'No alternative' to H Block demolition say hospital bosses

HISTORIC BUILDING: Christchurch Hospital HISTORIC BUILDING: Christchurch Hospital

HOSPITAL bosses have sought to reassure residents that they have explored alternatives to demolishing the historic H Block at Christchurch Hospital.

The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals Trust has released details of two independent reports which looked into different options for the former workhouse infirmary.

Revised plans have been submitted by the trust after councillors at Christchurch turned down previous plans to redevelop the site at Fairmile.

The plans, which the trust says would retain services including blood and the Macmillan Unit, include the demolition of H Block, a GP surgery as well as an 80-bed care home, 36 senior living apartments and 78 key worker housing flats.

However, the demolition of H Block has sparked concerns from local historians and organisations who want to see the building preserved.

Historian Sue Newman said she was unhappy with the prospect of a private care home on the green in front of the existing building.

But in the reports published by the trust, a quantity surveyor viability report carried out in January this year concluded that the internal width of Nightingale ward makes it unsuitable for reuse and the footprint limits any remodelling.

It said that if H Block were kept and used for existing departments, new build extensions would be required.

The works could cost up to £4.8million, making the site unaffordable for the trust and also impacting on parking provision and key worker housing, income the trust needs to carry out the development work.

English Heritage also turned down an application to recommend the unused H Block for listing, citing a lack of architectural interest, lack of historic interest and the previous unsympathetic alterations.

Richard Renaut, director of service development, said: “I want to assure those who have any concerns about H block that it has been assessed appropriately.

“While English Heritage notes the local interest, H block falls short of the high level of architectural interest necessary to merit national designation as a listed building.

“It is also clear from the surveyor’s report that a considerable amount of money would be needed to bring the building up to any kind of standard, but would still be unfit for delivering healthcare without considerable investment.

“This is simply not affordable.”

Comments(6)

HRH of Boscombe says...
12:04pm Wed 20 Feb 13

'English Heritage also turned down an application to recommend the unused H Block for listing'
.
I'm nor surprised. It looks like a derelict prison.

Hessenford says...
12:30pm Wed 20 Feb 13

I don't believe any thing Renault and Spotswood say but this has gone on long enough and services are needed in the area, just knock it down and get on with it.

guisselle says...
5:16pm Wed 20 Feb 13

Forward planning for future use seems
like a sensible option! There is a need
for Christchurch residents to have
NHS facilities.

Victor_Meldrew_ Jnr says...
5:28pm Wed 20 Feb 13

Fact: Christchurch needs this hospital because Christchurch has a population of 47,500 residents.

May I ask all those who are against the proposals for Christchurch Hospital to consider what would happen if everything closed down.
Current statistics show that 262 out-patients are seen each day at Christchurch, 52 x-rays are carried out each day, and 256 blood tests are carried out each day. That is a daily total of 570 patients each working day that would have to be accommodated at RBH.

People who use RBH for blood tests currently have to wait an average of 1 hour 42 minutes during the day. Add to that a further 32 patients every hour requiring blood tests, and similar additions to the out-patients dept and RBH could not cope with these additions. The hospital is at least 50+ beds over capacity for in-patients. Why are we giving in to the minority, when the majority are in favour of planning being granted.

Victor_Meldrew_Lives! says...
7:16pm Sat 23 Feb 13

Hessenford wrote:
I don't believe any thing Renault and Spotswood say but this has gone on long enough and services are needed in the area, just knock it down and get on with it.
Agreed. I am available to carry out the work if required?

point--of--view says...
11:03pm Sun 24 Feb 13

Victor_Meldrew_ Jnr wrote:
Fact: Christchurch needs this hospital because Christchurch has a population of 47,500 residents. May I ask all those who are against the proposals for Christchurch Hospital to consider what would happen if everything closed down. Current statistics show that 262 out-patients are seen each day at Christchurch, 52 x-rays are carried out each day, and 256 blood tests are carried out each day. That is a daily total of 570 patients each working day that would have to be accommodated at RBH. People who use RBH for blood tests currently have to wait an average of 1 hour 42 minutes during the day. Add to that a further 32 patients every hour requiring blood tests, and similar additions to the out-patients dept and RBH could not cope with these additions. The hospital is at least 50+ beds over capacity for in-patients. Why are we giving in to the minority, when the majority are in favour of planning being granted.
Victor_Meldrew_Jnr
This scheme is to build private housing, OAP homes and a nursing home. Take a look at the plans and you will see no hospital development. Other than the chaplaincy and a few new entrances nothing new is being added to the hospital! Only the wards being demolished and the parking is reduced down as well. The GP Surgery seems to be more about selling the existing site to build flats on and relocating!

The NHS trust offers no guarantee at all that services will remain in Christchurch! Look at the marketing material your stats came from? Take my point on that one? Do you really trust them given the history of the Christchurch site?

The land is pretty well parcelled up to be further sold off. With permission given on this application on a conservation zone it will make it so much easier to get permission for future developments on the MacMillan and dentistry areas. Perhaps more massive and expensive OAP homes coming soon!

If you want a hospital as you suggest or some token health care services left in Christchurch do not support this scheme. Lobby your MP and force this site sell off to be stopped. Whilst the NHS trust has building on the site some

As you suggest consider what will happen when Christchurch has no hospital.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree