wrote:
Dorset plod should get off their high horses over their own (in)competences. OK, plod, dish out tickets like confetti when you see someone using a mobile phone, stopping in a yellow box junction, or ignoring a red light. Either they did it or they didn't. Sadly, though, traffic coppers are not the sharpest tools in the shed..they tend to be power-hungry control-freaks who are too thick to get promotion so they take their frustrations out on their motorist victims by bullying them. Giving them the right to dish out tickets over 'subjective' matters such as 'careless driving' will lead the average 'fik' copper to say 'u gonna argue wiv me sunshine...eres a ticket to do it wiv'.
You know nothing! Traffic officer positions are very sought after, and there's a lot of competition for them. It's not a role you're given because you can't get promotion, far from it!

In Absentia, Bournemouth says...
10:40pm Tue 18 Aug 09

ferret38 wrote:
Yeah Yeah its just a money making event ! Admit it ?
So catching idiots driving whilst using mobile phones is just a money making exercise? Don't be ridiculous.

This is the type of traffic policing we should have rather than self perpetuating organisations like the Dorset Safety Camera Partnership.

asj, poole says...
10:50pm Tue 18 Aug 09

why can't the police put so much effort into CRIME do undercover operations into thefts, muggings, drug dealing's, and anti-social behaviour. or is that not in the realm's of POLICING these days. are all uniformed police in the traffic division!!!!

Bournemouthstorm, Bournemouth (Town Centre) says...
10:56pm Tue 18 Aug 09

ferret38 wrote:
Yeah Yeah its just a money making event ! Admit it ?
Don't be a plonker. We need more traffic police to get some of the selfish morans off the roads.

West Howe Sean, Bournemouth says...
11:16pm Tue 18 Aug 09

So almost half the fixed penalty tickets issued were for not wearing a seat belt - It is more dangerous to go skiing than drive without a seat belt.

Just another case of the Police ripping us off while ignoring violent crime and robbery.

Chris..., says...
11:21pm Tue 18 Aug 09

Invariably I think you will find that Traffic Police are not use for Crime Fighting unless there is a short fall of normal Police Officers, or more are required. Their primary job is just that, Traffic, ensuring our raids are safe from idiots who drive without seatbelts, use mobile phones (mums included), or as the white van at Wallisdown crossroads at lunchtime today, doing both. A bigger idiot. What I would say is that more stiffer punishment is needed to curtail these offences. Whilst on the subject of traffic, it is high time Police kept an I on some of the taxi drivers in the area who think they have the god given right to do what they want, like edging out into a line of traffic, not using indicators, cutting corners making one brake hard at junctions. The next time a taxi driver does this to me, he bette watch his rear view mirror.

Bob49, Bournemouth says...
11:31pm Tue 18 Aug 09

"NOW COULD THE POLICE HAVE A BLITZ ON REAL CRIME!"

Hear hear

Proper crime like murder, nothing less, brutal murder at that. Brutal murder where the victim is not only middle class but photogenic.

The traffic police should be put to driving vans in and out of courts so that outraged folk (many on here) can rightfully bang their fists on the sides of those vans.

Others should be obliged to stroll nonchalantly up and down the High Street whistling Dixon of Dock Street pausing only to help old ladies across the road and dispensing the time in a cheery fashion.




GB1980, Southbourne says...
1:33am Wed 19 Aug 09

Back to the original point, there are two sides to the argument:

Drivers should be competent, and those posing a risk to other road users (regardless of age, race, need to get somewhere, whether or not they have children, etc) should not be on the road unless they can display a proficiency of driving as they did on their driving test; a traffic officer should have good reason to stop and fine a motorist, and ideally have solid evidence to back that up.

On the flip-side in I would not like to see or hear of incidents in England where traffic officers have behaved like those in American films who are out to pocket the fines; "Pardon me sir, you appear to have a tail-light out...... Smash!... That'll be a £20 fine".

gd58, bournemouth says...
2:17am Wed 19 Aug 09

Blue tooth headsets £10-£15, fixed penalty notices £60! Now I'm no rocket scientist but.......
I wonder how many cyclists were fined for no lights, failure to stop at red lights etc.?

EGHH, says...
7:24am Wed 19 Aug 09

Totally agree with the above. Can we now have a blitz on cyclists that break the law please. Including the idiot who goes through the red light at the civic centre every morning dodging in front of oncoming traffic!!!

pd7, Dorset says...
7:36am Wed 19 Aug 09

Good , do it again and again . Until these idiots are removed from the road.

Far more effective than some idiot with with a Kodak brownie hidden in a bush.

MandinVerwood, Verwood says...
8:50am Wed 19 Aug 09

Forget the poor car drivers being targeted again -

What about the cyclists!! Rant - moan - winge!!!

;-)


GB916, christchurch says...
9:22am Wed 19 Aug 09

Example 18/08/2009
2 cyclists ignored a red light Boscombe and Christchurch.
met one foreign student cyling down wrong side of road,Cycle lane Old christchurch road

A family of four cycling on pavement
Christchurch

White van person ignored red traffic light Boscombe

2 cars excessive speed Bournemouth

White van person nearly took out a cyclist by driving in the cycle lane Fairmile

6 pedestrians walked into road without even looking first,worst place for this bus interchange Bournemouth Square

And this is just in one 2 hr period,so it shows we all need to be careful and it all people who use the roads or footpaths that dis-obey the highway code.

The above is why we need more police on the streets and be less reliant on speed camera's

rayc, Wimborne says...
11:23am Wed 19 Aug 09

How many drivers have been reported for an offence that could lead to a court appearance for Careless or Dangerous Driving? This operation is a media exercise and shows that the Police are after the easy FPN option. The Magistrates Association have quite rightly said that if Careless Driving is reduced to a FPN offence the Police will abuse it.

djd, bournemouth says...
12:51pm Wed 19 Aug 09

West Howe Sean wrote:
So almost half the fixed penalty tickets issued were for not wearing a seat belt - It is more dangerous to go skiing than drive without a seat belt. Just another case of the Police ripping us off while ignoring violent crime and robbery.
Quite simply, if people wear their seat belts and don't use their mobile phones whilst driving, police could not issue fixed penalty tickets.

Maybe the police could then be better employed on the pistes, ticketing the skiers.

Zzzz, Poole says...
2:27pm Wed 19 Aug 09

PokesdownMark wrote:
There are not many ways for ordinary folks to end up in prison. Well I say ordinary, but you know what I mean. Very few ways in fact. To lose your liberty. Then your job. Then possibly your spouse. But one way is to use a mobile phone and be involved in a serious accident. Even if its not their fault. Its very very very stupid. Because the consequences can be so bad.
If you use a mobile when driving then you really ought to think along these lines and think hard.


(security word: term-life. spooky!)
Anyone who uses a mobile while driving is 'hard of thinking' anyhow. They are not normal but subnormal.

The-Bleeding-Obvious, bournemouth says...
6:07pm Wed 19 Aug 09

This is clearly a money-making/politic
al exercise by the authorities to show the public that the government is doing something to try and keep death of the road.I wonder if the non-technical jobsworths have consulted a statistician to see if their efforts will save lives? If you do the sums you find 75 million miles are driven for each road death, if every body took their driving test before going to work each day I doubt the statistics would show an improvement!
You would have thought by now that the money harvested from the normally safe but unfortunate drivers caught up in this would be used to send out the latest edition of the highway code on an annual basis when road tax is renewed! The highway code is a code of practice, a quality control document, and when updated users should be notified as is the case with just about every other proffession!

solitaire, christchurch says...
6:21pm Wed 19 Aug 09

Where was Operation Vortex when I needed them this morning? Right bloody TIT of a bloke agitated because I let two cars across the road. He revved up behind me - nearly got in the boot & drove behind me to Lansdowne roundabout trying to intimidate me. He had a girlfriend/wife and kids in the car. As I went down Old Xch Rd he gave me the finger. RED MIST. I did meet up with him at the top of Bath Hill and he followed me up to the Triangle. How big of him as I'm a woman in my 50's.... still doesn't stop me from referring to drivers like that as c u next tuesdays! I've got his reg. Not that he'll be on the roads for long driving like a ****

tommytorets, christchurch says...
8:10pm Sun 23 Aug 09

why all the comments about this operation, the simple answer would be to get rid of all the speed cameras because they obviously dont do any good, and put traffic cops back on the road to catch bad drivers like they used too, then put all the police who were taking part in operation vortex and give them real crime to deal with, again like they used too.
If ,as we are always told, speed is the real killer on our roads hence the fixation with speed cameras, then why run an operatiion like this in the first place, we are told that it is speed that is the main killer, we have to remember that speed cameras do not take a photo of drivers on mobile phones, drunk drivers, drugged drivers, drivers not wearing seatbelts, untaxed vehicles, uninsured vehicles, bald tyres, no mot, overweight vehicles or stolen vehicles, i rest my case, demolish all speed cameras and get the traffic police out there again, that would save a lot more lives all the year round rather that only when a special operation is run.

Comments are closed on this article.


Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »