TEXT PHOTOS, VIDEOS + NEWS TO 80360, TYPE BE, THEN LEAVE A SPACE BEFORE YOUR MESSAGE OR E-MAIL »
7:00am Friday 16th November 2007
Residents in uproar over the prospect of a massive tourist attraction on their doorsteps are now being told the site is undecided.
People living at Harbourside Park, Poole, received letters from a senior council officer telling them their area has been identified as a "potential location" for the Solar Pyramid. It invited them to a meeting where details of the giant sundial would be discussed. The council has confirmed no letters to other areas have been delivered.
But residents who raised the matter at a meeting claim Conservative councillors told them no location had been revealed. That would emerge from a £40,000 feasibility study, due to start by the end of November.
Baiter resident David Howard said: "They are backtracking so fast now. I think they realise they have a can of worms here."
Mr Howard, chairman of Parkstone Bay Association, said: "As this 150ft high attraction' covers an area of 2,500sqm and requires foundations some 65m deep it is difficult to envisage what other possible locations the council has in mind, but no doubt they will inform us in due course."
Liberal Democrat Cllr Brian Clements said he had attended several confidential briefings where Baiter was named as the location and was shocked to hear it being denied at a public meeting.
He said both the tourism and the town centre management boards supported the project, which could bring much needed business, particularly to the Quay area.
"It was made clear that location at Baiter was the only way of achieving that result. I also formed a strong impression that negotiations with developers were based on that location," he said.
However, Conservative Cllr Don Collier said: "The proposal from the company is Baiter. We haven't made our minds up, we are looking at it. There will be loads of debate about it. It's not being done in smoke-filled rooms."
Jim Bright, strategic director for Borough of Poole, said: "The council has not pre-determined a location for the Solar Pyramid proposal.
"Harbourside Park is a potential location and was used during initial testing to see if the project could be viable in a Poole setting. Other locations will be considered as part of more detailed assessment of the prop-osal."
We asked if you backed the pyramid.
As we went to press 469 people had voted of whom 26 per cent (123) were in favour and 74 per cent (346) against.
accountability, Chichester says...
7:53am Fri 16 Nov 07
rebus, Corfe Mullen says...
8:41am Fri 16 Nov 07
Charlie, says...
8:43am Fri 16 Nov 07
Charlie, says...
8:47am Fri 16 Nov 07
clairenpoole, Poole says...
8:59am Fri 16 Nov 07
Tru Belle, purbeck says...
9:53am Fri 16 Nov 07
godzilla, hamworthy says...
10:02am Fri 16 Nov 07
Charlie wrote:HEAR HEAR charlie where do these people got off ignoring the objections to the people who acutally pay them.
Sounds like councillors elected by US and permanent staff all paid by US to do the best for US, have already agreed to have this monstrosity somewhere in Poole, whether we like it or not. Absolute arrogance!
John, Poole says...
10:18am Fri 16 Nov 07
Phil wrote:What do you expect other than a hare-brained schemed when a man named Leverett is excited by the proposal?
Why bother spending £40,000 of our money on a feasibility study when it's obvious that the pyramid isn't wanted by the public? If only they'd asked us in the first place! Councillors would do well to remember that we employ them to govern for us, not over us. If they've got any sense (I doubt it), they'll scrap this hare-brained scheme immediately and stop wasting our money looking into it.
JIFFY, POOLE says...
10:23am Fri 16 Nov 07
tony foster, Bournemouth says...
10:25am Fri 16 Nov 07
snoff, Poole says...
11:54am Fri 16 Nov 07
accountability wrote:or Chichester!
It would look good ..........in Derbyshire!
Markmag, Boscombe says...
12:31pm Fri 16 Nov 07
accountability, Chichester says...
1:24pm Fri 16 Nov 07
snoff wrote:....or the Isle of Wight? Anywhere but Poole!
accountability wrote:or Chichester!
It would look good ..........in Derbyshire!
Tru Belle, purbeck says...
3:05pm Fri 16 Nov 07
Fonty Booth, says...
4:12pm Fri 16 Nov 07
accountability, Chichester says...
4:29pm Fri 16 Nov 07
Fonty Booth wrote:LOL. Nice one!
Locate it at Burley by the donkey shed, the donkeys can rub their backs on it, Grockles can wonder at it, ELM wont even notice it he will be behind the bus shelter, bless.
snoff, Poole says...
5:09pm Fri 16 Nov 07
accountability wrote:I agree, the idea is a bad one which I feel will go no further than an being just that - an idea.
snoff wrote:....or the Isle of Wight? Anywhere but Poole! You may have missed it on the previous thread but it was going to be in Derbyshire before Poole's enlightened councillors snatched it from their grasp ....obviously more money down here. Yours!accountability wrote: It would look good ..........in Derbyshire!or Chichester!
accountability, Chichester says...
5:23pm Fri 16 Nov 07
Shedmans Friend, Bournemouth says...
6:27pm Fri 16 Nov 07
accountability, Chichester says...
8:07pm Fri 16 Nov 07
Shedmans Friend wrote:It always looked as if Poole had learned from all Bournemouth's many past mistakes until this barmy notion surfaced.
Whinge Whinge whinge!
Bournemouth has the Imax - let Poole have some attention!!
The-bleeding-obvious, Bournemouth says...
8:41am Sat 17 Nov 07
Fonty Booth, says...
9:44am Sat 17 Nov 07
Peter, Highcliffe says...
11:13am Sat 17 Nov 07
John, Poole says...
3:10pm Sat 17 Nov 07
Tru Belle, purbeck says...
4:56pm Sat 17 Nov 07
ColinLambert, Parkstone says...
5:31pm Sun 9 Dec 07
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Phil, Poole says...
7:51am Fri 16 Nov 07