Councillors and community relationships could reach 'new low' if parking changes take place

PRICE DROP: Christchurch Chamber of Trade and Commerce president Peter Watson-Lee, left, with Christchurch traders who are calling for a £1 for 2 hours parking rate to encourage shoppers PRICE DROP: Christchurch Chamber of Trade and Commerce president Peter Watson-Lee, left, with Christchurch traders who are calling for a £1 for 2 hours parking rate to encourage shoppers

CHRISTCHURCH councillors could plunge their relationship with the business community to a “new low”, if they choose to adopt controversial new parking charges proposed by officers.

That’s the claim made by the borough’s Chamber of Trade and Commerce president, Peter Watson-Lee, ahead of an important resources committee assessing parking charges today.

Despite 5,500 people putting pen to paper to support the Chamber of Trade’s “£1 for two hours” parking fee for town centre car parks, council officers are still urging members to reject the proposal.

Officers claim the proposal would leave them £34,000 out of pocket from a predicted income of just over £2.5million.

Mr Watson-Lee said: “The council officer’s recommendation is immensely disappointing.

“If the councillors go along with it, it amounts to a slap in the face to the town centre traders.

“The petition of 5,500 signatures is one of the biggest there has ever been and shows the tremendous strength of support from the public for this proposal.

“It is extraordinary that the council seems so out of touch with their constituents’ wishes.

“It would also be a major blow to the viability of the town centre.

“The exodus of shoppers to neighbouring towns and to the supermarkets and Castlepoint with their free parking will gather pace.

“Christchurch traders are working hard to make the town attractive, but they need help from their council and it is so very dispiriting that they seem unwilling to give that support.

“I fear they do not understand how demoralising their approach is. It would plunge the relationship between the council and the business community to a new low.

“The extraordinary thing is that we had worked with the council officers and had believed we had reached a conclusion which demonstrated the proposal would be cost neutral even without increased numbers – meaning if it was successful in bringing in new shoppers it could make money for the council as well as giving an essential boost to the town itself.

“For some reason those figures do not appear in the papers to be put before the committee.

“I urge everyone, traders and town centre users, to lobby their councillors as a matter of urgency before the meeting.”

...and £1 Fee for evenings too

Officers are also proposing to charge £1 from 7pm in town centre car parks.

At present, any parking between 7pm and 8am is free but officers are suggesting members approve the new charge despite objections from residents, the Alliance of Christchurch Residents Associations and the Regent Centre’s trustees.

They fear it would adversely affect the night-time economy and the Regent Centre.

But officers, in a report to the resources committee today, say although the charge will impact on night-time users of the Regent Centre, it will not have an impact on daytime users.

What are your thoughts on the proposed parkig changes?

Comments(10)

Northwoods says...
12:38pm Wed 6 Feb 13

Either councillors are completely brain-dead or have a hidden agenda. If I were a cynical person, I would believe the latter, i.e. they are taking kickbacks from the large supermarket chains to force people away from the high streets.

Cerdicjute says...
12:55pm Wed 6 Feb 13

Are these the same Councillors who gave themselves pay rises last year because there was money in the kitty to do so?

Don't lobby them, just vote Independent next time around and put an end to the status quo.

coster says...
1:30pm Wed 6 Feb 13

These so called 'Officers' are local government employees, if they do not wish to support their employers (the council taxpayers) then they should resign or be dismissed.

twynham says...
1:31pm Wed 6 Feb 13

“It is extraordinary that the council seems so out of touch with their constituents’ wishes."
.
Not with this lot it isn't.

richt says...
1:49pm Wed 6 Feb 13

Their decision to reject Morrisons and bring some new life to Christchurch trading seems to suggest they are not in touch with the majority.

BBC Escapee says...
7:06pm Wed 6 Feb 13

Christchurch already has two car parks that you can sit in at most times of the day for free!

They are called Barrack Road and Bargates/Fairmile Road unfortunately they are supposed to be roads with traffic moving on, not massive gridlocked tailbacks!

Christchurch - the only town with a bypass running through it!

skydriver says...
7:36pm Wed 6 Feb 13

twynham wrote:
“It is extraordinary that the council seems so out of touch with their constituents’ wishes."
.
Not with this lot it isn't.
Don't waste your time on comments to this council they are either deaf of have a hearing deficit, they have all be around far to long, All of them, and the leader is as credible as a Syrian newspaper, he only does what he wants and that final. As he told people at a meeting a short time ago when they started questions, Shut Up, well that says it all......roll on the elections.

Hessenford says...
9:06am Thu 7 Feb 13

skydriver wrote:
twynham wrote:
“It is extraordinary that the council seems so out of touch with their constituents’ wishes."
.
Not with this lot it isn't.
Don't waste your time on comments to this council they are either deaf of have a hearing deficit, they have all be around far to long, All of them, and the leader is as credible as a Syrian newspaper, he only does what he wants and that final. As he told people at a meeting a short time ago when they started questions, Shut Up, well that says it all......roll on the elections.
Elections will change nothing, there are to many blue rinse oldies living here.

dobrojoe says...
10:27am Thu 7 Feb 13

Where parking space is limited, as it is in Christchurch, I don't mind a small parking charge. 80p for an hour is not unreasonable. What I do object to is the fact that a.) the parking machines don't give change or b.) if I don't have the small coins and put £1 in, I should get a corresponding increase in the parking time.

mytown1 says...
6:04pm Thu 7 Feb 13

If you believe that you are working with the council I am afraid you are mistaken. The council work only for themselves and not for what the people want. Remember the Council Leader not only tells us (the public and the ones that pay the council tax bills, and their salaries and pensions) to "shut up" at meetings), he also tells us we need to base decisions on needs and not wants. Well I do not want to see my town die a slow lingering death. I want a thriving community, where residents are listened to and their views heard. Commercial or otherwise.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree