Twin Sails to be put to the test as Poole Bridge to close for 10 days in April

CLOSING: Poole Bridge CLOSING: Poole Bridge

ESSENTIAL maintenance work to Poole’s 86-year-old lifting bridge is forcing its closure for 10 days in April.

Replacement of worn parts and inspections of Poole Bridge will take place from Tuesday April 16 to April 25.

The bridge will be closed to traffic and pedestrians from 10.30am on the first day to midnight on the last, all day and all night, including the weekend of April 20-21.

However all scheduled lifts for boats will take place during the closure. The work will cost up to £70,000 and is coming out of Borough of Poole’s bridge maintenance fund.

With the Twin Sails Bridge up and running, for the first time there is no need for a pedestrian ferry to run from Hamworthy to Town Quay, as with previous closures.

The bridge was last closed during the daytime for resurfacing works in 2006.

Cllr Xena Dion, cabinet portfolio holder for transportation at Borough of Poole, said: “The work will cost between £50,000-£70,000 depending on the condition of a number of components which can only be assessed as the work progresses.”

Dangerously rusted steel platforms attached to the side of the bridge, which support the traffic barrier motor/control boxes, will be removed.

The old flashing wig-wag lights and columns, which obstruct pedestrians, will be removed from the footpath and new lights installed on large platforms.

Worn nose bolts which lock the lifting spans together will be replaced and engineers will inspect and repair various mechanical problems in the lifting gears and motors.

A crushed moving barrier will be replaced and maintenance carried out on the other three at each tower. External floodlights will be repaired or replaced.

Other work will include refurbishing signs and vehicle impact damage to overhead gantries, replacing damaged sections of copper cladding on the towers and faulty electrical systems.

“We would like to thank residents for their patience while this work is carried out and hope to keep disruption to a minimum now that we have the second harbour crossing,” said Cllr Dion.

Fred Winwood, chairman of Hamside Residents' Association, said it would cause difficulties but added: “Unfortunately it is unavoidable, and quite frankly the people of Hamworthy are used to it now.”

But he said it would be a test for the second crossing, the history of problems with which was “a worry”.

He added: “Provided the Twin Sails Bridge performs we’re in no worse a situation than we were before, but if it doesn’t we’re going to have serious problems and people will be absolutely fed up of it.”

Lili Vandiver, manager of The Potters Arms, which is close to the old bridge on Blandford Road, said it was worrying news for her business.

“It will impact business – we’ve already gone through that will the roadworks on the water main which messed up business for 10 weeks.

“And it will impact me personally as I walk over that bridge – I will have to go twice as far now to do my banking.”

Cllr Fred Drane, Purbeck District councillor for Lytchett Minster and Upton East, said residents in his ward would be “very concerned”.

“With the Twin Sails Bridge giving up so many times there will be concerns it could go wrong again – we hope it doesn’t – but everything would back up and go through Upton.”

He added: “It will be a test for the bridge – but let’s hope it’s not a test for our patience.”

Comments(12)

benjamin says...
6:07pm Sun 10 Mar 13

Now we will see what the Twin Sails Bridge is made of!

muscliffman says...
7:19pm Sun 10 Mar 13

That the headline "86 year old Poole bridge to be put to the test because the new twin-sails bridge is closing" has and never would appear in the Echo says it all!

The-Bleeding-Obvious says...
8:45pm Sun 10 Mar 13

Poole Bridge, which really does look like a well designed and functional bridge is out of action because bits of it have worn out as a result of normal wear and tear. The track record of the Twin Sails bridge so far would suggest that it is going to need constant maintenance and no doubt replacement long before the trusted Poole Bridge has had its day.

Borough of Poole, I think you are going to need a much bigger bridge maintenance fund!

BIGTONE says...
9:17pm Sun 10 Mar 13

The-Bleeding-Obvious wrote:
Poole Bridge, which really does look like a well designed and functional bridge is out of action because bits of it have worn out as a result of normal wear and tear. The track record of the Twin Sails bridge so far would suggest that it is going to need constant maintenance and no doubt replacement long before the trusted Poole Bridge has had its day.

Borough of Poole, I think you are going to need a much bigger bridge maintenance fund!
I think everyone will have to use the long way round.

Baywolf says...
10:31pm Sun 10 Mar 13

So ten days out of action for road traffic but not for boats, ten days of using one bridge that's unreliable, £70,000 repair bill just for one, yes I can really see the logic of building a second lifting bridge. Where's that Atkinson woman vaulting how wonderful the Twin Sails is ..

Yankee1 says...
10:54pm Sun 10 Mar 13

About as well as Purbeck fares when the chain ferry shuts for its annual refit.

LornaBournemouth says...
11:08pm Sun 10 Mar 13

Thanks for telling us the obvious Fred WinGEwood!

cyco44 says...
12:35am Mon 11 Mar 13

The whole point of the original proposal for a new bridge some 20 odd years ago was to REPLACE the old lifting bridge. This was because it was deemed to be nearing the end of it's service life and that the annual maintenance costs were becoming too prohibitive, indeed figures being bandied around back then were in the region of £125,000 per annum. Now here we are all these years later still paying these annual service costs on a bridge that was supposedly on it's last legs! And low and behold we now have another mechanical bridge with it's own set of annual service costs! Why oh why didn't the powers that be listen to the general consensus at the time that the people of Poole and Hamworthy would have preferred a fixed span bridge. Oh I remember, they said it would cost too much, but surely it won't take many more years before the cost of running these two bridges far exceeds what a fixed span bridge would have cost in the first place!

portia6 says...
12:53am Mon 11 Mar 13

Yep, sure sums up the consensus
of opinions! We need a new council,
can we get some engineers from
New York!

Baywolf says...
6:59am Mon 11 Mar 13

cyco44 wrote:
The whole point of the original proposal for a new bridge some 20 odd years ago was to REPLACE the old lifting bridge. This was because it was deemed to be nearing the end of it's service life and that the annual maintenance costs were becoming too prohibitive, indeed figures being bandied around back then were in the region of £125,000 per annum. Now here we are all these years later still paying these annual service costs on a bridge that was supposedly on it's last legs! And low and behold we now have another mechanical bridge with it's own set of annual service costs! Why oh why didn't the powers that be listen to the general consensus at the time that the people of Poole and Hamworthy would have preferred a fixed span bridge. Oh I remember, they said it would cost too much, but surely it won't take many more years before the cost of running these two bridges far exceeds what a fixed span bridge would have cost in the first place!
Well said cyco44 couldn't have said it better. Wish I could have forewarded this to that Atkinson woman.

jobsworthwatch says...
8:10am Mon 11 Mar 13

cyco44 wrote:
The whole point of the original proposal for a new bridge some 20 odd years ago was to REPLACE the old lifting bridge. This was because it was deemed to be nearing the end of it's service life and that the annual maintenance costs were becoming too prohibitive, indeed figures being bandied around back then were in the region of £125,000 per annum. Now here we are all these years later still paying these annual service costs on a bridge that was supposedly on it's last legs! And low and behold we now have another mechanical bridge with it's own set of annual service costs! Why oh why didn't the powers that be listen to the general consensus at the time that the people of Poole and Hamworthy would have preferred a fixed span bridge. Oh I remember, they said it would cost too much, but surely it won't take many more years before the cost of running these two bridges far exceeds what a fixed span bridge would have cost in the first place!
Its because councilors tend to be butchers, bakers and candlestick makers, employing top consultants makes no difference because they can't understand the advice given. The result is gross incompetence everywhere you look! We need to get engineers and scientists into local government (and central government) trouble is they have much better and more interesting things to do!

live-and-let-live says...
9:46am Mon 11 Mar 13

the reason we have two lifting bridges instead of one fixed bridge across holes bay is because THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT blocked the plans in 1997 and said it was too expensive.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree