When news happens text pix and video to 80360. Start your message with BE then leave a space.
7:00am Saturday 11th October 2008
A PUB has apologised to a blind man who was ordered to leave for wearing the wrong trousers.
Eddie Dancer was told his track suit bottoms had breached the pub’s “no sports trousers” policy and had to leave the beer garden in which he and friend Lorraine Way were enjoying an afternoon drink.
The couple’s visit to the Richmond Arms in Charminster was a rare outing for 50-year-old Mr Dancer, who rarely leaves the house since he suddenly went blind six years ago.
Mr Dancer, of Columbian Way, Slades Farm, said: “I was upset and surprised. I had a pair of tracksuit bottoms on but they were brand new – they weren’t tatty or dirty.
“I couldn’t believe it. I used to go in the Richmond Arms before I lost my sight and it’s just an ordinary local pub, not somewhere you would expect to dress up for.
“It was the first time I had been out for months and it has knocked my confidence. We were having a nice day and this completely ruined it.”
Friend Lorraine is equally upset and claims other drinkers were in the pub wearing shorts and work boots. She said Mr Dancer finds track suit trousers easier to wear because of the lack of belts and buttons.
“We were eating our chips when a girl came from nowhere and said they had a no sports trousers policy in the pub,” she said.
“I thought it was a joke at first, I thought she must have known Eddie and was having a laugh.
“But then we realised she was serious. She said we could finish our drinks and chips but we had to go after that.
“He felt embarrassed but I was furious. It has taken a whole team of carers and family and a great deal of support to encourage Eddie to get out of the house. All we wanted to do was sit in the sunshine.”
Mike O’Leary, manager for the Richmond Arms, said: “I want to apologise to Mr Dancer for this incident.
“We do have a dress code on tracksuits. However, it’s up to the manager’s discretion on how it is implemented. “It was an honest misunderstanding by one of our staff and will not happen again. Mr Dancer is welcome in the pub at any time.”
2Much...again!, Ringwood says...
9:00am Sat 11 Oct 08
MJD, HAMWORTHY says...
9:18am Sat 11 Oct 08
Frank28, Hants says...
9:18am Sat 11 Oct 08
oliver_1, bournemouth says...
9:39am Sat 11 Oct 08
Tango Charlie, Bournemouth says...
9:41am Sat 11 Oct 08
2Much...again!, Ringwood says...
9:50am Sat 11 Oct 08
oliver_1 wrote:If your Dad knows him, then surely he knows that disabled people don't want "special" treatment..the majority just wanted be treated like everyone else..individuals. It's stories like this that gives the "pity" issue..and most disabled people don't want pity.
my dad knows this man quite well and he said that eddie suffers bad with his legs and they swell up so he has no option but to wear tracksuit bottoms.i think it is disgusting the way they approached him knowing he was blind !
nobull, bournemouth says...
11:15am Sat 11 Oct 08
nobull, bournemouth says...
11:16am Sat 11 Oct 08
Zzzz, Poole says...
3:01pm Sat 11 Oct 08
Sariain, Poole says...
9:55pm Sat 11 Oct 08
Tango Charlie wrote:What!!! Was a white stick on show!! An arm band!! This isn't Nazi Germany! Your attitude towards Blind people is offensive. Why does it matter if he was Blind? The most shocking part of this story is that the Richmond Arms has a dress code.
Although initially shocked by the story. I would like to enquire if the gentleman was showing any indication that he was blind?
Was a white stick on show? An arm band perhaps? The usual sort of things suggested by the Highway Code that would indicate to a driver that the had to take extra care.
If not, then I would understand why the pub did not make an intitial allowance for him.
Furthermore, was he told to leave before, or after, they knew he was blind?
2Much...again!, Ringwood says...
9:33am Sun 12 Oct 08
Tango Charlie wrote:Why should the pub make an allowance for him?
Although initially shocked by the story. I would like to enquire if the gentleman was showing any indication that he was blind?
Was a white stick on show? An arm band perhaps? The usual sort of things suggested by the Highway Code that would indicate to a driver that the had to take extra care.
If not, then I would understand why the pub did not make an intitial allowance for him.
Furthermore, was he told to leave before, or after, they knew he was blind?
AnnoyedBoscombe, Bournemouth says...
11:36am Sun 12 Oct 08
djd, bournemouth says...
6:40pm Sun 12 Oct 08
wvmatt, USA says...
5:37pm Mon 13 Oct 08
Add your comment
Register for a FREE Bournemouth Echo account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
amused, poole says...
8:06am Sat 11 Oct 08