Your Echo
TEXT PHOTOS, VIDEOS + NEWS TO 80360, TYPE BE, THEN LEAVE A SPACE BEFORE YOUR MESSAGE OR E-MAIL »
Tobacco display ban will ruin newsagents
7:00pm Monday 12th January 2009
Comments (15)A NEWSAGENT in Wareham has launched a campaign to save his shop in the wake of tightening government legislation.
Mark Howlett, who runs Farwells in North Street, says banning displays of tobacco will be “the last straw” for retailers like him.
Mr Howlett, who is also chairman of Wareham Chamber of Trade, said: “Local shops like ours are at the sharp end of this credit crunch and being forced to hide our tobacco out of sight will be the last straw for many.
“It would cost us thousands just to refurbish the shop.
“For the average small shop, tobacco sales represent around a third of turnover and anything that restricts our ability to sell tobacco is a threat to our livelihood.”
The campaign by the Tobacco Retailers’ Alliance aims to highlight the effect that the display ban would have on retailers and is urging government to address youth smoking in other ways.
Westminster announced in December that the display of tobacco products would be banned by 2013 in a bid to stop young people in particular from starting the killer habit.
The alliance says statistics from the Centre for Economic and Business Research show the ban could cause 2,600 shops to close across the UK.
Mr Howlett added: “Tobacco is a legal product and retailers have a right to display it openly. It is very difficult to sell something that your customers can’t see.
“The government rakes in millions of pounds each year in tax revenue from tobacco so they won’t ban it, yet they are prepared to put this burden on small businesses just for selling it.
“There are more effective ways to tackle underage smoking which won’t jeopardise small shops.”
Your Say YourBournemouth Echo
alasdair1967, poole says...
8:15pm Mon 12 Jan 09
john_the_voice_has moved, bournemouth, near christchurch says...
8:25pm Mon 12 Jan 09
Any thing that stops people killing themselves and other is a good idea.
The sooner these things are removed from the earth the better.
Nothing to do with a nanny state, why should you kill me and others because you have a weak mind??
alasdair1967, poole says...
8:37pm Mon 12 Jan 09
2Much...again!, Ringwood says...
8:23am Tue 13 Jan 09
cooperman wrote:There's always someone who will let the judgemental side rule all else. Just because you smoked like a steam engine..not everyone does!
well Mr Howlett if you are in the business of dealing in the sale of products that kill its inevitable that in an aware and responsible society that restrictions will be placed on you - the sooner smoking is consigned to history the better and I used to be a 60 a day man so I am well qualified to make a judgement - it is a filthy,un-nessesary,
expensive,habit that needs to be made difficult to pursue ,i think cigarettes ought to be £20 a packet or more and hidden from view - definatetly. the government may earn lots of money from taxes on tobacco but it also costs very much more to process the illness this causes through the national health service
Alasdair1967 has rightly pointed out that yet again this country has nannied us and brainwashed the general public in the meantime by thinking it's right to take away choices.
This is why this country is in the mess it's in..not because we don't have a choice to smoke where we want, but because people are totally sucked in by the media and propaganda on what's right & wrong!
Smokers are not hurting anyone now..so leave alone and fight for a cause that's obviously more worthy of your efforts!
O'Really, Christchurch says...
9:47am Tue 13 Jan 09
Why oh why oh why?
In these increasingly tough economic times innocent newsagents should be encouraged to expand their standard product base (fags, newspapers and sweeties) to include other popular products like heroin, crack and televisions so as to maximise their profit-taking.
GB916, christchurch says...
10:14am Tue 13 Jan 09
djd, bournemouth says...
1:40pm Tue 13 Jan 09
If people want to smoke they will but tobacco products.
I think it is a filthy unhealthy habit but if people want to smoke let them.
Mike Pickering, Bournemouth says...
3:10pm Tue 13 Jan 09
The tobacco industry itself maintains that the only purpose of advertising is to persuade current smokers to switch brand, not to encourage people to take up smoking in the first place, so if a current smoker wants to buy a packet of cigarettes, then all they have to do is go into a newsagent and buy them. I don't for one minute think that someone who is craving a smoke will not seek out buying some cigarettes because they don't see a sign - I too am one of the painfully pious legion of ex-smokers, and I know full-well the crazed mind-set that can come on when nicotine levels get low.. If I was outside the newsagent and didnt see any tobacco signage it would not have put me off going in to ask.
There will still be just as many smokers, determined to get their cigarettes from the same places they always did.
What we have a chance of doing by hiding the trappings of the tobacco industry from children, is making it less familiar to them. One of my first memories is of the branding of the Players No6 packet from the early 70's, and that frankly, is atrocious and something I would gladely stomp upon the sensitivites of smokers to prevent happening to any future generations.
Smoking is a choice that should only be made by adults to choose to begin to do, I defend the legality and availability of tobacco and our right to consume it, but it is something it is our collective responsiblity to ensure that children are barely even aware of. Don't talk about, demonstrate, or even smoke tobacco around children if you have any sense of propriety or consideration for them - it is a deadly, nasty, pointless exercise of which they should know nothing.
Take down the advertisements and branding that normalises it in their minds, and keep it to yourselves, just as you do every other 'adult' activity.
djd, bournemouth says...
3:40pm Tue 13 Jan 09
Parents smoke - children take cigarettes from parents. Peer pressure is also a contrbutory factor to children smoking.
It has to stop somewhere, but like alcohol, if it is available at home, abuse will continue.
amused, poole says...
9:37pm Tue 13 Jan 09
ski, west moors says...
2:05pm Wed 14 Jan 09
GB1980, Southbourne says...
9:23pm Wed 14 Jan 09
Tobacconists will still be allowed to have a 'tobacco menu' so what is the difference? I'm against children smoking, but I'm also against introducing pointless legislation just for the sake of showing that a cause has been recognised.
2Much...again!, Ringwood says...
9:55pm Wed 14 Jan 09
paul.p, says...
6:42pm Sat 17 Jan 09
In this section
- BOURNEMOUTH AND POOLE COLLEGE IN CASH CRISIS
- Grogan and Calderwood guilty of plotting terrifying armed robbery on Academy Snooker Club
- NIGHT FLIGHTS TO TAKE OFF FROM BOURNEMOUTH AIRPORT
- Boscombe Arts Centre campaigners throw down the gauntlet
- School alert as pair have swine flu virus
- Much-maligned Purbeck online cookware store 'overwhelmed' by orders
- Green shoots of recovery for McCarthy and Stone in Ferndown
- Plane crashed at Bournemouth Airport after instructor's mistake
- Dorset traffic light speed camera list is fake
- Deal at Christchurch Woolies 'imminent'
Sponsored Links
Local Advertisers
Local Information
Enter your postcode, town or place name
cooperman, bournemouth says...
7:45pm Mon 12 Jan 09
expensive,habit that needs to be made difficult to pursue ,i think cigarettes ought to be £20 a packet or more and hidden from view - definatetly. the government may earn lots of money from taxes on tobacco but it also costs very much more to process the illness this causes through the national health service