Experts blast Christchurch hospital plans

STANDING THEIR GROUND: Objectors to the demolition plans gather with pictures of staff who worked in the building in its former use in the early 1900s STANDING THEIR GROUND: Objectors to the demolition plans gather with pictures of staff who worked in the building in its former use in the early 1900s

HOSPITAL chiefs have been criticised for their revised plans for Christchurch hospital by local heritage experts still unhappy with the proposal.

Despite Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals Trust resubmitting plans after members of Christchurch council’s planning committee turned down their £10million proposal, historians are still calling for the preservation of H Block.

But hospital bosses say H Block is still earmarked for demolition, although they have altered the design and features of the buildings set to replace the former workhouse infirmary.

Richard Renaut, director of service development said: “It’s a straight choice between keeping services or having empty buildings.

“H block is an unlisted building that has been empty for several years, as it is unfit for healthcare use.

“An independent expert report has concluded it would cost an extra £5m to keep and convert the building, above and beyond the current investment on the actual site.

“This is money that isn’t available and can’t be justified, especially because the facilities at the end would be far less usable and far more costly to run.”

But Sue Newman, from Christchurch Conservation Trust said while she doesn’t object to houses at the back of the site, she continues to wonder why they have to take H Block out.

“It is not just the loss of the building, but the building of a truly massive care home for a private developer not even where H Block now stands, but in front of it, on the green, also part of the conservation area,” she said.

“And, to add insult to injury, a senior living development is also proposed on the conservation area open space.”

She added: “Why can’t H Block be sold? Its dedicated role in nursing injured soldiers from both wars makes it rather a war memorial.

“Most importantly, there were national planning policies given for the refusal, policies the Trust had not complied with, and I cannot see this new application complies with them either.”

Other aspects of the revised plans include an 80-bed care home and plans for 36 senior living apartments as well as 78 keyworker flats, reduced from 81.

Should the plans not be approved on March 14, funding for the GP surgery proposed for the site, will be lost, the Trust says.

Comments(11)

speedy231278 says...
12:19pm Mon 11 Feb 13

It's a working site, not a musuem, so if the building needs to go, it needs to go.

If this lot feel so strongly, perhaps they ought to put together the money to purchase it?

coster says...
3:07pm Mon 11 Feb 13

The people of Christchurch have bought and paid for this establishment for many years, it existed prior to the NHS takeover. Its facilities have been destroyed quite deliberately.

poolebob says...
5:33pm Mon 11 Feb 13

The headline is misleading when it says "experts"
It's just one persons views and we are not told what qualifies her to give her views.
Is she a self appointed "expert"

ajj-dorset says...
6:17pm Mon 11 Feb 13

The buildings are being demolished for one reason and one reason only, Greed.

That the Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals Trust will stoop to threatening to pull out of the building is tantamount to blackmail and shows up the mentality of those running aspects of the NHS these days.

This revised plan barely differs from the previous one. Both are effectively selling off the land to private developers who will make huge profits on the back of tax payer owned site.

The trustees should remember the Christchurch part of their name and invest in the site rather than flogging it off like some modern day corporate spivs.

Live Laugh Love says...
6:43pm Mon 11 Feb 13

It's sad but the truth is that the older buildings are not going to be used for in-patients anymore.

We have two choices, we either back the plans and keep services, or we lose it all. Anyone who is or knows someone that uses the services regularly will understand that we must keep Christchurch Hospital alive and by saying yes to the proposals, that will safeguard our hospital.

If you previously said yes to the proposals then you must write in again as the previous letters have been discarded.

For the sake of patients and staff, PLEASE BACK THESE PLANS.

bsjc1234 says...
7:07pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Live laugh love says “If you previously said yes to the proposals then you must write in again as the previous letters have been discarded.
For the sake of patients and staff, PLEASE BACK THESE PLANS”
This raises some interesting questions which someone needs to answer –
1 - If this is true and you need to write for a second time? If so then clearly the Echo and Bournemouth hospital need to make this important point known to all.
2 – Do all the people in Christchurch know that their hospital could close within the next year?
3 – Do all the people in Christchurch realize that if Christchurch closes then they may need to go to Poole?
Jobs and the local NHS is clearly at risk here, Mr Chope needs to realize he will be answerable to any hospital closure on his patch, as will all the local councilor’s in Christchurch. The Echo need to get together with RBH and put an action plan together. This bunch of so called experts (pictured) are not experts, they look to be just a load of people who have nothing better to do, let’s hope they do not need a local hospital in the future….unless they wish for a trip to Poole by bus?

Victor_Meldrew_ Jnr says...
7:22pm Mon 11 Feb 13

May I ask all those who are against the proposals for Christchurch Hospital to consider what would happen if everything closed down.

Current statistics show that 262 outpatients are seen each day at Christchurch, 52 x-rays are carried out each day, and 256 blood tests are carried out each day. That is a daily total of 570 patients each working day that would have to be accommodated at RBH.

People who use RBH for blood tests have to wait an average of 1 hour 42 minutes during the day. Add to that a further 32 patients every hour requiring blood tests.Similar additions to out patients dept.

RBH could not cope with these additions. The hospital is at least 55 beds over capacity for in-patients.

To keep the buildings as at present would not be viable as it would take £5M to make it habitable. The area needs to be smartened up and brought into the 21st century. We need to have something that we can be proud of.

shoppingnoodles says...
8:11pm Mon 11 Feb 13

31 years ago, my Mother was in H block (aptly named in my opinion, as it looks like a Victorian prison), recovering from stomach cancer surgery. Frankly it was a dismal, outdated, dark and depressing dumping ground even then. It lends nothing at all to modern nursing practices and I quite agree that it is unworkable.

In my opinion H block contributes nothing to the heritage of Christchurch at all. The trees and green space at the front however, have a massive impact on the beauty of the area and to my knowledge will be left intact by the developers.

I am concerned about the high density of key worker housing with no consideration to local services, parking etc, but I would be delighted to see better healthcare provision in this area. We need to preserve local health facilities and if this means demolishing an ugly, outdated eyesore, then HOORAH to that!

Tripod says...
9:12pm Mon 11 Feb 13

"Experts"! What Experts?
If their idea of "Heritage" is an old Victorian Work House, I'd suggest they look deeper into what a Work House was; certainly nothing to be proud off!

mytown1 says...
9:52pm Mon 11 Feb 13

So why are these people who are trying to preserve the Conservation area of the green in the front so wrong. The new proposals are for the building line for the proposed nursing home to come forward 20ft onto the present green with a hedge to make a private garden in front of the 80 bedroom nursing home. The Senior Living Accommodation will take away green public open space on the turn into the present access road. Why should Public Open space be sacrificed for the overdevelopment of the Christchurch Hospital site. By all means let everyone have their say, but do not be fooled that this is a small development. Access for all vehicles is through the existing access routes now. Imagine an 80 bed nursing home and the requirements /logistics involved with commercial vehicles just for this alone. Drs surgery, Day Care units, dermatology, private houses, Macmillan Unit, Key worker Homes, Snr Living Accommodation plus workers, dentist, all requiring parking. Then on top of this add patients attending out clinics, blood tests and G.P surgery the list just goes on. No if it was simply just based on a Block at the front of the hospital to keep or destroy, then perhaps the dilemma for the people trying to conserve the green areas would not be so great.

Live Laugh Love says...
1:53pm Tue 12 Feb 13

Thanks mytown1, you have just listed all the reasons why we must keep services at Christchurch. I'd gladly give 20ft of grass to save having to go to Bournemouth or Poole for an appointment. The new building design is very sympathetic to the old one so lets back these proposals and keep our working hospital!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree