- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@bournemouthecho
All the latest news and chat from the Echo
@bmthechosport
All the latest sport from the Echo team
- Find us on Facebook
Bournemouth Daily Echo
Like us on Facebook
Police on day-long road safety patrol stop 60 drivers for breaking the law (From Bournemouth Echo)
When news happens text pix and video to 80360. Start your message with BE then leave a space.
Police on day-long road safety patrol stop 60 drivers for breaking the law
1:00pm Wednesday 20th February 2013 in News By Juliette Astrup
SURROUNDED: Out and about with Dorset Police during the Dorset Road Safe ‘Surround a Town’ crackdown across Bournemouth. Traffic Officer PC Graham Davis issues a fixed penalty ticket to a motorist caught speeding on the Dorset Way
TRAFFIC police on a day-long road safety crackdown stopped more than 60 drivers, including 35 driving without seatbelts, and 14 talking on mobiles.
The 10-hour ‘Surround a Town’ action last Wednesday saw officers patrolling the main roads to tackle motoring offences and bad driving.
Among those stopped were seven people speeding, one without an MOT, another without insurance, a learner without L-plates, as well as a driver drinking from a flask, and another chomping on a large roll.
Six more motorists were stopped and given advice on issues including tailgating and tinted windows.
Those caught not wearing their seatbelts were asked to attend a free seatbelt course, and drivers seen using their mobile phone or speeding were offered a future drivers' awareness course costing £110. These courses, held at Streetwise in Bournemouth that day, replace the traditional fine.
The day also included education for children, with Dorset Road Safe at Manorside Combined School talking to youngsters aged five to 12 about the importance of road and cycle safety.
While safer neighbourhood officers were stationed outside the school ready to offer words of advice to parents spotted parking on single yellow lines, in bus stops and on the zig zags when dropping their children off.
Children seen cycling to school without lights were also issued with free ones to keep them safe on the roads.
Inspector Matt Butler, from Dorset Police Traffic Section said: “Surround a Town brings together a number of initiatives to reduce road casualties. We target and educate vulnerable road users together with motorists committing road traffic offences that lead to increased casualties.
“We will continue to enforce all traffic offences in an attempt to keep Dorset road users safe.”
The figures from Surround A town initiative
- 35 seatbelt offences, 7 speeding offences
- 14 mobile phone offences
- 6 vehicles were stopped and given words of advice in relation to various issues such as tailgating and tinted windows
- 2 vehicles were stopped as the drivers were deemed to not be in complete control of their vehicle – one was drinking from a flask and one was eating a large roll – words of advice were given to both drivers
- 1 vehicle was stopped and found to have no valid MOT
- 1 vehicle was stopped and the driver was found to have no insurance
- 1 vehicle was stopped as the driver was a learner and not displaying ‘L’ plates
Comments(40)
TinyLegacy
says...
1:16pm Wed 20 Feb 13
l'anglais wrote:Yeah, i'm sure they dropped everything to go chasing cars. Grow up.
In the meantime, some nutter is charging around Kinson with a gun.
Let's weigh up our targets & priorities, Gunman or Cash making opportunity, fleecing Car owners.
l'anglais
says...
1:22pm Wed 20 Feb 13
TinyLegacy wrote:Touché.
l'anglais wrote:Yeah, i'm sure they dropped everything to go chasing cars. Grow up.
In the meantime, some nutter is charging around Kinson with a gun.
Let's weigh up our targets & priorities, Gunman or Cash making opportunity, fleecing Car owners.
If there were more bobbies on the beat around town centres and sensitive areas, rather than hidden in a unmarked car with a speed gun, then maybe we could all GROW UP in a safer society.
lilliputcherry
says...
1:23pm Wed 20 Feb 13
bournenbred
says...
1:36pm Wed 20 Feb 13
lilliputcherry wrote:Horsemeat and fake vodka.
What we really want to know is what filling did the 'large roll' contain and what was in the 'flask'?
They weren't really after the motorists :-)
TinyLegacy
says...
1:39pm Wed 20 Feb 13
l'anglais wrote:Yes, a comforting thought for anyone who's lost a loved one thanks to a motorist who shouldn't have been on the road. It's called 'pro-active' policing... Unfortunately the likes of muggers, rapists etc don't walk around with billboard signs.
TinyLegacy wrote:Touché.
l'anglais wrote:Yeah, i'm sure they dropped everything to go chasing cars. Grow up.
In the meantime, some nutter is charging around Kinson with a gun.
Let's weigh up our targets & priorities, Gunman or Cash making opportunity, fleecing Car owners.
If there were more bobbies on the beat around town centres and sensitive areas, rather than hidden in a unmarked car with a speed gun, then maybe we could all GROW UP in a safer society.
Tango Charlie
says...
1:44pm Wed 20 Feb 13
overnment/uploads/sy
stem/uploads/attachm
ent_data/file/9066/r
eported-road-casualt
ies-in-great-britain
-main-results-2011.p
df
In 2011 there were 25,122 people killed or serously injured on the uk's roads. That is 483 a week! The same as a full Airbus 380 crashing. Who thinks that this is safe?
speedy231278
says...
1:56pm Wed 20 Feb 13
Lord gungedin of Ferndown
says...
2:03pm Wed 20 Feb 13
FNS-man
says...
2:18pm Wed 20 Feb 13
l'anglais wrote:So who kills kids? It's not people with guns. It is people in cars.
TinyLegacy wrote:Touché. If there were more bobbies on the beat around town centres and sensitive areas, rather than hidden in a unmarked car with a speed gun, then maybe we could all GROW UP in a safer society.l'anglais wrote: In the meantime, some nutter is charging around Kinson with a gun. Let's weigh up our targets & priorities, Gunman or Cash making opportunity, fleecing Car owners.Yeah, i'm sure they dropped everything to go chasing cars. Grow up.
Allyssia
says...
2:41pm Wed 20 Feb 13
djd
says...
2:43pm Wed 20 Feb 13
There are so many people driving who couldn't care less about other drivers' safety, and obviously their own.
If this stop just one person being killed or seriously injured on the roads, surely it's worth it.
As for the idiots with no seat belts and using mobile phones, they are just beyond contempt.
l'anglais
says...
2:45pm Wed 20 Feb 13
FNS-man wrote:Dunblane? Connecticut last Christmas?
l'anglais wrote:So who kills kids? It's not people with guns. It is people in cars.
TinyLegacy wrote:Touché. If there were more bobbies on the beat around town centres and sensitive areas, rather than hidden in a unmarked car with a speed gun, then maybe we could all GROW UP in a safer society.l'anglais wrote: In the meantime, some nutter is charging around Kinson with a gun. Let's weigh up our targets & priorities, Gunman or Cash making opportunity, fleecing Car owners.Yeah, i'm sure they dropped everything to go chasing cars. Grow up.
Don't tell me some nutter in a Fiesta did it.
l'anglais
says...
2:49pm Wed 20 Feb 13
TinyLegacy wrote:Therefore the need for extra vigilance in tracking muggers, rapists etc...
l'anglais wrote:Yes, a comforting thought for anyone who's lost a loved one thanks to a motorist who shouldn't have been on the road. It's called 'pro-active' policing... Unfortunately the likes of muggers, rapists etc don't walk around with billboard signs.
TinyLegacy wrote:Touché.
l'anglais wrote:Yeah, i'm sure they dropped everything to go chasing cars. Grow up.
In the meantime, some nutter is charging around Kinson with a gun.
Let's weigh up our targets & priorities, Gunman or Cash making opportunity, fleecing Car owners.
If there were more bobbies on the beat around town centres and sensitive areas, rather than hidden in a unmarked car with a speed gun, then maybe we could all GROW UP in a safer society.
Stopping 35 non-seat belt wearers, isn't a threat to your children or mine.
Keeping an eye on those recidivists just been let out after doing a 10 stretch for murder is far more relevant to the future welfare of our kids.
retry69
says...
2:57pm Wed 20 Feb 13
Allyssia wrote:PMS again its been rife this last couple of days
Meanwhile houses are getting burgled, feral kids are running riot and mini-motos roam the streets. But some poor motorist was seen getting a patronising lecture because he was speeding on a, wait for it - bypass. Whooo what an easy target. Way to go Police - well done. I suppose one crumb of comfort that with these cuts to the Police, there will be less of these ever so pleasant traffic cops. I agree more Police on the beat please. Can't remember the last one I saw patrolling......
hadvar
says...
3:35pm Wed 20 Feb 13
Stats or it didn't happen Inspector. Tell us exactly how many KSI 'surrounding towns' prevents.
fixedthatforyou
says...
3:56pm Wed 20 Feb 13
It has been shown that initiativedays like these can throw up a number of un expected results, including large hauls of drugs, and people wanted on warrants for more serious crimes.
As to the comment about Dunblane. a school shooting over fifteen years ago and in a country that has a seperate policing and legal system is a pointless staw man argument.
scrumpyjack
says...
3:59pm Wed 20 Feb 13
lilliputcherry wrote:I have no real issue with them enforcing laws but this did make me raise an eyebrow.
What we really want to know is what filling did the 'large roll' contain and what was in the 'flask'?
Changing a CD or smoking, for example could be classes just as bad as taking a bit our of a roll, if not more so.
Seems a bit petty.
scrumpyjack
says...
4:09pm Wed 20 Feb 13
FNS-man wrote:Or Somalians.
l'anglais wrote:So who kills kids? It's not people with guns. It is people in cars.
TinyLegacy wrote:Touché. If there were more bobbies on the beat around town centres and sensitive areas, rather than hidden in a unmarked car with a speed gun, then maybe we could all GROW UP in a safer society.l'anglais wrote: In the meantime, some nutter is charging around Kinson with a gun. Let's weigh up our targets & priorities, Gunman or Cash making opportunity, fleecing Car owners.Yeah, i'm sure they dropped everything to go chasing cars. Grow up.
scrumpyjack
says...
4:16pm Wed 20 Feb 13
Allyssia wrote:Officers 'on the beat' are statiscally likely to come across a crime in progress once every 7 years.
Meanwhile houses are getting burgled, feral kids are running riot and mini-motos roam the streets. But some poor motorist was seen getting a patronising lecture because he was speeding on a, wait for it - bypass. Whooo what an easy target. Way to go Police - well done. I suppose one crumb of comfort that with these cuts to the Police, there will be less of these ever so pleasant traffic cops. I agree more Police on the beat please. Can't remember the last one I saw patrolling......
Good use of their time in fighting crime?
scrumpyjack
says...
4:19pm Wed 20 Feb 13
l'anglais wrote:God you show yourself up.
FNS-man wrote:Dunblane? Connecticut last Christmas?
l'anglais wrote:So who kills kids? It's not people with guns. It is people in cars.
TinyLegacy wrote:Touché. If there were more bobbies on the beat around town centres and sensitive areas, rather than hidden in a unmarked car with a speed gun, then maybe we could all GROW UP in a safer society.l'anglais wrote: In the meantime, some nutter is charging around Kinson with a gun. Let's weigh up our targets & priorities, Gunman or Cash making opportunity, fleecing Car owners.Yeah, i'm sure they dropped everything to go chasing cars. Grow up.
Don't tell me some nutter in a Fiesta did it.
Your best argument in defence of your ridiculous comments is an extraordinary event that happened 17 years ago and something that happened in a different country with completely different gun laws.
Oh yeah that'll do and show 'em who's boss.
*rolls eyes
FNS-man
says...
4:32pm Wed 20 Feb 13
l'anglais wrote:More people got killed on the roads last week than at Dunblane. Kids are killed in road accidents as passengers and pedestrians, not by escaped murderers, unless you are living in a detective novel.
FNS-man wrote:Dunblane? Connecticut last Christmas? Don't tell me some nutter in a Fiesta did it.l'anglais wrote:So who kills kids? It's not people with guns. It is people in cars.TinyLegacy wrote:Touché. If there were more bobbies on the beat around town centres and sensitive areas, rather than hidden in a unmarked car with a speed gun, then maybe we could all GROW UP in a safer society.l'anglais wrote: In the meantime, some nutter is charging around Kinson with a gun. Let's weigh up our targets & priorities, Gunman or Cash making opportunity, fleecing Car owners.Yeah, i'm sure they dropped everything to go chasing cars. Grow up.
And that is in a place where kids don't ride their bikes around. Imagine if we had the majority of kids cycling to school. There would be one killed every day with the way people currently drive.
Essentially the attitude of many people is unless you're an adult and drive a car then you can suffer in silence.
Teddy 1
says...
4:33pm Wed 20 Feb 13
ragj195
says...
4:33pm Wed 20 Feb 13
l'anglais wrote:Do you not think that drivers using their mobile phone while driving poses a serious threat to the safety of drivers and pedestrians around them?
TinyLegacy wrote:Touché.
l'anglais wrote:Yeah, i'm sure they dropped everything to go chasing cars. Grow up.
In the meantime, some nutter is charging around Kinson with a gun.
Let's weigh up our targets & priorities, Gunman or Cash making opportunity, fleecing Car owners.
If there were more bobbies on the beat around town centres and sensitive areas, rather than hidden in a unmarked car with a speed gun, then maybe we could all GROW UP in a safer society.
Perhaps they should hit the beat and catch all those rapists hiding in bushes around town! Or those pesky clubbers that get into fights and pose a serious risk to my two kids. Not to mention the chav that wants to steal a bike from my garage worth all of £50.
Motorists, of which I am one, are a soft touch but that's because so many of them break the law. The fact is so much time could be saved by simply raising the penalty for using a mobile from measly 3 points to an instant 4 week ban.
Teddy 1
says...
4:34pm Wed 20 Feb 13
l'anglais
says...
5:15pm Wed 20 Feb 13
FNS-man wrote:Why this constant barrage of hatred towards car drivers.
l'anglais wrote:More people got killed on the roads last week than at Dunblane. Kids are killed in road accidents as passengers and pedestrians, not by escaped murderers, unless you are living in a detective novel.
FNS-man wrote:Dunblane? Connecticut last Christmas? Don't tell me some nutter in a Fiesta did it.l'anglais wrote:So who kills kids? It's not people with guns. It is people in cars.TinyLegacy wrote:Touché. If there were more bobbies on the beat around town centres and sensitive areas, rather than hidden in a unmarked car with a speed gun, then maybe we could all GROW UP in a safer society.l'anglais wrote: In the meantime, some nutter is charging around Kinson with a gun. Let's weigh up our targets & priorities, Gunman or Cash making opportunity, fleecing Car owners.Yeah, i'm sure they dropped everything to go chasing cars. Grow up.
And that is in a place where kids don't ride their bikes around. Imagine if we had the majority of kids cycling to school. There would be one killed every day with the way people currently drive.
Essentially the attitude of many people is unless you're an adult and drive a car then you can suffer in silence.
There are many ways of getting injured and accidental death.
Far more people die from falls on stairs, steps etc.. than get killed on the Roads. Are we going to have policemen at the foot of every staircase.
I agree their are poor drivers out there, and yes there should be stiffer sentences, but stop targeting (profiteering) those engaged in poor road behaviour over other crimes taking place in our society.
Molecatcher
says...
5:23pm Wed 20 Feb 13
EGHH
says...
5:31pm Wed 20 Feb 13
retry69
says...
5:41pm Wed 20 Feb 13
ragj195 wrote:4 week ban!!! Thats the problem the deterent is not there,driving while using a hand held mobile 6 months ban second offence crushed car,similar lines for speeding.No Excuses should mean just that.
l'anglais wrote:Do you not think that drivers using their mobile phone while driving poses a serious threat to the safety of drivers and pedestrians around them?
TinyLegacy wrote:Touché.
l'anglais wrote:Yeah, i'm sure they dropped everything to go chasing cars. Grow up.
In the meantime, some nutter is charging around Kinson with a gun.
Let's weigh up our targets & priorities, Gunman or Cash making opportunity, fleecing Car owners.
If there were more bobbies on the beat around town centres and sensitive areas, rather than hidden in a unmarked car with a speed gun, then maybe we could all GROW UP in a safer society.
Perhaps they should hit the beat and catch all those rapists hiding in bushes around town! Or those pesky clubbers that get into fights and pose a serious risk to my two kids. Not to mention the chav that wants to steal a bike from my garage worth all of £50.
Motorists, of which I am one, are a soft touch but that's because so many of them break the law. The fact is so much time could be saved by simply raising the penalty for using a mobile from measly 3 points to an instant 4 week ban.
ragj195
says...
7:21pm Wed 20 Feb 13
retry69 wrote:There are plenty of reasons why you can't crush the car. I'm sure Avis would have something to say about it!
ragj195 wrote:4 week ban!!! Thats the problem the deterent is not there,driving while using a hand held mobile 6 months ban second offence crushed car,similar lines for speeding.No Excuses should mean just that.
l'anglais wrote:Do you not think that drivers using their mobile phone while driving poses a serious threat to the safety of drivers and pedestrians around them?
TinyLegacy wrote:Touché.
l'anglais wrote:Yeah, i'm sure they dropped everything to go chasing cars. Grow up.
In the meantime, some nutter is charging around Kinson with a gun.
Let's weigh up our targets & priorities, Gunman or Cash making opportunity, fleecing Car owners.
If there were more bobbies on the beat around town centres and sensitive areas, rather than hidden in a unmarked car with a speed gun, then maybe we could all GROW UP in a safer society.
Perhaps they should hit the beat and catch all those rapists hiding in bushes around town! Or those pesky clubbers that get into fights and pose a serious risk to my two kids. Not to mention the chav that wants to steal a bike from my garage worth all of £50.
Motorists, of which I am one, are a soft touch but that's because so many of them break the law. The fact is so much time could be saved by simply raising the penalty for using a mobile from measly 3 points to an instant 4 week ban.
retry69
says...
8:49pm Wed 20 Feb 13
ragj195 wrote:There is always one smart ****
retry69 wrote:There are plenty of reasons why you can't crush the car. I'm sure Avis would have something to say about it!
ragj195 wrote:4 week ban!!! Thats the problem the deterent is not there,driving while using a hand held mobile 6 months ban second offence crushed car,similar lines for speeding.No Excuses should mean just that.
l'anglais wrote:Do you not think that drivers using their mobile phone while driving poses a serious threat to the safety of drivers and pedestrians around them?
TinyLegacy wrote:Touché.
l'anglais wrote:Yeah, i'm sure they dropped everything to go chasing cars. Grow up.
In the meantime, some nutter is charging around Kinson with a gun.
Let's weigh up our targets & priorities, Gunman or Cash making opportunity, fleecing Car owners.
If there were more bobbies on the beat around town centres and sensitive areas, rather than hidden in a unmarked car with a speed gun, then maybe we could all GROW UP in a safer society.
Perhaps they should hit the beat and catch all those rapists hiding in bushes around town! Or those pesky clubbers that get into fights and pose a serious risk to my two kids. Not to mention the chav that wants to steal a bike from my garage worth all of £50.
Motorists, of which I am one, are a soft touch but that's because so many of them break the law. The fact is so much time could be saved by simply raising the penalty for using a mobile from measly 3 points to an instant 4 week ban.
DansAFCB
says...
9:58pm Wed 20 Feb 13
The burglar only stole her lifetime jewellery collection but hey lets stop someone with no seat belt........ fuc.ing joke!!!!!!!!
BIGTONE
says...
10:30pm Wed 20 Feb 13
Hessenford
says...
7:50am Thu 21 Feb 13
large_cheese
says...
10:19am Thu 21 Feb 13
Fair enough if the driver is allowing younger passengers not to wear seatbelts.
Otherwise, waste of time.
really?? seriously??
says...
10:56am Thu 21 Feb 13
speedy231278 wrote:Yeah , but they let them off.....AGAIN.
Did they stop any Special Constables using a mobile phone on their lap?
jill M
says...
1:39pm Thu 21 Feb 13
really?? seriously?? wrote:For goodness sake, why cannot you digest the facts, it was the CPS that decided not to prosecute, THE POLICE APPEALED AGAINST THE DECISION - oh what's the point, you just turn everything around to suit yourselves, you usually do.
speedy231278 wrote:Yeah , but they let them off.....AGAIN.
Did they stop any Special Constables using a mobile phone on their lap?
uvox44
says...
1:59pm Thu 21 Feb 13
blahblahbleurgh
says...
5:27pm Thu 21 Feb 13
dorsetspeed
says...
5:57pm Thu 21 Feb 13
l'anglais says...
1:05pm Wed 20 Feb 13
Let's weigh up our targets & priorities, Gunman or Cash making opportunity, fleecing Car owners.