Council under attack for "staggering" pay-offs (From Bournemouth Echo)
When news happens text pix and video to 80360. Start your message with BE then leave a space.
Council under attack for "staggering" pay-offs
8:35am Thursday 7th February 2013 in News
DORSET County Council has come under fire for ‘staggering’ pay-offs to staff leaving the authority.
The council’s own accounts show that in 2010-11 it shelled out a total of £1.03million on seven ‘exit packages’ with the total cost of the packages ranging from £100,000 to £242,000 – but they refuse to say who got the cash.
Tough times to come as council backs £11m cuts plan
The payments come at a time when the council is aiming to save around £39million over three years and shed 500 jobs as local Government face unprecedented cuts in funding.
However, the council insists reports that it had spent £1.03million on of 'pay-offs' to top executives was misleading.
A spokesman for the authority said the seven payments all related to staff who took voluntary redundancy in the 2011/12 financial year and were paid a total of £333,107, with individual payments ranging from £35,000 to £73,000.
He said a further £455,733 was paid by the council into the Pension Fund to cover the 'pensions strain' caused by the fact the individuals were all over 55-years-old.
Robert Oxley, campaign manager of the TaxPayers' Alliance hit out at the pay offs.
He said: “The council has forked out a staggering sum of money on redundancy pay outs at a time when it has to find savings.
“Overly generous pay offs cost taxpayers dearly and run the danger of undermining any benefits of making staff redundant.
“In many cases, the terms and conditions provided to senior staff at councils such as Dorset are terrible value for taxpayers' money.
“Axing these gold plated deals must be a priority when replacing staff."
The council did not reveal which posts the payments related to. The spokesman said: “The total one-off cost was £818,840.
“The ongoing savings arising from these redundancies amounted to £471,000 a year.
“No additional cost falls on the taxpayer as Dorset's policy is only to allow voluntary redundancy where the 'pay-back' from the ensuing savings is less than two years.
“In this instance the average payback was 21 months.”
He added: “All councils are having to make substantial savings as a result of cuts in public spending.
“Dorset has made savings of £43 million in the last two years and shed more than 500 full time equivalent posts.
“Voluntary redundancy is just one of a number of tools available to councils to enable the necessary re-structuring of services.”
DORSET branch secretary for the GMB Union Gary Pattison said he believed the figures reflected an 'injustice' in the way redundancies were handled by the authority.
He said a number of senior managers took voluntary redundancy when the pay off they received used a redundancy multiplier of two-and-a-half times the national minimum.
The redundancy multiplier has now been reduced to 1.75 and that was the package that many lower paid staff were left with and some of them were compulsory redundancies.
Mr Pattison said: “We had senior managers who were well aware there was a risk of cutting the multiplier going ahead a taking voluntary redundancy while lower level staff when out with 1.75.“There is a sort of imbalance.”
Dorset branch secretary for Unison Pamela Jefferies said she will be seeking more details from the council on what the payments relate to and their long term impact.
She said: “It is a lot of money of money but if it's been done to save money as well.
“From a staff point of view it's probably better to see these high figure posts and keep more front line posts for people that work hands on delivering services.”
Comments(9)
dorsetred
says...
10:03am Thu 7 Feb 13
crispy_pants
says...
10:45am Thu 7 Feb 13
.
They do not have to earn their money.
.
They are given a department budget and come hell or high water they will spend every penny regardless. Towards the end of the financial year it gets spent on anything. And this is not made up; Pictures; Video camera that went missing within weeks; new furniture; plants.
.
And they will always be bailed out of financial trouble.
.
Oh dear our pension scheme is underfunded, where can we get the money?
s-pb2
says...
10:57am Thu 7 Feb 13
muscliffman
says...
12:29pm Thu 7 Feb 13
As is suggested, this may well be because we will then discover some individuals have 'double dipped' and are back behind Council desks earning full salaries again.
But when you put the fat piggies on a farm in charge of their own troughs...........
Pablo23
says...
1:31pm Thu 7 Feb 13
skydriver
says...
2:01pm Thu 7 Feb 13
Pablo23 wrote:Quite right, who do these people think they are. In a commercial business they would have gone long ago without a penny.
We pay their wages, we have a right to know who got paid what.
Still the council will recoup the money very quickly with increase parking fees, council tax etc etc, so we Again will pay.
Can anyone tell me, can we have a vote of No Confidence in the local councils, if so let's get shot of them all and search for people who can do a good job properly with dipping their fingers in the till, and looking after themselves, with the local people cash.
Letcommonsenseprevail
says...
6:26pm Thu 7 Feb 13
Old Colonial
says...
8:37pm Thu 7 Feb 13
LetcommonsenseprevaiBad contract! Too much thinking can be harmful to health.
l wrote:
Although the figures seem high, it was contractual. Also, much cheaper than employing them until retirement, methinks......
speedy231278 says...
10:00am Thu 7 Feb 13