Student pretended to be famous modelling scout to trick girls to pose naked

Bournemouth Echo: Neil Summerson Neil Summerson

A YOUNG archaeology student posed as a famous modelling scout to snare young women in a ‘degrading’ con.

Neil Summerson, 27, pretended to be Lynn Campbell-Walter, director of BMA Models, when he messaged his four victims on dating website Plenty of Fish.

After reassuring the women, who were aged between 16 and 22, that the internet connection was secure, he encouraged them to Skype him and take their clothes off.

The defendant then told them that he had saved videos and photographs of them that would be sent to all of their Facebook friends if they told anyone.

Carolyn Branford-Wood, prosecuting, said his last victim had become physically sick with fear after his scam.

“He asked them to pose, and asked them to remove clothing and underwear to ensure there was no ‘manipulation of the body’,” she said.

The student of archaeology and and ancient history at the University of Leicester encouraged one of the women, who was just 17, to meet him for sex.

In a statement read to the court, she said she felt ‘shocked, scared, angry and disgusted’.

Summerson, of Orchard Plaza, High Street, Poole, pleaded guilty to two counts of voyeurism and two of causing a person to engage in sexual activity without their consent.

In 2009, he was cautioned for exposing himself via webcam to a 15-year-old and a 20-year-old, as well as contacting two women aged 20 and 22 online while pretending to be a modelling scout and asking them to take their clothes off.

Judge Samuel Wiggs said he had ‘reluctantly’ decided not to send Summerson, pictured above, to prison.

However, he added: “What you did to these young girls – and they are young girls – was degrading in the extreme.

“You tricked them in their own homes into thinking you were somebody else. You threatened them with the exposure of the images you had supposedly taken. You were deceitful.”

He sentenced Summerson to a three-year community order and an electronically-tagged three-month curfew.

The defendant will remain on the sexual offenders register for five years, and he has been made the subject of Sexual Offences Prevention Order for five years.

• Warning to hopefuls...

Lynn Campbell-Walter, whose identity was used by Summerson to trap his victims, said: “I’d like to take the opportunity to send the message to young women that this is not how professional agencies do business.

“Beware anyone who gets in touch like this. Any real agent will ask you to come and meet them properly.”

She added: “For a lot of young women, it’s a dream to be scouted. But I’d ask everyone to take care when contacted over social media in this way.”

Comments (38)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

6:15am Wed 26 Feb 14

Letcommonsenseprevail says...

Wiggsy lets a pervert off with a light sentence once again............
Wiggsy lets a pervert off with a light sentence once again............ Letcommonsenseprevail
  • Score: 39

6:53am Wed 26 Feb 14

we-shall-see says...

Lets hope they have also issued him with an order not to have the use of a pc or other device which can access the web, for he will surely keep doing this sort of thing otherwise?

Having said that, some girls must be gullible in their haste to remove their clothing via a web-cam, that's all I can say :o/
Lets hope they have also issued him with an order not to have the use of a pc or other device which can access the web, for he will surely keep doing this sort of thing otherwise? Having said that, some girls must be gullible in their haste to remove their clothing via a web-cam, that's all I can say :o/ we-shall-see
  • Score: 33

8:03am Wed 26 Feb 14

poolebabe says...

Hopefully the sexual harm prevention order will ban him from using devices to access the Internet. However, it has to be policed! He shouldn't have been spared prison, but as above, wiggs strikes again. His judgements appear criminal I think.
Hopefully the sexual harm prevention order will ban him from using devices to access the Internet. However, it has to be policed! He shouldn't have been spared prison, but as above, wiggs strikes again. His judgements appear criminal I think. poolebabe
  • Score: 16

9:08am Wed 26 Feb 14

Vikki27 says...

No bright bulbs in that box, were there?! Ladies, here's a hint - if a man is a REAL talent scout, he would never ask you to strip for him in Skype! Surely you must realise that?

If in doubt, INSIST on meeting at an office, then look up the address for the office of the modelling agency on Google!
No bright bulbs in that box, were there?! Ladies, here's a hint - if a man is a REAL talent scout, he would never ask you to strip for him in Skype! Surely you must realise that? If in doubt, INSIST on meeting at an office, then look up the address for the office of the modelling agency on Google! Vikki27
  • Score: 39

9:25am Wed 26 Feb 14

RM says...

The perverts' friend Judge strikes again.
The perverts' friend Judge strikes again. RM
  • Score: 19

9:25am Wed 26 Feb 14

BIGTONE says...

What good is a 3 month tag?
It just means he is forced to be at home more on his computer!!!
What good is a 3 month tag? It just means he is forced to be at home more on his computer!!! BIGTONE
  • Score: 26

9:45am Wed 26 Feb 14

thisloginprocessisdaft says...

So, a man says he is someone else in a message on a dating site. He asks you to take your cloths off during a video chat, you do it?
So, a man says he is someone else in a message on a dating site. He asks you to take your cloths off during a video chat, you do it? thisloginprocessisdaft
  • Score: 22

9:48am Wed 26 Feb 14

nickynoodah says...

Hang on where he get his money from
what's his job
hang on he looks 40 you know.
Hang on where he get his money from what's his job hang on he looks 40 you know. nickynoodah
  • Score: -9

10:09am Wed 26 Feb 14

MrDMan says...

Vikki27 wrote:
No bright bulbs in that box, were there?! Ladies, here's a hint - if a man is a REAL talent scout, he would never ask you to strip for him in Skype! Surely you must realise that?

If in doubt, INSIST on meeting at an office, then look up the address for the office of the modelling agency on Google!
That's just as silly.
Google search "casting couch" just to realise how daft this, is and how many girls are exploited in this way!
[quote][p][bold]Vikki27[/bold] wrote: No bright bulbs in that box, were there?! Ladies, here's a hint - if a man is a REAL talent scout, he would never ask you to strip for him in Skype! Surely you must realise that? If in doubt, INSIST on meeting at an office, then look up the address for the office of the modelling agency on Google![/p][/quote]That's just as silly. Google search "casting couch" just to realise how daft this, is and how many girls are exploited in this way! MrDMan
  • Score: -1

10:19am Wed 26 Feb 14

madras says...

The oldest trick in the book...
The oldest trick in the book... madras
  • Score: 7

11:39am Wed 26 Feb 14

muscliffman says...

How frighteningly niave of them! It rather seems that the biggest crime committed in all this was gross stupidity - and not at perpetrator's end of the webcam!
How frighteningly niave of them! It rather seems that the biggest crime committed in all this was gross stupidity - and not at perpetrator's end of the webcam! muscliffman
  • Score: 11

11:42am Wed 26 Feb 14

seaviews says...

RM wrote:
The perverts' friend Judge strikes again.
Goto
https://submissions.
epetitions.direct.go
v.uk/petitions/49745
[quote][p][bold]RM[/bold] wrote: The perverts' friend Judge strikes again.[/p][/quote]Goto https://submissions. epetitions.direct.go v.uk/petitions/49745 seaviews
  • Score: 1

11:44am Wed 26 Feb 14

hadvar says...

Summerson is obviously a pervert and a nasty peice of work. However, I'm wondering how immensely naive one has to be to fall for this. I'm really sorry for the victims, and in no way does it detract from the fact that he's the criminal here, but in the name of all that's holy : "I'm from a modeling agency, please can I see you with no kit on...".....to fall for this is phenominaly stupid.
Summerson is obviously a pervert and a nasty peice of work. However, I'm wondering how immensely naive one has to be to fall for this. I'm really sorry for the victims, and in no way does it detract from the fact that he's the criminal here, but in the name of all that's holy : "I'm from a modeling agency, please can I see you with no kit on...".....to fall for this is phenominaly stupid. hadvar
  • Score: 13

12:23pm Wed 26 Feb 14

Gingertree says...

Sick sick man but also can't help wondering why girls as young as 16 or 17 feel the need to be on a dating site in the first place
Sick sick man but also can't help wondering why girls as young as 16 or 17 feel the need to be on a dating site in the first place Gingertree
  • Score: 16

3:32pm Wed 26 Feb 14

lazystar says...

The full details have been admitted & only some of the court cases that went fully to court are here.There is a lot more evidence that was not taken the whole way & affected MANY more girls in a personal way - not just through pc evidence which was destroyed by Summerson.
The full details have been admitted & only some of the court cases that went fully to court are here.There is a lot more evidence that was not taken the whole way & affected MANY more girls in a personal way - not just through pc evidence which was destroyed by Summerson. lazystar
  • Score: 10

4:33pm Wed 26 Feb 14

lazystar says...

The girls are NOT on trial here.
this is a distorted view of the facts.
Neil had no need to work & had a VERY good lawer that had had Bournemouth University in a difficult position & conflict.
Not all the girls were through an anonymous webcam (this case is NOT ABOUT A GIRLS NAIVETY)
neils solicitors managed to avoid previous being taken into account thus you are only presented with partial facts of which pretending to be a scout was just part of a story.
The girls are NOT on trial here. this is a distorted view of the facts. Neil had no need to work & had a VERY good lawer that had had Bournemouth University in a difficult position & conflict. Not all the girls were through an anonymous webcam (this case is NOT ABOUT A GIRLS NAIVETY) neils solicitors managed to avoid previous being taken into account thus you are only presented with partial facts of which pretending to be a scout was just part of a story. lazystar
  • Score: 14

5:30pm Wed 26 Feb 14

rozmister says...

lazystar wrote:
The girls are NOT on trial here.
this is a distorted view of the facts.
Neil had no need to work & had a VERY good lawer that had had Bournemouth University in a difficult position & conflict.
Not all the girls were through an anonymous webcam (this case is NOT ABOUT A GIRLS NAIVETY)
neils solicitors managed to avoid previous being taken into account thus you are only presented with partial facts of which pretending to be a scout was just part of a story.
Why were Bournemouth university in a difficult position? It says in the article he went to the university of Leicester.

I agree about the girls though, we were all young and naive at some point. Its easy to point out other people's errors on hindsight.
[quote][p][bold]lazystar[/bold] wrote: The girls are NOT on trial here. this is a distorted view of the facts. Neil had no need to work & had a VERY good lawer that had had Bournemouth University in a difficult position & conflict. Not all the girls were through an anonymous webcam (this case is NOT ABOUT A GIRLS NAIVETY) neils solicitors managed to avoid previous being taken into account thus you are only presented with partial facts of which pretending to be a scout was just part of a story.[/p][/quote]Why were Bournemouth university in a difficult position? It says in the article he went to the university of Leicester. I agree about the girls though, we were all young and naive at some point. Its easy to point out other people's errors on hindsight. rozmister
  • Score: 2

5:34pm Wed 26 Feb 14

Chris the plumber says...

getting girls to strip taking their pictures then threatening to expose them on social media... some women are so stupid, and some men tell porky pies on dating site ..... gosh that news worthy isn't it. !
getting girls to strip taking their pictures then threatening to expose them on social media... some women are so stupid, and some men tell porky pies on dating site ..... gosh that news worthy isn't it. ! Chris the plumber
  • Score: -12

6:48pm Wed 26 Feb 14

lazystar says...

Chrisvthe plumber- idiotic misplaced mysogynystic views - If you ever have daughters you would have a different outlook on life.
Neil Summerson went to BOTH Leicester & Bournemouth university - it just wasnt mentioned in the case that was reported.
it doesnt mean of course that Other cases against Neil were reported on - it just means that This case was.
as I said Neil had a very good solicitor & I hope any other girls affected can come forward within 6months so theyre information is not admissable.
Chrisvthe plumber- idiotic misplaced mysogynystic views - If you ever have daughters you would have a different outlook on life. Neil Summerson went to BOTH Leicester & Bournemouth university - it just wasnt mentioned in the case that was reported. it doesnt mean of course that Other cases against Neil were reported on - it just means that This case was. as I said Neil had a very good solicitor & I hope any other girls affected can come forward within 6months so theyre information is not admissable. lazystar
  • Score: 11

6:58pm Wed 26 Feb 14

hamworthygirl says...

Whilst I think think this man is sick and deserves a stiff sentence I am wondering why the girls/women fell for this old trick. In this day and age I would hope all women would be extra careful, maybe they were after their 15 mins of fame which seems to be the goal of our young people sadly. I hope they will get over their experience and others will learn from the story
Whilst I think think this man is sick and deserves a stiff sentence I am wondering why the girls/women fell for this old trick. In this day and age I would hope all women would be extra careful, maybe they were after their 15 mins of fame which seems to be the goal of our young people sadly. I hope they will get over their experience and others will learn from the story hamworthygirl
  • Score: 0

7:07pm Wed 26 Feb 14

lazystar says...

Why are people focusing on the girls naivety ?
Why not focus on a very charming man that has eventually had his photo published in a newspaper for abusing young girls?
The news report is only a partial reality on a much larger story - if it was said a 27 year old man was grooming 15 year old girls for sex would you not be in arms about it ??
Use some common sence & stop blaming innocent girls.
Why are people focusing on the girls naivety ? Why not focus on a very charming man that has eventually had his photo published in a newspaper for abusing young girls? The news report is only a partial reality on a much larger story - if it was said a 27 year old man was grooming 15 year old girls for sex would you not be in arms about it ?? Use some common sence & stop blaming innocent girls. lazystar
  • Score: 14

7:08pm Wed 26 Feb 14

Chris the plumber says...

yes i have two daughters Lazy star, and they would not be so stupid AS to think they would become a "model" by getting her kit off on Skype for some bloke they do know know and have never met........ ....No lazy star stupid is the only word that will do. and I thought it was the younger generation who were computer savvy..!!
yes i have two daughters Lazy star, and they would not be so stupid AS to think they would become a "model" by getting her kit off on Skype for some bloke they do know know and have never met........ ....No lazy star stupid is the only word that will do. and I thought it was the younger generation who were computer savvy..!! Chris the plumber
  • Score: -4

7:19pm Wed 26 Feb 14

hamworthygirl says...

Chris the plumber wrote:
yes i have two daughters Lazy star, and they would not be so stupid AS to think they would become a "model" by getting her kit off on Skype for some bloke they do know know and have never met........ ....No lazy star stupid is the only word that will do. and I thought it was the younger generation who were computer savvy..!!
I agree with you sadly chris i have a daughter and 3 grandchildren 2 of them will be 13 soon and i hope we have made sure they are wise to such men. I certainly made sure i checked on my daughter in chat rooms which had just started to be popular when she was a young woman. No one is blaming the girls just wondering how they are so naive.
[quote][p][bold]Chris the plumber[/bold] wrote: yes i have two daughters Lazy star, and they would not be so stupid AS to think they would become a "model" by getting her kit off on Skype for some bloke they do know know and have never met........ ....No lazy star stupid is the only word that will do. and I thought it was the younger generation who were computer savvy..!![/p][/quote]I agree with you sadly chris i have a daughter and 3 grandchildren 2 of them will be 13 soon and i hope we have made sure they are wise to such men. I certainly made sure i checked on my daughter in chat rooms which had just started to be popular when she was a young woman. No one is blaming the girls just wondering how they are so naive. hamworthygirl
  • Score: 7

7:21pm Wed 26 Feb 14

lazystar says...

Im glad your girls are savvy, Chris.
the reported story is only good for headlines & getting his photo out there.
He is a charming, intelligent good looking man that has groomed, threatened & abused girls as young as 15 & preyed & threatened older women not linked to the photography agency.
This is just the first time he has been charged.
the agency is just a small part of his arsenal that mskes good headlines.
Im glad your girls are savvy, Chris. the reported story is only good for headlines & getting his photo out there. He is a charming, intelligent good looking man that has groomed, threatened & abused girls as young as 15 & preyed & threatened older women not linked to the photography agency. This is just the first time he has been charged. the agency is just a small part of his arsenal that mskes good headlines. lazystar
  • Score: 11

7:35pm Wed 26 Feb 14

pete woodley says...

lazystar wrote:
Im glad your girls are savvy, Chris.
the reported story is only good for headlines & getting his photo out there.
He is a charming, intelligent good looking man that has groomed, threatened & abused girls as young as 15 & preyed & threatened older women not linked to the photography agency.
This is just the first time he has been charged.
the agency is just a small part of his arsenal that mskes good headlines.
I am surprised he has not been sorted out by the families of some of these girls.
[quote][p][bold]lazystar[/bold] wrote: Im glad your girls are savvy, Chris. the reported story is only good for headlines & getting his photo out there. He is a charming, intelligent good looking man that has groomed, threatened & abused girls as young as 15 & preyed & threatened older women not linked to the photography agency. This is just the first time he has been charged. the agency is just a small part of his arsenal that mskes good headlines.[/p][/quote]I am surprised he has not been sorted out by the families of some of these girls. pete woodley
  • Score: 3

7:53pm Wed 26 Feb 14

Bob49 says...

pete woodley wrote:
lazystar wrote:
Im glad your girls are savvy, Chris.
the reported story is only good for headlines & getting his photo out there.
He is a charming, intelligent good looking man that has groomed, threatened & abused girls as young as 15 & preyed & threatened older women not linked to the photography agency.
This is just the first time he has been charged.
the agency is just a small part of his arsenal that mskes good headlines.
I am surprised he has not been sorted out by the families of some of these girls.
yes, a good punch to the head should do the trick

especially of he has his hands in his pockets at the time
[quote][p][bold]pete woodley[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lazystar[/bold] wrote: Im glad your girls are savvy, Chris. the reported story is only good for headlines & getting his photo out there. He is a charming, intelligent good looking man that has groomed, threatened & abused girls as young as 15 & preyed & threatened older women not linked to the photography agency. This is just the first time he has been charged. the agency is just a small part of his arsenal that mskes good headlines.[/p][/quote]I am surprised he has not been sorted out by the families of some of these girls.[/p][/quote]yes, a good punch to the head should do the trick especially of he has his hands in his pockets at the time Bob49
  • Score: 3

8:11pm Wed 26 Feb 14

ryan_gazzan@hotmail.com says...

Young student ????? He's bloody 27 for God's sake !!
Young student ????? He's bloody 27 for God's sake !! ryan_gazzan@hotmail.com
  • Score: 4

8:14pm Wed 26 Feb 14

Chris the plumber says...

pete woodley wrote:
lazystar wrote:
Im glad your girls are savvy, Chris.
the reported story is only good for headlines & getting his photo out there.
He is a charming, intelligent good looking man that has groomed, threatened & abused girls as young as 15 & preyed & threatened older women not linked to the photography agency.
This is just the first time he has been charged.
the agency is just a small part of his arsenal that mskes good headlines.
I am surprised he has not been sorted out by the families of some of these girls.
sorted out? I believe he has been reported to the police hence the story ...
unless you are advocating violence of some sort.
[quote][p][bold]pete woodley[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lazystar[/bold] wrote: Im glad your girls are savvy, Chris. the reported story is only good for headlines & getting his photo out there. He is a charming, intelligent good looking man that has groomed, threatened & abused girls as young as 15 & preyed & threatened older women not linked to the photography agency. This is just the first time he has been charged. the agency is just a small part of his arsenal that mskes good headlines.[/p][/quote]I am surprised he has not been sorted out by the families of some of these girls.[/p][/quote]sorted out? I believe he has been reported to the police hence the story ... unless you are advocating violence of some sort. Chris the plumber
  • Score: 2

9:34pm Wed 26 Feb 14

rozmister says...

hamworthygirl wrote:
Chris the plumber wrote:
yes i have two daughters Lazy star, and they would not be so stupid AS to think they would become a "model" by getting her kit off on Skype for some bloke they do know know and have never met........ ....No lazy star stupid is the only word that will do. and I thought it was the younger generation who were computer savvy..!!
I agree with you sadly chris i have a daughter and 3 grandchildren 2 of them will be 13 soon and i hope we have made sure they are wise to such men. I certainly made sure i checked on my daughter in chat rooms which had just started to be popular when she was a young woman. No one is blaming the girls just wondering how they are so naive.
Your daughters & grandchildren were very lucky then ham worthy girl. When I was a teenager I was unsupervised in chat rooms and online and I'm sure some of what happened to me would now be classed as grooming but no one talked about grooming at that time. I was young, unguided and had low self esteem. We don't know these girls background to judge what made them so naive but youth and insecurity makes lots of girls do stupid things. A charming predator like this man would pick the most vulnerable ones and sweet talk them round, that's how they work.
[quote][p][bold]hamworthygirl[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chris the plumber[/bold] wrote: yes i have two daughters Lazy star, and they would not be so stupid AS to think they would become a "model" by getting her kit off on Skype for some bloke they do know know and have never met........ ....No lazy star stupid is the only word that will do. and I thought it was the younger generation who were computer savvy..!![/p][/quote]I agree with you sadly chris i have a daughter and 3 grandchildren 2 of them will be 13 soon and i hope we have made sure they are wise to such men. I certainly made sure i checked on my daughter in chat rooms which had just started to be popular when she was a young woman. No one is blaming the girls just wondering how they are so naive.[/p][/quote]Your daughters & grandchildren were very lucky then ham worthy girl. When I was a teenager I was unsupervised in chat rooms and online and I'm sure some of what happened to me would now be classed as grooming but no one talked about grooming at that time. I was young, unguided and had low self esteem. We don't know these girls background to judge what made them so naive but youth and insecurity makes lots of girls do stupid things. A charming predator like this man would pick the most vulnerable ones and sweet talk them round, that's how they work. rozmister
  • Score: 9

9:42pm Wed 26 Feb 14

twynhamob says...

Seems to me he did not have a very good lawyer, and has pled guilty, bu to what really? Voyerism, its not like to chase employee who used a camera at the swimming pool, he made contact through a dating service, impersonated someone else (is that a crime?) lied to them (not a legal violation), and just how do you get someone to engage in sexual activity without there consent?
Surely through a computer that is impossible.
Not saying what he did was "nice" but exactly what laws were broken?
Just reading what is printed, is this another failure of the Ohec to report all the truthful facts, or just sensationalism.
Seems to me he did not have a very good lawyer, and has pled guilty, bu to what really? Voyerism, its not like to chase employee who used a camera at the swimming pool, he made contact through a dating service, impersonated someone else (is that a crime?) lied to them (not a legal violation), and just how do you get someone to engage in sexual activity without there consent? Surely through a computer that is impossible. Not saying what he did was "nice" but exactly what laws were broken? Just reading what is printed, is this another failure of the Ohec to report all the truthful facts, or just sensationalism. twynhamob
  • Score: -12

9:44pm Wed 26 Feb 14

rozmister says...

twynhamob wrote:
Seems to me he did not have a very good lawyer, and has pled guilty, bu to what really? Voyerism, its not like to chase employee who used a camera at the swimming pool, he made contact through a dating service, impersonated someone else (is that a crime?) lied to them (not a legal violation), and just how do you get someone to engage in sexual activity without there consent?
Surely through a computer that is impossible.
Not saying what he did was "nice" but exactly what laws were broken?
Just reading what is printed, is this another failure of the Ohec to report all the truthful facts, or just sensationalism.
I'm pretty sure the point where he started blackmailing them into taking more pictures could have landed him a blackmail charge although it hasn't which probably indicates he did have a good lawyer.
[quote][p][bold]twynhamob[/bold] wrote: Seems to me he did not have a very good lawyer, and has pled guilty, bu to what really? Voyerism, its not like to chase employee who used a camera at the swimming pool, he made contact through a dating service, impersonated someone else (is that a crime?) lied to them (not a legal violation), and just how do you get someone to engage in sexual activity without there consent? Surely through a computer that is impossible. Not saying what he did was "nice" but exactly what laws were broken? Just reading what is printed, is this another failure of the Ohec to report all the truthful facts, or just sensationalism.[/p][/quote]I'm pretty sure the point where he started blackmailing them into taking more pictures could have landed him a blackmail charge although it hasn't which probably indicates he did have a good lawyer. rozmister
  • Score: 10

9:53pm Wed 26 Feb 14

lazystar says...

Twinhamob
Neil Summerson was guity of this and more - to reiterate he does have a good solicitor as this is to date the only charge that stuck because of immisable evidence.
bad misconduct at TWO universitys with young girls.
Rozmister - thankyou for sharing your experience & I hope life is good for you now
Twinhamob Neil Summerson was guity of this and more - to reiterate he does have a good solicitor as this is to date the only charge that stuck because of immisable evidence. bad misconduct at TWO universitys with young girls. Rozmister - thankyou for sharing your experience & I hope life is good for you now lazystar
  • Score: 10

10:40pm Wed 26 Feb 14

Live-life says...

This is a man that has proven that money buys Freedom. His legal team have managed to get him off a lot of charges through loop holes. However you may feel about the girls involved within this case, he abused them. They are the victims. And there are many more who have suffered at Neil Summersons hands. Quite literally. The papers can only publish certain aspects of a story. You can see however that just from this one article that he is a long term sex offender and will probably continue to offend, and sadly it won't be the last time he is in the papers I'm sure. My heart goes out to those poor girls. He is a sick disgusting human being
This is a man that has proven that money buys Freedom. His legal team have managed to get him off a lot of charges through loop holes. However you may feel about the girls involved within this case, he abused them. They are the victims. And there are many more who have suffered at Neil Summersons hands. Quite literally. The papers can only publish certain aspects of a story. You can see however that just from this one article that he is a long term sex offender and will probably continue to offend, and sadly it won't be the last time he is in the papers I'm sure. My heart goes out to those poor girls. He is a sick disgusting human being Live-life
  • Score: 13

1:09am Thu 27 Feb 14

Bob49 says...

Judge Samuel Wiggs said he had ‘reluctantly’ decided not to send Summerson, pictured above, to prison."

hmmmm

Given previous offences which the judge would have seen before sentencing, and the fact that one of the offences involved a girl under the age of consents and also there thereactions that amount to blackmail there seems to be an incredible amount of leniency shown here.

Perhaps Judge Wiggs could outline a bit further what (or who) caused that leniency - given that he appeared to be minded against the light sentence.

Or perhaps, whether it was a coincidence that he was chosen to judge this case.

All very fishy it would seem.
Judge Samuel Wiggs said he had ‘reluctantly’ decided not to send Summerson, pictured above, to prison." hmmmm Given previous offences which the judge would have seen before sentencing, and the fact that one of the offences involved a girl under the age of consents and also there thereactions that amount to blackmail there seems to be an incredible amount of leniency shown here. Perhaps Judge Wiggs could outline a bit further what (or who) caused that leniency - given that he appeared to be minded against the light sentence. Or perhaps, whether it was a coincidence that he was chosen to judge this case. All very fishy it would seem. Bob49
  • Score: 7

8:39am Thu 27 Feb 14

Branksome snail says...

Is Judge Wiggs the friend of perverts?

its doesnt matter that the girls/women were judged to be naive (although they're not on trial here) All young males/femail victims can make ill judged decisions. If these were young girls of 8 or 9 would peeople say they were naive? Whats the difference?

The guy clearly has a problem, has a tendency to groom young femails and i dont see any deterrent in the sentance here that will not stop him just carrying on.
Is Judge Wiggs the friend of perverts? its doesnt matter that the girls/women were judged to be naive (although they're not on trial here) All young males/femail victims can make ill judged decisions. If these were young girls of 8 or 9 would peeople say they were naive? Whats the difference? The guy clearly has a problem, has a tendency to groom young femails and i dont see any deterrent in the sentance here that will not stop him just carrying on. Branksome snail
  • Score: 7

1:48pm Thu 27 Feb 14

nickynoodah says...

rozmister wrote:
hamworthygirl wrote:
Chris the plumber wrote:
yes i have two daughters Lazy star, and they would not be so stupid AS to think they would become a "model" by getting her kit off on Skype for some bloke they do know know and have never met........ ....No lazy star stupid is the only word that will do. and I thought it was the younger generation who were computer savvy..!!
I agree with you sadly chris i have a daughter and 3 grandchildren 2 of them will be 13 soon and i hope we have made sure they are wise to such men. I certainly made sure i checked on my daughter in chat rooms which had just started to be popular when she was a young woman. No one is blaming the girls just wondering how they are so naive.
Your daughters & grandchildren were very lucky then ham worthy girl. When I was a teenager I was unsupervised in chat rooms and online and I'm sure some of what happened to me would now be classed as grooming but no one talked about grooming at that time. I was young, unguided and had low self esteem. We don't know these girls background to judge what made them so naive but youth and insecurity makes lots of girls do stupid things. A charming predator like this man would pick the most vulnerable ones and sweet talk them round, that's how they work.
Oh hang on
you've got twin daughters
have you forgotten what you've posted in the past
now do you remember.
[quote][p][bold]rozmister[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]hamworthygirl[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chris the plumber[/bold] wrote: yes i have two daughters Lazy star, and they would not be so stupid AS to think they would become a "model" by getting her kit off on Skype for some bloke they do know know and have never met........ ....No lazy star stupid is the only word that will do. and I thought it was the younger generation who were computer savvy..!![/p][/quote]I agree with you sadly chris i have a daughter and 3 grandchildren 2 of them will be 13 soon and i hope we have made sure they are wise to such men. I certainly made sure i checked on my daughter in chat rooms which had just started to be popular when she was a young woman. No one is blaming the girls just wondering how they are so naive.[/p][/quote]Your daughters & grandchildren were very lucky then ham worthy girl. When I was a teenager I was unsupervised in chat rooms and online and I'm sure some of what happened to me would now be classed as grooming but no one talked about grooming at that time. I was young, unguided and had low self esteem. We don't know these girls background to judge what made them so naive but youth and insecurity makes lots of girls do stupid things. A charming predator like this man would pick the most vulnerable ones and sweet talk them round, that's how they work.[/p][/quote]Oh hang on you've got twin daughters have you forgotten what you've posted in the past now do you remember. nickynoodah
  • Score: 0

11:19pm Thu 27 Feb 14

RM says...

seaviews wrote:
RM wrote:
The perverts' friend Judge strikes again.
Goto
https://submissions.

epetitions.direct.go

v.uk/petitions/49745
Thanks for the petition link seaviews. I hadn't seen it y'day.
[quote][p][bold]seaviews[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]RM[/bold] wrote: The perverts' friend Judge strikes again.[/p][/quote]Goto https://submissions. epetitions.direct.go v.uk/petitions/49745[/p][/quote]Thanks for the petition link seaviews. I hadn't seen it y'day. RM
  • Score: 0

2:18am Fri 28 Feb 14

Avengerboy says...

If you ever commit murder ..... Can I have Judge Wiggsy. Please?
If you ever commit murder ..... Can I have Judge Wiggsy. Please? Avengerboy
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree