Peter Yeates's case to be reviewed by judge

Former Dorset Police Detective Sergeant Peter Yeates outside Bournemouth Magistrates Court

Former Dorset Police Detective Sergeant Peter Yeates outside Bournemouth Magistrates Court

First published in News
Last updated
by

A DISGRACED former detective who stole thousands of pounds worth of mobile phones from the police store to sell online has appealed against his sentence.

Peter Yeates, the uncle of tragic Joanna Yeates who was murdered in Bristol in 2010, was jailed for eight months after pilfering mobile phones and cameras from the stores across Dorset over three years.

The 51-year-old was handed a 34-week prison term last month after admitting four counts of theft from employer.

A spokesperson for the Court of Appeal confirmed that Yeates has now lodged an appeal against his sentence and his case will be reviewed by a single judge.

Yeates, who recently retired as a detective sergeant in Dorset Police’s Major Crime Investigation team, blamed his offending on the breakdown of his marriage, pressures of work and the tragic murder of his niece.

Portsmouth Crown Court heard that Yeates, of Gravel Hill, Poole, had admitted stealing two Fujifilm Finepix digital cameras worth around £65, a Casio Exilim digital camera costing £26.47, and a number of mobile phones worth no more than £5,000 on dates between January 1, 2009, and May 31, 2012.

Investigations later established that Yeates had been selling phones on the Mazuma Mobile website and had recycled 461 phones with them over three years and received £10,671.35. The amount he received from each device ranged from £3 to £120.

Ian Lawrie QC said Yeates’s sense of humiliation was “profound”, He said Yeates once tackled an armed man during a domestic incident and had received six commendations during his career.

Sentencing, Judge Ian Pearson ordered Yeates to pay Dorset Police £8,000 and £500 towards court costs.

Yeates reached the end of his service last year and subsequently retired from Dorset Police.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

3:28pm Thu 4 Jul 13

BIGTONE says...

You cannot steal over a 3 year period and blame it on other factors. Within that 3 year period it only takes one occasion of premeditation to be guilty.

He needs to be careful.
It could backfire upon him and receives a larger tarrif.
You cannot steal over a 3 year period and blame it on other factors. Within that 3 year period it only takes one occasion of premeditation to be guilty. He needs to be careful. It could backfire upon him and receives a larger tarrif. BIGTONE
  • Score: 0

3:50pm Thu 4 Jul 13

muscliffman says...

BIGTONE wrote:
You cannot steal over a 3 year period and blame it on other factors. Within that 3 year period it only takes one occasion of premeditation to be guilty.

He needs to be careful.
It could backfire upon him and receives a larger tarrif.
Indeed, an appeal does not have just two possible outcomes, a lesser sentence or no change. There is a third option - a far harsher sentence.

This man seems to be blaming everyone but himself for his own actions, they may not buy any of that a second time.
[quote][p][bold]BIGTONE[/bold] wrote: You cannot steal over a 3 year period and blame it on other factors. Within that 3 year period it only takes one occasion of premeditation to be guilty. He needs to be careful. It could backfire upon him and receives a larger tarrif.[/p][/quote]Indeed, an appeal does not have just two possible outcomes, a lesser sentence or no change. There is a third option - a far harsher sentence. This man seems to be blaming everyone but himself for his own actions, they may not buy any of that a second time. muscliffman
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree